Composite materials, technologies and manufacturing: current scenario of European Union shipyards

References

• Belingardi G, Beyene AT, Koricho EG. 2013. Geometrical optimization of bumper beam profile made of pultruded composite by numerical simulation. Compos Struct. 102:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeing Commitment. 2007. Aircraft & Composite Recycling. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOTES, 12. https://www.boeingsuppliers.com/environmental/TechNotes/TNdec07.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bolster ED, Cuypers H, Itterbeeck PV, Wastiels J, Wilde WPD. 2009. Use of hypar-shell structures with textile reinforced cement matrix composites in lightweight constructions. Compos Sci Technol. 69(9):1341–1347. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.028. Special Issue on the 12th European Conference on Composite Materials, ECCM 2006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Tang X, Zhang T, Chu W, Bai Y. 2023. Fast prediction of turbine energy acquisition capacity under combined action of wave and current based on digital twin method. Sh Offshore Struct. 1–15. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2023.2175962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carral L, Tarrío-Saavedra J, Iglesias G, San-Cristobal JR. 2021. Evaluation of the structural complexity of organisations and products in naval-shipbuilding projects. Sh Offshore Struct. 16(6):670–685. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2020.1773049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers DW. 1994. The potential for the use of composite materials in marine structures. Mar Struct. 7(2–5):441–456. doi: 10.1016/0951-8339(94)90034-5.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla KK. 2019. Composite materials: science and engineering. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74365-3.
   Google Scholar
• Choi M, Kim SH, Chung H. 2017 May. Optimal shipyard facility layout planning based on a genetic algorithm and stochastic growth algorithm. Sh Offshore Struct. 12(4):486–494. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2016.1176294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosky A, Grant C, Kelly D, Legrand X, Pearce G. 2015 Jul. Fibre placement processes for composites manufacture. In: Boisse P, editor. Advances in composites manufacturing and process design. Woodhead Publishing; p. 79–92. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-78242-307-2.00004-X.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL. 2021a. Class guideline. Additive manufacturing - qualification and certification process for materials and components. DNV AS. DNV-CG-0197.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL. 2021b. Class programme. Type approval. Additive manufacturing feedstock DNV AS. DNV AS. DNV-CP-0291.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL. 2022. Class programme. Approval of manufacturers. Additive manufacturing DNV AS. DNV AS. DNV-CP-0267.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021a. FIBRE4YARDS Project. https://www.fibre4yards.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021b. FIBRE composite manufacturing technologies FOR the automation and modular construction in shipYARDS, FIBRE4YARDS Project, H2020, CORDIS, European Commission. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101006860. [accessed 2023 Mar 02].
   Google Scholar
• Fibregy – Composites for a sustainable environment. 2021. https://fibregy.eu/. [accessed 2023 Mar 02].
   Google Scholar
• Hayman B, Weitzenböck JR, Noury P, Hayman B, Mcgeorge D, Weitzenböck J. 2002. Lightweight construction for advanced shipbuilding-recent development. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265101727.
   Google Scholar
• HOME – FibreShip. 2017. http://www.fibreship.eu/. [accessed 2023 Mar 02].
   Google Scholar
• Joppen R, Lipsmeier A, Tewes C, Kühn A, Dumitrescu R. 2019. Evaluation of investments in the digitalization of a production. Procedia CIRP. 81:411–416. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.071.
   Google Scholar
• Kafali M, Eren S, Helvacioglu IH, Unsan Y. 2021. A study on sub-work based work package determination methodology for shipyards. Sh Offshore Struct. 17(1):177–187. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2021.1943848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SY, Shim CS, Sturtevant C, Kim DDW, Song HC. 2014. Mechanical properties and production quality of hand-layup and vacuum infusion processed hybrid composite materials for GFRP marine structures. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 6(3):723–736. doi: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimpara I. 1991. Use of advanced composite materials in marine vehicles. Mar Struct. 4(2):117–127. doi: 10.1016/0951-8339(91)90016-5.
   Google Scholar
• Mangino E, Carruthers J, Pitarresi G. 2007. The future use of structural composite materials in the automotive industry. Int J Veh Des. 44(3/4):211–232. doi: 10.1504/IJVD.2007.013640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MapChart. 2023. https://www.mapchart.net/. [accessed 2023 Mar 02].
   Google Scholar
• Marsh G. 2003. Material trends for frp boats. Reinf Plast. 47(9):23–26. doi: 10.1016/S0034-3617(03)00931-7.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez X, Jurado-Granados J, Jurado A, Garcia J. 2021 Jul. FIBRESHIP: A great step forward in the design and construction of lightweight large-length vessels. In: Developments in Maritime Technology and Engineering - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Maritime Technology and Engineering, MARTECH 2020. Vol. 1. CRC Press/Balkema; p. 671–675. doi: 10.1201/9781003216582-75.
   Google Scholar
• Mathijsen D. 2016. Now is the time to make the change from metal to composites in naval shipbuilding. Reinf Plast. 60(5):289–293. doi: 10.1016/j.repl.2016.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Meola C, Boccardi S. 2017. Composite materials in the aeronautical industry. Infrared thermography in the evaluation of aerospace composite materials; p. 1–24. doi: 10.1016/b978-1-78242-171-9.00001-2.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritz AP, Gellert E, Burchill P, Challis K. 2001. Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines. Compos Struct. 53(1):21–42. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto DM, López VC, Molina SI. 2018 Oct. Large-format polymeric pellet-based additive manufacturing for the naval industry. Addit Manuf. 23:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohya AA, Wehrspohn J, Meissner R, Wicke K. 2021. A modular framework for the life cycle based evaluation of aircraft technologies, maintenance strategies, and operational decision making using discrete event simulation. Aerospace. 8(7):187. doi: 10.3390/aerospace8070187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsses Project: Ramsses Project. 2022. https:www.ramsses-project.eu/ [visited on 2022 Jul 28].
   Google Scholar
• Sender J, Illgen B, Klink S, Flügge W. 2021. Integration of learning effects in the design of shipbuilding networks. Procedia CIRP. 100:103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.017.
   Google Scholar
• Shenoi RA, Dulieu-Barton JM, Quinn S, Blake JIR, Boyd SW. 2011. Composite materials for marine applications: Key challenges for the future. In: Nicolais L, Meo M, Milella E, editors. Composite materials. London: Springer London; p. 69–89. doi: 10.1007/978-0-85729-166-0_3.
   Google Scholar
• Tena I, Esnaola A, Sarrionandia M, Ulacia I, Torre J, Aurrekoetxea J. 2015. Out of die ultraviolet cured pultrusion for automotive crash structures. Compos B Eng. 79:209–216. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veritas B. 2019. Additive manufacturing-guidelines for certification of product made using wire arc additive manufacturing (waam) process. https://marine-offshore.bureauveritas.com/bv-rules.
   Google Scholar
• Xie N, Zheng S, Wu Q. 2020 May. Two-dimensional packing algorithm for autoclave molding scheduling of aeronautical composite materials production. Comput Ind Eng. 146:106599. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106599.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon S-W. 2021 Apr. Advanced composites engineering and its nano-bridging technology. In: Application of composite materials for shipbuilding and marine engineering. WORLD SCIENTIFIC; p. 251–291. doi: 10.1142/9789811235320_0009.
   Google Scholar