Participatory citizenship in the making? The multiple citizenship trajectories of participatory budgeting participants in Brazil

References

• Abers, R. (1996). From ideas to practice: The Partido dos Trabalhadores and participatory governance in Brazil. Latin American Perspectives, 23(4), 35–53. doi: 10.1177/0094582X9602300404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abers, R. (1998). From clientelism to cooperation: Local government, participatory policy and civic organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Politics and Society, 26(4), 511–537. doi: 10.1177/0032329298026004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abers, R. (2000). Inventing local democracy: Grassroots politics in Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Abers, R. (2001). Learning democratic practice: Distributing government resources through popular participation. In M. Freire & R. E. Stren (Eds.), The challenge of urban government: Policies and practices (pp. 129–144). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G. (2003). Participation, activism and politics: The Porto Alegre experiment. In A. Fung & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance (pp. 43–72). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G. (2005). Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2008). Making space for civil society: Institutional reforms and local democracy in Brazil. Social Forces, 86(3), 911–936. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2011). Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, V. (2010). Politiques au guichet, politique du guichet. In O. Borraz & V. Guiraudon (Eds.), Politiques publiques 2: Changer la société (pp. 265–286). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (2011). Making volunteers: Civic life after welfare’s end. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elkin, S. L., & Soltan, K. E. (Eds.). (1999). Citizen competence and democratic institutions. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fedozzi, L., Furtado, A., Sartori Bassani, V. D., Gomes Macedo, C. E., Parenza, C. T., & Cruz, M. (2013). Orçamento Participativo de Porto Alegre: Perfil, Avaliaçao e Percepçoes do Publico Participante. Porto Alegre: Prefeitura de Porto Alegre and Editora Hartmann.
   Google Scholar
• Fillieule, O. (2001). Propositions pour une analyse processuelle de l’engagement individuel. Revue Française de Science Politique, 51(1), 199–215.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1993). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracies. In B. Robbins (Ed.), The Phantom public sphere (pp. 109–142). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (Eds.). (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Goirand, C. (2013). Participation institutionnalisée et action collective contestataire. Revue internationale de politique comparée, 20(4), 7–28. doi: 10.3917/ripc.204.0007
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. J. (2009). Can we promote cohesion through contact? Intergroup contact and the development of community cohesion. In C. Durose, S. Greasley, & L. Richardson (Eds.), Changing local governance, changing citizens (pp. 91–110). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagopian, F. (2007). Latin American citizenship and democratic theory. In J. S. Tulchin & M. Ruthenburg (Eds.), Citizenship in Latin America (pp. 11–74). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J., & Schugurensky, D. (2005). Learning citizenship and democracy through participatory budgeting: The case of Rosario in Argentina. In R. van der Veen, D. Wildermeerch, J. Youngblood, & V. Masick (Eds.), Democratic practices as learning opportunities (pp. 85–100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond adversary democracy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mazeaud, A., & Talpin, J. (2010). Participer pourquoi faire? Esquisse d’une sociologie de l’engagement dans les budgets participatifs. Sociologie, 1, 357–374. doi: 10.3917/socio.003.0357
   Google Scholar
• Melgar, T. R. (2014). A time for closure? Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre after the workers’ party era. The Journal of Latin American Studies, 46(1), 121–149. doi: 10.1017/S0022216X13001582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1960 [1873]). Autobiography. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montambeault, F. (2012). Learning to be ‘Better Democrats’? The role of informality in Brazilian participatory budgeting experiences. In M. Cameron, E. Hershberg, & K. Sharpe (Eds.), Voice and consequence: Direct participation and democracy in Latin America (pp. 99–122). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Montambeault, F. (2015a). The politics of local participatory democracy in Latin America: Actors, institutions and interactions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montambeault, F. (2015b, May). ‘It was once a radical proposal … ’: The policy drift of participatory budgeting in Brazil. Paper presented at the Annual Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1992). Democratic citizenship and the political community. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Dimensions of radical democracy: Pluralism, citizenship, community (pp. 225–239). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Nez, H. (2011). Nature et légitimités des savoirs citoyens dans l’urbanisme participatif: une enquête ethnographique à Paris. Sociologie, 2(4), 387–404. doi: 10.3917/socio.024.0387
   Google Scholar
• Nez, H. (2016). Does participation mean reciprocal learning? The relationships between diverse stakeholders during participatory budgeting in Paris. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3). doi:10.1080/17448689.2016.1215371
   Google Scholar
• Nylen, W. R. (2003). Participatory democracy versus elitist democracy: Lessons from Brazil. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oxhorn, P. (2010) Cidadania Como Consumo ou Cidadania como Agência: Uma Comparação Entre as Reformas de Democratização da Bolívia e do Brasil. Sociologias, 12(24), 18–43. doi: 10.1590/S1517-45222010000200003
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schugurensky, D. (2007). ‘This is our school of citizenship’: Informal learning in local democracy. In Z. Bekerman, N. C. Burbules, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 163–182). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Talpin, J. (2012). Schools of democracy: How ordinary citizens (sometimes) become competent in participatory budgeting institutions. Colchester: ECPR Press Monographs.
   Google Scholar
• Toughton, M., & Wampler, B. (2014). Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 47(10), 1442–1469. doi: 10.1177/0010414013512601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. (2007). Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation, accountability. University Park: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, B., & Avritzer, L. (2004). Participatory publics: Civil society and new institutions in democratic Brazil. Comparative Politics, 36(3), 291–312. doi: 10.2307/4150132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampler, B., & Avritzer, L. (2005). The spread of participatory democracy in Brazil: From radical democracy to participatory good government. Journal of Latin American Urban Studies, 7, 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. I. (1995). Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal Citizenship. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing citizenship (pp. 175–208). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar