Hydrodynamic analysis of a hybrid modular floating structure system and its expansibility

References

• American Petroleum Institute. 1996. Recommended Practice for Design and Analysis of Station keeping System for Floating Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Ding J, Tian C, Wu YS, Li ZW, Ling HJ, Ma XZ. 2017. Hydroelastic analysis and model tests of a single module VLFS deployed near islands and reefs. Ocean Eng. 144:224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding R, Liu CR, Zhang HC, Xu DL, Shi QJ, Yan DL, Yang WY, Chen WP, Wu YS. 2020. Experimental investigation on characteristic change of a scale-extendable chain-type floating structure. Ocean Eng. 213:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummen I, Olbert G. 2021. Conceptual design of a modular floating multi-purpose island. Front Mar Sci. 8:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.615222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du SX, Ertekin CR. 1991. Dynamic response analysis of a flexibly joined, multi-module Very Large Floating structure. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: OEANS.
   Google Scholar
• Fujikubo M, Yao T. 2001. Structural modeling for global response analysis of VLFS. Mar Struct. 14:295–310. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8339(00)00062-9
   Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi M. 2000. Hydrodynamic interactions among a great number of columns supporting a very large flexible structure. J Fluids Struct. 14:1013–1034. doi: 10.1006/jfls.2000.0306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BW, Sa YH, Jo HK, Kyu Cho S. 2007. Evaluation of bending moments and shear forces at unit connections of very large floating structures using hydroelastic and rigid body analyses. Ocean Eng. 34:1668–1679. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2006.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamas-Pardo M, Iglesias G, Carral L. 2015. A review of Very Large Floating Structures (VLFS) for coastal and offshore uses. Ocean Eng. 109:677–690. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Yang Q, Bao G. 2017. Performance investigation of a two-raft-type wave energy converter with hydraulic power take-off unit. Appl Ocean Res. 62:139–155. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López I, Andreu J, Ceballos S, Martínez de Alegría I, Kortabarria I. 2013. Review of wave energy technologies and the necessary power-equipment. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 27:413–434. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcallister KR. 1997. Mobile offshore bases- an overview of recent research. J Mar Sci Technol. 2:173–181. doi: 10.1007/BF02489808
   Google Scholar
• Michailides C, Angelides DC. 2012. Modeling of energy extraction and behavior of a flexible floating breakwater. Appl Ocean Res. 35:77–94. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustapa MA, Yaakob OB, Ahmed YM, Rheem CK, Koh KK, Adnan FA. 2017. Wave energy device and breakwater integration: A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 77:43–58. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman JN. 1998. Wave effects on hinged bodies part III- hinge loads vs. number of modules.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HP, Wang CM, Flocard F, Pedroso DM. 2019b. Extracting energy while reducing hydroelastic responses of VLFS using a modular raft wec-type attachment. Appl Ocean Res. 84:302–316. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2018.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HP, Wang CM, Pedroso DM. 2019a. Optimization of modular raft WEC-type attachment to VLFS and module connections for maximum reduction in hydroelastic response and wave energy production. Ocean Eng. 172:407–421. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quevedo E, Carton M, Delory E, Castro A, Hernández J, Llinás O, de Lara J, Papandroulakis N, Anastasiadis P, Bard J, et al. 2013. Multi-use offshore platform configurations in the scope of the FP7 TROPOS project. Bergen, Norway: OCEANS.
   Google Scholar
• Ren NX, Wu HB, Ma Z, Ou Jinping. 2019b. Hydrodynamic analysis of a novel modular floating structure system with central tension-leg platforms. Ships Offsh Struct. 15(9):1011–1022. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2019.1700035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren NX, Zhang C, Magee AR, Hellan Øyvind, Dai Jian, Ang Kok Keng. 2019a. Hydrodynamic analysis of a modular multi-purpose floating structure system with different outermost connector types. Ocean Eng. 176:158–168. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs HR, Ertekin RC. 1999b. Characteristics of the wave response of mobile offshore bases. 18th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic engineering; St. Johns, Newfoundland.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs HR, Ertekin RC, Mills TRJ. 1998. Wave induced response of a 5 module Mobile Offshore base. 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic engineering; Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs HR, Ertekin RC, Mills TRJ. 1999a. Impact of stiffness on the response of a multimodule mobile offshore base. Int J Offshore Polar Eng. 9(2):126–133.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs HR, Ertekin RC, Mills TRJ. 2000. A comparative study of RMFC and FEA models for the wave-induced response of a MOB. Ocean Eng. 13:217–232.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki H. 2005. Overview of megafloat: concept, design criteria, analysis, and design. Marine Structures. 18(2):111–132. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2005.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajali Z, Shafieefar M. 2011. Hydrodynamic analysis of multi-body floating piers under wave action. Ocean Eng. 38:1925–1933. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana H, Khanjani MJ. 2013. Reducing hydroelastic response of very large floating structure: A literature review. Int J Comput Appl. 71(5):12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Tay ZY. 2019. Energy extraction from an articulated plate anti-motion device of a very large floating structure under irregular waves. Renewable Energy. 130:206–222. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CM, Tay ZY. 2011. Very large floating structures: applications, research and development. Procedia Eng. 14:62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Wang CM, Wang BT. 2015. Large floating structure technology advances. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang ZF, Zhou LM, Dong S, Wu Lunyu, Li Zhanbin, Mou Lin, Wang Aifang. 2014. Wind wave characteristics and Engineering environment of the South China Sea. J Ocean Univ China. 13(06):893–900. doi: 10.1007/s11802-014-2331-0
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe E, Utsunomiya T, Wang CM. 2004. Hydroelastic analysis of pontoon-type VLFS: a literature survey. Eng Struct. 26(2):245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Xu D, Zhao H, Xia S, Wu Y. 2018. Energy extraction of wave energy converters embedded in a very large modularized floating platform. Energy. 158:317–329. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu H. 2021. Methodology for the assessment and optimization of connection parameter combinations for modular floating structures. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 143(2):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar