Process design and energy assessment of an onboard carbon capture system with boilers or heat pumps for additional steam generation

References

• Alkhaledi AN, Sampath S, Pilidis P. 2022. A hydrogen fuelled LH2 tanker ship design. Ships Offshore Struct. 17(7):1555–1564. doi:10.1080/17445302.2021.1935626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar NR, Seddiek IS. 2020. Enhancing energy efficiency for new generations of containerized shipping. Ocean Eng. 215:107887. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpagaus C, Bless F, Uhlmann M, Schiffmann J, Bertsch SS. 2018. High temperature heat pumps: market overview, state of the art, research status, refrigerants, and application potentials. Energy. 152:985–1010. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless F, Arpagaus C, Bertsch SS, Schiffmann J. 2017. Theoretical analysis of steam generation methods – energy, CO2 emission, and cost analysis. Energy. 129:114–121. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins A, Feron P, Hayward J, Jiang K, Zhai R. 2019. Further assessment of emerging CO2 capture technologies for the power sector and their potential to reduce cost. CSIRO Report ep189975.
   Google Scholar
• DNV. 2022. Maritime forecast to 2050 – energy transition outlook 2022. Høvik: Det Norske Veritas.
   Google Scholar
• Du Y, Gao T, Rochelle GT, Bhown AS. 2021. Zero- and negative-emissions fossil-fired power plants using CO2 capture by conventional aqueous amines. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 111:103473. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einbu A, Pettersen T, Morud J, Tobiesen A, Jayarathna CK, Skagestad R, Nysæther G. 2022. Energy assessments of onboard CO2 capture from ship engines by MEA-based post combustion capture system with flue gas heat integration. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 113:103526. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra M, Monteiro J, van den Akker JT, Abu-Zahra MRM, Gilling E, Goetheer E. 2019. Ship-based carbon capture onboard of diesel or LNG-fuelled ships. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 85:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feron PHM, Cousins A, Jiang K, Zhai R, Garcia M. 2020. An update of the benchmark post-combustion CO2-capture technology. Fuel. 273:117776. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotopoulos AG, Margaris DP. 2020. Computational analysis of air lubrication system for commercial shipping and impacts on fuel consumption. Computation. 8(2):38. doi:10.3390/computation8020038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GPSA. 2016. GPSA engineering data book – SI version. Section 13. Tulsa: Gas Processors Suppliers Association (GPSA); 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Güler E, Ergin S. 2021. An investigation on the solvent based carbon capture and storage system by process modeling and comparisons with another carbon control methods for different ships. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 110:103438. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEAGHG. 2010. Corrosion and materials selection in CCS systems (IEAGHG Technical Report 2010–03). Cheltenham.: IEA greenhouse gas R&D programme (IEAGHG).
   Google Scholar
• IEAGHG. 2022. Prime Solvent candidates for next generation of PCC plants (IEAGHG Technical Report 2022–03). Cheltenham.: IEA greenhouse gas R&D programme (IEAGHG).
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2021a. Guidelines for determining minimum propulsion power to maintain the manoeuvrability of ships in adverse conditions. London: International Maritime Organization (IMO) (MEPC. Circ.850/Rev.3).
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2021b. Amendments to the annex of the protocol of 1997 to amend the international convention for the prevention of pollution from ships, 1973, as modified by the protocol of 1978 relating thereto 2021 revised MARPOL annex VI. London: International Maritime Organization (IMO) (MEPC. Resolution 328(76)).
   Google Scholar
• Ji C, Yuan S, Huffman M, El-Halwagi MM, Wang Q. 2021. Post-combustion carbon capture for tank to propeller via process modeling and simulation. J CO2 Util. 51:101655. doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joung T-H, Kang S-G, Lee J-K, Ahn J. 2020. The IMO initial strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and its follow-up actions towards 2050. J Int Marit Saf Environ Aff Ship. 4(1):1–7. doi:10.1080/25725084.2019.1707938.
   Google Scholar
• Jung J, Seo Y. 2022. Onboard CO2 capture process design using rigorous rate-based model. J Ocean Eng Technol. 36(3):168–180. doi:10.26748/KSOE.2022.006.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns D, Liu H, Consoli C. 2021. Technology readiness and costs of CCS. Melbourne: Global CCS institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kittel J, Gonzalez S. 2014. Corrosion in CO2 post-combustion capture with alkanolamines–a review. Oil Gas Sci Technol – Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles. 69(5):915–929. doi:10.2516/ogst/2013161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodziejski M, Michalska-Pozoga I. 2023. Battery energy storage systems in ships’ hybrid/electric propulsion systems. Energies. 16(3):1122. doi:10.3390/en16031122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen HO. 2017. Ship-desmo-tool [accessed 24 Mar 2023]. Available from: https://gitlab.gbar.dtu.dk/oceanwave3d/Ship-Desmo/tree/master.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Choi Y, Che S, Choi M, Chang D. 2022. Integrated design evaluation of propulsion, electric power, and re-liquefaction system for large-scale liquefied hydrogen tanker. Int J Hydrog Energy. 47(6):4120–4135. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Yoo S, Park H, Ahn J, Chang D. 2021. Novel methodology for EEDI calculation considering onboard carbon capture and storage system. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 105:103241. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X, Wang M. 2017. Study of solvent-based carbon capture for cargo ships through process modelling and simulation. Appl Energy. 195:402–413. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAN ES. 2019. Propulsion of 2,200–3,000 TEU container vessels. Augsburg: MAN Energy Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Mangalapally HP. 2014. Pilot plant study of post combustion capture of carbon dioxide with aqueous amine solutions. University of Kaiserslautern.
   Google Scholar
• Mateu-Royo C, Arpagaus C, Mota-Babiloni A, Navarro-Esbrí J, Bertsch SS. 2021. Advanced high temperature heat pump configurations using low GWP refrigerants for industrial waste heat recovery: a comprehensive study. Energy Convers Manag. 229:113752. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateu-Royo C, Sawalha S, Mota-Babiloni A, Navarro-Esbrí J. 2020. High temperature heat pump integration into district heating network. Energy Convers Manag. 210:112719. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy T, Mizsey P. 2013. Effect of fossil fuels on the parameters of CO2 capture. Environ Sci Technol. 47(15):8948–8954. doi:10.1021/es400306u.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwaoha C, Beaulieu M, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Gibson MD. 2018. Techno-economic analysis of CO2 capture from a 1.2 million MTPA cement plant using AMP-PZ-MEA blend. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 78:400–412. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh J, Anantharaman R, Zahid U, Lee P, Lim Y. 2022. Process design of onboard membrane carbon capture and liquefaction systems for LNG-fueled ships. Sep Purif Technol. 282:120052. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochelle Gary, Chen Eric, Freeman Stephanie, Van Wagener David, Xu Qing, Voice Alexander. 2011. Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2 capture technology. Chemical Engineering Journal. 171(3):725–733. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochelle GT. 2009. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science. 325(5948):1652–1654. doi:10.1126/science.1176731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ros JA, Skylogianni E, Doedée V, van den Akker JT, Vredeveldt AW, Linders MJG, Goetheer ELV, Monteiro JGM-S. 2022. Advancements in ship-based carbon capture technology on board of LNG-fuelled ships. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 114:103575. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ship & Bunker. 2023. Bunker prices [accessed 28 Jun 2023]. Available from: https://shipandbunker.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Ship Technol. 2013. Onboard carbon capture: dream or reality? [accessed 24 Mar 2023]. Available from: https://www.ship-technology.com/analysis/featureonboard-carbon-capture-dream-or-reality.
   Google Scholar
• Shu G, Liang Y, Wei H, Tian H, Zhao J, Liu L. 2013. A review of waste heat recovery on two-stroke IC engine aboard ships. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 19:385–401. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindagi S, Vijayakumar R. 2021. Succinct review of MBDR/BDR technique in reducing ship’s drag. Ships Offshore Struct. 16(9):968–979. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1790296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stec M, Tatarczuk A, Iluk T, Szul M. 2021. Reducing the energy efficiency design index for ships through a post-combustion carbon capture process. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 108:103333. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies F, Ringsberg JW. 2022. Wind-assisted, electric, and pure wind propulsion – the path towards zero-emission RoRo ships. Ships Offshore Struct. 1–8. doi:10.1080/17445302.2022.2111923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA. 2018. Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• van der Spek M, Arendsen R, Ramirez A, Faaij A. 2016. Model development and process simulation of postcombustion carbon capture technology with aqueous AMP/PZ solvent. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 47:176–199. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Harbou I, Mangalapally HP, Hasse H. 2013. Pilot plant experiments for two new amine solvents for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 18:305–314. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir Henry, Sanchez-Fernandez Eva, Charalambous Charithea, Ros Jasper, Monteiro Juliana Garcia Moretz-Sohn, Skylogianni Eirini, Wiechers Georg, Moser Peter, van der Spek Mijndert, Garcia Susana. 2023. Impact of high capture rates and solvent and emission management strategies on the costs of full-scale post-combustion CO2 capture plants using long-term pilot plant data. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 126:103914. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing K, Huang H, Guo X, Wang Y, Tu Z, Li J. 2022. Thermodynamic analysis of improving fuel consumption of natural gas engine by combining Miller cycle with high geometric compression ratio. Energy Convers Manag. 254:115219. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Weiyu, Chen Jian, Luo Xiaobo, Wang Meihong. 2017. Modelling and process analysis of post-combustion carbon capture with the blend of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and piperazine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 63:37–46. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zincir B. 2022. Environmental and economic evaluation of ammonia as a fuel for short-sea shipping: a case study. Int J Hydrog Energy. 47(41):18148–18168. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar