Machine learning methods for predicting marine port accidents: a case study in container terminal

References

• Awad M, Khanna R. 2015. Support vector machines for classification. In: Effic learn mach. Berkeley, CA: Apress; p. 39–66. doi:10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9_3
   Google Scholar
• Bridgelall R, Tolliver DD. 2021. Railroad accident analysis using extreme gradient boosting. Accid Anal Prev. 156:106126. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bye RJ, Aalberg AL. 2018. Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: an exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 176:174–186. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Guestrin C. 2016. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. Proc ACM SIGKDD Int Conf Knowl Discov Data Min. 785–794. doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785.
   Google Scholar
• Coraddu A, Oneto L, de Maya B N, Kurt R. 2020. Determining the most influential human factors in maritime accidents: a data-driven approach. Ocean Eng. 211:107588. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan S, Blanco-Davis E, Yang Z, Zhang J, Yan X. 2020. Incorporation of human factors into maritime accident analysis using a data-driven Bayesian network. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 203:107070. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.107070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiskin R, Cakir E, Sevgili C. 2021. Decision tree and logistic regression analysis to explore factors contributing to harbour tugboat accidents. J Navig. 74(1):79–104. doi:10.1017/S0373463320000363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang T, Wang S, Sharma A. 2020. Highway crash detection and risk estimation using deep learning. Accid Anal Prev. 135:105392. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrion M, Paltrinieri N, Nejad AR. 2021. Learning from failures in cruise ship industry: the blackout of Viking Sky in Hustadvika, Norway. Eng Fail Anal. 125:105355. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. 2013. An introduction to statistical learning. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7
   Google Scholar
• Jiang M, Lu J, Yang Z, Li J. 2020. Risk analysis of maritime accidents along the main route of the Maritime Silk Road: a Bayesian network approach. Marit Policy Manag. 47(6):815–832. doi:10.1080/03088839.2020.1730010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke G, Meng Q, Finley T, Wang T, Chen W, Ma W, Ye Q, Liu TY. 2017. LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2017:3147–3155.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Kim J, Lee G, Park J. 2021. Machine learning-based models for accident prediction at a Korean container port. Sustainability. 13(16):9137. doi:10.3390/su13169137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo M, Sungho S. 2019. Half-century research developments in maritime accidents: future directions. Accid Anal Prev. 123:448–460. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navas de Maya B, Ahn SI, Kurt RE. 2019. Statistical analysis of MAIB database for the period 1990–2016. In: Sustain Dev Innov Mar Technol – Proc 18th Int Congr Int Marit Assoc Mediterr IMAM 2019. CRC Press; p. 505–511. doi:10.1201/9780367810085-67.
   Google Scholar
• Navas de Maya B, Arslan O, Akyuz E, Kurt RE, Turan O. 2020. Application of data-mining techniques to predict and rank maritime non-conformities in tanker shipping companies using accident inspection reports. Ships Offshore Struct. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1862530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navas de Maya B, Kurt RE. 2020. Marine accident learning with fuzzy cognitive maps: a method to model and weight human-related contributing factors into maritime accidents. Ships Offshore Struct. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1843843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltrinieri N, Comfort L, Reniers G. 2019. Learning about risk: machine learning for risk assessment. Saf Sci. 118:475–486. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puisa R, Lin L, Bolbot V, Vassalos D. 2018. Unravelling causal factors of maritime incidents and accidents. Saf Sci. 110:124–141. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim MA, Hassan HM. 2021. A deep learning based traffic crash severity prediction framework. Accid Anal Prev. 154:106090. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson A, Brito M, Sabeur Z, Tran-Thanh L. 2021. A machine learning approach for monitoring ship safety in extreme weather events. Saf Sci. 141:105336. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theofilatos A, Chen C, Antoniou C. 2019. Comparing machine learning and deep learning methods for real-time crash prediction. Transp Res Rec. 2673(8):169–178. doi:10.1177/%2F0361198119841571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Teixeira ÂP, Guedes Soares C, Yan X, Liu K. 2016. Maritime transportation risk assessment of Tianjin port with Bayesian belief networks. Risk Anal. 36(6):1171–1187. doi:10.1111/risa.12519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar