Unsteady RANS and IDDES studies on a telescopic crescent-shaped wingsail

References

• ASTM. 2004. Standards specification for aluminum and aluminum-alloy sheet and plate. Philadelphia, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson GM. 2019. Analysis of lift, drag and CX polar graph for a 3D segment rigid sail using CFD analysis. J Mar Eng Technol. 18(1):36–45. doi: 10.1080/20464177.2018.1494953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blount H, Portell JM. 2021. CFD investigation of wind powered ships under extreme conditions. Gothenburg, Sweden. https://odr.chalmers.se/handle/20.500.12380/304254.
   Google Scholar
• Dassault Systemes. 2020. Abaqus analysis user's guide.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson L. 2019. Fluid mechanics, turbulent flow and turbulence modeling. Gothenburg, Sweden: Division of Fluid Dynamics, Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• EUROSTAT. 2019. Greenhouse gas emissions by source sector. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: EUROSTAT.
   Google Scholar
• Hamada N. 1985. The development in Japan of modern sail-assisted ships for energy conservation. Regional Conference on Sail-motor Propulsion, Manila, Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsenrath J. 1955. Tables of thermal properties of gases: comprising tables of thermodynamic and transport properties of air, argon, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and steam. Vol. 564. Gaithersburg, USA: US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2018. Interpretation of initial IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships. Vol. 60, p. 195–201.
   Google Scholar
• International Chamber of Shipping. 2014. Shipping, world trade and the reduction of CO2 emissions. London: International Chamber of Shipping.
   Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum. 2020. Navigating towards cleaner maritime shipping. OECD Publishing. www.itf-oecd.org.
   Google Scholar
• Khan L, Macklin J, Peck B, Morton O, Souppez J-BRG. 2021. A review of wind-assisted ship propulsion for sustainable commercial shipping: latest developments and future stakes. Proceedings of the Wind Propulsion Conference 2021, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kimball J. 2009. Physics of sailing. CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781420073775.
   Google Scholar
• Lee H, Jo Y, Lee DJ, Choi S. 2016. Surrogate model based design optimization of multiple wing sails considering flow interaction effect. Ocean Eng. 121:422–436. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.05.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu R, Ringsberg JW. 2020. Ship energy performance study of three wind-assisted ship propulsion technologies including a parametric study of the Flettner rotor technology. Ships Offsh Struct. 15(3):249–258. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2019.1612544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Bi H, Gan R, Li X, Yan X. 2018. New insights into airfoil sail selection for sail-assisted vessel with computational fluid dynamics simulation. Adv Mech Eng. 10(4):168781401877125. doi: 10.1177/1687814018771254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter FR. 1993. Zonal two equation κ-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nikmanesh M. 2021. Sailing performance analysis using CFD simulations: a study on crescent shaped wing profiles. https://odr.chalmers.se/handle/20.500.12380/304303.
   Google Scholar
• Patankar SV. 1981. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. CRC Press. doi: 10.13182/nse81-a20112.
   Google Scholar
• Rousmaniere J. 1999. The annapolis book of seamanship:: completely revised, expanded and updated. New York, USA: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Sauzé C, Neal M. 2008. Design considerations for sailing robots performing long term autonomous oceanography. Proceedings of the International Robotic Sailing Conference. 27(2). p. 21–29. www.roboticsailing.org.
   Google Scholar
• Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MK, Travin AK. 2008. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 29(6):1638–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens PLM Software. 2021. STAR-CCM+ user guide (version 16.02). Munich, Germany: Siemens PLM Software Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Silva MF, Friebe A, Malheiro B, Guedes P, Ferreira P, Waller M. 2019. Rigid wing sailboats: a state of the art survey. Ocean Eng. 187:106150–106150. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky J. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon Weather Rev. 91(3):99–164. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• Tillig F, Ringsberg JW. 2020. Design, operation and analysis of wind-assisted cargo ships. Ocean Eng. 211:107603–107603. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traut M, Gilbert P, Walsh C, Bows A, Filippone A, Stansby P, Wood R. 2014. Propulsive power contribution of a kite and a Flettner rotor on selected shipping routes. Appl Energy. 113:362–372. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workinn D. 2021. A high-level interface for a sailing vessel. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-299430.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Nikmanesh MB, Yao HD, Ramne B, Ringsberg JW. 2022. Propulsive performance of a novel crescent-shaped wind sail analyzed with unsteady rans. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering – OMAE, Hamburg, German.
   Google Scholar