A novel transformation kernel density estimation method for predicting design force values of wave energy converters

References

• Chai W, Leira BJ. 2018. Environmental contours based on inverse SORM. Mar Struct. 60:34–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarindo G, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C. 2021. Environmental wave contours by inverse FORM and Monte Carlo simulation with variance reduction techniques. Ocean Eng. 228:1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe RG, Michelen C, Eckert-Gallup AC, Yu Y, van Rij J. 2016. WDRT: a toolbox for design-response analysis of wave energy converters. Proceedings of the 4th Marine Energy Technology Symposium (METS); Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert-Gallup A, Martin N. 2016. Kernel density estimation (KDE) with adaptive bandwidth selection for environmental contours of extreme sea states. Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE OCEANS 2016; Monterey, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards SJ, Coe RG. 2019. The effect of environmental contour selection on expected wave energy converter response. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 141(1):011901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselsteiner AF, Coe RG, Manuel L, Nguyen PT, Martin N, Eckert-Gallup AA. 2019. Benchmarking exercise on estimating extreme environmental conditions: methodology and baseline results. ASME 2019 38th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering; American Society Of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection; ASME: Glasgow, Scotland, UK, Volume 3.
   Google Scholar
• Haselsteiner AF, Mackay E, Thoben KD. 2021. Reducing conservatism in highest density environmental contours. Appl Ocean Res. 117:102936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselsteiner AF, Ohlendorf JH, Wosniok W, Thoben KD. 2017. Deriving environmental contours from highest density regions. Coast Eng. 123:42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselsteiner AF, Thoben KD. 2020. Predicting wave heights for marine design by prioritizing extreme events in a global model. Renew Energ. 156:1146–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haver S, Winterstein S. 2009. Environmental contour lines: a method for estimating long term extremes by a short term analysis. Trans Soc Naval Architects Mar Eng. 116:116–127.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay E, Haselsteiner AF. 2021. Marginal and total exceedance probabilities of environmental contours. Mar Struct. 75:102863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel L, Nguyen PTT, Canning J, Coe RG, Eckert-Gallup AC, Martin N. 2018. Alternative approaches to develop environmental contours from metocean data. J Ocean Eng and Mar Energ. 4:293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiesen J, Bitner-Gregersen E. 1990. Joint distributions for significant wave height and wave zero-up-crossing period. Appl Ocean Res. 12(2):93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochi MK. 2005. Ocean waves: the stochastic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt M. 1952. Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann Math Stat. 23(3):470–472.
   Google Scholar
• Ross E, Astrup OC, Bitner-Gregersen E, Bunn N, Feld G, Gouldby B, Huseby A, Liu Y, Randell D, Vanem E, Jonathan P P. 2020. On environmental contours for marine and coastal design. Ocean Eng. 195:106194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman BW. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wand MP, Jones MC. 1995. Kernel smoothing. New York: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wand MP, Marron JS, Ruppert D. 1991. Transformations in density estimation (with comments). J Amer Statist Assoc. 86:343–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YG. 2018. A novel simulation method for predicting power outputs of wave energy converters. Appl. Ocean Res. 80:37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YG. 2019. Efficient prediction of wave energy converters power output considering bottom effects. Ocean Eng. 181:89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YG. 2020a. A robust methodology for displaying two-dimensional environmental contours at two offshore sites. J Mar Sci Technol. 25:1063–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YG. 2020b. A novel environmental contour method for predicting long-term extreme wave conditions. Renew Energ. 162:926–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YG. 2021a. A robust methodology for predicting extreme structural responses of offshore wind turbines. Ships Offshore Struc. 16(10):1078–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YG. 2021b. A new method for predicting the extreme dynamic responses of wave energy converters. Proc Inst Civ Eng: Marit Eng. 174(3):81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YG. 2022a. A robust environmental contour method for designing offshore structures. IJST-T Civ Eng, 2022, 46(6): 4677–4687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YG. 2022b. A new method for structural safety and reliability analysis of offshore wind turbines. Proc Inst Civ Eng Marit Eng. 175(3):78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winterstein S, Ude T, Cornell C, Bjerager P, Haver S. 1993. Environmental parameters for extreme response: inverse FORM with omission factors. ICOSSAR-93; Innsbruck, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Wrang L, Katsidoniotaki E, Nilsson E, Rutgersson A, Rydén J, Göteman M. 2021. Comparative analysis of environmental contour approaches to estimating extreme waves for offshore installations for the Baltic Sea and the North Sea. J Mar Sci Eng. 9(1):96–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YL, Dong S. 2022. Comparison of environmental contour and response-based approaches for system reliability analysis of floating structures. Struct Saf. 94:102150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YL, Dong S. 2022. Design load estimation with IFORM-based models considering long-term extreme response for mooring systems. Ships Offshore Struc. 17(3):541–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar