Undermining, defending or expanding EU citizenship? CSOs’ positions on providing humanitarian assistance to EU citizens with limited rights to public welfare services in Norway

References

• Acheson, N. (2014). Lenin's useful idiots: Voluntary action and public service reform in Northern Ireland. National Coalition for Independent Action. http://independentaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Lenins-Useful-Idiots-final-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alseth, A. K. (2018). Neoliberalism and changing immigration and integration policies in Norway. In M. Kamali, & J. H. Jönsson (Eds.), Neoliberalism, Nordic welfare states and social work (pp. 46–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Angell, O. H. (2016). Diakonia as innovation: A political and organisational perspective. Diaconia, 7(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.13109/diac.2016.7.2.142
   Google Scholar
• Barbulescu, R., & Favell, A. (2020). Commentary: A citizenship without social rights? EU freedom of movement and changing access to welfare rights. International Migration, 58(1), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N. (2013). Humanitarian governance. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012512-083711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendixsen, S. (2018). Differentiation of rights in the Norwegian welfare state: Hierarchies of belonging and humanitarian exceptionalism. Social Inclusion, 6(3), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i3.1520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruzelius, C. (2020). Non-for-profits and EU citizens’ cross-border social rights in different welfare states. Journal of Social Policy, 49(3), 601–621. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279419000680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, K., & Schweyher, M. (2021). Borders and bureaucracies of EU mobile citizenship: Polish migrants and the personal identification number in Sweden. Political Geography, 87(2021), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102394
   Google Scholar
• Bymisjon, K. (2016). Utsatte migranter og prekære arbeids- og levekår i Oslo. En erfaringsrapport fra Kirkens Bymisjons arbeid med nye brukergrupper. https://www.eurodiaconia.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Kirkens-Bymisjon-Oslo-PrekariatsRapp-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Callinicos, A. (2001). Against the third way; an anti-capitalist critique. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2004). The path-dependency of an idea: Why Scandinavian welfare states remain distinct. Social Policy and Administration, 38(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVerteuil, G. (2017). Post-welfare city at the margins: Immigrant precarity and the mediating third sector in London. Urban Geography, 38(10), 1517–1533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1286840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P. J., Scullion, L., Jones, K., & Stewart, A. (2019). The impact of conditionality on the welfare rights of EU migrants in the UK. Policy & Politics, 47(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15296527346800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, K. (2009). The making of a European civil society: ‘Imagined’, ‘practised’ and ‘staged’. Policy and Society, 28(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. (2000). Proactive and defensive engagement: Social citizenship in a changing public sphere. Sociological Research Online, 5(3), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engebrigtsen, A., & Haug, A. V. (2018). Evaluering av tilskuddsordningen for humanitære tiltak til tilreisende EØS-borgere som tigger. NOVA. https://oda.oslomet.no/oda-xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12199/3501/Nettutg-NOVA-Notat-2-2018-Evaluering-av-tilskuddsordninger-for-tilreisende-EOS-borgere-bokmerk.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2011). Exploring the (bio)political dimensions of voluntarism and care in the city: The case of a ‘low barrier’ emergency shelter. Health & Place, 17(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. (2005). Compassion and repression: The moral economy of immigration policies in France. Cultural Anthropology, 20(3), 362–387. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2005.20.3.362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. (2012). Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heindlmaier, A., & Blauberger, M. (2017). Enter at your own risk: Free movement of EU citizens in practice. West European Politics, 40(6), 1198–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1294383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugman, R., Pittaway, E., & Bartolomei, L. (2011). When 'do no harm' is not enough: The ethics of research with refugees and other vulnerable groups. British Journal of Social Work, 41(7), 1271–1287. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamali, M., & Jönsson, J. H. (2018). Neoliberalism, Nordic welfare states and social work: Current and future challenges. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, M.-A. (2018). The limits of egalitarianism: Irregular migration and the Norwegian welfare state. In S. Bendixsen, M. B. Bringslid, & H. Vike (Eds.), Egalitarianism in Scandinavia (pp. 223–243). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, M.-A. (2021). Migration control and access to welfare: The precarious inclusion of irregular migrants in Norway. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kildal, N., & Kuhnle, S. (2007). Normative foundations of the welfare state: The Nordic experience. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lafleur, J. M., & Mescoli, E. (2018). Creating undocumented EU migrants through welfare: A conceptualization of undeserving and precarious citizenship. Sociology, 52(3), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518764615
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leerkes, A. (2016). Back to the poorhouse? Social protection and social control of unauthorised immigrants in the shadow of the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716637139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loga, J. (2018a). Civil society and the welfare state in Norway – historical relations and future roles. Community Development Journal, 53(3), 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsy027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loga, J. (2018b). Sivilsamfunnets roller i velferdsstatens omstilling. Norsk Sosiologisk Tidsskrift, 2(01), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-2512-2018-01-05
   Google Scholar
• Milbourne, L. (2013). Voluntary sector in transition: Hard times or new opportunities?. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misje, T. (2021). Queuing for food and playing lottery for beds: A parallel social service system and the lived experiences of humanitarian service provision to homeless EU migrants in Norway. Nordic Social Work Research, 11(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1857820
   Google Scholar
• Misje, T. (2022). The precarious inclusion of homeless EU migrants in Norwegian public social welfare: Moral bordering and social workers’ dilemmas. Critical Social Policy, 42(3), 448–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183211036580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen, T. E. (2016). Social media's role in ‘Hybrid strategies’. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• NRK. (2022). En million kroner ekstra til helsehjelp til papirløse. https://www.nrk.no/osloogviken/en-million-kroner-ekstra-til-helsehjelp-til-papirlose–1.16200756?fbclid=IwAR3t770OK0TuMKNLbMEcxn4YsfHwn
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, C. (2017). Unity in adversity: EU citizenship, social justice and the cautionary tale of the UK. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Onyx, J., Armitage, L., Dalton, B., Melville, R., Casey, J., & Banks, R. (2010). Advocacy with gloves on: The ‘manners’ of strategy used by some third sector organizations undertaking advocacy in NSW and Queensland. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9106-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozerdem, A., & Jacoby, T. (2006). Disaster management and civil society: Earthquake relief in Japan, Turkey and India. IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Pennings, F., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2018). EU citizenship and social rights: Entitlements and impediments to accessing welfare. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Salonen, A. S. (2016). Lifelong emergency? The food bank in an era of institutionalized food charity in Toronto. Diaconia, 7(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.13109/diac.2016.7.1.27
   Google Scholar
• Schweyher, M. (2023). Precarity, work exploitation and inferior social rights: EU citizenship of Polish labour migrants in Norway. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(5), 1292–1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1987206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seilskjær, M. (2023). I count. Bostedsløse EU-migranter i Norge. Kirkens Bymisjon. https://kirkensbymisjon.fra1.digitaloceanspaces.com/content/uploads/2023/05/24230100/I-COUNT.-Bostedslose-EU-migranter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Selle, P. (1998). Organisasjonssamfunnet - ein statsreiskap? In T. Grønlie, & P. Selle (Eds.), Ein stat? Fristillingas fire ansikt (pp. 141–178). Samlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Selle, P., Strømsnes, K., & Loga, J. (2018). State and civil society: A regime change? In B. Enjolras, & K. Strømsnes (Eds.), Scandinavian civil society and social transformations: The case of Norway (pp. 117–163). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Selle, P., & Wollebæk, D. (2010). Why social democracy is not a civil society regime in Norway. Journal of Political Ideologies, 15(3), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2010.513872
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H. (2015). Giving in Norway: An ambitious welfare state with a self-reliant nonprofit sector. In P. W. F. Handy (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of global philanthropy (pp. 230–248). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H. (2016). Mot en ny skandinavisk velferdsmodell? Konsekvenser av ideell, kommersiell og offentlig tjenesteyting for aktivt medborgerskap. Institutt for Samfunnsforskning . https://samfunnsforskning.brage.unit.no/samfunnsforskning-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2442438/Rapport_R_01_2016_v5-1.pdf?sequence = 1&isAllowed = y
   Google Scholar
• Synnes, K. M. (2021). Guarding the borders of the Norwegian welfare state. How NAV employees decide on social assistance for unemployed Polish migrants. Nordic Social Work Research, 11(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1861070
   Google Scholar
• Synnes, K. M. (2022). Når terskelen til velferdsstaten blir for høy. Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning, 25(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18261/tfv.25.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Ticktin, M. (2005). Policing and humanitarianism in France: Immigration and the turn to law as state of exception. Interventions, 7(3), 346–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698010500268148
   Google Scholar
• Ticktin, M. (2011). Casualties of care. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ticktin, M. (2014). Transnational humanitarianism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43(1), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vike, H. (2015). Likhetens natur. Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift, 26(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-2898-2015-01-02
   Google Scholar
• Yıldız, C., & De Genova, N. (2018). Un/free mobility: Roma migrants in the European Union. Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 24(4), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1335819
   Google Scholar