Adaptation of FEM-based open-source software for ship structural analysis

References

• Ambler SW. 2005. The elements of UML 2.0 style. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andric J, Kitarovic S, Radolovic V, Prebeg P. 2019. Structural analysis and design of a car carrier with composite sandwich deck panels. Ships Offsh Struct. 14(S1):171–S186.
   Google Scholar
• Andric J, Piric K, Prebeg P, Andrisic J, Dmitrasinovic A. 2018. Structural design and analysis of a large “open type” livestock carrier. Ships Offsh Struct. 13(S1):167–S181.
   Google Scholar
• Andric J, Prebeg P, Andrisic J, Zanic V. 2020. Structural optimisation of a bulk carrier accord-ing IACS CSR-BC. Ships Offsh Struct. 15(2):123–137.
   Google Scholar
• Bakica A, Vladimir N, Jasak H, Kim ES. 2021. Numerical simulations of hydrodynamic loads and structural responses of a pre-swirl stator. Int J Naval Arch Ocean Eng. [accessed 2021 Oct 14]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678221000522.
   Google Scholar
• Basu RI, Kirkhope KJ, Srinivasan J. 1995. Guidelines for evaluation of ship structural finite element analysis. Washington, DC: SSC.
   Google Scholar
• Batoz JN, Ben Tahar M. 1982. Evaluation of a new quadrilateral thin plate bending element. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 18:1655–1677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booch G, Maksimchuk RA, Engle MW, Young BJ, Conallen J, Houston KA. 2007. Object-oriented analysis and design with applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Cook RD. 1986. On the allman triangle and a related quadrilateral element. Comput Struct. 22:1065–1067.
   Google Scholar
• DNVGL. 2015. DNVGL-CG-0127 finite element analysis. Hovik. https://rules.dnv.com/docs/pdf/DNV/CG/2015-10/DNVGL-CG-0127.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Horak M, Patzak B, Jirasek M. 2014. On design of element evaluators in OOFEM. Adv Eng Softw. 72:193–202.
   Google Scholar
• IACS. 2018. Common structural rules for bulk carriers and Oil tankers. London: IACS.
   Google Scholar
• ISSC Committee IV.2 Design methods. 2018. In: Kaminski ML, Rigo P, editor. Proceedings of the 20th International ship and Offshore Structures congress (ISSC 2018). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeal RH. 1982. Derivation of element stiffness matrices by assumed strian distributions. Nucl Eng Des. 70:3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeal RH. 1989. The evolution of lower order plate and shell elements in MSC/nastran. Finite Elem Anal Des. 5:197–222.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeal RH. 1994. Finite elements: their design and performance. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Macneal RH, Harder RL. 1985. A proposed standard Set of problems to test finite element accuracy. Finite Elem Anal Des. 1:3–20.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeal RH, Harder RL. 1988. A refined four-noded membrane element with rotational degrees of freedom. Comput Struct. 28(1):75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins JRRA, Lambe AB. 2013. Multidisciplinary design optimization: a survey of architectures. AIAA J. 51(9):2049–2075.
   Google Scholar
• Palaversa M, Prebeg P, Andrić J. 2019. REMAKE project deliverable 2.1 – definition of requirements for OOFEM upgrade. Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Palaversa M, Prebeg P, Andric J. 2020. Opportunities of using open-source FEA software in ship structural design. In: Bertram V, editor. 19th conference on Computer Applications and information technology in the maritime industries – COMPIT ‘20. Italy: Pontignano; p. 17.8–19.8.
   Google Scholar
• Patzak B. 2012. OOFEM – an object-oriented simulation tool for advanced modelling of materials and structures. Acta Polytech. 52(6):59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Patzak B, Bittnar Z. 2001. Design of object-oriented finite element code. Adv Eng Softw. 32:759–767.
   Google Scholar
• Payer HG, Schellin TE. 2013. ‘A class society’s view on rationally based ship structural design’. Ships Offsh Struct. 8(3-4):319–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens PLM Software. 2019a. Simcenter Nastran element library reference. [accessed 2021 Sept 1]. https://docs.plm.automation.siemens.com/data_services/resources/scnastran/2020_1/help/tdoc/en_US/pdf/element.pdf21.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens PLM Software. 2019b. Simcenter Nastran Verification Manual. [accessed 2021 Sept 1]. https://docs.plm.automation.siemens.com/data_services/resources/scnastran/2020_1/help/tdoc/en_US/pdf/verification.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van Keulen F, Haftka RT, Kim NH. 2005. Review of options for structural design sensitivty analysis. part 1: linear system. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng. 194:3213–3243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar