Numerical method for the vibration analysis of pre-swirl stator

References

• Achenbach E, Heinecke E. 1981. On vortex shedding from smooth and rough cylinders in the range of Reynolds numbers 6×103 to 5×106. J Fluid Mech. 109(12):239–251.
   Google Scholar
• Ančić I, Theotokatos G, Vladimir N. 2018a. Towards improving energy efficiency regulations of bulk carriers. Ocean Eng. 148(November 2017):193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Ančić I, Vladimir N, Cho DS. 2018b. Determining environmental pollution from ships using index of energy efficiency and environmental eligibility (I4E). Mar Policy. 95(June):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bakica A, Gatin I, Vukčević V, Jasak H, Vladimir N. 2019. Accurate assessment of ship-propulsion characteristics using CFD. Ocean Eng. 175:149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakica A, Malenica Š, Vladimir N. 2020a. Hydro-structure coupling of CFD and FEM – quasi-static approach. Ocean Eng. 217:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakica A, Vladimir N, Gatin I, Jasak H. 2020b. CFD simulation of loadings on circular duct in calm water and waves. Ships Offshore Struct. 15(sup1):S110–S122.
   Google Scholar
• Blevins RD. 1979. Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Blevins RD. 2001. Flow-induced vibration. 2nd ed., Krieger Pub Co, Malabar, Florida, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau Veritas. 2016. HYDROSTAR for experts – user manual.
   Google Scholar
• Gokce MK, Kinaci OK, Alkan AD. 2019. Self-propulsion estimations for a bulk carrier. Ships Offshore Struct. 14(7):656–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Lin B. 2019. Design and development of the energy saving rudder-bulb-fin combination by using computational fluid dynamics technique. In: Proceedings of PRADS2019; Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2011. Resolution MEPC.203(62) inclusion of regulations on energy efficiency for ships in MARPOL Annex VI (Technical report).
   Google Scholar
• Ju HB, Jang BS, Lee DB, Kim HJ, Park CK. 2018. A simplified structural safety assessment of a fin-typed energy saving devices subjected to nonlinear hydrodynamic load. Ocean Eng. 149(June 2017):245–259.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Choi JE, Choi BJ, Chung SH, Seo HW. 2015. Development of energy-saving devices for a full slow-speed ship through improving propulsion performance. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 7(2):390–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DB, Jang BS, Kim HJ. 2016. Development of procedure for structural safety assessment of energy saving device subjected to nonlinear hydrodynamic load. Ocean Eng. 116:165–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienhard J. 1966. Synopsis of lift, drag and vortex frequency data for rigid circular cylinders. Washington State University, College of Engineering, Research Division Bulletin 300.
   Google Scholar
• Malenica S, Derbanne Q, Sireta FX, Bigot F, Tiphine E, De-Hauteclocque G, Chen XB. 2013. HOMER – integrated hydro-structure interactions tool for naval and off-shore applications. In: RINA, Royal Institution of Naval Architects – International Conference on Computer Applications in Shipbuilding 2013, ICCAS 2013, Busan, South Korea. Vol. 3. p. 209–221.
   Google Scholar
• Matsui S, Uto S, Yamada Y, Watanabe S. 2018. Numerical study on the structural response of energy-saving device of ice-class vessel due to impact of ice block. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 10(3):367–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewis F, Guiard T. 2011. Mewis ductx00AF; – new developments, solutions and conclusions. In: Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Hamburg, Germany, June. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mizzi K, Demirel YK, Banks C, Turan O, Kaklis P, Atlar M. 2017. Design optimisation of propeller boss cap fins for enhanced propeller performance. Appl Ocean Res. 62:210–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mofidi A, Carrica PM. 2014. Simulations of zigzag maneuvers for a container ship with direct moving rudder and propeller. Comput Fluids. 96:191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paboeuf S, Cassez A. 2017. ESD structural issue – UPstream device. Int Shipbuild Prog. 63(3–4):291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins HJ, Flikkema MB, Schuiling B, Xing-Kaeding Y, Voermans AA, Müller M, Coache S, Hasselaar TW, Paboeuf S. 2016. Green retrofitting through optimisation of hull-propulsion interaction – GRIP. Transp Res Proc. 14:1591–1600.
   Google Scholar
• Ragab S, Hajj MR, Ibrahim MM, Zakaria MY. 2018. A computational study of vortex shedding from a NACA-0012 airfoil at high angles of attack. Int J Aerodyn. 6(1):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto N, Kume K, Kawanami Y, Kamiirisa H, Mokuo K, Tamashima M. 2019. Evaluation of hydrodynamic performance of pre-swirl and post-swirl ESDs for merchant ships by numerical towing tank procedure. Ocean Eng. 178(February):104–133.
   Google Scholar
• Shen Z, Wan D, Carrica PM. 2015. Dynamic overset grids in OpenFOAM with application to KCS self–propulsion and maneuvering. Ocean Eng. 108:287–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YJ, Kim MC, Kang JG, Kim HU, Rok Shin I. 2019. Validation of optimally designed stator-propeller system by EFD and CFD. Brodogradnja. 70(3):133–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIEMENS. 2014. Advanced dynamic analysis user's guide.
   Google Scholar
• Song K-w, Guo C-y, Wang C, Sun C, Li P, Zhong R-f. 2019. Experimental and numerical study on the scale effect of stern flap on ship resistance and flow field. Ships Offshore Struct. 15(9):981–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsou W, Guan P, Chang W, Chen C. 2019. Structural design and strength estimation of energy saving Y-fin by using finite element method. In: Proceedings of PRADS2019; Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Vladimir N, Ančić I, Šestan A. 2018. Effect of ship size on EEDI requirements for large container ships. J Mar Sci Technol (Japan). 23(1):42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukčević V. 2016. Numerical modelling of coupled potential and viscous flow for marine applications [PhD thesis]. University of Zagreb.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Guo C, Wang C, Han F. 2020. A case study on the effect of an energy recovering rudder bulb-turbine device on ship powering characteristics. Ships Offshore Struct. 15(8):878–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang PW, Liao PK, Hsin CY, Quéméner Y, Lin CW. 2016. Ship motions contribution to the fatigue life of a pre-swirl stator. In: Proceedings of PRADS2016, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Wang Y, Huang C, Hu Z, Yi R. 2015. An effective CFD approach for marine-vehicle maneuvering simulation based on the hybrid reference frames method. Ocean Eng. 109:83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarusevych S, Boutilier MS. 2011. Vortex shedding of an airfoil at low reynolds numbers. AIAA J. 49(10):2221–2227.
   Google Scholar