A cross-national study of cultural values and contextual norms of mobile phone activity

References

• Avant, G.R., and K.P. Knutsen. 1993. Understanding cultural differences: Janteloven and social conformity in Norway. Et Cetera: A Review of General Semantics, 50, no. 4: 449–60.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N.S. 2008. Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N.S., and E.M. Campbell. 2011. Gender and mobile phones in cross-national context. Language Sciences, 34, no. 1: 13–27. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, N.S., and Y. Segerstad. 2010. Cross-cultural patterns in mobile-phone use: Public space and reachability in Sweden, the USA and Japan. New Media & Society, 12, no. 1: 13–34. doi:10.1177/1461444809355111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertel, T.F., and G. Stald. 2011. From SMS to SNS: The use of the internet on the mobile phone among young Danes. Proceedings of the Nordmedia Conference, in Akureyri, Iceland, February 10.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., and N.B. Ellison. 2007. Social network sites. Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13: 210–30. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S.W. 2007. A cross-cultural comparison of perceptions and uses of mobile telephony. New Media & Society, 9, no. 2: 343–63. doi:10.1177/1461444807075016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S.W. 2008a. Perceptions of mobile phone use in public: The roles of individualism, collectivism, and focus of the setting. Communication Reports, 21, no. 2: 70–81. doi:10.1080/08934210802301506.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S.W. 2008b. Mobile technology and the body: Apparatgeist, fashion, & function. In Handbook of mobile communication studies, ed. J. Katz, 153–64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell S.W., and Y.J. Park. 2008. Social implications of mobile telephony: The rise of personal communication society. Sociology Compass, 2, no. 2: 371–87. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00080.x.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M., M. Fernandez-Ardevol, J.L. Qiu, and A. Sey. 2007. Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, L. 1986. Essays on individualism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallop Index Denmark. 2011. Gallup indez danmark pressemeddelelse [Galllop Index Denmark press release]. June 23, Press release.
   Google Scholar
• Gesteland, R.R. 1999. Cross-culture business behavior. Herndon, VA: Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., and D. Okabe. 2005. Intimate connections: Contextualizing Japanese youth and mobile messaging. In Inside the text: Social perspectives on SMS in the mobile age, ed. R. Harper, L. Palen, and A. Taylor, 127–43. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J.E., and M. Aakhus. ed. 2002. Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kluckhohn, F.R., and F.L. Strodtbeck. 1961. Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. 2004. The mobile connection: The cell phone's impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. 2008. New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. ( in press). Taken for grantedness.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T.J., and W.E. Bijker. 1993. The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology, ed. W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 17–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shuter, R. 2011. Introduction: New media across cultures-prospect and promise. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 4, no. 4: 241–45. doi:10.1080/17513057.2011.598041.
   Google Scholar
• Shuter, R. 2012a. Intercultural new media studies: The next frontier in intercultural communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41, no. 3: 219–31. doi:10.1080/17475759.2012.728761.
   Google Scholar
• Shuter, R. 2012b. Gender and new media use in India: A critical intercultural analysis. In New media and intercultural communication: Identity, community and politics, ed. P. Cheong, J. Martin, and L. Macfayden, 209–222. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Shuter, R., and S. Chattopadhyay. 2010. Emerging interpersonal norms of text messaging in India and the United States. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 39, no. 2: 123–47. doi:10.1080/17475759.2010.526319.
   Google Scholar
• Shi-xu. 2011. Open up discourse-theoretical frontiers. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 6: 211–13. doi:10.1080/17447143.2011.620235.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2012. Nearly half of American adults are smartphone owners. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Smartphone-Update-2012.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Stald, G. 2008. Mobile identity: Youth, identity, and mobile communication media. In Youth, identity, and digital media, ed. D. Buckingham, 143–64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H.C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H.C., and M.J. Gelfand. 1998. Converging measurements of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Walthers, J.B. 1994. Anticipated on-going interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20: 473–502. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00332.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar