Numerical analysis of the correlation between the pitting severity and surface roughness of corroded specimens

References

• Adjel S, Merakeb N, Benchouia S, Ehlers S, Baccouche M. 2018. Effect of corrosion pit density on the fatigue life of aluminum 1050A. Int. J. Adv. Man. Tech. 97:3163–3177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An B, Wang X, Xu Y, Jackson RL. 2019. Deterministic elastic-plastic modeling of rough surface contact including spectral interpolation and comparison to theoretical models. J. Tribol. Int. 135:246–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari J, Khan F, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, Ojeda R. 2015. Modeling of pitting corrosion in marine and offshore steel structures: A technical review. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 37:39–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan B. 1998. Contact mechanics of rough surfaces in tribology: multiple asperity contact. Tribol Lett. 4:1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan B. 2001. Modern Tribology handbook. Volume 1. Columbus, OH: CRC Press LLC, The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves IA, Melchers RE. 2011. Pitting corrosion in pipeline steel weld zones. Corros Sci. 53(12):4026–4032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croll SG. 2020. Surface roughness profile and its effect on coating adhesion and corrosion protection: A review. Prog Org Coat. 148:105847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Baere K, Verstraelen H, Rigo P, Van Passel S, Lenaerts S, Potters G. 2013a. Reducing the cost of ballast tank corrosion: an economic modeling approach. Mar. Struct. 32:136–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Baere K, Verstraelen H, Rigo P, Van Passel S, Lenaerts S, Potters G. 2013b. Study on alternative approaches to corrosion protection of ballast tanks using an economic model. Mar. Struct. 32:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diao D, Kandori A. 2006. Finite element analysis of the effect of interfacial roughness and adhesion strength on the local delamination of hard coating under sliding contact. Tribol Int. 39:849–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner CP, Melchers RE. 2003. Corrosion analysis of bulk carriers, part I: operational parameters influencing corrosion rates. Mar. Struct. 16:547–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germanischer Lloyd. 2013. Guidelines on ballast water management. Hamburg: Germanischer Lloyd SE.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen CMH, Hognestada A, Knudsen OØ, Sørbya K. 2019. The effect of surface roughness on corrosion resistance of machined and epoxy coated steel. Prog Org Coat. 130:17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer A, D'Souza F, Morales CFL, Ferrari G, Mol JMC, De Wit JHW. 2013. Ship ballast tanks a review from microbial corrosion and electrochemical point of view. J. Ocean. Eng. 70:188–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhang J. 2018. Material corrosion and protection. Berlin: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai and Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• IACS. 2004. IACS Guidelines for Surveys, Assessment and Repair of Hull Structure - Bulk Carriers.
   Google Scholar
• IACS. 2015. Guidelines for coating maintenance and repairs for ballast tanks and combined cargo/ballast tanks on oil tankers. IACS Recommendation 87, Revision 2 - 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jelovica J, Romanoff J, Ehlers S, Aroma J. 2013. Ultimate strength of corroded web-core sandwich beams. Mar. Struct. 31:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khun NW, Frankel GS. 2013. Effects of surface roughness, texture and polymer degradation on cathodic delamination of epoxy coated steel samples. Corros Sci. 67:152–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DK, Kim SJ, Kim HB, Zhang XM, Li CG, Paik JK. 2015. Ultimate strength performance of bulk carriers with various corrosion additions. Ships Offshore Struct. 10(1):59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DG, Kim BC. 2005. Investigation of coating failure on the surface of a water ballast tank of an oil tanker. Adhesion Science and Tech. 19(10):879–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Jian W, Wang JY, Hofmann S, Kovac J. 2013. Influence of non-Gaussian roughness on sputter depth profiles. J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 276:447–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mears RB, Evans UR. 1935. The “probability of corrosion. Trans. Faraday Soc. 31(31):527–542.
   Google Scholar
• Megalingam A, Maruyam MM. 2012. Comparative contact analysis study of finite element method based deterministic, simplified multi-asperity and modified statistical contact models. J. Tribol. 134(1):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megalingam A, Maruyam MM. 2014. Effect of surface parameters on finite element method based deterministic Gaussian rough surface contact model. Journal of Eng. Tribology. 228(12):1358–1373.
   Google Scholar
• Melchers RE. 2008. Operational based corrosion analysis in naval ships. Corros Sci. 50(10):3296–3307.
   Google Scholar
• Melchers RE. 2019. Predicting long-term corrosion of metal alloys in physical infrastructure. Npj Mater. Degrad. 3(4):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Melchers RE, Jiang X. 2006. Estimation of models for durability of epoxy coatings in water ballast tanks. Ships Offshore Struct. 1(1):61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Melchers RE, Paik JK. 2009. Effect of tensile strain on the rate of marine corrosion of steel plates. Corrosion Science. 51(10):2298–2303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann K. 2018. Laser scanning and tensile tests of 2 sizes corroded specimens using digital image correlation. Hamburg: TUHH & Wood group.
   Google Scholar
• Nugroho FA, Braun M, Ehlers S. 2021. Probability analysis of pit distribution on corroded ballast tank. J. Ocean Eng. 228:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho FA, Siregar B, Putra GL, Dhelika R. 2018. Study on the alteration of geometrical dimensions of tee stiffeners concerning the ultimate strength characteristics under a vertical bending load. Int. J. Tech. 9:1027–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2022 (in press). ship-shaped Offshore installations: design, construction, operation, healthcare and decommissioning. 2nd ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Kim DK. 2012. Advanced method for the development of an empirical model to predict time-dependent corrosion wastage. Corros Sci. 63:51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Park AK, Hwang JS. 2004. A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for seawater ballast tank structures of ships. Corros Sci. 46:471–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prajapati DK, Tiwari M. 2017. Topography analysis of random anisotropic Gaussian rough surfaces. J. Tribol. 139(4):041402. (9 pages).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajput A, Ak M, Kim SJ, Noh SH, Park JH, Paik JK. 2018. Effects of the Surface Preparation on the Life of Epoxy Coating in Steel Ship Plates: An Experimental Study. Int. Conf. Ship Offshore Struct. (ICSOS); Sept. 17–19 Gothenburg; 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rajput A, Paik JK. 2021. Effects of naturally-progressed corrosion on the chemical and mechanical properties of structural steels. Structures. 29:2120–2138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW. 2017. A study on the influence of ageing of coatings on their mechanical properties and fracture in ballast tanks. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(1):S268–S279.
   Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW, Li Z, Johnson E, Kuznecovs A, Shafieisabet R. 2018. Reduction in ultimate strength capacity of corroded ships involved in collision accidents. Ships Offshore Struct. 13(1):155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Eldeen S, Garbatov Y, Soares CG. 2013. Experimental assessment of corroded steel box-girders subjected to uniform bending. Ships Offshore Struct. 8(6):653–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata T. 2011. Corrosion probability and statistical evaluation of corrosion data. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Uhlig’s Corrosion Handbook, 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson MK. 2006. Methods for generating rough surfaces in ANSYS. International ANSYS Users Conference & Exhibition.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson MK. 2011. A comparison of methods to evaluate the behavior of finite element models with rough surfaces. J. Scanning Microscopies. 33:353–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloei A, Stoilov V, Northwood D. 2014. The relationship between surface roughness and corrosion. Proceedings of the ASME (Int. Mech. Eng. Cong. & Exp).
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse DJ, Archard JF. 1970. The properties of random surfaces of significance in their contact. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A. A. 316:97–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JJ. 2001. The properties of asperities of real surfaces. J. Tribol. 123(4):872–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Wu L, Luo J, Zhou L. 2020. Mechanical response of thin hard coatings under indentation considering rough surface and residual stress. Diamond & Related Materials. 108:107991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu N, Polycarpou AA. 2004. Combining and contacting of two rough surfaces with asymmetric distribution of asperity heights. J. Triboloy. 126(2): 225–232(8 pages).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Ni Z, Liu H, Zhao Z, Fan X, Zhang H. 2020. Influence of random pit corrosion on axial stiffness of thin-walled circular tubes. Journal of Structure. 28:2596–2604.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Sundararajan S. 2005. The effect of autocorrelation length on the real area of contact and friction behavior of rough surfaces. J Appl Phys. 97:103526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Fu L. 2018. The probability distribution of pitting for accelerated corrosion reinforcement. Case Stud. Constr. Mat. 9:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Zhang H, Xian L, Liu H. 2020. Tensile strength of Q345 steel with random pitting corrosion based on numerical analysis. Thin-Walled Struct. 148:106579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar