‘Authoritarian civil society’: How anti-democracy activism shapes Thailand’s autocracy

References

• Aarts, P., & Cavatorta, F. (Eds.). (2013). Civil society in Syria and Iran: Activism in authoritarian contexts. Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Alagappa, M. (ed.). (2004). Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arugay, A. A. (2014). Democracy’s saviors and spoilers: A study of the causal conditions and mechanisms behind civil society coups after the third wave of democratization [Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University]. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_diss/31/
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D., & Mathieson, D. S. (2007). Militia Redux: Or Sor and the revival of paramilitarism in Thailand. White Lotus.
   Google Scholar
• Bangkok Post. (2019, October 5). Axe Sedition rap, urges opposition. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/1765184/axe-sedition-rap-urges-opposition
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. (1991). The good society. Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, S. (1997). Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics, 49(3), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. (1997). Myths of moderation: Confrontation and conflict during democratic transitions. Comparative Politics, 29(3), 305–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/422123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum-Dumontet, E. (2016, September 20). Friends, followers, police officers, and enemies: Social surveillance in Thailand. Privacy International. https://www.privacyinternational.org/node/935
   Google Scholar
• Bob, C. (2011). Civil and uncivil society. In M. Edwards (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society (pp. 209–219). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boose, J. W. (2012). Democratization and civil society: Libya, Tunisia, and the Arab spring. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(4), 310–315. doi:10.7763/IJSSH.2012.V2.116
   Google Scholar
• Borgh, C., & Terwindt, C. (2012). Shrinking operational space of NGOs – A framework of analysis. Development in Practice, 22(8), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2012.714745
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. (2016, October 26). The dark side of Thai royalism. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2016/10/the-darker-side-of-thai-royalism/
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, W. A. (1998). Imaging democracy: Reading the events of May in Thailand. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T., & Brechenmacher, S. (2014). Closing space: Democracy and human rights support under fire. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2014/02/20/closing-space-democracy-and-human-rights-support-under-fire-pub-54503
   Google Scholar
• Casquete, J. (2006). Protest rituals and uncivil communities. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 7(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760600819473
   Google Scholar
• Cassani, A., & Tomini, L. (2018). Autocratization in post-cold war political regimes. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chachavaipongpun, P. (Ed.). (2014). Good coup gone bad: Thailand’s political development since Thaksin’s downfall. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiching, N. (2009). Thai politics under Marshal Phibulsongkram and American Global Order [Doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University]. http://thesis.grad.chula.ac.th/readfile1.php?fn=ab4881903924.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chaloemtiarana, T. (2007). Thailand: The politics of Despotic Paternalism. Cornell Southeast Asia Program.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, P. (2015). Civil military relations in Thailand since the 2014 coup: The tragedy of security sector deform (Report No. 138). Peace Research Institute Frankfurt. http://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/user_upload/prif138.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Charoensin-Olarn, C. (2011). Aesthetics and people’s politics. Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connors, M. K. (2003). Democracy and national identity in Thailand. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D. (2014). Mobilizing for democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dönmez, R. O. (2008). Vigilantism in Turkey: Totalitarian movements and uncivil society in a post-9/11 democracy. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 9(4), 551–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760802436183
   Google Scholar
• Encarnación, O. G. (2002). Venezuela’s ‘civil society coup.’ World Policy Journal, 19(2), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1215/07402775-2002-3005
   Google Scholar
• Frantz, E., & Kendall-Taylor, A. (2017). The evolution of autocracy: Why authoritarianism is becoming more formidable. Survival, 59(5), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1375229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giersdof, S., & Croissant, A. (2011). Civil society and competitive authoritarianism in Malaysia. Journal of Civil Society, 7(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2011.553401
   Google Scholar
• Hadiz, V. R. (2018). Imagine all the people? Mobilising Islamic populism for right-wing politics in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(4), 566–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1433225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann, K. (1998). Civil society and the democratic transition in Spain. Perspectives on Political Science, 27(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10457099809604900
   Google Scholar
• Helliker, K. (2012). Civil society and state-centred struggles. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 30(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2012.641723
   Google Scholar
• Hewison, K. (2014). Considerations on inequality and politics in Thailand. Demoratization, 21(5), 846–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.882910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. (2010). Beyond civil society: An organizational PERSPECTIVE on state-NGO relations in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Civil Society, 6(3), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2010.528949
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (2019, October). To speak out is dangerous: Criminalization of peaceful expression in Thailand. https://www.hrw.org/report/2019/10/24/speak-out-dangerous/criminalization-peaceful-expression-thailand
   Google Scholar
• iLaw. (2019a). Latest statistics. https://freedom.ilaw.or.th/en/content/latest-statistic
   Google Scholar
• iLaw. (2019b). Database: Criminal charges. https://freedom.ilaw.or.th/case?order_by=update_progress_time
   Google Scholar
• Khaosod. (2014, September 30). Chiang Mai Royalists File Lese Majeste Aginst Facebooker. http://www.khaosodenglish.com/politics/2014/09/30/1412070339/
   Google Scholar
• Kongkirati, P. (2016). Thailand’s failed 2014 election: The anti-election movement, violence and democratic breakdown. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1166259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongkirati, P., & Kanchoochat, V. (2018). The Prayuth regime: Embedded military and hierarchical capitalism in Thailand. Trans-Regional and National Studies of Southeast Asia, 6(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2018.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecky, P., & Mudde, C. (2003). Uncivil society: Contentious politics in post-communist Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kummetha, T. (2014, January 23). Witch hunts at rally sites and on the Internet. Prachatai. https://prachatai.com/english/node/3837
   Google Scholar
• Kummetha, T. (2016). Misunderstanding the Internet, misunderstanding the users: Cases from Thailand. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia 20. https://kyotoreview.org/yav/misunderstanding-internet-thailand/
   Google Scholar
• Kuzmarov, J. (2012). Modernizing repression: Police training and national building in the American century. University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. (2013). Civil society and the authoritarian state: Cooptation, contestation and discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 9(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2013.818767
   Google Scholar
• Lorch, J. (2006). Civil society under authoritarian rule: The case of Myanmar. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 2, 3–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lorch, J. (2017). Civil society support for military coups: Bangladesh and the Philippines. Journal of Civil Society, 13(2), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2017.1312790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, J., & Bunk, B. (2017). Using civil society as an authoritarian legitimation strategy: Algeria and Mozambique in comparative perspective. Democratization, 24(6), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1256285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveluck, B. (2019). The many shades of digital vigilantism. A typology of online self-justice. Global Crime, https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2019.1614444
   Google Scholar
• Lührman, A., & Lindberg, S. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it? Democratization, 26(7), 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., & Bizzarro, F. (2019). The fates of third-wave democracies. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manager Online. (2018, March 18). Rienthong Allege future forward of anti-monarchy. Ready to confront the public enemy. https://mgronline.com/onlinesection/detail/9610000026976
   Google Scholar
• Matejova, M., Parker, S., & Dauvergne, P. (2018). The politics of repressing environmentalists as agents of foreign influence. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 72(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1421141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCargo, D. (2005). Network monarchy and legitimacy crises in Thailand. The Pacific Review, 18(4), 499–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500338937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mérieau, E. (2016). Thailand’s deep state, royal power and the constitutional court (1997–2015). Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1151917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller, J., & Skaaning, S. E. (2013). The third wave: Inside the numbers. Journal of Democracy, 24(4), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2003). The populist radical right: A pathological normalcy. West European Politics, 33(6), 1167–1186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.508901
   Google Scholar
• Pakawapan, P. R. (2013). State and uncivil society in Thailand at the Temple of Preah Vihear. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Pakawapan, P. R. (2017). The central role of Thailand’s internal security operations command in the post-counter insurgency period (Trends in Southeast Asia No. 17). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Petrone, L. (2011). Institutionalizing pluralism in Russia: A new authoritarianism? Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 27(2), 166–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279.2011.564086
   Google Scholar
• Pitidol, T. (2016). Redefining democratic discourse in Thailand’s civil society. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1164229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pongpaichit, P. (2008). Thaksin’s Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701651960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pongsudhirak, T. (2008). Thailand since the coup. Journal of Democracy, 19(4), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppe, A. E., & Wolff, J. (2017). The contested spaces of civil society in a plural world: Norm contestation in the debate about restrictions on international civil society support. Contemporary Politics, 23(4), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1343219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, J. M., & Thyne, C. (2011). Global instances of coups from 1950 to 2010: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 48(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310397436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prachatai. (2015, October 13). Ultra-royalist steps up Lèse Majesté Campaign against Facebook and YouTube. https://prachatai.com/english/node/5539
   Google Scholar
• Prachatai. (2016, April 27). Admin of anti-ignorance association file cases against 20 anti-monarchy pages. https://prachatai.com/journal/2016/04/65476
   Google Scholar
• Pye, O., & Schaffar, W. (2008). The 2006 anti-Thaksin movement in Thailand: An analysis. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701651945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quadir, F. (2003). How civil is civil society? Authoritarian state, partisan civil society, and the struggle for democratic development in Bangladesh. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 24(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2003.9668930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. A. (2002). The politics of uncivil society in Egypt. Review of African Political Economy, 29(91), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240208704582
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. J. (2002). National identity and its defenders: Thailand today. Silkworm Books.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T. (2018). Reduced scope for action worldwide for civil society (GIGA Focus Global No. 5). German Institute of Global and Area Studies. https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publication/reduced-scope-for-action-worldwide-for-civil-society
   Google Scholar
• Rojjanametakul, S. (2014, April 28). Steady rise of fascism here is terrifying. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/print/406983/
   Google Scholar
• Sae Chua, B. (2014, September 23). Revisiting people’s politics. Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/576-revisiting-people-s-politics
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Satitniramai, A. (2016). Yellow vs. red and the rise of a new middle class in Thailand. In: W. Berenschot, S. Nordholt & L. Bakker (Eds.). Citizenship and democratization in Southeast Asia (pp. 289–312). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Saxer, M. (2014). In the Vertigo of change: How to resolve Thailand’s transformation crisis. OpenWorlds.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, W. (2016). New social media and politics in Thailand: The emergence of fascist vigilante groups on Facebook. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 9(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-2016.2-3
   Google Scholar
• Sombatpoonsiri, J. (2011). Arming civilians for self-defence: The impact of firearms proliferation on the conflict dynamics in Southern Thailand. Global Change, Peace & Security, 23(3), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2011.601857
   Google Scholar
• Sombatpoonsiri, J. (2017a). The policing of anti-government protests: Thailand’s 2013–2014 demonstrations and a crisis of police legitimacy. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 4(1), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797016689224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sombatpoonsiri, J. (2017b). The 2014 military coup in Thailand: Implications on political conflicts and resolution. Asian Journal Peacebuilding, 5(1), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.18588/201705.00a022
   Google Scholar
• Sombatpoonsiri, J. (2018). Manipulating civic spaces: Cyber trolling in Thailand and the Philippines (GIGA Focus Asia No. 3). German Institute of Global and Area Studies. https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publication/cyber-trolling-in-thailand-and-the-philippines
   Google Scholar
• Sombatpoonsiri, J. (in press). Securitising fake news: Policy responses to disinformation in Thailand. In R. Tapsell & A. Sinpeng (Eds.), From grassroots activism to disinformation: Social media’s impact on Southeast Asian society (pp. 108–128). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Spires, A. J. (2011). Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/660741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tejapira, K. (2006). Toppling Thaksin. New Left Review, 39, 5–37.
   Google Scholar
• Thai Lawyers for Human Rights. (2016, November 15). One month after his majesty’s death: Analysis of conflicts and 112 charges. http://www.tlhr2014.com/th/?p=2754
   Google Scholar
• Thai Netizen Network. (2013, August). Thai Netizen network report: Thailand freedom and internet culture. https://thainetizen.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/netizen-report-2011-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tonsakulrungruang, K. (2020, February 28). Anakot Mai: ‘Lawfare’ and future forward party’s legacy. New Mandala. https://www.newmandala.org/anakot-mai-lawfare-and-future-forward-partys-legacy/
   Google Scholar
• von Bülow, M. (2018). The empowerment of conservative civil society in Brazil. In: R. Young (Eds.). The mobilization of conservative civil society. https://carnegieeurope.eu/2018/10/04/empowerment-of-conservative-civil-society-in-brazil-pub-77371
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, A. H. (1994). Political transition process in central and Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 24(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.2307/422022
   Google Scholar
• Winichakul, T. (2013, December 26). The antidemocratic roots of the Thai protesters. Aljazeera. http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2013/12/theantidemocraticrootsofthethaiprotesters.html
   Google Scholar
• Wischermann, J., Bunk, B., Köllner, P., & Lorch, J. (2018). Do associations support authoritarian rule? Evidence from Algeria, Mozambique, and Vietnam. Journal of Civil Society, 14(2), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2018.1464707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldring, H. E. S. (1998). State and civil society in the political philosophy of Alexis de Tocqueville. Voluntas, 9(4), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022197815098
   Google Scholar
• Yabanci, B. (2019). Turkey’s tamed civil society: Containment and appropriation under a competitive authoritarian regime. Journal of Civil Society, 15(4), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2019.1668627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar