Experimental investigation of the effect of sail geometry on the flow around the SUBOFF submarine model inspired by the dolphin’s dorsal fin

References

• Barlow JB, Rae WH, Pope A. 1999. Low-speed wind tunnel testing. Wiley. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Beckwith TG, Marangoni RD, Lienhard JH. 1993. Mechanical measurements. Addison-Wesley. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Beigi SM, Shateri A, Manshadi MD. 2020. Numerical investigation of the effect of the location of stern planes on submarine wake flow. Ocean Syst Eng. 10(3):289–316.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges DH, Blanton JN, Brewer WH, Park JT. 2003. Experimental investigation of the flow past a submarine at angle of drift. AIAA J. 41(1):71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Devenport WJ, Agarwal NK, Dewitz MB, Simpson RL, Poddar K. 1990. Effects of a fillet on the flow past a wing-body junction. AIAA J. 28(12):2017–2024. doi:10.2514/3.10517.
   Google Scholar
• Devenport WJ, Simpson RL, Dewitz MB, Agarwal NK. 1992. Effects of a leading-edge fillet on the flow past an appendage-body junction. AIAA J. 30(9):2177–2183. doi:10.2514/3.11201.
   Google Scholar
• Efremov DV, Milanov EM. 2019. Hydrodynamics of DARPA SUBOFF submarine at shallowly immersion conditions. TransNav. 13(2):337–342. doi:10.12716/1001.13.02.09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidler JE, Smith CA. 1978. Methods for prediction submersible hydrodynamic characteristics. Nielsen Engineering & Research incorporated. Report: NCSC TM-238-78.
   Google Scholar
• Fox RW, McDonald AT, Pritchard PJ. 2004. Introduction to fluid mechanics. Wiley. Hoboken, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Fretes ER, Djatmiko EB, Wardhana W. 2013. Methods for prediction submersible hydrodynamic characteristics. Nielsen Engineering & Research incorporated. Report: NCSC TM-238-78.
   Google Scholar
• Gorski JJ. 2001. Marine vortices and their computation. NSWC. MD 20817-5700. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Groves NC, Huang TT, Chang MS, Center DTR. 1989. Geometric Characteristics of DARPA Suboff Models: (DTRC Model Nos. 5470 and 5471). David Taylor Research Center. https://books.google.com/books?id=e51InwEACAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Huang T, Liu HL, Groves N, Forlini T, Blanton J, Gowing S. 1992. Measurements of flows over an axisymmetric body with various appendages in a wind tunnel: the DARPA SUBOFF experimental program. Ninet Symp Nav Hydrodyn; Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez Juan M, Hultmark M, Smits AJ. 2010. The intermediate wake of a body of revolution at high Reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech. 659:516–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li Y, Shang D. 2019. The hydrodynamic noise suppression of a scaled submarine model by leading-edge serrations. J Mar Sci Eng. 7(3):68–94. doi:10.3390/jmse7030068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Xiong Y, Wang Z, Wang S, Tu C. 2011. Experimental study on effect of a new vortex control baffler and its influencing factor. China Ocean Eng. 25(1):83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manshadi MD, Hejranfar K, Farajollahi AH. 2017. Effect of vortex generators on hydrodynamic behavior of an underwater axisymmetric hull at high angles of attack. J Visualization. 20:559–579. DOI:10.1007/s12650-016-0412-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renilson M. 2018. Submarine hydrodynamic. 2nd ed. Springer International Publishing. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Saeidinezhad A, Dehghan A, Manshadi MD. 2015. Experimental investigation of hydrodynamic characteristics of a submersible vehicle model with a nonaxisymmetric nose in pitch maneuver. Ocean Eng. 100:26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevgi G, Barlas B, Unal UO. 2022. Investigation of the effect of the flow regulators on the flow around a generic submarine sail. J Nav Sci Eng. 18(2):251–279.
   Google Scholar
• Shariati SK, Mousavizadegan SH. 2017. The effect of appendages on the hydrodynamic characteristics of an underwater vehicle near the free surface. Appl Ocean Res. 67:31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson RL. 2001. Junction flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 33(1):415–443. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.33.1.415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreenivas K, Hyams D, Mitchell D. 2003. Physics based simulation of Reynolds number effects in vortex intensive incompressible flows. NATO Research and Technology Organisation. DTIC Document.
   Google Scholar
• Toxopeus S, Roderik K, Kerkvliet M, Hoeijmakers H, Nienhuis B. 2014. Improvement of resistance and wake field of an underwater vehicle by optimising the fin-body junction flow with CFD. 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2014); San Francisco. doi:10.1115/OMAE2014-23784.
   Google Scholar
• Treaster AL, Yocum AM. 1978. The calibration and application of five-hole probes. Pennsylvania State Univ University Park Applied Research Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Huang Q, Pan G. 2021. Numerical research on the influence of sail leading edge shapes on the hydrodynamic noise of a submarine. Appl Ocean Res. 117(6):102935–102951. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2021.102935.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo SJ, Hong SY, Song JH, Seol HS. 2022. Analysis of the effect of vortex reduction structures on submarine tonal noise via frequency-domain method employing thickness noise source. Ocean Eng. 257:111640–111654. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Dong K, Wang X, Feng D. 2022. Hydrodynamic interaction study during surface ship overtaking submarine. Ocean Eng. 265:112602–112615. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Shen HC, Yao HZ. 2005. Validation of numerical simulation on resistance and flow field of submarine and numerical optimization of submarine hull form. J Ship Mech. 9(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Li H, Pang Y, Chen Q, Yan P. 2018. Experimental investigation on roll stability of blunt-nose submarine in buoyantly rising maneuvers. Appl Ocean Res. 81(9):34–46. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2018.09.011.
   Google Scholar