Ultimate capacity of cracked tubular T-joints reinforced with grouted clamp connection in axial tension

References

• American Petroleum Institute. 2014. Recommended Practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms-working stress design . 22nd. Washington, DC: API.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing, Materials. 2002. E8/ E8M: Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM international.
   Google Scholar
• American Welding Society. 2020. Structural welding code–steel. D1 1/D1 1M: 2020.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. 2004. C 496/C 496M-04. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. 4(2004):5.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C109. 1999. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). West Conshohocken, PA : ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Banon H. 1994. Assessing fitness for purpose of offshore platforms. II: risk management, maintenance, and repair. Journal of Structural Engineering. 120:3613–3633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standards. 2004. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards 7910. 2013. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards. IS: 4031-1988 Part 6: Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards. 1956. IS 516–1956 (Reaffirmed 1999): Indian Standard Methods of Tests for Strength of Concrete.
   Google Scholar
• Cheaitani M J, Burdekin F M. 1994. Ultimate strength of cracked tubular joints. Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Tubular Structures, Tubular Structures VI. Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chellappan NV, Nallayarasu S.. 2019. Residual strength of cracked tubular joint using Nonlinear Finite Element analysis..Proceedings of the fourth International Conference in Ocean Engineering (ICOE2018).Springer; p.395 - 416
   Google Scholar
• Chellappan NV, Nallayarasu S. 2021. Experimental and numerical investigation on axial load transfer across cracked tubular joint strengthened with grouted clamps of a jacket in under water condition. Ships Offsh Struct. Jun 10:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Feng R, Xiong L. 2016. Experimental and numerical investigations on double-skin CHS tubular X-joints under axial compression. Thin-Walled Struct. 106:268–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers CA. 1984. Analysis of the structural behaviour of grouted pile/sleeve connections for offshore structures. UK: City University London.
   Google Scholar
• Dassault Systèmes Simulia. 2018. ABAQUS/standard user’s manual. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dier A. 2004. Assessment and repair of offshore structures. C357R001 Rev 1. UK: MSL Engineering Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood RG, Shuttleworth EP. 1988. Grouted and mechanical strengthening and repair of tubular steel offshore structures. London, UK: HM Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Krahl NW, Karsan DI. 1985. Axial strength of grouted pile-to-sleeve connections. Journal of Structural Engineering. 111(4):889–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Llewelyn-Parry A. 1999. Strength of ring-stiffened tubular T-joints in offshore structures - a numerical parametric study. J Constr Steel Res. 51:239–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Marcus MK., Dexter Ellen M.. 2004. Finite-element modelling of multi-planar offshore tubular joints. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 126:120–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu LH, Winkel GD, Yu Y, Wardenier J. 1994. Deformation limit for the ultimate strength of hollow section joints. Tubular Structures. VI:341–347.
   Google Scholar
• MSL Engineering Ltd. 2000. JIP Phase II Final Report on Tubular Joint Non-Linear Modeling Algorithms for Frame Analysis, Document No C20400R014.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy F, Smith BL, others. 1993. The investigation and repair of defective joints on the kinsale alpha platform. Offshore Technology conference.
   Google Scholar
• Qian X, Jitpairod K, Marshall P, Swaddiwudhipong S, Ou Z, Zhang Y, Pradana MR. 2014. Fatigue and residual strength of concrete-filled tubular X-joints with full capacity welds. J Constr Steel Res. 100:21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee HC. 1989. Fatigue crack growth analyses of offshore structural tubular joint. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Samarakoon S M S M K, RM Chandima Ratnayake, Siriwardane S.A.S.C. 2013. Structural integrity control of ageing offshore structures: Repairing and strengthening with grouted connections. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Vol. 55355:V003T03A032.
   Google Scholar
• Thandavamoorthy TS, Madhava Rao AG, Santhakumar AR. 2001. Development of a fly ash and epoxy based high-performance grout for the repair of offshore platforms. Special Publication. 199:239–258.
   Google Scholar
• Wardenier J, Kurobane Y., Packer JA, Van der Vegte, Zhao XL. 2001. Design guide 1 for circular hollow section (CHS) joint under predominantly static loading. CIDECT construction with hollow steel sections .
   Google Scholar
• Yura JA, Zettlemoyer NA, Edwards IF. 1980. Ultimate capacity equations for tubular joints. Offshore Technology conference.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang CJ, Zhang HH, Shi X, Chen JR, Zhou L. 2016. Design method of an expansive stressed grouted clamp on a joint of a jacket platform. The 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering conference. International Society of offshore and Polar engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X L, Herion S, Packer J A, Puthli R, Sedlacek G, Wardenier J. 2000. Design guide for circular and rectangular hollow section joints under fatigue loading. CIDECT Publication.
   Google Scholar