Predicting ship ramming performance in thick level ice via experiments

References

• Ahn S, Kee LT. 2019. A study of the Change of ship speed according to the ice load signal during slow ramming. J Ocean Eng Technol. 33(6):627–631. doi: 10.26748/KSOE.2019.086
   Google Scholar
• Ahn SJ, An WS, Lee TK, Choi K. 2018. An analysis on the change of ship speed according to ice load signal in continuous icebreaking and ramming. Proceedings of the Asme 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Vol 8.
   Google Scholar
• Bambulyak A, Polach RUFVU, Ehlers S, Sydnes A. 2014. Challenges with oil spill risk assessment in Arctic Regions: shipping along the Northern Sea Route. 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Vol 4b.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers E, Francois JF, Rojas-Romagosa H. 2018. Melting ice caps and the economic impact of opening the Northern Sea Route. Econ J. 128(610):1095–1127. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedyk IV, Peeta S. 2018. A binary probit model to analyze freight transportation decision-maker perspectives for container shipping on the Northern Sea Route. Marit Econ Logist. 20(3):358–374. doi: 10.1057/s41278-016-0046-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai W, Leira BJ, Hoyland KV, Sinsabvarodom C, Yu ZL. 2020. Statistics of thickness and strength of first-year ice along the Northern Sea Route. J Mar Sci Technol. 26:331–343 .
   Google Scholar
• Cheaitou A, Faury O, Cariou P, Hamdan S, Fabbri G. 2019. Ice thickness data in the northern sea route (NSR) for the period 2006–2016. Data Brief. 24:103925. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.103925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho SR, Lee S. 2016. The resistance of ice breaking ship using the regression analysis of model tests (vol 108C, pg 692, 2015). Ocean Eng. 113:350–350. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari N, Rizzuto E, Prestileo A. 2015. Modelling ice characteristics in iceberg-ship collision analyses. Towards Green Mar Technol Transp. 1:325–336.
   Google Scholar
• Guo CY, Zhang ZT, Tian TP, Li XY, Zhao DG. 2018. Numerical simulation on the resistance performance of Ice-going container ship under brash Ice conditions. China Ocean Eng. 32(5):546–556. doi: 10.1007/s13344-018-0057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Sun JQ, Ji SP, Tian YK. 2016. Experimental study on the resistance of a transport ship navigating in level Ice. J Mar Sci Appl. 15(2):105–111. doi: 10.1007/s11804-016-1351-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong SY, Choi K, Kang KJ, Ha JS. 2017. Prediction of ship resistance in level ice based on empirical approach. Int J Nav Arch Ocean. 9(6):613–623. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji SY, Wang AL, Su J, Yue QJ. 2011. Experimental studies on elastic modulus and flexural strength of Sea Ice in the bohai Sea. J Cold Reg Eng. 25(4):182–195. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jugovic TP, Zgaljic D, Balic K. 2020. Market analysis and affirmation factors of the Northern Sea Route. T Marit Sci-Toms. 9(1):72–81. doi: 10.7225/toms.v09.n01.006
   Google Scholar
• Kim E, Storheim M, von Bock R, von Polach R, Amdahl J. 2012. Design and Modelling of Accidental Ship Collisions with Ice Masses at Laboratory-Scale. Proceedings of the Asme 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Vol 6, 495–505.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Lee CJ, Choi KS, Kim MC. 2011. Study on icebreaking performance of the Korea icebreaker ARAON in the arctic sea. Int J Nav Arch Ocean. 3(3):208–215. doi: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Lee CJ, Kim YS, Choi GG, Lew JM. 2016. Determination of global ice loads on the ship using the measured full-scale motion data. Int J Nav Arch Ocean. 8(4):301–311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Goerlandt F, Kujala P, Lehtiranta J, Lensu M. 2018. Evaluation of selected state-of-the-art methods for ship transit simulation in various ice conditions based on full-scale measurement. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 151:94–108. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Kotilainen M, Goerlandt F, Kujala P. 2019. An extended ice failure model to improve the fidelity of icebreaking pattern in numerical simulation of ship performance in level ice. Ocean Eng. 176:169–183. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu ZH, Amdahl J, Loset S. 2011. Plasticity based material modelling of ice and its application to ship-iceberg impacts. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 65(3):326–334. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu L, Kujala P, Valdez Banda OA. 2020. Ramming induced ice loads between the ship bow and multiyear thick ice in Antarctic Weddell Sea. In Developments in the Collision and Grounding of Ships and Offshore Structures: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships and Offshore Structures (ICCGS 2019), 21–23 October, 2019, Lisbon, Portugal (p. 204). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luo W-Z, Guo C-Y, Wu T-C, Su Y-M. 2018. Experimental research on resistance and motion attitude variation of ship–wave–ice interaction in marginal ice zones. Mar Struct. 58:399–415. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikko K, Mikko S, Pentti K. 2019. Rotating ice cusps on ship's bow shoulder: full-scale study on the cusp sizes and corresponding peak loads in different ice and operational conditions. Ocean Eng. 189:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moslet PO. 2007. Field testing of uniaxial compression strength of columnar sea ice. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 48(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2006.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myland D, Ehlers S. 2016. Influence of bow design on ice breaking resistance. Ocean Eng. 119:217–232. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myland D, Ehlers S. 2017. Methodology to assess the floe size and distribution along a ship hull during model scale ice tests for self-propelled ships sailing ahead in level ice. Ships Offsh Struct. 12:S100–S108. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2016.1266591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myland D, Ehlers S. 2019. Investigation on semi-empirical coefficients and exponents of a resistance prediction method for ships sailing ahead in level ice. Ships Offsh Struct. 14:S161–S170. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2018.1564535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KD, Kim HS. 2014. Study on the ship ice resistance estimation using empirical formulas. 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Vol 10.
   Google Scholar
• Polach RUFVU, Ehlers S. 2015. On the scalability of model-scale Ice experiments. J Offshore Mech Arct. 137(5):051502(8 pages).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW, Broman M, Nordqvist P. 2014. Development of a model for global response of ship hull during ramming of heavy ice features. 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Vol 10.
   Google Scholar
• Riska K. 2018. Ice edge failure process and modelling ice pressure. Philos T R Soc A. 376(2129):20170340. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0340
   Google Scholar
• Riska K, Bridges R. 2019. Limit state design and methodologies in ice class rules for ships and standards for Arctic offshore structures. Mar Struct. 63:462–479. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riska K, Leiviskä T, Nyman T, Fransson L, Lehtonen J, Eronen H, Backman A. 2001. Ice performance of the Swedish multi-purpose icebreaker Tor Viking II, Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
   Google Scholar
• Sawamura J, Yamaguchi H, Ushio S, Yamauchi Y. 2020. Calculation of penetration distance during ship ramming in multi-year ice. Okhotsk Sea Polar Oceans Res. 4:10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sodhi DS, Griggs DB, Tucker WB. 2001. Ice performance tests of USCGC Healy, Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
   Google Scholar
• Su B, Riska K, Moan T. 2010. A numerical method for the prediction of ship performance in level ice. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 60(3):177–188. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vliet R, Metrikine AV. 2019. Failure criteria for a numerical model of sea ice in multi-directional tension, compression, bending and splitting. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 159:123–141. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Diao F, Song M, Han Y, Ding S. 2020. Calculation methods of icebreaking capability for a double-acting polar ship. J Mar Sci Eng. 8(3):179. doi: 10.3390/jmse8030179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar