Experimental investigation on ship’s model in carrying out energy economics of BDR/ALS methodology

References

• American Bureau of Shipping. 2019. Advisories and debriefs on air lubrication technology by ABS. April 1; [cited 2020 Jul 28]. Available from: https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/advisories-and-debriefs/Air%20Lubrication%20Technology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Composa I, Nerea N, Luis del P-V, Jaio M. 2020. Energy efficiency optimisation in industrial processes: integral decision support tool. Energy. 191(116480):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Butuzov A, Sverchkov A, Poustoshny A, Chalov S. 1999. State of art in investigations and development for the ship on the air cavities. International Workshop on Ship Hydrodynamics, China, p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccio SL. 2010. Friction drag reduction of external flows with bubble and gas injection. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 42(1):183–203.
   Google Scholar
• Elbing BR, Mäkiharju S, Wiggins A, Perlin M, Dowling DR, Ceccio SL. 2013. On the scaling of air layer drag reduction. J Fluid Mech. 717:484–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbing BR, Winkel ES, Lay KA, Ceccio SL, Dowling DR, Perlin M. 2008. Bubble-induced skin-friction drag reduction and the abrupt transition to air-layer drag reduction. J Fluid Mech. 612:201–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foeth EJ. 2008. Decreasing frictional resistance by air lubrication. 20th International Hiswa Symposium on Yacht Design and Yacht Construction & Maritime Research Institute; Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Foeth, Eggers, and Ouadvlieg. 2010. The efficacy of air-bubble lubrication for decreasing friction resistance. International Conference on Ship Reduction SMOOTH-SHIPS Istanbul, Turkey, Paper No. 12, p. 118–122.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda K, Tokunaga J, Nobunaga T, Nakatani T, Iwasaki T. 2000. Frictional drag reduction with air lubricant over a super-water repellent surface. J Mar Sci Technol. 5(3):123–130.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes G. 1954. Friction and form resistance in turbulent flow and a proposed formulation for use in model and ship correlation. Tranactions (Transactions RINA). 96:314–376.
   Google Scholar
• IMO, MEPC 75 of. 2021. International Maritime Organization. [cited 2021 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MeetingSummaries/Pages/MEPC-75th-session.aspx#:~:text=IMO%20WEB%20ACCOUNTS-,Marine%20Environment%20Protection%20Committee%20(MEPC)%2075%2C,16%2D20%20November%20(virtual%20session&text=The%20MEPC%20approved%20draft%20new.
   Google Scholar
• ISO GUM. 2008. Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. GUM 1995. BIMP, 2008, JCMG 100:2008.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2011a. Recommended procedure for dynamometer calibration 7.5-01- 03-01. ITTC.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2011b. ITTC receommended procedure for resistance test. ITTC Procedure 7.5-02-02-01.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2014. ITTC general guidelines for uncertainty analysis in resistance test. ITTC Procedure 7.5-02-02-02.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2017a. ITTC receommended procedure for uncertainty analysis, calibration. International Towing Tank Conference, 7.5-01-03-01.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2017b. ITTC recommended procedures for performance prediction method. International Towing Tank Conference 7.5-02 (03-01.4): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jang J, Ho CS, Sung-Mok A, Booki K, Soo SJ. 2014. Experimental investigation of frictional resistance reduction with air layer on the hull bottom of a ship. Int J Naval Architect Ocean Eng. 6:363–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato H, Kodama Y. 2001. Microbubbles as a skin friction reduction device – a midterm review of the research. Tokyo, Japan: Center for Smart Control of Turbulence National Maritime Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kawabuchi M, Kawakita C, Mizokami S, Higasa S, Kodan Y, Takano S. 2011. CFD predictions of bubbly flow around an energy-saving ship with Mitsubishi air lubrication system. Mitsubishi Heavy Indus Tech Rev. 48:1.
   Google Scholar
• Kawakita C. 2013. Study on marine propeller running in bubbly flow. Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsors; Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kim D, Gundersen T. 2020. Use of exergy efficiency for the optimization of LNG processes with NGL extraction. Energy. 2020:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kodama Y, Akira K, Takahito T, Hideki K. 2000. Experimental study on microbubbles and their applicability to ships for skin friction reduction. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 21:582–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama Y, Takahashi T, Makino M, Hori T, Ueda T, Kawamura N, Shibata M, et al. 2005. Practical application of microbubbles to ships – large scale model experiments and a new full scale experiment. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Smart Control of Turbulence; Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Vijayakumar A. 2020a. Development of an energy efficient stern flap for improved warship EEDI of a typical high-speed displacement surface combatant. Def Sci J. 70(1):95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Vijayakumar R. 2020b. Effect of flap angle on transom stern flow of a high-speed displacement surface combatant. Ocean Syst Eng. 10(1):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Latorre R, Miller A, Philips R. 2003. Micro-bubble resistance reduction on a model SES catamaran. Ocean Eng. 30:2297–2309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lay KA, Yakushiji R, Mäkiharju S, Perlin M, Ceccio SL. 2010. Partial cavity drag reduction at high Reynolds numbers. J Ship Res. 54(2):109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Wang L, Green L, Song K, Wang L, Smith R. 2015. Advances of drag-reducing surface technologies in turbulence based on boundary layer control. J Hydrod. 27(4):473–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madavan K, Deutsch S, Merkle CL. 1984. Measurements of local skin friction in a microbubble modified turbulent boundary layer. Technical Memorandum, File No. TM 84-136, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkiharju SAA, Elbing BR, Wiggins A, Schinasi S, Marc J, Broeck V, Perlin M, Dowling DR, Ceccio SL. 2013. On the scaling of air entrainment from a ventilated partial cavity. J Fluid Mech. 732:47–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkiharju SA, Perlin M, Ceccio SL. 2012. On the energy economics of air lubrication drag reduction. Inter J Nav Archit Oc Engng. 4(4):412–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng JCS, Uhlman JS. 1989. Microbubble formulation and splitting in a turbulent boundary layer for turbulence reduction. Advances in Fluid Dynamics (Symposium in Honor of Maurice Holton on his 70th Birthday), p. 168–217.
   Google Scholar
• Merkle CL, Madavan K, Deutsch S. 1983. Reduction of Turbulent Skin Friction by Microbubbles. Technical Memorandum, The Pennsylvania State University, File No. TM 83-23.
   Google Scholar
• Mizokami S, Kawakita C, Kodan Y, Takano S, Higasa S, Shigenaga R. 2010. Experimental study of air lubrication method and verification of effects on actual hull by means of sea trial. Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Techn Rev. 47(3):41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Moriguchi Y, Kato H. 2002. Influence of microbubble diameter and distribution on frictional resistance reduction. J Mar Sci Technol. 7:79–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murai Y. 2014. Frictional drag reduction by bubble injection. Exp Fluids. 55(1773):1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Murai Y, Fukuda H, Oishi Y, Kodama Y, Yamamoto F. 2007. Skin friction reduction by large air bubbles in a horizontal channel flow. Int J Multiphase Flow. 33(2):147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakatake Y, Hirofumi Y, Hiroshi T, Hidechika G. 2020. Reduction of fuel consumption of a small-scale gas turbine engine with fine bubble fuel. Energy. 197:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Oishi Y, Murai Y. 2017. Horizontal turbulent channel flow interacted by a single large bubble. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 55:128–139.
   Google Scholar
• Park HJ, Oishi Y, Tasaka Y, Murai Y, Takeda Y. 2009. Turbulent shear control with oscillatory bubble injection. J Phys Conf Ser. 147:012037.
   Google Scholar
• Prohaska CW. 1966. A simple method for evaluation of form factor and the low speed wave resistance. Proceedings 11th ITTC; Tokyo, Japan, p. 65–66. Paper: P1966-4.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders WC, Winkel ES, Dowling DR, Perlin M, Ceccio SL. 2006. Bubble friction drag reduction in a high-Reynolds-number flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech. 552:353–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen X, Ceccio SL, Perlin M. 2006. Influence of bubble size on micro-bubble drag reduction. Exp Fluids. 41(3):415–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberschmidt N, Tasker D, Pappas T, Johannesson J. 2016. Silverstream® system – air lubrication performance verification and design development. [cited 2020 Jul 28]. https://conferences.ncl.ac.uk/media/sites/conferencewebsites/scc2016/1.3.2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi S, Vijayakumar R. 2020b. Succinct review of MBDR/BDR technique in reducing ship’s drag. Ships and Offshore Structures doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2020.1790296.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi SC, Vijayakumar R, Nirali S, Saxena B. 2019. Numerical investigation of influence of Micro Bubble injection, distribution, void fraction and flow speed on frictional drag reduction. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference in Ocean Engineering (ICOE2018). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 22. Springer, Singapore. (Springer) 1: p. 293–316.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi S, Vijayakumar R, Saxena BK. 2018b. Investigation of air lubrication system (ALS) on drag reduction of ship. Worldwide Maritime Technology Conference, Shanghai Society of Naval Architects and Marine Enginers; Shanghai, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi S, Vijayakumar R, Saxena BK. 2018c. Investigation of influence of Micro Bubble Drag Reduction (MBDR) on frictional drag reduction of a bulk carrier. Mumbai: INMARCO, IMEI, INDIA.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi SC, Vijayakumar R, Saxena B. 2018a. Frictional drag reduction: review and numerical simulation of microbubble drag reduction in a channel flow. Trans Royal Inst Naval Architect Part A: Int J Marit Eng. 160:121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindagi SC, Vijayakumar R, Saxena BK. 2020a. Parametric CFD investigation of ALS technique on reduction in drag of Bulk Carrier. Ships Offsh Struct. 15(4):417–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi T, Kakugawa A, Nagaya S, Yanagihara T, Kodama Y. 2001. Mechanisms and scale effects of skin friction reduction by microbubbles. 2nd Symposium on the Smart Control of Turbulence, University of Tokyo; Tokyo, Japan, p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Winkel ES, Ceccio SL, Dowling DR, Perlin M. 2004. Bubble-size distributions produced by wall injection of air into flowing freshwater, saltwater and surfactant solutions. Exp Fluids. 37:802–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar