Ratification of multilateral environmental agreements: Civil society access to international institutions

References

• Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agné, H., Dellmuth, L. M., & Tallberg, J. (2015). Does stakeholder involvement Foster democratic legitimacy in international organizations? An empirical assessment of a normative theory. The Review of International Organizations, 10(4), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9212-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albin, C. (1999). Can NGOs enhance the effectiveness of international negotiations? International Negotiations, 4(3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069920848534
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Democratizing global environmental governance? Stakeholder democracy after the world summit on sustainable development. European Journal of International Relations, 12(4), 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106069321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, S. (1994). Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(Suppl. 1), 878–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/46.Supplement_1.878
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, S. (2005). Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998). Taking time seriously. Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1260–1288. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., & Betzold, C. (2012). Civil society in global environmental governance. The Journal of Environment & Development, 21(1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496511435551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., Böhmelt, T., & Koubi, V. (2013). Is there a democracy-civil society paradox in global environmental governance? Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., & Gampfer, R. (2013). Effects of civil society involvement on popular legitimacy of global environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., Gampfer, R., Meng, T., & Su, Y.-S. (2016). Could more civil society involvement increase public support for climate policy-making? Evidence from a survey experiment in China. Global Environmental Change, 40, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., Kalbhenn, A., Koubi, V., & Spilker, G. (2010). A comparison of international and domestic sources of global governance dynamics. British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 509–538. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., Kalbhenn, A., Koubi, V., & Spilker, G. (2013). Is there a ‘depth versus participation’ dilemma in international cooperation? Review of International Organizations, 8(4), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-013-9165-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., & Koubi, V. (2009). Effects of political institutions on air quality. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1355–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., Mohrenberg, S., & Koubi, V. (2020). Do citizens evaluate international cooperation based on information about procedural and outcome quality? Review of International Organizations, 15(2), 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09354-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsill, M. M., & Corell, E. (2008). NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., & Gupta, A. (2011). Accountability and legitimacy in Earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1856–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T. (2013). A closer look at the information provision rationale: Civil society participation in state’s delegations at the UNFCCC. Review of International Organizations, 8(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9149-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T., & Betzold, C. (2013). The impact of environmental interest groups in international negotiations: Do ENGOs induce stronger environmental commitments? International Environmental Agreements, 13(2), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-012-9180-3
   Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T., Koubi, V., & Bernauer, T. (2014). Civil society participation in global governance: Insights from climate politics. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D. B., & Signorino, C. S. (2010). Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis, 18(3), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnovitz, S. (1997). Two centuries of participation: NGOs and international governance. Michigan Journal of International Law, 18(2), 183–286. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol18/iss2/1
   Google Scholar
• Correlates of War Project. (2011). State system membership list, v.2011. Retrieved August 25, 2016. http://correlatesofwar.org
   Google Scholar
• Dellas, E. (2011). CSD water partnerships: Privatization, participation and legitimacy. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1916–1923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellmuth, L. M., & Tallberg, J. (2015). The social legitimacy of international organisations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations. Review of International Studies, 41(3), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2009). World politics and organizational fields: The case of transnational sustainability governance. European Journal of International Relations, 15(4), 707–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109345056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, G. W., Rocke, D. M., & Barsoom, P. N. (1996). Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization, 50(3), 379–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2012). Global civil society: The progress of post-Westphalian politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042010-164946
   Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the Penn world table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150–3182. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., Neumayer, E., & Ujhelyi, G. (2007). Kyoto protocol cooperation: Does government corruption facilitate environmental lobbying? Public Choice, 133(1/2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9187-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, K. S. (2002). Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5), 712–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702046005006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., & Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). Introduction: legalization and world politics. International Organization, 54(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, C., & Shackley, S. (2001). The respectable politics of climate change: The epistemic communities and NGOs. International Affairs, 77(2), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. F. (2010). Private authority on the rise: A century of delegation in multilateral environmental agreements. In C. Jönsson, & J. Tallberg (Eds.), Transnational actors in global governance: Patterns, explanations, and implications (pp. 155–176). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. F. (2018). Transnational delegation in global environmental governance: When do non-state actors govern? Regulation & Governance, 12(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman, A. T. (2005). The design of international agreements. The European Journal of International Law, 16(4), 579–612. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanegraaff, M., & Poletti, A. (2017). How participatory is global governance of trade and environment? The cases of WTO and UN climate summits. In R. Marchetti (Ed.), Partnerships in international policy-making. International series on public policy (pp. 51–69). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, O. A. (2008). Treaties’ end: The past, present and future of international lawmaking in the United States. Yale Law Journal, 117(7), 1236–1372. https://doi.org/10.2307/20454683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation & discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissling, C., & Steffek, J. (2008). CSOs and the democratization of international governance: Prospects and problems. In J. Steffek, C. Kissling, & P. Nanz (Eds.), Civil society participation in European and global governance: A cure for the democratic deficit? (pp. 208–218). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B. (2001). Loosening the ties that bind: A learning model of agreement flexibility. International Organization, 55(2), 289–325. https://doi.org/10.1162/00208180151140586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B. (2005). Contracting around international uncertainty. The American Political Science Review, 99(4), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. G., & Jaggers, K. (2002). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2002. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, L. F. (2015). Estimating onsets of binary events in panel data. Political Analysis, 23(4), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpv019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. B. (1994). Regime design matters: Intentional oil pollution and treaty compliance. International Organization, 48(3), 425–458. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. B. (2011). Transparency for governance: The mechanisms and effectiveness of disclosure-based and education-based transparency policies. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1882–1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. B. (2014). International environmental agreements database project (Version 2014.3). http://iea.uoregon.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. B., & Keilbach, P. M. (2001). Situation structure and institutional design: Reciprocity, coercion, and exchange. International Organization, 55(4), 891–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohrenberg, S., Koubi, V., & Bernauer, T. (2019). Effects of funding mechanisms on participation in multilateral environmental agreements. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9423-z
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2004). Is there a ‘democratic deficit’ in world politics? A framework for analysis. Government and Opposition, 39(1), 336–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00126.x
   Google Scholar
• Nanz, P., & Steffek, J. (2004). Global governance, participation and the public sphere. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, J. C., Nordstrom, T., & Warnke, K. (2004). The COW-2 international organizations dataset version 2.0. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940490463933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piewitt, M., Rodekamp, M., & Steffek, J. (2010). Civil society in world politics: How accountable are transnational CSOs? Journal of Civil Society, 6(3), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2010.528946
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K. (1997). States, NGOs, and international environmental institutions. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. T., Parks, B. C., & Vasquez, A. A. (2004). Who ratifies environmental treaties and why? Institutionalism, structuralism and participation by 192 nations in 22 treaties. Global Environmental Politics, 4(3), 22–64. https://doi.org/10.1162/1526380041748029
   Google Scholar
• Rosendorff, B. P., & Milner, H. V. (2001). The optimal design of international trade institutions: Uncertainty and escape. International Organization, 55(4), 829–857. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte, J. A. (2004). Civil society and democratically accountable global governance. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten, G., & Glasbergen, P. (2011). Creating legitimacy in global private governance: The case of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1891–1899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2008). The global diffusion of markets and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spilker, G., & Koubi, V. (2016). The effects of treaty legality and domestic institutional hurdles on environmental treaty ratification. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9255-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprinz, D., & Vaahtoranta, T. (1994). The interest-based Explanation of international environmental policy. International Organization, 48(1), 77–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300000825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. (2010). Explaining patterns of transnational participation: The role of policy fields. In C. Jönsson, & J. Tallberg (Eds.), Transnational actors in global governance: Patterns, explanations, and implications (pp. 67–87). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, J., & Ferretti, M. P. (2009). Accountability or ‘good decisions’? The competing goals of civil society participation in international governance. Global Society, 23(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820802556736
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, J., & Nanz, P. (2008). Emergent patterns of civil society participation in global and European governance. In J. Steffek, C. Kissling, & P. Nanz (Eds.), Civil society participation in European and global governance: A cure for the democratic deficit? (pp. 1–29). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stroup, S. S., & Murdie, A. (2012). There’s no place like home: Explaining international NGO advocacy. The Review of International Organizations, 7(4), 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9145-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., Dellmuth, L. M., Agné, H., & Duit, A. (2018). NGO influence in international organizations: Information, access and exchange. British Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341500037X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., & Jönsson, C. (2010). Transnational actor participation in international institutions: Where, why, and with what consequences? In C. Jönsson, & J. Tallberg (Eds.), Transnational actors in global governance: Patterns, explanations, and implications (pp. 1–21). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., & Squatrito, T. (2013). The opening up of international organizations: Transnational access in global governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jönsson, C. (2014). Explaining the transnational design of international organizations. International Organization, 68(4), 741–774. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818314000149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., & Uhlin, A. (2011). Civil society and global democracy: An assessment. In D. Archibugi, R. Marchetti, & M. Koenig-Archibugi (Eds.), Global democracy: Normative and empirical perspectives (pp. 210–232). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Stein, J. (2008). The international law and politics of climate change: Ratification of the United Nations framework convention and the Kyoto protocol. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(2), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707313692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangler, L., Altamirano-Cabrera, J.-C., & Weikard, H.-P. (2013). The political economy of international environmental agreements: A survey. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(3), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-012-9196-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willetts, P. (1996). From Stockholm to Rio and beyond: The impact of the environmental movement on the United Nations consultative arrangements for NGOs. Review of International Studies, 22(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamin, F. (2001). NGOs and international environmental law: A critical evaluation of their roles and responsibilities. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 10(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9388.00271
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2000). Democratic governance beyond the nation-state: The EU and other international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 183–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2014). The politicization of world politics and its effects: Eight propositions. European Political Science Review, 6(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar