A new integrated wet-towing method of offshore wind turbine with tri-bucket foundation

References

• Achmus M, Schröder CJB. 2014. Installation und Tragverhalten von Bucketgründungen für Offshorebauwerke. Bautechnik. 91(9):597–608. doi:10.1002/bate.201400043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Santos L, Filgueira-Vizoso A, Lamas-Galdo I, Carral-Couce L. 2018. Methodology to calculate the installation costs of offshore wind farms located in deep waters. J Cleaner Prod. 170:1124–1135. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.219.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso J, Vieira M, Henriques E, Reis L. 2021, Aug 9. Computational analysis of the transportation phase of an innovative foundation for offshore wind turbine. Ships Offsh Struct. 16:725–734. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1779016.
   Google Scholar
• China Classification Society. 2012. Guidelines for Towage at sea.
   Google Scholar
• Ding H, Feng Z, Zhang P, Le C, Guo Y. 2020. Floating performance of a Composite Bucket Foundation with an offshore wind tower during transportation. Energies. 13(4). doi:10.3390/en13040882.
   Google Scholar
• Ding H, Zhao X, Le C, Zhang P, Min Q. 2019. Towing motion characteristics of Composite Bucket Foundation for offshore wind turbines. Energies. 12(19). doi:10.3390/en12193767.
   Google Scholar
• Dong X, Lian J, Wang H, Yu T, Zhao Y. 2018. Structural vibration monitoring and operational modal analysis of offshore wind turbine structure. Ocean Eng. 150:280–297. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durakovic A. 2022. Monopile foundations to go beyond 50-metre depths at Scottish Offshore Wind Farm, https://www.offshorewind.biz/2021/12/14/monopile-foundations-to-go-beyond-50-metre-depths-at-scottish-offshore-wind-farm/. [accessed 01 March 2022].
   Google Scholar
• ESTEYCO. 2021. ELISA - ELICAN PROJECT, WORLD'S FIRST CRANESLESS BOTTOM-FIXED OFFSHORE TURBINE. 5MW “ELISA” PROTOTYPE. [accessed 5 Jun 2021]. https://www.esteyco.com/proyectos/elisa-elican-project/.
   Google Scholar
• Jadali A, Ioannou A, Kolios A. 2021. A multi-attribute review toward effective planning of end-of-life strategies for offshore wind farms. Energy Sources Part B-Econ Plan Policy. 16(6):584–602. doi:10.1080/15567249.2021.1941434.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Z. 2021. Installation of offshore wind turbines: a technical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 139. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110576.
   Google Scholar
• Ku C-Y, Chien L-K. 2016. Modeling of load bearing characteristics of jacket foundation piles for offshore wind turbines in Taiwan. Energies. 9(8). doi:10.3390/en9080625.
   Google Scholar
• Lacal-Arantegui R, Yusta JM, Antonio Dominguez-Navarro J. 2018. Offshore wind installation: analysing the evidence behind improvements in installation time. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 92:133–145. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian J, Jiang J, Dong X, Wang H, Zhou H. 2021a. One damping estimation approach of the parked offshore wind turbine supported by wide-shallow bucket foundation. Ocean Eng. 235. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109387.
   Google Scholar
• Lian J, Wang P, Wang H, Guo Y, Xu Y, Ye F, Yang Y. 2021b. Experimental study of one-step overall transportation of composite bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine under the coupled dynamic action of wave and current. J Renew Sustain Energy. 13:3. doi:10.1063/5.0039907.
   Google Scholar
• Liu R, Ma W-G, Qi Y, Wu X-l. 2019. Experimental studies on the drag reduction effect of bucket foundation installation under suction pressure in sand. Ships Offsh Struct. 14(5):421–431. doi:10.1080/17445302.2018.1500188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee G, Kim SR, Kwag D. 2019. Seismic response comparison of offshore wind turbines as types of support structures. J Wind Energy. 10(1):5–13. doi:10.33519/kwea.2019.10.1.001.
   Google Scholar
• Miao C, Gao Y, Song C, Xie P, Chen X, Sun K. 2017. Analysis on the fatigue of TLP tendons during wet-tow installation. China Offshore Oil Gas. 29(4):152–158.
   Google Scholar
• Morato A, Sriramula S, Krishnan N. 2019. Kriging models for aero-elastic simulations and reliability analysis of offshore wind turbine support structures. Ships Offsh Struct. 14(6):545–558. doi:10.1080/17445302.2018.1522738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo R, Cao R, Liu M, Li M, Huang Y. 2021. Seismic fragility analysis of monopile offshore wind turbines considering ground motion directionality. Ocean Eng. 235. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109414.
   Google Scholar
• Penner N, Griessmann T, Rolfes R. 2020. Monitoring of suction bucket jackets for offshore wind turbines: dynamic load bearing behaviour and modelling. Mar Struct. 72. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102745.
   Google Scholar
• Plodpradit P, Kwon O, Dinh VN, Murphy J, Kim K-D. 2020. Suction bucket pile-soil-structure interactions of offshore wind turbine jacket foundations using coupled dynamic analysis. J Mar Sci Eng. 8(6). doi:10.3390/jmse8060416.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan SF. 2018. Fatigue analysis on jacket transportation. China Offshore Platf. 33(3):82–87.
   Google Scholar
• Shadlou M, Bhattacharya S. 2016. Dynamic stiffness of monopiles supporting offshore wind turbine generators. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 88:15–32. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Smart G, Smith A, Warner E, Sperstad IB, Prinsen B, Lacal-Arántegui R. 2016. IEA Wind Task 26: Offshore Wind Farm Baseline Documentation. United States: N. p. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Stone KJL, Arshi HS, Zdravkovic L. 2018. Use of a bearing plate to enhance the lateral capacity of monopiles in sand. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng. 144(8). doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001913.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira M, Maciel G, Henriques E, Reis L. 2019. A new proposal for an offshore wind foundation for transitional waters. Mar Struct. 68. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.102657.
   Google Scholar
• Vergassola M, Cabboi A, van der Male P, Iop. 2020. Comparative analysis of offshore support structures for two-bladed large wind turbines (10 + MW) in deep waters. Paper presented at: the Conference on Science of Making Torque from Wind (TORQUE), Delft Univ Technol, Wind Energy Inst, ELECTR NETWORK. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052076.
   Google Scholar
• Vestas MHI. 2019. MHI Vestas achieves final turbine installation at Horns Reef 3. Technical Report; Vestas: Aarhus N, Aarhus, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Wang JJ, Lu R, Lu N. 2003. Truss spar strength and fatigue analysis for Wet Tow. Proceedings of the International offshore and polar engineering conference; ISOPE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zeng X, Li J, Yang X, Wang H. 2018. A review on recent advancements of substructures for offshore wind turbines. Energy Convers Manage. 158:103–119. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.061.
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Hu Y, Li Y, Yang J, Duan L, Wang T, Adcock T, Jiang Z, Gao Z, Lin Z, et al. 2019. Foundations of offshore wind turbines: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 104:379–393. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar