Dynamic performance of a semisubmersible floating wind-wave integrated system

References

• Abazari A. 2023. Dynamic response of a combined spar-type FOWT and OWC-WEC by a simplified approach. Renew Energy Res Appl. 4(1):66–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agamloh EB, Wallace AK, Jouanne AV. 2008. Application of fluid-structure interaction simulation of an ocean wave energy extraction device. Renew Energy. 33(4):748–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal A, Chella MA, Bihs H, Arntsen ØA. 2017. Numerical study of irregular breaking wave forces on a monopile for offshore wind turbines. Energy Procedia. 137:246–254.
   Google Scholar
• Aubault A, Alves M, Sarmento A, Roddier D, Peiffer A. 2011. Modeling of an oscillating water column on the Floating Foundation WindFloat. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE. Vol. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Babarit A, Hals J, Muliawan MJ, Kurniawan A, Moan T, Krokstad J. 2012. Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters. Renew Energy. 41:44–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Yu X, Xiang G, Ruan W, Lu P. 2018. On critical parameters of squall associated with the mooring design of a turret-moored FPSO. Sh Offshore Struct. 13:182–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Wang R, Xiao P, Zhu L, Sun L. 2020. Numerical analysis of a floating semi-submersible wind turbine integrated with a point absorber wave energy convertor. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth (2020) International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Cong P, Teng B, Bai W, Ning D, Liu Y. 2021. Wave power absorption by an oscillating water column (OWC) device of annular cross-section in a combined wind-wave energy system. Appl Ocean Res. 107(4):102499.
   Google Scholar
• Falco AFDO. 2010. Wave energy utilization: a review of the technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 14(3):899–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri F, Ambühl S, Fischer B, Kofoed JP. 2014. Balancing power output and structural fatigue of wave energy converters by means of control strategies. Energies. 7(4):1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghafari HR, Ghassemi H, He G. 2021. Numerical study of the wavestar wave energy converter with multi-point-absorber around DeepCwind semisubmersible floating platform. Ocean Eng. 232:109177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen MM, Beatty S, Iglesias G, Kramer MM. 2016. Characterization of loads on a hemispherical point absorber wave energy converter. Int J Mar Energy. 13:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman JM, Butterfield S, Musial W, Scott G. 2009. Definition of a 5MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development. Off Sci Tech Inf Tech Rep.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Díaz H, Guedes Soares C. 2021a. A failure analysis of floating offshore wind turbines using AHP-FMEA methodology. Ocean Eng. 234:109261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Shi W, Zhang L, Michailides C, Li X. 2021b. Wind–wave coupling effect on the dynamic response of a combined wind–wave energy converter. J Mar Sci Eng. 9(10):1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Liu Y. 2022. Short-crestedness effect on the dynamic response of offshore floating wind turbines. Ships Offshore Struct. 17(10):2272–2281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao M, Wu Y. 2021. Conceptual design and dynamic analysis of a novel passive floating offshore wind turbine structure. Ships Offsh Struct. 16(10):1040–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li S, Qian Y, Chen D. 2017. Wind profiles and wave spectra for potential wind farms in South China Sea. Part II: wave spectrum model. Energies. 10(1):127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luan C, Gao Z, Moan T. 2016. Design and Analysis of a Braceless Steel 5-MW Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine. Proceedings of the ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. V006T09A052.
   Google Scholar
• Michailides C. 2021. Ηydrodynamic response and produced power of a combined concept consisting of a spar and heaving type WECs. Energies. 14(1):225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailides C, Gao Z, Moan T. 2016a. Experimental and numerical study of the response of the offshore combined wind/wave energy concept SFC in extreme environmental conditions. Mar Struct. 50:35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailides C, Gao Z, Moan T. 2016b. Experimental study of the functionality of a semisubmersible wind turbine combined with flap-type wave energy converters. Renew Energy. 93:675–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailides C, Gao Z, Moan T. 2017. Wave- and wind-induced responses of the semisubmersible wind energy and flap-type wave energy converter based on experiments”. Int J Offshore Polar Eng. 27(1):54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohapatra P, Bhattacharyya A, Sahoo T. 2021. Performance of a floating oscillating water column wave energy converter over a sloping bed. Ships Offshore Struct. 16(6):659–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muliawan M J, Karimirad M, Moan T. 2013a. Dynamic response and power performance of a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and coaxial floating wave energy converter[J]. Renew Energy. 50:47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muliawan MJ, Karimirad M, Zhen G, Moan T. 2013b. Extreme responses of a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and floating wave energy converter (STC) system with survival modes. J Ocean Eng. 65:71–82. OE-S-12-005191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning DZ, Guo BM, Wang RQ, Vyzikas T, Greaves D. 2020. Geometrical investigation of a U-shaped oscillating water column wave energy device. Appl Ocean Res. 97:102105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peiffer A, Roddier D, Aubault A. 2011. Design of a point absorber inside the WindFloat structure[C]. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 44373:247–255.
   Google Scholar
• Pelc R, Fujita RM. 2002. Renewable energy from the ocean. Mar Policy. 26(6):471–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeswari K, Nallayarasu S. 2021. Hydrodynamic response of three- and four-column semi-submersibles supporting a wind turbine in regular and random waves. Ships Offsh Struct. 16(10):1050–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren N, Gao Z, Moan T, Wan L. 2015. Long-term performance estimation of the Spar–Torus-Combination (STC) system with different survival modes. Ocean Eng. 108(1):716–728.
   Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Venugopal V, Shi W. 2022. Dynamic analysis of a multi-column TLP floating offshore wind turbine with tendon failure scenarios. Ocean Eng. 245:110472. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Z, Zhen X, Jiang Z, Gao Z, Li Y, Shi W. 2023. Underactuated control and analysis of single blade installation using a Jackup installation vessel and active Tugger line force control. Mar Struct. 88:103338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reza GH, Hassan G, Guanghua H. 2021. Numerical study of the Wavestar wave energy converter with multi-point-absorber around DeepCwind semisubmersible floating platform. Ocean Eng. 232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ropero-Giralda P, Crespo AJC, Tagliafierro B, Altomare C, Domínguez JM, Gómez-Gesteira M, Viccione G. 2020. Efficiency and survivability analysis of a point-absorber wave energy converter using DualSPHysics. Renew Energy. 162:1763–1776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi W, Zhang L, Karimirad M, Michailides C, Jiang Z, Li X. 2023. Combined effects of aerodynamic and second-order hydrodynamic loads for floating wind turbines at different water depths. Appl Ocean Res. 130:103416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaare B, Hanson TD, Nielsen FG, Yttervik R, Hansen AM, Thomsen K, Larsen TJ. 2007. Integrated dynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbines[C]//European wind energy conference and exhibition. Hamburg. Germany. 2007(3):1929–1939.
   Google Scholar
• Tran T, Kim D-H. 2015. The coupled dynamic response computation for a semi-submersible platform of floating offshore wind turbine. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 147:104–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Ji C, Xue H, Tang W. 2017. Frequency domain approach for the coupled analysis of floating wind turbine system. Ships Offsh Struct. 12(6):767–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y. 2021. Predicting loads and dynamic responses of an offshore wind turbine in a nonlinear mixed sea. Ships Offshore Struct. 16(4):373–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Shi W, Michailides C, Wan L, Kim H, Li X. 2022. WEC shape effect on the motion response and power performance of a combined wind-wave energy converter. Ocean Eng. 250:111038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang L, Michailides C, Wan L, Shi W. 2020. Hydrodynamic response of a combined wind–wave marine energy structure. J Mar Sci Eng. 8(4):253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wave Star: Unlimited Clean Energy. 2022. Wave Star [Internet]. [Accessed 2023 Jan 15]. https://wavestarenergy.com/news/.
   Google Scholar
• Windt C, Davidson J, Ransley EJ, Greaves D, Jakobsen M, Kramer M, Ringwood JV. 2020. Validation of a CFD-based numerical wave tank model for the power production assessment of the Wavestar ocean wave energy converter. Renew Energy. 146:2499–2516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Gaidai O, Naess A, Sahoo P. 2020. Extreme loads analysis of a site-specific semi-submersible type wind turbine. Ships Offsh Struct. 15(1):46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Yang SH, Ringsberg JW, Johnson E, Hu Z. 2021. Experimental and numerical investigation of a taut-moored wave energy converter: a validation of simulated mooring line forces. Ships Offshore Struct. 15:55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Shi W, Karimirad M, Michailides C, Jiang Z. 2020. Second-order hydrodynamic effects on the response of three semisubmersible floating offshore wind turbines. Ocean Eng. 207:107371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Shi W, Zeng Y, Michailides C, Zheng S, Li Y. 2023. Experimental investigation on the hydrodynamic effects of heave plates used in floating offshore wind turbines. Ocean Eng. 267:113103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Shi W, Li D, Li X, Duan Y, Verma A. 2022. A novel framework for modeling floating offshore wind turbines based on the vector form intrinsic finite element (VFIFE) method. Ocean Eng. 262:112221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Zhang L, Wu H. 2012. Motion performance and mooring system of a floating offshore wind turbine. J Mar Sci Appl. 11(03):7.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Wang W, Shi W, Li X. 2020. Effects of second-order hydrodynamics on an ultra-large semi-submersible floating offshore wind turbine. Structures. 28:2260–2275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar