Assessment of marine diesel engine crankshaft damages

References

• Akan E, Bayar S. 2021. Interval type-2 fuzzy program evaluation and review technique for project management in shipbuilding. Ships Offsh Struct. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliabadi MM, Pourhasan A, Mohammadfam I. 2020. Risk modelling of a hydrogen gasholder using Fuzzy Bayesian Network (FBN). Int J Hydrogen Energy. 45(1):1177–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaleye AO, Kurt RE. 2020. Safety analysis of offshore decommissioning operation through Bayesian network. Ships Offsh Struct. 15(1):99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrak B. 2019. Is it Possible to Prevent Crankshaft Damage, the Nightmare of Ship-Owners?. Accessed 2021 September 10. https://turkpandi.com/assets/page_docs/press/sirkuler/Ocak2019Sirkulering.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cakir E, Sevgili C, Fiskin R. 2021. An analysis of severity of oil spill caused by vessel accidents. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 90:102662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CH, Kontovas C, Yu Q, Yang Z. 2021. Risk assessment of the operations of maritime autonomous surface ships. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 207:107324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Winkler RL. 1999. Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal. 19(2):187–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergin A, Eker I. 2019. Application of fuzzy topsis model for container port selection considering environmental factors. International Journal Of Maritime Engineering. 161(A3).
   Google Scholar
• GeNIe Modeler. 2021. Bayes Fusion, LLC. Accessed 2022 January 1. https://www.bayesfusion.com/downloads/.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes J, Gaivota N, Martins RF, Silva PP. 2018. Failure analysis of crankshafts used in maritime V12 diesel engines. Eng Fail Anal. 92:466–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu HM, Chen CT. 1996. Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 79(3):279–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal B. 2021. The use of Fuzzy-Bayes approach on the causal factors of empty container repositioning. Mar Technol Soc J. 55(5):20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal B, Aydın M. 2021. Application of fuzzy Bayesian approach on bankruptcy causes for container liner industry. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 100769.
   Google Scholar
• Kamal B, Kara G, Okşaş O. 2020. An Application Of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process To overcapacity absorbing methods In Container shipping. International Journal of Maritime Engineering. 162:331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal B, Kutay Ş. 2021. Assessment of causal mechanism of ship bunkering oil pollution. Ocean Coast Manag. 215:105939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevan S, Zhang R, Smith N. 2001. Bayesian networks for system reliability reassessment. Structural Safety. 23(3):231–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KS, Seo YJ, Kim A, Ha MH. 2018. Ship acquisition of shipping companies by sale & purchase activities for sustainable growth: exploratory fuzzy-AHP application. Sustainability. 10(6):1763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajakarunakaran S, Kumar AM, Prabhu VA. 2015. Applications of fuzzy faulty tree analysis and expert elicitation for evaluation of risks in LPG refuelling station. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 33:109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şakar C. 2017. Petrol/kimyasal tankerlerde tehlikeli yük operasyonlarında emniyet ve risk değerlendirmesi: Olasılıksal ilişki analizleri. Phd Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Şakar C, Zorba Y. 2017. A study on Safety and risk assessment of dangerous cargo operations in oil/chemical tankers. Journal of ETA Maritime Science. 5(4):396–413.
   Google Scholar
• Senol YE, Yasli F. 2021. A risk analysis study for chemical cargo tank cleaning process using Fuzzy Bayesian network. Ocean Eng. 235:109360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo YJ, Ha MH, Yang Z, Bhattacharya S. 2018. The ship management firm selection: the case of South Korea. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 34(3):256–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish Club. 2015. Main engine damage. Accessed 2021 September 1. https://www.swedishclub.com/media_upload/files/Publications/Loss%20Prevention/Main%20Engine%20damage%202015%20The%20Swedish%20Club.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Club. 2018. Main engine damage. Accessed 2021 September 10. https://www.swedishclub.com/media_upload/files/Loss%20Prevention/Main%20Engine%20Damage/TSC-main-engine-WEB2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Gaag LC, Renooij S, Witteman CL, Aleman BM, Taal BG. 2002. Probabilities for a probabilistic network: a case study in oesophageal cancer. Artif Intell Med. 25(2):123–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WJ. 1997. New similarity measures on fuzzy sets and on elements. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 85(3):305–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YF, Roohi SF, Hu XM, Xie M. 2011. Investigations of human and organizational factors in hazardous vapor accidents. J Hazard Mater. 191(1-3):69–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin E, Arslan O, Aymelek M. 2020. Developing a policy management algorithm for ship provision: a Delphi Technique Integrated with Hesitant Fuzzy Set (DTIHFS) approach. Maritime Policy & Management. 47(8):1097–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaşlı F. 2020. Yeraltı madencilik sektörü mesleki güvenlik risk analizi (Doctoral dissertation, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü).
   Google Scholar
• Yu Q, Liu K, Chang CH, Yang Z. 2020. Realising advanced risk assessment of vessel traffic flows near offshore wind farms. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 203:107086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control. 8(3):338–353.
   Google Scholar
• Zarei E, Yazdi M, Abbassi R, Khan F. 2019. A hybrid model for human factor analysis in process accidents: FBN-HFACS. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 57:142–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Yan XP, Yang ZL, Wall A, Wang J. 2013. Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze river. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 118:93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Thai VV, Yuen KF, Loh HS, Zhou Q. 2018. Addressing the epistemic uncertainty in maritime accidents modelling using Bayesian network with interval probabilities. Saf Sci. 102:211–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar