Marine vessel energy efficiency performance prediction based on daily reported noon reports

References

• Adland R, Cariou P, Jia H, Wolff FC. 2018. The energy efficiency effects of periodic ship hull cleaning. J Cleaner Prod. 178:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen P, Borrod AS, Blanchot H. 2005. Evaluation of the service performance of ships. Marine Technol SNAME News. 42(04):177–183.
   Google Scholar
• Barelli L, Bidini G, Gallorini F, Iantorno F, Pane N, Ottaviano PA, Trombetti L. 2018. Dynamic modeling of a hybrid propulsion system for tourist boat. Energies. 11(10):2592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar M, Nuran M. 2022. Multi-criteria decision making using TOPSIS method for battery type selection in hybrid propulsion system. Trans Maritime Sci. 11(1):0–0.
   Google Scholar
• Bayraktar M, Pamik M, Sokukcu M, Yuksel O. 2023. A SWOT-AHP analysis on biodiesel as an alternative future marine fuel. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennabi N, Charpentier JF, Menana H, Billard JY, Genet P. 2016. Hybrid propulsion systems for small ships: context and challenges. In: 2016 XXII international conference on electrical machines (ICEM), September. Lausanne, Switzerland: IEEE; p. 2948–2954.
   Google Scholar
• Beşikçi EB, Arslan O, Turan O, Ölçer AI. 2016. An artificial neural network based decision support system for energy efficient ship operations. Comput Oper Res. 66:393–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialystocki N, Konovessis D. 2016. On the estimation of ship's fuel consumption and speed curve: a statistical approach. J Ocean Eng Sci. 1(2):157–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsæter A, Vanem E. 2018. Ship speed prediction based on full scale sensor measurements of shaft thrust and environmental conditions. Ocean Eng. 162:316–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capasso C, Notti E, Veneri O. 2019. Design of a hybrid propulsion architecture for midsize boats. Energy Procedia. 158:2954–2959.
   Google Scholar
• Capezza C, Coleman S, Lepore A, Palumbo B, Vitiello L. 2019. Ship fuel consumption monitoring and fault detection via partial least squares and control charts of navigation data. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 67:375–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi H, Pedrielli G, Ng SH, Kister T, Bressan S. 2018. A framework for real-time monitoring of energy efficiency of marine vessels. Energy. 145:246–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coraddu A, Oneto L, Baldi F, Cipollini F, Atlar M, Savio S. 2019. Data-driven ship digital twin for estimating the speed loss caused by the marine fouling. Ocean Eng. 186:106063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro MCT, Vance T, Yunnie AL, Fileman TW, Hall-Spencer JM. 2018. Low salinity as a biosecurity tool for minimizing biofouling on ship sea chests. Ocean Sci. 14(4):661–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan G, Fan T, Chen X, Chen L, Ma J. 2021. A hybrid algorithm on the vessel routing optimization for marine debris collection. Expert Syst Appl. 182:115198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erol E, Cansoy CE, Aybar OÖ. 2020. Assessment of the impact of fouling on vessel energy efficiency by analyzing ship automation data. Appl Ocean Res. 105:102418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan Q, Harris CJ. 2001. Comparison of two measurement fusion methods for kalman-filter-based multisensor data fusion. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 37(1):273–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertsma RD, Negenborn RR, Visser K, Loonstijn MA, Hopman JJ. 2017. Pitch control for ships with diesel mechanical and hybrid propulsion: modelling, validation and performance quantification. Appl Energy. 206:1609–1631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaemi MH, Zeraatgar H. 2021. Analysis of hull, propeller and engine interactions in regular waves by a combination of experiment and simulation. J Mar Sci Technol. 26(1):257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harati-Mokhtari A, Wall A, Brooks P, Wang J. 2007. Automatic identification system (AIS): data reliability and human error implications. J Navig. 60(3):373–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isherwood RM. 1972. Wind resistance of merchant ships. Royal Inst Naval Archit. 115:327–338.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon M, Noh Y, Shin Y, Lim O, Lee I, Cho D. 2018. Prediction of ship fuel consumption by using an artificial neural network. J Mech Sci Technol. 32(12):5785–5796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatuğ Ç, Arslanoğlu Y. 2021. The effect of ship’s body and propeller condition on the energy efficiency of the marine vessels.
   Google Scholar
• Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut (KNMI). 2022. Historical wind speed equivalents of the Beaufort Scale, 1850-1950.[accessed 2022 May 15]. https://cdn.knmi.nl/knmi/pdf/bibliotheek/knmipubDIV/HISKLIM/HISKLIM_13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lan H, Wen S, Hong YY, David CY, Zhang L. 2015. Optimal sizing of hybrid PV/diesel/battery in ship power system. Appl Energy. 158:26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JB, Roh MI, Kim KS. 2021. Prediction of ship power based on variation in deep feed-forward neural network. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng. 13:641–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim S, Pazouki K, Murphy AJ. 2017. Holistic energy mapping methodology for reduced fuel consumption and emissions. In International Conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering (Vol. 57748, p. V07BT06A030), June. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren JF, Wilewska-Bien M, Granhag L, Andersson K, Eriksson KM. 2016. Discharges to the sea. In: Andersson K, Brynolf S, Lindgren J, Wilewska-Bien M, editors. Shipping and the environment. Berlin: Springer; p. 125–168.
   Google Scholar
• Logan KP. 2012. Using a ship’s propeller for hull condition monitoring. Nav Eng J. 124(1):71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo S, Ma N, Hirakawa Y. 2016. Evaluation of resistance increase and speed loss of a ship in wind and waves. J Ocean Eng Sci. 1(3):212–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martić I, Degiuli N, Majetić D, Farkas A. 2021. Artificial neural network model for the evaluation of added resistance of container ships in head waves. J Mar Sci Eng. 9(8):826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEPC, I. 2009. 1/Circ. 684 guidelines for voluntary use of the ship energy efficiency operational indicator (EEOI). London: International Maritime Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira L, Vettor R, Guedes Soares C. 2021. Neural network approach for predicting ship speed and fuel consumption. J Mar Sci Eng. 9(2):119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Kim B, Jeong S, Park JH, Jeong D, Ahn K. 2017. A comparative analysis of ship speed-power performance based on the noon reports and recorded sensor data: overcoming sensor issues. In: OCEANS 2017-Anchorage, September. Anchorage, AK, USA: IEEE; p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen BP, Larsen J. 2009. Prediction of full-scale propulsion power using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on computer and IT applications in the maritime industries (COMPIT’09), May. Budapest: Technical University of Denmark; p. 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson EW, Hasse L. 1987. Did the Beaufort scale or the wind climate change? J Phys Oceanogr. 17(7):1071–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psaraftis HN, Kontovas CA. 2013. Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: a taxonomy and survey. Transp Res C, Emerg Technol. 26:331–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Meteorological Society. 2021. The Beaufort Scale. [accessed 2022 Jan 10, 2022]. https://www.rmets.org/resource/beaufort-scale.
   Google Scholar
• Sherbaz S, Duan W. 2012. Operational options for green ships. J Mar Sci Appl. 11(3):335–340.
   Google Scholar
• Smith TWP, Aldous L, Bucknall R. 2013. Noon report data uncertainty. Low carbon shipping conference, London.
   Google Scholar
• Stopford B. 2018. Designing event-driven systems. Boston, MA: O'Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Szelangiewicz T, Wiśniewski B, Żelazny K. 2014. The influence of wind, wave and loading condition on total resistance and speed of the vessel. Pol Marit Res. 21(3):61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelangiewicz T, Żelazny K. 2006. Calculation of the mean long-term service speed of transport ship part I resistance of ship sailing on regular shipping route in real weather conditions. Pol Marit Res. 13(50):23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Taskar B, Regener PB, Andersen P. 2019. The impact of propulsion factors on vessel performance in waves. In Proceedings of 6th international symposium on marine propulsors, Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas P, Segnini C. 2022. Propeller slip and its role to the boat’s performance. [accessed 2022 May 11]. https://e-ribbing.com/en/propellers/296-propeller-slip-and-its-role-to-the-boat-performance.html.
   Google Scholar
• Townsin RL. 2003. The ship hull fouling penalty. Biofouling. 19(S1):9–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tran TA. 2021. Comparative analysis on the fuel consumption prediction model for bulk carriers from ship launching to current states based on sea trial data and machine learning technique. J Ocean Eng Sci. 6(4):317–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettor R, Prpić-Oršić J, Guedes Soares C. 2018. Impact of wind loads on long-term fuel consumption and emissions in trans-oceanic shipping. Brodogradnja: Teorija i Praksa Brodogradnje i Pomorske Tehnike. 69(4):15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Vie R. 1998. Commercial experience with electric propulsion on passenger cruise vessels. Trans Inst Mar Eng C. 110:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Ji B, Zhao J, Liu W, Xu T. 2018. Predicting ship fuel consumption based on LASSO regression. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 65:817–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia C, Zhu Y, Zhou S, Peng H, Feng Y, Zhou W, Shi J, Zhang J. 2022. Simulation study on transient performance of a marine engine matched with high-pressure SCR system. Int J Engine Res. 24(4). doi:10.1177/14680874221084052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan R, Wang S, Du Y. 2020. Development of a two-stage ship fuel consumption prediction and reduction model for a dry bulk ship. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 138:101930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuksel O, Koseoglu B. 2022. Numerical simulation of the hybrid ship power distribution system and an analysis of its emission reduction potential. Ships Offsh Struct. 18(1):78–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Chen M. 2021. A novel Big data collection system for ship energy efficiency monitoring and analysis based on BeiDou system. J Adv Transp. 2021:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Xia C, Liu D, Zhu Y, Feng Y. 2023. Experimental investigation of the high-pressure SCR reactor impact on a marine two-stroke diesel engine. Fuel. 335:127064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Hu Q, Hu Z, Zhen R. 2022. An adaptive hyper parameter tuning model for ship fuel consumption prediction under complex maritime environments. J Ocean Eng Sci. 7(3):255–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar