A multi-objective optimisation study of trimaran hull applying RBF-Morph technique and integrated optimisation platform at two design speeds

References

• Abt C, Harries S, Heimann J, Winter H. 2003. From redesign to optimal hull lines by means of parametric modeling. 2nd International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Maritime Industries; Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• wct 2wct 2Akbari K, Khedmati MR, Seif MS. 2014. Experimental study on heave and pitch motion characteristics of a wave-piercing trimaran. Trans Famena. 38(3):13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancolini ME, Cella U, Travostino G, Mancini M. 2013. Shaping up-mesh morphing reduces the time required to optimize an aircraft wing. ANSYS Advantage Magazine. VII(1).
   Google Scholar
• Cerka J, Mickevicien R, Asmontas Z, Norkevicius L, Zapnickas T, Djackov V, Zhou P. 2017. Optimization of the research vessel hull form by using numerical simulation. Ocean Eng. 139:33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang H, Zhan C, Liu Z, Cheng X, Feng B. 2021. Dynamic sampling method for ship resistance performance optimisation based on approximated model. Ships Offsh Struct. 16(4):386–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Diez M, Kandasamy M, Zhang Z, Campana EF, Stern F. 2015. High-fidelity global optimization of shape design by dimensionality reduction, metamodels and deterministic particle swarm. Eng Optim. 47(4):473–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino D, Serani A, Diez M. 2020. Design-space assessment and dimensionality reduction: an off-line method for shape reparameterization in simulation based optimization. Ocean Eng. 197:106852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer A, Van der Schoot MS, Bijl H. 2007. Mesh deformation based on radial basis function interpolation. Comput Struct. 85(4):784–795.
   Google Scholar
• Garg N, Kenway GKW, Martins JRRA, Young YL. 2017. High-fidelity multipoint hydro structural optimization of a 3-D hydrofoil. J Fluids Struct. 71:15–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Nazemian A, Ghadimi A. 2019a. Numerical scrutiny of the influence of side hulls arrangement on the motion of a trimaran vessel in regular waves through CFD analysis. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 41(1):1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Nazemian A, Sheikholeslami M. 2019b. Numerical simulation of the slamming phenomenon of a wave-piercing trimaran in the presence of irregular waves under various seagoing modes. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Maritime Env. 233(4):1198–1211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoropoulos G, Dimitris S. 2010. Hull-form optimization in calm and rough water. Comput Aided Des. 42:977–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo BJ, Deng GB, Steen S. 2013. Verification and validation of numerical calculation of ship resistance and flow field of a large tanker. Ships Offsh Struct. 8(1):3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Feng Y. 2020. CFD-based multi-objective optimization of a waterjet-propelled trimaran. Ocean Eng. 195:106755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang F, Yang C. 2016. Hull form optimization of a cargo ship for reduced drag. J Hydrodyn. 28(2):173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immonen E. 2019. A parametric morphing method for generating structured meshes for marine free surface flow applications with plane symmetry. J Comput Des Eng. 6(3):348–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITTC Recommendations. 2002. Uncertainty analysis in CFD, uncertainty assessment methodology and procedures. ITTC-quality manual. Proceedings of the International Towing Tank Conference, Venice, Italy, 8–14 September 2002.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC Recommendations. 2017. Uncertainty analysis in CFD, verification and validation methodology and Procedures. ITTC-Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 7.5-03-01-01. Proceedings of the International Towing Tank Conference, Wuxi, China, 18 September 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kim GH, Park S. 2017. Development of a numerical simulation tool for efficient and robust prediction of ship resistance. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng. 9(5):537–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Yang C. 2010. A new surface modification approach for CFD-based hull form optimization. J Hydrodyn Ser B. 22(5):520–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WJ, Van SH, Kim DH. 2001. Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models. Exp Fluids. 31:567–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson L, Stern F. 2014. Book: an assessment of the Gothenburg 2010 workshop. Gothenburg, Sweden: Springer Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson L, Stern F, Visonneau M, Hirata N, Hino T, Kim J. 2015. A workshop on CFD in ship hydrodynamics. Tokyo 2015: volume 2.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood S, Huang D. 2012. Computational fluid dynamics based bulbous bow optimization using a genetic algorithm. J Mar Sci Appl. 11:286–294.
   Google Scholar
• Morris AM, Alen CB, Rendall CS. 2008. CFD-based optimization of aerofoils using radial basis functions for domain element parameterization and mesh deformation. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 58:827–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Paniagua J, Garcia J, Crespo A. 2015. Aerodynamic optimization of the nose shape of a train using the adjoint method. J Appl Fluid Mech. 8(3):601–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemian A, Ghadimi P. 2020a. Multi-objective optimization of trimaran sidehull arrangement via surrogate-based approach for reducing resistance and improving the seakeeping performance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ. doi:10.1177/1475090220980275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemian A, Ghadimi P. 2020b. Shape optimisation of trimaran ship hull using CFD-based simulation and adjoint solver. Ships Offshore Struct. 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemian A, Ghadimi P. 2021a. CFD-based optimization of a displacement trimaran hull for improving its calm water and wavy condition resistance. Appl Ocean Res. 113:102729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemian A, Ghadimi P. 2021b. Global optimization of trimaran hull form to get minimum resistance by slender body method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 43(2):67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RBF-Morph™. 2012. Webinars and Q&A, http://www.rbf-morph.com.
   Google Scholar
• Recommendations ITTC. 2011. ITTC-recommended procedures and guidelines. Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications. 7.5–03. 02–03, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Recommendations ITTC. 2014. ITTC-recommended procedures and guidelines. Practical guidelines for ship resistance CFD. 7.5–03. 02–04, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rendall TCS, Allen CB. 2008. Unified fluid-structure interpolation and mesh motion using radial basis functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 74:1519–1559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serani A, Fasano G, Liuzzi G, Lucidi S, Iemma U, Campana EF, Diez M. 2016. Ship hydrodynamic optimization by local hybridization of deterministic derivative-free global algorithms. Appl Ocean Res. 59:115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieger D, Menzel S, Botsch M. 2014. RBF morphing techniques for simulation-based design optimization. Eng Comput. 30(2):161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens PLM. 2019. Webinars and Q&A, http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com.
   Google Scholar
• Staten ML, Owen SJ, Shontz SM, Salinger AG, Coffey TS. 2012. A comparison of mesh morphing methods for 3D shape optimization. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 293–311.
   Google Scholar
• Tahara Y, Tohyama S, Katsui T. 2006. CFD-based multi-objective optimization method for ship design. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 52(5):499–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkmen BS, Turan O. 2007. A new integrated multi-objective optimisation algorithm and its application to ship design. Ships Offsh Struct. 2(1):21–37.
   Google Scholar
• User Guide. 2019. HEEDS MDO version 19.2. SIEMENS Simcenter.
   Google Scholar
• User Guide. 2020. StarCCM+ version 2020.1. SIEMENS Simcenter.
   Google Scholar
• Vasudev KL, Sharma R, Bhattacharyya SK. 2014. A multi-objective optimization design framework integrated with CFD for the design of AUVs. Methods Oceanogr. 10:138–165.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H, Chen J, Lu Q, Ma N. 2014. Application of knowledge-based engineering for ship optimisation design. Ships Offsh Struct. 9(1):64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakerdoost H, Ghassemi H, Ghiasi M. 2013. Ship hull form optimization by evolutionary algorithm in order to diminish the drag. J Marine Sci Appl. 12:170–179.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang BJ, Zhang SL. 2018. Book: research on ship design and optimization based on simulation-based design (SBD) technique. Shanghai, China: Springer Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Dx Z, Wh L. 2008. Parametric approach to design of hull forms. J Hydrodyn Ser B. 20(6):804–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar