Numerical study of energy capture equipment using tanker rolling motion for different wave heights and encounter angles

References

• Ahn S, Neary VS, Haas KA. 2022. Global wave energy resource classification system for regional energy planning and project development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 162:112438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Shami E, Wang Z, Wang X. 2021. Non-linear dynamic simulations of two-body wave energy converters via identification of viscous drag coefficients of different shapes of the submerged body based on numerical wave tank CFD simulation. Renew Energy. 179:983–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baniela SI. 2017. Roll motion of a ship and the roll stabilising effect of bilge keels. J Navig. 144:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Begovic E, Gatin I, Jasak H, Rinauro B. 2020. CFD simulations for surf-riding occurrence assessment. Ocean Eng. 218:107975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordogna G, Muggiasca S, Giappino S, Belloli M, Keuning JA, Huijsmans RHM. 2020. The effects of the aerodynamic interaction on the performance of two Flettner rotors. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 196:104024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burhanudin J, Abu Hasim AS, Ishak AM, Burhanudin J, Dardin SMFBSM. 2022. A review of power electronics for nearshore wave energy converter applications. IEEE Access. 10:16670–16680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Huo Y, Shi X, Liu Y. 2022. Numerical and experimental research on a resonance-based wave energy converter. Energy Convers Manag. 269:116152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng P, Liang N, Li R, Lan H, Cheng Q. 2020. Analysis of influence of ship roll on ship power system with renewable energy. Energies. 13:1.
   Google Scholar
• Cui FD, Daskiran C, King T, Robinson B, Lee K, Katz J, Boufadel MC. 2020. Modeling oil dispersion under breaking waves. Part I: wave hydrodynamics. Environ Fluid Mech. 20(6):1527–1551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curto D, Franzitta V, Guercio A, Trapanese M. 2022. Testing a linear ironless generator for the sea wave energy harvesting. In: Oceans 2022. New York: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Deiterding R, Domingues Margarete O, Schneider K. 2020. Multiresolution analysis as a criterion for effective dynamic mesh adaptation – a case study for Euler equations in the SAMR framework AMROC. Comput Fluids. 205:104583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng XL. 2015. Numerical simulation of Vortex induced vibrations using PC Newmark-β-based fluid-structure interaction method [Doctoral dissertation]. Zhejiang University.
   Google Scholar
• Deü JF, Matignon D. 2010. Simulation of fractionally damped mechanical systems by means of a newmark-diffusive scheme. Compute Math Appl. 59(5):1745–1753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan Y, Zheng Q, Jiang B. 2020. Use of computational fluid dynamics to implement an aerodynamic inverse design method based on exact Riemann solution and moving wall boundary. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 14(1):284–298.
   Google Scholar
• Farshi B, Assadi A. 2011. Development of a chaotic nonlinear tuned mass damper for optimal vibration response. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat. 16:4514–4523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo BJ, Steen S. 2011. Comparison of numerical methods for wave generation by VOF-based numerical wave tank. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE, Rotterdam. 2011-49777.
   Google Scholar
• Guo CY, Xu P, Wang C, Kan Z. 2019. Numerical and experimental study of blockage effect correction method in towing tank. China Ocean Eng. 33(5):522–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid RT, Hassan G, Hashem N. 2018. Seakeeping performance estimation of the container ship under irregular wave condition using artificial neural network. Am J Civ Eng Archit. 6:147–153.
   Google Scholar
• Huang S, Sheng SW, You YG, Gerthoffert A, Wang WS, Wang ZP. 2018. Numerical study of a novel flex mooring system of the floating wave energy converter in ultra-shallow water and experimental validation. Ocean Eng. 151:342–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issakhov A, Zhandaulet Y. 2020. Numerical simulation of dam break waves on movable beds for various forms of the obstacle by VOF method. Water Resour Manage. 34(8):2269–2289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatuğ C, Durmuşoğlu Y. 2020. Design of a solar photovoltaic system for a Ro-Ro ship and estimation of performance analysis: a case study. Sol Energy. 207:1259–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan H, Wen SL, Hong YY, Yu DC, Zhang LJ. 2015. Optimal sizing of hybrid PV/diesel/battery in ship power system. Appl Energy. 158:26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li BY, Zhang R, Zhang BS, Deng F, Cui Y. 2022. A scheme for capturing the kinetic energy of the flow liquid in a ship’s cabin. Ocean Eng. 266(3):112973.
   Google Scholar
• Mallouppas G, Yfantis EA. 2021. Decarbonization in shipping industry: a review of research, technology development, and innovation proposals. J Mar Sci Eng. 9:415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmark NM. 1959. A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div. 85(3):67–94.
   Google Scholar
• Nizamani M, Nizamani Z, Nakayama A, Osman M. 2022. Analysis of loads caused by waves on the deck near the free surface of the offshore platform using computational fluid dynamics. Ships Offshore Struct. 17:1964–1974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddiek IS, Ammar NR. 2022. Carbon footprint and cost analysis of renewable hydrogen-fuelled ships. Ships Offsh Struct. doi:10.1080/17445302.2022.2093031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng SW, Wang KL, Lin HJ, Zhang YQ, You YG, Wang ZP. 2019. Real Sea condition test of 100 kW eagle wave power generation device ‘Wanshan’. Acta Energ Sol Sin. 40:709–714. 0254-0096: 03-0709-06.
   Google Scholar
• Song BW, Ding WJ, Mao ZY. 2012. Conversion system of ocean buoys based on wave energy. J Mech Eng. 48. doi:10.3901/JME.2012.12.139.
   Google Scholar
• Soonseok S, Saishuai D, Yigit KD, Mehmet A, Sandy D, Osman T. 2021. Experimental and theoretical study of the effect of hull roughness on ship resistance. J Ship Res. 65(1):62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong CF, Wei ZY, Meng YQ. 2020. Port & Waterway Engineering. doi:10.16233/j.cnki.issn1002-4972.20200303.015.
   Google Scholar
• Ulveseter JV, Thorsen MJ, Sævik S, Larsen CM. 2017. Stochastic modelling of cross-flow vortex-induced vibrations. Mar Struct. 56:260–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang DW, Mo JL, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Ouyang H, Zhou ZR. 2017. The effect of the grooved elastic damping component in reducing friction-induced vibration. Tribol Int. 110:264–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JD, He GH, You R, Liu PF. 2018. Numerical study on interaction of a solitary wave with the submerged obstacle. Ocean Eng. 158:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Song BW, Mao ZY, Tian WL, Zhang TY. 2020. Numerical investigation on VIV suppression of the cylinder with the bionic surface inspired by giant cactus. Ocean Eng. 214:107775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YJ, Yu JH. 2016. Enhancement of rolling energy conversion of a boat using an eccentric rotor revolving in a hula-hoop motion. Ocean Eng. 116:21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu PC, Lin CY. 2021. Strategies for the low sulfur policy of IMO – an example of a container vessel sailing through a European route. J Mar Sci Eng. 9:1383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Q, Zhang TM, Pan YJ, Zhang ZT, Yuan YP, Liu YJ. 2019. A novel oscillating buoy wave energy harvester based on a spatial double X-shaped mechanism for self-powered sensors in sea-crossing bridges. Energy Convers Manage. 204:112286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav SS, DebRoy P. 2022. Generation of stable linear waves in shallow water in a numerical wave tank. J Appl Fluid Mech. 15:537–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamac HI, Koca A. 2021. Numerical analysis of wave energy converting systems in case of using piezoelectric materials for energy harvesting. J Mar Eng Technol. 20:138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao KH, Zhang KP, Zhang YC, You FJ, Wang CM, Xiao JJ, Sun DH. 2020. Damping characteristic study of ship bionic antirolling device. Ships Offsh Struct. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1816707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan YP, Wang JX, Yan XP, Li Q, Long T. 2018. A design and experimental investigation of a large-scale solar energy/diesel generator powered hybrid ship. Energy. 165:965–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang BS, Wang KH, Song BW, Mao ZY, Tian WL. 2018. Numerical investigation on the effect of the cross-sectional aspect ratio of a rectangular cylinder in FIM on hydrokinetic energy conversion. Energy. 165:949–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YQ, Sheng SW, You YG. 2019. Development status and application direction of wave energy generation technology. Adv New Renew Energy. 7:374–378. 2095-560X: 04-0374-05.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng M, Zhang X, Zhang L, Teng H, Hu J, Hu M. 2018. Uniform test method optimum design for drag-type modified savonius VAWTs by CFD numerical simulation. Arab J Sci Eng. 43(9):4453–4461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou GY. 2015. Design of ship loaded wave energy power device. Ship Sci Technol. 37. doi:10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2015.07.051.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou JL, Zhao JB, Zhu FS, Wang YG, Cui TY. 2019. Analysis on movement and load of seesaw wave energy generator. China Ship Repair. 32. doi:10.13352/j.issn.1001-8328.2019.02.007.
   Google Scholar