Mobile UX design: learning from the Flyover Country mobile app

References

• Abraham, L. (2019). Where do we go from here? Understanding mobile map design, geography. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025004005
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. P., & Bennett, D. A. (2005). A Manifesto on mobile computing in geographic education*. The Professional Geographer, 57(4), 506–515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2005.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birlenbach, D., Cook Shinneman, A., Loeffler, S., & Amy, M. (2019). Flyover country: Creating flexible field experiences using a mobile geoscience App. In the Trenches.
   Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L. (2006). Visualizing information on mobile devices. IEEE Compuer, 39(3), 40–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2006.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., & Reimann, R. (2003). About face 2.0: The essentials of interaction design. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dent, B. D., Torguson, J. S., & Hodler, T. W. (1999). Cartography: Thematic map design. WCB/McGraw-Hill New York.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L.. (2019). Vector formats and sources. In J. P. Wilson (Ed.), Geographic information science & technology body of knowledge (4th Quarter 2019 Edition). UCGIS. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2019.4.8
   Google Scholar
• Elzakker, C. P. J. M. v., & Ooms, K. (2018). Understanding map uses and users. In A. J. Kent, & P. Vujakovic (Eds.), The Routeledge handbook of mapping and cartography (pp. 55–67). Routeledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fils, D., Noren, A., Lehnert, K., & Diver, P. (2016). Open Core data: Connecting scientific drilling data to scientists and community data resources. Paper read at AGU fall meeting abstracts.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, J. J. (2010). Elements of user experience, the: User-centered design for the web and beyond. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goring, S. J., Graham, R., Loeffler, S., Myrbo, A., Oliver, J. S., Ormond, C., & Williams, J. W. (2018). The Neotoma paleoecology database: A research outreach nexus. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. M. (1995). You can’t get there from here: Situated learning, transfer, and map skills. Contermporary Educational Psychology, 20(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. L., Robinson, A. C., & Roth, R. E. (2017). Envisioning the future of cartographic research. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. M. (2010). Interacting with geospatial technologies. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hoarau, C. (2011). Reaching a compromise between contextual constraints and cartographic rules: Application to sustainable maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 38(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1559/1523040638279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoober, S. (2013). How do users really hold mobile devices. http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2013/02/how-do-users-really-hold-mobile-devices.php
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., Gartner, G., Krisp, J. M., Raubal, M., & Van de Weghe, N. (2018). Location based services: Ongoing evolution and research agenda. Journal of Location Based Services, 12(2), 63–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17489725.2018.1508763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug, S. (2000). Don’t make me think: A common sense approach to web usability (2nd ed.). New Riders Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Loeffler, S. (2018). Improving geoscience data access and interoperability through the Flyover Country mobile app.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (1995). How maps work. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (2013). Cartography as an academic field: A lost opportunity or a new beginning? The Cartographic Journal, 50(2), 166–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/0008704113Z.00000000083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M., Crawford, S., Akella, M., & Lengerich, G. (2008). Design and implementation of a model, web-based, GIS-enabled cancer atlas. The Cartographic Journal, 45(4), 246–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/174327708X347755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, M. J., Bryant, C. W., Miller, A. R., Coggins, R. E., & Gardner, S. T. (2010). Floating action buttons: Google Patents.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, R. (2014). Expert perspectives on the design and use of learning materials for neocartographic interfaces. University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Meilinger, T., Hölscher, C., Büchner, S. J., & Brösamle, M. (2007). How much information do you need? Schematic maps in wayfinding and self localisation. In T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat & D. R. Montello (Eds.), Spatial cognition, lecture notes in computer science (pp. 381–400). Spring-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, A. (2003). Earthscope: Opportunities and challenges for earth-science research and education. The Leading Edge, 22(3), 268–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1564533
   Google Scholar
• Meng, L., Zipf, A., & Reichenbacher, T. (2005). Map-based mobile services: Theories, methods, and implementations. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhaus, I. (2013). Web cartography: Map design for interactive and mobile devices. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munzner, T. (2009). A nested process model for visualization design and validation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6), 921–928. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrbo, A., Loeffler, S., Shinneman, A. L. C., & McEwan, R. (2018). Outreach and educational opportunities created by open-data resources. Past Global Change Magazine, 26(2), 74–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22498/pages.26.2.74
   Google Scholar
• Myrbo, A., Murphy, M., & Stanley, V. (2011). The Minneapolis chain of lakes by bicycle: Glacial history, human modifications, and paleolimnology of an urban natural environment. Field Guides, 24, 425–437.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. E., Husson, J. M., & Czaplewski, J. (2018). Macrostrat: A platform for geological data integration and deep-time earth crust research. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 19(4), 1393–1409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, S. E., & McClennen, M. (2016). The paleobiology database application programming interface. Paleobiology, 42(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2015.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. P. (2014). Mapping in the cloud. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbacher, T. (2001). Adaptive concepts for a mobile cartography. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 11(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02837443
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbacher, T. (2003, August 10–16). Adaptive methods for mobile cartography. Paper read at 21st international cartographic conference, Durban, South Africa, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbacher, T. (2004). Mobile cartography: Adaptive visualisation of geographic information on mobile devices. Verlag Dr. Hut München.
   Google Scholar
• Ricker, B.. (2019). Mobile devices. In J. P. Wilson (Ed.), Geographic information science & technology body of knowledge. UCGIS. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2019.3.8
   Google Scholar
• Ricker, B., & Roth, R. (2018). Mobile maps and responsive design. Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge:CV 40.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. C., Demšar, U., Moore, A. B., Buckley, A., Jiang, B., Field, K., Kraak, M.-J., Camboim, S. P., & Sluter, C. R. (2017). Geospatial big data and cartography: Research challenges and opportunities for making maps that matter. International Journal of Cartography, 3(sup1), 32–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2016.1278151
   Google Scholar
• Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Scenario-based design. In J. Jacko, & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamental evolving technologies and emerging applications (pp. 1032–1050). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2012). Cartographic interaction primitives: Framework and synthesis. The Cartographic Journal, 49(4), 376–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2019). How do user-centered design studies contribute to cartography? GEOGRAFIE, 124(2), 133–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2019124020133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2017). User interface and user experience (UI/UX) design. In J. P. Wilson (Ed.), The geographic information science & technology body of knowledge (2nd quarter 2017 edition). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2017.2.5
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E., Çöltekin, A., Delazari, L., Filho, H. F., Griffin, A., Hall, A., Korpi, J., Lokka, I., Mendonça, A., & Ooms, K. (2017). User studies in cartography: Opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 3(sup1), 61–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1288534
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E., Hart, D., Mead, R., & Quinn, C. (2017). Wireframing for interactive & web-based geographic visualization: Designing the NOAA Lake level Viewer. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 44(4), 338–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1171166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R., Young, S., Nestel, C., Sack, C., Davidson, B., Janicki, J., Knoppke-Wetzel, V., Ma, F., Mead, R., & Rose, C. (2018). Global landscapes: Teaching globalization through responsive mobile map design. The Professional Geographer, 70, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1416297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, W. B., Carbotte, S. M., Coplan, J. O., O’Hara, S., Melkonian, A., Arko, R., Weissel, R. A., Ferrini, V., Goodwillie, A., & Nitsche, F. (2009). Global multi-resolution topography synthesis. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 10(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnurrenberger, D. W., Kelts, K. R., Johnson, T. C., Shane, L. C., & Ito, E. (2001). National lacustrine core repository (LacCore). Journal of Paleolimnology, 25(1), 123–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008171027125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlmair, M., Meyer, M., & Munzner, T. (2012). Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2431–2440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinneman, A. L., Loeffler, S., & Myrbo, A. E. (2020). Self-guided field trips allow flexibility in undergraduate student introductory field experiences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1768006
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (1996, September 3–6). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualization. Paper read at IEEE conference on visual Languages, Boulder, CO..
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. E., Robinson, A. C., & MacEachren, A. M. (2013, August 25–30). Designing map symbols for mobile devices: Challenges, best practices, and the utilization of skeuomorphism. Paper read at international cartographic conference, Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Van Elzakker, C. P., Delikostidis, I., & van Oosterom, P. J. (2008). Field-based usability evaluation methodology for mobile geo-applications. The Cartographic Journal, 45(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/174327708X305139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J., & Curtis, L. (2008). Green: The new computing coat of arms? IT Professional, 10(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2008.9
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. W., Grimm, E. C., Blois, J. L., Charles, D. F., Davis, E. B., Goring, S. J., Graham, R. W., Smith, A. J., Anderson, M., & Arroyo-Cabrales, J. (2018). The Neotoma paleoecology database, a multiproxy, international, community-curated data resource. Quaternary Research, 89(1), 156–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/qua.2017.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar