Investigation on the dent rebound mechanism and the structural multi-objective optimisation of sandwich pipes

References

• Ai SM, Xu Y, Kang Z, Yan FS. 2019. Performance comparison of stress-objective and fatigue-objective optimisation for steel lazy wave risers. Ships Offsh Struct. 14:534–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allouti M, Schmitt C, Pluvinage G, Gilgert J, Hariri S. 2012. Study of the influence of dent depth on the critical pressure of pipeline. Eng Fail Anal. 21:40–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• API 5L. 2012. Specification for line pipe. Washington (DC): American Petroleum Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baroutaji A, Gilchrist MD, Smyth D, Olabi AG. 2015. Analysis and optimization of sandwich tubes energy absorbers under lateral loading. Int J Impact Eng. 82:74–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu A, Baykasoğlu C. 2016. Multiple objective crashworthiness optimization of circular tubes with functionally graded thickness via artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part C. 231(11):2005–2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooker DC. 2004. A numerical study on the lateral indentation of continuously supported tubes. J Constr Steel Res. 60(8):1177–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G. 2017. Residual ultimate strength of offshore metallic pipelines with structural damage - a literature review. Ships Offsh Struct. 12(8):1037–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G. 2018. Numerical investigation of residual ultimate strength of dented metallic pipes subjected to pure bending. Ships Offsh Struct. 13(5):519–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng HR, Pinheiro BC, Estefen SF, Xu LL, Paz CM, Duan ML. 2021. Ultimate bending strength of sandwich pipes with actual interlayer behavior. Thin-Walled Struct. 161:107476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T. 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 6(2):182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estefen SF, Lourenço MI, Feng JK, Paz CM, Bessa de Lima D. 2016. Sandwich pipe for long distance pipelines: flow assurance and costs. Proceeding of the ASME 35th international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering; 19–24 June; Busan, South Korea. Paper OMAE2016-54950.
   Google Scholar
• Estefen SF, Netto TA, Pasqualino IP. 2005. Strength analyses of sandwich pipes for ultra deepwaters. J Appl Mech. 72(4):599–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Valdés D, Vázquez-Hernández AO, Ortega-Herrera JA, Ocampo-Ramírez A, Hernández D. 2020. FEM-based evaluation of friction and initial imperfections effects on sandwich pipes local buckling. Mar Struct. 72:102769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu G, Estefen SF, Lourenço MI, Yang JK, Paz CM, Duan ML. 2021. Buckle propagation of damaged SHCC sandwich pipes: experimental tests and numerical simulation. Mar Struct. 77:102976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong SF, Wang XP, Zhang T, Liu CB. 2018. Buckle propagation of sandwich pipes under external pressure. Eng Struct. 175:339–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha I, White DJ, Randolph MF. 2019. Subsea pipeline walking with velocity dependent seabed friction. Appl Ocean Res. 82:296–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guz IA, Menshykova M, Paik JK. 2015. Thick-walled composite tubes for offshore applications: an example of stress and failure analysis for filament-wound multi-layered pipes. Ship Offshore Struct. 12(3):304–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han CJ, Tan SS, Zhang J, Zhang C. 2018. Simulation investigation of dent behavior of steel pipe under external load. Eng Fail Anal. 90:341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemian R, Mohareb M. 2016. Buckling finite element formulation for sandwich pipes under external pressure. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 147:41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He T, Duan ML, Wang JL, Lv SS, An C. 2015. On the external pressure capacity of deepwater sandwich pipes with inter-layer adhesion conditions. Appl Ocean Res. 52:115–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamanos SA, Andreadakis KP. 2006. Denting of internally pressurized tubes under lateral loads. Int J Mech Sci. 48(10):1080–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopatin AV, Morozov EV. 2015. Buckling of the composite sandwich cylindrical shell with clamped ends under uniform external pressure. Compos Struct. 122:209–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugan P, Kannan S, Baskar S. 2009. NSGA-II algorithm for multi-objective generation expansion planning problem. Electr Power Syst Res. 79(4):622–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noronha DB, Martins RR, Jacob BP, de Souza E. 2010. Procedures for the strain based assessment of pipeline dents. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 87(5):254–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odina L, Hardjanto F, Walker A. 2018. Effects of impact loads on CRA-lined pipelines. Ocean Eng. 166:117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver KD. 1999. The response of a soil backed submarine pipeline impacted by a dropped object [PhD Thesis], University of Aberdeen.
   Google Scholar
• Onyegiri I, Kashtalyan M. 2017. Finite element analysis of a sandwich pipe joint. Ocean Eng. 146:363–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyegiri I, Kashtalyan M. 2018a. Threaded connectors for sandwich pipes - part 1: parametric & comparative studies. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 168:117–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyegiri I, Kashtalyan M. 2018b. Threaded connectors for sandwich pipes – part 2: optimisation of stress relief groove. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 168:125–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro B, Guedes Soares C, Pasqualino I. 2018. Generalized expressions for stress concentration factors of pipeline plain dents under cyclic internal pressure. J Pressure Vessels Piping. 170:82–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi C, Yang S, Dong F. 2012. Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of tapered square tubes under oblique impact loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 59:103–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian XD, Wang Y, Richard Liew JY, Zhang MH. 2015. A load-indentation formulation for cement composite filled pipe-in-pipe structures. Eng Struct. 92:84–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quispe JLP, Pasqualino IP, Estefen SF, de Souza MIL. 2020. Structural behavior of threaded connections for sandwich pipes under make-up torque, external pressure, and axial load. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 186:104156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasamy R, Ya TT. 2014. Nonlinear finite element analysis of collapse and post-collapse behaviour in dented submarine pipelines. Appl Ocean Res. 46:116–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu DM, Wang L, Kim SK, Lee JM. 2017. Comparative study on deformation and mechanical behavior of corroded pipe. Part I: numerical simulation and experimental investigation under impact load. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 9:509–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin SH, Song HC, Jang CD. 2006. Optimum structural design of tankers using multi-objective optimization technique. Ships Offsh Struct. 1:213–219.
   Google Scholar
• Souzangarzadeh H, Jahan A, Rezvani JM, Milani AS. 2020. Multi-objective optimization of cylindrical segmented tubes as energy absorbers under oblique crushes: D-optimal design and integration of MULTIMOORA with combinative weighting. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 62:249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun GY, Xu FX, Li GY, Li Q. 2014. Crashing analysis and multiobjective optimization for thin-walled structures with functionally graded thickness. Int J Impact Eng. 64:62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taheri F, Arjomandi K. 2011. A new look at the external pressure capacity of sandwich pipes. Mar Struct. 24(1):23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian YT, Chai WS, Borgi SE, Zhang CH, Sun LQ, Xiao Z, Fu DF. 2021. Assessment of submarine pipeline damages subjected to falling object impact considering the effect of seabed. Mar Struct. 78:102963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapper PA. 2020. Static analysis of offshore pipe-lay on flat inelastic seabed. Ocean Eng. 213:107673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan F, Guan F, Deng YB, Liu SH, Liu YH, Huang P. 2021. Indentation response of pressurized sandwich pipes filled with cement composite under lateral loading. Ocean Engineering. 244:108736.
   Google Scholar
• Wan F, Guan F, Zhou CX, Liu SH, Yang T. 2020. Pressure capacity of sandwich pipe with cement-based core configuration under deep-water external pressure. J Sandw Struct Mater. 22(4):1292–1326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Han L. 2019. Analytical behavior of carbon steel-concrete-stainless steel double skin tube (DST) used in submarine pipeline structure. Mar Struct. 63:99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang FC. 2018. Effective design of submarine pipe-in-pipe using finite element analysis. Ocean Eng. 153:23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang LZ, Zhang J, Yuan F, Li K. 2014. Interaction between catenary riser and soft seabed: large-scale indoor tests. Appl Ocean Res. 45:10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Duan ML, Zhang Y. 2017. Experimental and numerical investigation of vertical pipe-soil interaction considering pipe velocity. Ships Offsh Struct. 12:77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Zhang Y, Li L. 2021. Analysis of ductile damage changes of pipelines with unconstrained dents in rebound process. Eng Fail Anal. 120:105071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Bai Y, Fang P, Yuan S, Liu C. 2019. Structural analysis of fibreglass reinforced bonded flexible pipe subjected to tension. Ships Offsh Struct. 14(7):777–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue JH, Wang Y, Yuan D. 2015. A shear deformation theory for bending and buckling of undersea sandwich pipes. Compos Struct. 132:633–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan S, Shen X, Jin Z, Ye H. 2016. On elastic-plastic collapse of subsea pipelines under external hydrostatic pressure and denting force. Appl Ocean Res. 58:305–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JK, Estefen SF, Fu GM, Paz CM, Lourenço MI. 2020b. Collapse pressure of sandwich pipes with strain-hardening cementitious composite - part 2: A suitable prediction equation. Thin-Walled Struct. 148:106606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JK, Paz CM, Estefen SF, Fu GM, Lourenço MI. 2020a. Collapse pressure of sandwich pipes with strain-hardening cementitious composite-part 1: experiments and parametric study. Thin-Walled Struct. 148:106605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarei HR, Kröger M. 2006. Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of circular aluminum tubes. Thin-Walled Struct. 44:301–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeinoddini M, Arabzadeh H, Ezzati M, Parke GAR. 2013. Response of submarine pipelines to impacts from dropped objects: Bed flexibility effects. Int J Impact Eng. 62:12–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Huang Y, Wu Y, Mohamed HS. 2020. Investigations on the re-rounding performance of dented-pipelines at the service and shutdown stages. Eng Fail Anal. 116:104746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao T, Yu F. 2020. Critical upheaval buckling forces of sandwich pipelines with variable stiffnesses of pipe material. Ocean Eng. 217:107547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar