Hydroforming and buckling of toroids with polyhedral sections

References

• Alves LM, Martins PAF. 2010. Forming of thin-walled tubes into toroidal shells. J Mater Process Technol. 210(4):689–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ASTM] American Society for Testing and Materials. 2004. ASTM a240/240M-15a: standard specification for chromium and chromium-nickel stainless steel plate, sheet, and strip for pressure vessels and for general applications. ASTM Int. I:12.
   Google Scholar
• Błachut J. 2003. Collapse tests on externally pressurized toroids. J Press Vessel Technol Trans ASME. 125(1):91–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Błachut J. 2004. Buckling and first ply failure of composite toroidal pressure hull. Comput Struct. 82(23–26):1981–1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blachut J, Jaiswal OR. 2000. On buckling of toroidal shells under external pressure. Comput Struct. 77(3):233–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CCS]. 2013. Rules for the classification and construction of diving systems and submersibles. Published by China Classification Society in 2013. Beijing: China.
   Google Scholar
• Du Q, Cui W, Zhang B. 2015a. Buckling characteristics of a circular toroidal shell with stiffened ribs. Ocean Eng. 108:325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Q, Zou G, Zhang B, Wan Z. 2015b. Simplified theoretical solution of circular toroidal shell with ribs under uniform external pressure. Thin-Walled Struct. 96:49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duc ND. 2014. Nonlinear static and dynamic stability of functionally graded plates and shells. Vietnam: Vietnam Natl Univ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duc ND, Vuong PM. 2022. Nonlinear vibration response of shear deformable FGM sandwich toroidal shell segments. Meccanica. 57(5):1083–1103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galletly GD, Blachut J. 1995. Stability of complete circular and non-circular toroidal shells. J Mech Eng Sci. 209:245–255.
   Google Scholar
• GB/T 24511-2017. Stainless steel and heat resisting steel plate, sheet and strip for pressure equipments.
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi J, Helm J, Sheets CL. 1994. New method in design and manufacturing of fluid-filled multi-layered spherical pressure vessels. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 58:355–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi J, Zheng QS. 1994. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of hydrostatic bulging of an integral polyhedron into a spherical vessel. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 60:133–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He ZB, Yuan SJ, Wang ZR. 2008. Deformation of revolving closed-shell with multi-curvature profile under inner pressure. J Mater Process Technol. 206(1–3):400–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiammeepreecha W, Chucheepsakul S. 2017. Nonlinear static analysis of an underwater elastic semi-toroidal shell. Thin-Walled Struct. 116:12–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan PF. 1973. Buckling of toroidal shells under hydrostatic pressure. AIAA J. 11(10):1439–1441.
   Google Scholar
• Oh IY, Han SW, Woo YY, Ra JH, Moon YH. 2018. Tubular blank design to fabricate an elbow tube by a push-bending process. J Mater Process Technol. 260:112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietraszkiewicz W, Konopińska V. 2015. Junctions in shell structures: A review. Thin-Walled Struct. 95:310–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasty J. 2017. Integral hydro-bulge forming of single and multi-layered spherical pressure vessels. J Press Vessel Technol Trans ASME. 115:249–255.
   Google Scholar
• Ross CTF. 2005. A conceptual design of an underwater missile launcher. Ocean Eng. 32(1):85–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross CTF. 2006. A conceptual design of an underwater vehicle. Ocean Eng. 33(16):2087–2104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan S, Lang L, Ge Y. 2018. Hydroforming process for an ultrasmall bending radius elbow. Adv Mater Sci Eng . 2018:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart B. 1980. Adventures among the toroids: A study of orientable polyhedra with regular faces (2nd ed).
   Google Scholar
• Teng BG, Yuan SJ, Wang ZR. 2001. Experiment and numerical simulation of hydro-forming toroidal shells with different initial structure. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 78(1):31–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng BG, Yuan SJ, Wang ZR. 2002. Effect of the initial structure on the hydro-forming of toroidal shells. J Mater Process Technol. 123(1):18–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong PM, Duc ND. 2018. Nonlinear response and buckling analysis of eccentrically stiffened FGM toroidal shell segments in thermal environment. Aerosp Sci Technol. 79:383–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong PM, Duc ND. 2020a. Nonlinear static and dynamic stability of functionally graded toroidal shell segments under axial compression. Thin-Walled Struct. 155:106973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong PM, Duc ND. 2020b. Nonlinear vibration of FGM moderately thick toroidal shell segment within the framework of Reddy’s third order-shear deformation shell theory. Int J Mech Mater Des. 16(2):245–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong PM, Duc ND. 2020c. Nonlinear buckling and post-buckling behavior of shear deformable sandwich toroidal shell segments with functionally graded core subjected to axial compression and thermal loads. Aerosp Sci Technol. 106:106084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CY. 2005. Buckling and postbuckling of segmented tubes under external pressure. Int J Non Linear Mech. 40(4):551–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZR. 2018. Shell and Tube Hydroforming: Mechanics of Dieless Closed Shell Hydro-Bulging (pp. 343–364).
   Google Scholar
• Wang ZR, Liu G, Yuan SJ, Teng BG, He ZB. 2005. Progress in shell hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol. 167:230–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan S, Fan X. 2019. Developments and perspectives on the precision forming processes for ultra-large size integrated components. Int J Extrem Manuf. 1(2), 022002.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan S, Teng B, Wang ZR. 2001. A new hydroforming process for large elbow pipes. J Mater Process Technol. 117:28–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan S, Wang ZR, He Q. 1999. Finite element analysis of hydro-forming process of a toroidal shell. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 39(9):1439–1450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan SJ, Xu Z, Wang ZR, Hai W. 1998. The integrally hydro-forming process of pipe elbows. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 75:7–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan SJ, Zhang WW, Teng BG. 2015. Research on hydro-forming of combined ellipsoidal shells with two axis length ratios. J Mater Process Technol. 219:124–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan HJ, Redekop D. 2008. Vibration, buckling and collapse of ovaloid toroidal tanks. Thin-Walled Struct. 46(4):380–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Dai M, Wang F, Tang W, Zhao X. 2020. Theoretical and experimental study of the free hydroforming of egg-shaped shell. Ships Offshore Struct. 0(0):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Dai M, Wang F, Tang W, Zhao X. 2021. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping Buckling performance of egg-shaped shells fabricated through free hydroforming. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 193:104435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Di C, Wang F, Tang W. 2021. Buckling of segmented toroids under external pressure. Ocean Eng. 239:109921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang F, Wang F, Tang W, Zhao X. 2021. Free bulging of thin-walled cylinders closed by two heavy plates. Ocean Eng. 223:108646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang F, Wang F, Zhao X, Tang W, Chen F. 2021. Thin-Walled structures Buckling properties of bulged barrels under external pressure. Thin-Walled Struct. 168:108226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang X, Tang W, Wang F, Yin B. 2020. Experimental and numerical buckling analysis of toroidal shell segments under uniform external pressure. Thin-Walled Struct. 150:106689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang X, Tang W, Wang F, Zhu Y. 2021. Non-linear collapse behavior of externally pressurized resin toroidal and cylindrical shells: numerical and experimental studies. Ships Offshore Struct. 16(5):529–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Wang ZR. 2015. Shape improvement of a dieless hydro-bulged sphere made of hexagonal and pentagonal shaped panels. J Mater Process Technol. 220:87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Zhang WW, Yuan SJ. 2017. Research on hydro-forming of spherical shells with different preform types. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 92(5–8):2631–2638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang WW, Yuan SJ. 2016. Research on hydro-forming of combined prolate ellipsoidal shell with double generating lines. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 82(1–4):595–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang WW, Yuan SJ. 2017. Reverse geometric modeling for pre-form shape of prolate ellipsoid before hydro-forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 88(5–8):1903–1909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingoni A. 2015. Liquid-containment shells of revolution: A review of recent studies on strength, stability and dynamics. Thin-Walled Struct. 87:102–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingoni A, Enoma N, Govender N. 2015. Equatorial bending of an elliptic toroidal shell. Thin-Walled Struct. 96:286–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar