A procedure for numerically model surface of the corroded specimen

References

• Ansari TQ, Xiao Z, Hu S. 2018. Phase-field model of pitting corrosion kinetics in metallic materials. NPJ Comput Mater. 4:38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baere KD, Lemmens L, Potters G, Verstraelen H, Lenaerts S. 2011. In situ study of the parameters quantifying the corrosion in ballast tanks and an evaluation of improving alternatives. Ship Structure Committee Symposia. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Baere KD, Verstraelen H, Rigo P, Passel SV, Lenaerts S, Potters G. 2013a. Reducing the cost of ballast tank corrosion: an economic modeling approach. Mar. Struct. 32: 136–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baere KD, Verstraelen H, Rigo P, Passel SV, Lenaerts S, Potters G. 2013b. Study on alternative approaches to corrosion protection of ballast tanks using an economic model. Mar. Struct. 32:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari J, Khan F, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, Ojeda R. 2015. Modeling of pitting corrosion in marine and offshore steel structures: A technical review. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 37: 39–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan B. 1998. Contact mechanics of rough surfaces in tribology: multiple asperity contact. Tribology Letters. 4: 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan B. 2001. Modern Tribology handbook. Volume 1. CRC Press LLC, The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Caines S, Khan F, Shirokoffa J. 2013. Analysis of pitting corrosion on steel under insulation in marine environments. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind., 26: 1466–1483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerit M. 2013. Numerical investigation on torsional stress concentration factor at the semi elliptical corrosion pit. Eng. Fail. Ana. 67:225–232.
   Google Scholar
• Cerit M. 2019. Corrosion pit-induced stress concentration in spherical pressure vessel. Thin-Walled Struct. 136: 106–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerit M, Genel K, Eksi S. 2009. Numerical investigation on stress concentration of corrosion pit. Eng. Fail. Ana. 16: 2467–2472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croll SG. 2020. Surface roughness profile and its effect on coating adhesion and corrosion protection: A review. Progress in Organic Coatings. 148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DNV GL. 2015. Rules for Classification ships. Part 2 Materials and welding Chapter 2 Metallic materials.
   Google Scholar
• Diao D, Kandori A. 2006. Finite element analysis of the effect of interfacial roughness and adhesion strength on the local delamination of hard coating under sliding contact. Tribol Int. 39:849–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel GS. 1998. Pitting corrosion of metals: a review of the critical factors. J Electrochem Soc. 145:2186–2198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner CP, Melchers RE. 2003. Corrosion analysis of bulk carriers. part I: operational parameters influencing corrosion rates. Marine Structures. 16:547–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen CMH, Hognestada A, Knudsen OØ, Sørbya K. 2019. The effect of surface roughness on corrosion resistance of machined and epoxy coated steel. Progress in Organic Coatings. 130:17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer A, D'Souza F, Morales CFL, Ferrari G, Mol JMC, De Wit JHW. 2013. Ship ballast tanks a review from microbial corrosion and electrochemical point of view. J. Ocean. Eng. 70:188–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou J, Song L. 2015. Numerical investigation on stress concentration of tension steel bars with one or two corrosion pits. Adv. Mat. Sci. & Eng. 2015:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhang J. 2018. Material Corrosion and Protection. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai and Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Wei C, Chen L, Li P. 2014. Quantitative correlation between geometric parameters and stress concentration of corrosion pits. Eng. Fail. Ana. 44: 168–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowski M. 2014. Influence of pitting corrosion on fatigue and corrosion fatigue of ship structures part I pitting corrosion of ship structures. Polish Marit Res. 21:62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelovica J, Romanoff J, Ehlers S, Aromaa, J. 2012. Ultimate strength of corroded web-core sandwich beams. Mar. Struct. 31: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji J, Zhang C, Kodikara J, Yang SQ. 2015. Prediction of stress concentration factor of corrosion pits on buried pipes by least squares support vector machine. Eng. Fail. Ana. 55:131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia C, Shao Y, Guo L, Huang H. 2021. Surface topography and stress concentration analysis for corroded high strength steel plate. J Const. Steel Res. 187: 106952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashani MM, Crewe AJ, Alexander NA. 2013. Use of a 3D optical measurement technique for stochastic corrosion pattern analysis of reinforcing bars subjected to accelerated corrosion. Corros Sci. 73:208–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khun NW, Frankel GS. 2012. Effects of surface roughness, texture and polymer degradation on cathodic delamination of epoxy coated steel samples. J Corros Sc. 67:152–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolios A, Srikanth S, Salonitis K. 2014. Numerical simulation of material strength deterioration due to pitting corrosion. 2nd CIRP 2nd CIRP Conf. on Surf. Int. (CSI). 13:230–236.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DK, Wong EWC, Cho NK. 2020. An advanced technique to predict time dependent corrosion damage of onshore, offshore, nearshore and ship structures: Part I = generalisation. Int. J. Naval Arch. and Ocean Eng. 12: 657–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Zhang W, Huang Q 2018. Probability distribution of cross-sectional radius of corroded steel bars in concrete and its applicationMATEC Web of Conferences. In: ICCRRR, 199: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Li R, Miao C, Zhuang M. 2020. Experimental and numerical investigation of stress concentration factor of cable steel wire with corrosion pits. J. Civ. Eng. 5: 1581–1592.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Jian W, Wang JY, Hofmann S, Kovac J. 2013. Influence of non-Gaussian roughness on sputter depth profiles. J Appl Surf Sci. 276: 447–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchers RE, Jiang X. 2006. Estimation of models for durability of epoxy coatings in water ballast tanks. Ships Offshore Struct. 1(1):61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann K. 2018. Laser scanning and tensile tests of 2 sizes corroded specimens using digital image correlation. TUHH & Wood group.
   Google Scholar
• Nie B, Xua S, Wang Y. 2019. Time-dependent reliability analysis of corroded steel beam. KSCE J Civ Eng. 23: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Nugroho FA, Braun M, Ehlers S. 2021a. Probability analysis of pit distribution on corroded ballast tank. J. Ocean Eng. 228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho FA, Garhuom W, Andresen-Paulsen G, Ehlers S. 2021b. Numerical analysis of the correlation between the pitting severity and surface roughness of corroded specimen. J. Ship Offshore Struct.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho FA, Siregar B, Putra GL, Dhelika R. 2018. Study on the alteration of geometrical dimensions of Tee stiffeners concerning the ltimate strength characteristics under a vertical bending load. Int J Technol. 5:1027–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2022. ship-shaped offshore installations: design, construction, operation, healthcare and decommissioning. 2nd ed. UK: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Lee JM, Hwang JS, Park YI. 2003a. A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for the structures of single and double-hull tankers and FSOs and FPSOs. Mar. Technol. 40(3):201–217.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Thayamballi AK, Park YI, Hwang JS. 2003b. A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for bulk carrier structures. Int J Maritime Eng. 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pal S, Bhadauria SS, Kumar P. 2019. Pitting corrosion behavior of F304 stainless steel under the exposure of ferric chloride solution. J Bio Tribol Corros 5(91): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rajput A, Ak M, Kim SJ, Noh SH, Park JH, Paik JK. 2018. Effects of naturally – progressed corrosion on the chemical and mechanical properties of structural steels.Structure 29: 2120–2139.
   Google Scholar
• Rajput A, Paik JK. 2020. Effects of naturally – progressed corrosion on the chemical and mechanical properties of structural steels. Structure. 29:2120–2139.
   Google Scholar
• Rokhlin SI, Kim JY, Nagy H, Zoofan B. 1998. Effect of pitting corrosion on fatigue crack initiation and fatigue life. Eng. Fract. Mech. 62:425–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson MA. 2006. Methods for generating rough surfaces in ANSYS. International ANSYS Users Conference & Exhibition.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson MA. 2011. A comparison of methods to evaluate the behavior of finite element models with rough surfaces. J Scanning Micros. 33:353–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloei A, Stoilov V, Northwood D. 2014. A comparison of methods to evaluate the behavior of finite element models with rough surfaces. Journal of Scanning Microscopies 33: 353–369.
   Google Scholar
• Wei R, Du Y, Zou L, Li D. 2016. Statistical analysis of geometrical parameters of corroded reinforcement. J Comput Physic. 1:191–196.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse DJ, Archard JF. 1970. The Properties of Random Surfaces of Significance in Their Contact. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, A316: 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Wu JJ. 2001. The properties of asperities of real surfaces. J. Tribology. 123:872–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Wu L, Luo J, Zhou L. 2020. Mechanical response of thin hard coatings under indentation considering rough surface and residual stress. Diamond Relat Mater. 108:107991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan W, Xu Y, Zhou Y, Wang K. 2016. Investigation of stress concentration and casing strength degradation caused by corrosion pits. Int. J. Corr. 2016: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zerbst U, Madia M, Klinger C, Bettge D, Murakami Y. 2019. Defects as a root cause of fatigue failure of metallic components. III: cavities, dents, corrosion pits, scratches. Eng. Fail. Ana. 97:759–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Sundararajan S. 2005. The effect of autocorrelation length on the real area of contact and friction behavior of rough surfaces. J. App. Physics. 97: 103526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Fu L. 2018. The probability distribution of pitting for accelerated corrosion reinforcement. Case Stud Constr Mater. 9:1–9.
   Google Scholar