Carbon footprint and cost analysis of renewable hydrogen-fuelled ships

References

• Aldersey-Williams J, Rubert T. 2019. Levelised cost of energy – a theoretical justification and critical assessment. Energ Policy. 124:169–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhaledi AN, Sampath S, Pilidis P. 2021. A hydrogen fuelled LH2 tanker ship design. Ships Offsh Struct. 1–10. doi:10.1080/1744530220211935626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar NR. 2018. Energy- and cost-efficiency analysis of greenhouse gas emission reduction using slow steaming of ships: case study RO-RO cargo vessel. Ships Offsh Struct. 13:868–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar NR. 2019. An environmental and economic analysis of methanol fuel for a cellular container ship. Transport Res D. 69:66–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar NR, Seddiek IS. 2017. Eco-environmental analysis of ship emission control methods: case study RO-RO cargo vessel. Ocean Eng. 137:166–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar NR, Seddiek IS. 2020a. Enhancing energy efficiency for new generations of containerized shipping. Ocean Eng. 215:107887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar NR, Seddiek IS. 2020b. An environmental and economic analysis of emission reduction strategies for container ships with emphasis on the improved energy efficiency indexes. Environ Sci Pollut R. 27:23342–23355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar NR, Seddiek IS. 2021a. Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel. Environ Sci Pollut R. 28:37851–37866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar NR, Seddiek IS. 2021b. Wind assisted propulsion system onboard ships: case study Flettner rotors. Ships Offsh Struct. 1–12. doi:10.1080/17445302.2021.1937797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonopoulos S, Visser K, Kalikatzarakis M, Reppa V. 2021. MPC framework for the energy management of hybrid ships with an energy storage system. J Mar Sci Eng. 9 (9):993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banawan AA, El Gohary MM, Sadek IS. 2010. Environmental and economical benefits of changing from marine diesel oil to natural-gas fuel for short-voyage high-power passenger ships. P I Mech Eng M-J Eng. 224:103–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristowe G, Smallbone A. 2021. The key techno-economic and manufacturing drivers for reducing the cost of power-to-gas and a hydrogen-enabled energy system. Hydrogen. 2 (3):273–300.
   Google Scholar
• Bunkerworld. 2021. Fuel prices. Available from: http://www.bunkerworld.com/prices/
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer LC, Niemann AL, Hauschild MZ. 2003. Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 8:191–200.
   Google Scholar
• DNV. 2021. Future Marine Fuels. [Online] [accessed 2021 July 10]. https://www.teknologisk.dk/_/media/81392_5_Future%20Marine%20Fuels-DNV-March2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Elgohary MM, Seddiek IS, Salem AM. 2014. Overview of alternative fuels with emphasis on the potential of liquefied natural gas as future marine fuel. Proc Inst Mech Eng M: J Eng Maritime Environ. 229:365–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eudy L, Post M. 2018. Fuel cell buses in U.S. transit fleets: current status 2018. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-5400-72208.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspars-Wieloch H. 2019. Project net present value estimation under uncertainty. Central Europ J Oper Res. 27:179-197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghenai C, Bettayeb M, Brdjanin B, Hamid AK. 2019. Hybrid solar PV/PEM fuel cell/diesel generator power system for cruise ship: a case study in Stockholm, Sweden. Case Stud Therm Eng. 14:100497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gössling S, Meyer-Habighorst C, Humpe A. 2021. A global review of marine air pollution policies, their scope and effectiveness. Ocean Coast Manag. 212:105824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh CC, Felby C. 2017. Biofuels for the marine shipping sector. IEA bioenergy. Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• Iannaccone T, Landucci G, Tugnoli A, Salzano E, Cozzani V. 2020. Sustainability of cruise ship fuel systems: comparison among LNG and diesel technologies. J Clean Prod. 260:121069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inal OB, Deniz C. 2020. Assessment of fuel cell types for ships: based on multi-criteria decision analysis. J Clean Prod. 265:121734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2021. The Physical Science Basis: United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2020. Forth IMO GHG study 2020. Full Report. International Maritime Organization, London. [Online] [accessed 2021 December 17]. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Fourth-IMO-Greenhouse-Gas-Study-2020.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2021. Revised MARPOL Annex VI. [Online] [accessed 2021 July 17]. https://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/pdf/activities/statutory/eexi/eexi_MEPC_328_76.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong B, Wang H, Oguz E, Zhou P. 2018. An effective framework for life cycle and cost assessment for marine vessels aiming to select optimal propulsion systems. J Clean Prod. 187:111–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joung T-H, Kang S-G, Lee J-K, Ahn J. 2020. The IMO initial strategy for reducing greenhouse Gas(GHG) emissions, and its follow-up actions towards 2050. J Int Maritime Safe Environ Affair Shipping. 4:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kistner L, Schubert FL, Minke C, Bensmann A, Hanke-Rauschenbach R. 2021. Techno-economic and environmental comparison of internal combustion engines and solid oxide fuel cells for ship applications. J Power Sources. 508:230328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopasz JP, Ahluwalia RK, Papadias D, Wang X, Krause T. 2021. Potential role of hydrogen and fuel cells for maritime applications: ferries and towboats. Transportation research board 100th annual meeting; 2021 Jan 5 to 2021 Jan 29; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Lee H-J, Yoo S-H, Huh S-Y. 2020. Economic benefits of introducing LNG-fuelled ships for imported flour in South Korea. Transport Res D: Transport Environ. 78:102220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstad E, Borgen H, Eskeland GS, Paalson C, Psaraftis H, Turan O. 2019. The need to amend IMO’s EEDI to include a threshold for performance in waves (realistic sea conditions) to achieve the desired GHG reductions. Sustainability. 11 (13):3668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAN. 2015. Using Methanol Fuel in the MAN B&W ME-LGI Series. [Online] [accessed 2021 March 20]. https://www.mandieselturbo.com/docs/default-source/shopwaredocuments/using-methanol-fuel-in-the-man-b-w-me-lgi-series.pdf?sfvrsn=4.
   Google Scholar
• Marine Traffic. 2021. NAMMA EXPRESS. Ro-Ro Cargo, IMO: 8009064. [Online] [accessed 2021 December 22]. https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/ships/shipid:475263/mmsi:403289000/imo:8009064/vessel:NAMMA_EXPRESS.
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay CJ, Turnock SR, Hudson DA. 2021. Fuel cells for shipping: to meet on-board auxiliary demand and reduce emissions. Energy Rep. 7:63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ölçer A, Kitada M, Dalaklis D, Ballini F. 2018. Trends and challenges in maritime energy management. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74576-3
   Google Scholar
• Perčić M, Vladimir N, Fan A. 2020. Life-cycle cost assessment of alternative marine fuels to reduce the carbon footprint in short-sea shipping: a case study of Croatia. Appl Energ. 279:115848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perčić M, Vladimir N, Fan A. 2021. Techno-economic assessment of alternative marine fuels for inland shipping in Croatia. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 148:111363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psaraftis HN. 2021. Shipping decarbonization in the aftermath of MEPC 76. Clean Log Suppl Chain. 1:100008.
   Google Scholar
• Vessel Tracking. 2021. ALRIYADH (IMO 9441776) - Passenger/Ro-Ro Cargo Ship. [Online] [accessed 2021 December 22]. https://www.vesseltracking.net/ship/alriyadh-9441776.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Schertzer D, Tchiguirinskaia I. 2021. Assessing cost-effectiveness of nature-based solutions scenarios: integrating hydrological impacts and life cycle costs. J Clean Prod. 329:129740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivarolo M, Rattazzi D, Lamberti T, Magistri L. 2020. Clean energy production by PEM fuel cells on tourist ships: a time-dependent analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 45:25747–25757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadek I, Elgohary M. 2020. Assessment of renewable energy supply for green ports with a case study. Environ Sci Pollut R. 27:5547–5558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seddiek IS. 2016. Two-step strategies towards fuel saving and emissions reduction onboard ships. Ships Offsh Struct. 11:791–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddiek IS. 2020. Application of renewable energy technologies for eco-friendly sea ports. Ships Offsh Struct. 15:953–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddiek IS, Ammar NR. 2021. Harnessing wind energy on merchant ships: case study Flettner rotors onboard bulk carriers. Environ Sci Pollut R. 28:32695–32707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo S, Chu B, Noh Y, Jang W, Lee S, Seo Y, Chang D. 2016. An economic evaluation of operating expenditures for LNG fuel gas supply systems onboard ocean-going ships considering availability. Ships Offsh Struct. 11:213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serbin S, Washchilenko N, Cherednichenko O, Burunsuz K, Dzida M, Chen D. 2022. Application analysis of a hybrid solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine system for marine power plants. Ships Offsh Struct. 17:866–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welaya YMA, El Gohary MM, Ammar NR. 2011. A comparison between fuel cells and other alternatives for marine electric power generation. Int J Nav Arch Ocean. 3:141–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Pan X, Han Z, Zhao D, Liu B, Zheng D, Yan Z. 2018. Removal of NOx and SO2 from simulated ship emissions using wet scrubbing based on seawater electrolysis technology. Chem Eng J. 331:8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zincir B, Deniz C, Tunér M. 2019. Investigation of environmental, operational and economic performance of methanol partially premixed combustion at slow speed operation of a marine engine. J Clean Prod. 235:1006–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žižlavský O. 2014. Net present value approach: method for economic assessment of innovation projects. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 156:506–512.
   Google Scholar