Design study of stern tunnel wedge shapes for a low draft shallow water vessel

References

• Atlar M, Seo K, Sampson R, Danisman DB. 2013. Anti-slamming bulbous bow and tunnel stern applications on a novel deep-v catamaran for improved performance. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 5(2):302–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya A, Krasilnikov V, Steen S. 2016. Scale effects on open water characteristics of a controllable pitch propeller working within different duct designs. Ocean Eng. 112:226–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton J. 2018. Marine propellers and propulsion. Elsevier Science. https://books.google.be/books?id=rrf7DAEACAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas C, Coloman H, Raad P. 2008. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in {CFD } applications. J Fluids $\{$Eng Trans$\}$ $\{$ASME$\}$. 130(7):Article ID: 078001.
   Google Scholar
• Christopoulos B, Latorre R. 1983. River towboat hull and propulsion. Mar Technol. 20(3):209–226.
   Google Scholar
• Christopoulos B, Latorre R. 1991. Design and trials of a new river towboat propeller. Mar Technol. 28(4):236–246.
   Google Scholar
• Friedhoff B, Hoyer K, List S, Tenzer M. 2019. Investigation of the nominal and effective propeller inflow for a family of inland waterway vessels. Ocean Eng. 187:Article ID: 106180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose J, Gokarn RP. 2004. Basic ship propulsion. Allied publishers. https://books.google.be/books?id=nj1RWMy10vMC.
   Google Scholar
• Hino TE, Kaijō Gijutsu Anzen Kenkyūjo (Japan). 2005. The Proceedings of CFD Workshop, Tokyo, 2005. National Maritime Research Institute. https://books.google.be/books?id=wu_9MgEACAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2002. 7.5-01-01-01: Practical guidelines for model manufacture ship models. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2011. 7.5-03-02-03: Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications. Recommended procedures and guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2014. 7.5-03-03-01: Practical guidelines for ship self-propulsion CFD. Recommended procedures and guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• IWAI. 2017. Design of standardized vessels on national waterway 1. http://iwai.nic.in/standardised-vessel-design-concepts-nw-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kaidi S, Smaoui H, Sergent P. 2018. CFD investigation of mutual interaction between hull, propellers, and rudders for an inland container ship in deep, very deep, shallow, and very shallow waters. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng. 144(6):Article ID: 04018017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karafiath G. 1987. The effect of stern wedges on ship powering performance. Nav Eng J. 99(3):27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasilnikov VI. 2013. Self-propulsion RANS computations with a single-screw container ship. 3rd International Symposium on Marine Propulsors SMP; Vol. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Kuiper G. 1992. The wageningen propeller series. Marin. (Report no.).
   Google Scholar
• Kulczyk J, Tabaczek T. 2014. Coefficients of propeller-hull interaction in propulsion system of inland waterway vessels with stern tunnels. TransNav: Int J Mar Nav Safety Sea Transport. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Lackenby H. 1963. The effect of shallow water on ship speed. Shipbuilder Mar Eng. 70:446–450.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson L, Raven HC, Paulling JR. 2010. Ship Resistance and Flow. In: Principles of naval architecture. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. https://books.google.be/books?id=5zi8bwAACAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Linde F, Ouahsine A, Huybrechts N, Sergent P. 2017. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of ship resistance in restricted waterways: effect of ship sinkage and channel restriction. J Water Port Coast Ocean Eng. 143(1):Article ID: 06016003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyakhovitsky A. 2007. Shallow water and supercritical ships. Backbone Publishing Company. Available from: www.backbonepublishing.com.
   Google Scholar
• Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R. 2003. Ten years of industrial experience with the sst turbulence model. Turbul Heat Mass Transf. 4(1):625–632.
   Google Scholar
• Mucha P, el Moctar O, Dettmann T, Tenzer M. 2017. Inland waterway ship test case for resistance and propulsion prediction in shallow water. Ship Technol Res. 64(2):106–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven H. 2012. A computational study of shallow-water effects on ship viscous resistance. 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics; Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Rotteveel E, Hekkenberg R, van der Ploeg A. 2017. Inland ship stern optimization in shallow water. Ocean Eng. 141:555–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sames P, Schellin T, Muzaferija S, Peric M. 1999. Application of a two-fluid finite volume method to ship slamming. J Offshore Mech Arct Engg. 121:47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Terziev M, Tezdogan T, Oguz E, Gourlay T, Demirel YK, Incecik A. 2018. Numerical investigation of the behaviour and performance of ships advancing through restricted shallow waters. J Fluids Struct. 76:185–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck E. 1978. Hydrodynamic problems of ships in restricted waters. Ann Rev Fluid Mech. 10(1):33–46.
   Google Scholar