References
- A. (2004). A v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56.
- Allen, F. (2018). ‘Judicial Review and the Creep of Closed Material Procedures - R (on the application of Haralambous) v. Crown Court at St Albans and another’ (Kingsley Napley, 1 February 2018): https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/judicial-review-and-the-creep-of-closed-material-procedures-r-on-the-application-of-haralambous-v-crown-court-at-st-albans-and-another
- Alter, K. J., Gathii, J. T., & Helfer, L. R. (2020). Backlash against international courts in West, East, and Southern Africa: Causes and consequences. In J. T. Gathii (Ed.), The performance of Africa’s international courts: Using litigation for political, legal, and social change (pp. 254–299). OUP.
- Armand-Ugón, S. M. (2020). ‘Sawhoyamaxa Community v. Paraguay: A Good Example of Effective Strategic Litigation and Advocacy’, 37 Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Montevideo 1.
- Associated Press. (2020). ‘Human rights group accuses Saudi forces in Yemen of abuses’ (Associated Press, 25 March 2020). https://apnews.com/article/125e600cc3a3e06fe5b17c101397b64a
- Baker, N. (2007). Norman Baker MP v. Information Commissioner and the Cabinet Office, EA/2006/0045, 12 February 2007.
- Bakolias, M. (2000). Legal and judicial development: The role of civil society in the reform process. Fordham International Law Journal, 24(6), 526.
- Bank Mellat. (2014). Bank Mellat v. HM Treasury (No. 2) [2014] AC 700.
- Barsh, R. L., & Khattak, N. (2002). Non-governmental organisations in global governance: Great expectation, inconclusive results. In G. Alfredsson, & M. Stavropoulou (Eds.), Justice pending: Indigenous peoples and other good causes: Essays in honour of erica-irene daes (pp. 15–31). Brill Nijhoff.
- Bechtel, S. (2020). Digging a moat to protect the castle walls: CJEU solidifies barriers to NGO standing. (Client Earth, 30 October 2020): https://www.clientearth.org/projects/access-to-justice-for-a-greener-europe/updates/digging-a-moat-to-protect-the-castle-walls-cjeu-solidifies-barriers-to-ngo-standing/#:~:text = In%20conclusion%2C%20the%20Court%20not,understanding%20of%20public%20interest%20litigation
- Becker, J. (2014). 5 ways to a successful human rights campaign (International Service for Human Rights, 31 January 2014). https://ishr.ch/latest-updates/jo-becker-5-ways-successful-human-rights-campaign/
- Begum. (2021). R (on the application of Begum) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 7.
- Belhaj and Boudchar (2018). Belhaj and Boudchar v. Director of Public Prosecutions [2018] UKSC 33.
- Big Brother Watch. (2021). pp. Nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15, Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, Judgment, 26 May 2021.
- Bingham, T. (2011). The Rule of Law. Penguin.
- Bolick, C. (2019). ‘The Proper Role of “Judicial Activism”, 42(1) Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 1.
- Bonner, D. (2007). Executive measures, terrorism and national security: Have the rules of the game changed? Routledge.
- Campaign Against the Arms Trade. (2019). R (Campaign Against the Arms Trade) v. Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020.
- Campaign Against the Arms Trade. (2021). ‘Arms sales back on trial’ (Campaign Against the Arms Trade, 22 April 2021): https://caat.org.uk/news/arms-sales-back-on-trial-in-2023/#:~:text = CAAT's%20legal%20challenge%20over%20the,High%20Court%20in%20January%202023
- Câmpeanu. (2014). App. No. 47848/08, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], Judgment, 17 July 2014.
- Caparini, M. (2010). Civil society and the future of security sector reform. In M. Sedra (Ed.), The future of security sector refom (pp. 244–262). The Centre for International Governance Innovation.
- Carney, D. (2006). The timing rules in judicial review and the practical difficulties they cause environmental interest groups: The need for reform. Environmental Law Review, 8(4), 278. https://doi.org/10.1350/enlr.2006.8.4.278
- Carvalho, S., & Baker, E. (2014). Strategic litigation experiences in the inter-American human rights system. SUR – International Journal on Human Rights, 11(20), 448.
- Catalinac, A. (2016). Electoral reform and national security in Japan: From pork to foreign policy. CUP.
- Chamberlain, M. (2020). National security, closed material procedures, and fair trials. In A. Higgins (Ed.), The civil procedure rules at 20 (pp. 81–88). OUP.
- Charnovitz, S. (2006). Nongovernmental organizations and international Law. American Journal of International Law, 100(2), 348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002930000016699
- Clark, J. (2011). Civil society in the Age of crisis. Journal of Civil Society, 7(3), 241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2011.604986
- Davis, F. F., & de Londras, F. (2014). Critical debates on counter-terrorism judicial review. CUP.
- de Montbrial, T. (1988). Security requires caution. Foreign Policy, 71(71), 86. https://doi.org/10.2307/1148906
- Derfoufi, Z and Rights & Security International (2022) Prevent-ing Dissent: How the U.K.’s counterterrorism strategy is eroding democracy.
- Dickson, B. (2015). Activism and restraint within the UK supreme court. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 21(1), 1.
- Donohue, L. K. (2011). The limits of national security. American Criminal Law Review, 48, 1573.
- Fischer-Lescano, A. (2021). From strategic litigation to juridical action. In M. Saage-Maass, P. Zumbansen, M. Bader, & P. Shahab (Eds.), Transnational legal activism in global value chains: The Ali enterprises factory fire and the struggle for justice. Springer.
- Gathii, J. T. (2020). The Performance of Africa's International Courts: Using Litigation for Political, Legal, and Social Change. OUP.
- Goldberg, D. (1987). Executive secrecy, national security, and freedom of information in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 4(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-624X(87)90049-9.
- Graham, L. (2018). ‘Haralambous: The Supreme Court, Closed Proceedings and the Common Law, Round Three’ (Oxford Human Rights Hub Blog, 25 January 2018): https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/haralambous-the-supreme-court-closed-proceedings-and-the-common-law-round-three/
- Haralambous. (2018). R (on the application of Haralambous v. Crown Court at St. Albans and another) [2018] UKSC 1.
- Hungary. (2020). C-78/18, Commission v. Hungary (2020) ECLI:EU:C:2020:476.
- Ighodalo, A. (2012). Election crisis, liberal democracy and national security in Nigeria’s fourth republic. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 10(11), 163.
- Information Commissioner’s Office. ‘Section 24 — Safeguarding national security’ (ICO).
- Information Commissioner’s Office. (2015). ‘Time limits for compliance under the Freedom of Information Act (Section 10)’.
- Kazlauskaitė-Markelienė, R., & Petrauskaitė, A. (2010). Civil society and national security: A theoretical survey of the problem. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 9(1), 219. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10243-012-0010-7
- Kiyomi Serrano, S., & Minami, D. (2003). Korematsu v. United States: A “constant caution” in a time of crisis. Asian Law Journal, 10, 37.
- Kmiec, K. D. (2004). The origin and current meanings of "judicial activism". California Law Review, 92(5), 1441. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481421
- Knight, K. (2009). Promptness and judicial review. Judicial Review, 14(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2009.11426594
- Kovarik, C. (2021). ‘Strategic Litigation and the Evolution of Regional Human Rights Norms: Cases from Germany and The Netherlands’, Honors Theses, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 340.
- Levy, M. A. (1995). Is the environment a national security issue? International Security, 20(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539228
- Macdonald, S. (2008). Why we should abandon the balance metaphor: A New approach to counterterrorism policy. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, 15, 95.
- Macdonald, S. (2009). The unbalanced imagery of anti-terrorism policy. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 18(2), 519.
- McNamara, L. (2009). Closure, caution and the question of chilling: How have Australian counter-terrorism laws affected the media? Media & Arts Law Review, 14(1), 1.
- Mellifera. (2020). C-784/18 P, Mellifera v. Commission (2020) ECLI:EU:C:2020:630.
- Michaelsen, C. (2006). Balancing civil liberties against national security? A critique of counterterrorism rhetoric. UNSW Law Journal, 29(2), 1.
- Ministry of Justice. (2022). ‘Report on the use of closed material procedure (from 25 June 2020 to 24 June 2021)’.
- Nanopoulos, E. (2015). European human rights Law and the normalisation of the ‘closed material procedure’: Limit or source? The Modern Law Review, 78(6), 913. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12155
- Nichols Haddad, H. (2018). The hidden hands of justice: NGOs, human rights, and international courts. CUP.
- Nwauche, E. S. (2011). Enforcing ECOWAS Law in west African national courts. Journal of African Law, 55(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855311000106
- Open Society Justice Initiative. (2018). ‘Strategic Litigation Impacts: Insights from Global Experience’.
- Parsons, A. (2022). ‘Freedom of information is good, and stops bad things happening’ (My Society, 10 February 2022): https://www.mysociety.org/2022/02/10/freedom-of-information-is-good-and-stops-bad-things-happening/
- Rangelov, I., & Teitel, R. (2014). Transitional justice. In M. Kaldor, & I. Rangelov (Eds.), The handbook of global security policy (pp. 338–352). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Rappert, B., Moyes, R., Crowe, A., & Nash, T. (2012). The roles of civil society in the development of standards around new weapons and other technologies of warfare. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(886), 765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000744
- Rehman. (2001). Secretary of State for the Home Department v. Rehman [2001] UKHL 47.
- Rozenberg, J. (2020). Enemies of the people? How judges shape society. Bristol University Press.
- Rozzaqi Ginanjar, W., & Zakky Mubarrok, A. (2020). Civil society and global governance: The indirect participation of extinction rebellion in global governance on climate change. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 1(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v1i1.8
- Rumbul, R., & Parsons, A. (2021). Reforming Freedom of Information: Improvements to strengthen access to information in the UK, MySociety, April 2021.
- Rutzen, D. (2015). Civil society under assault. Journal of Democracy, 26(4), 28. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0071
- Sabbagh, D. (2021a), British arms sales prolonging Saudi war in Yemen, says Oxfam. The Guardian, 22 February 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/22/british-arms-sales-prolonging-saudi-war-in-yemen-says-oxfam#:~:text = Oxfam%20has%20accused%20the%20British,indiscriminate%20bombing%20in%20the%20country
- Sabbagh, D. (2021b). Watchdog steps in over secrecy about UK women in Syria stripped of citizenship. The Guardian, 29 March 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/29/watchdog-steps-in-secrecy-uk-women-syria-stripped-of-citizenship#:~:text = Watchdog%20steps%20in%20over%20secrecy%20about%20UK%20women%20in%20Syria%20stripped%20of%20citizenship,-This%20article%20is&text = The%20Home%20Office's%20refusal%20to,investigation%20by%20the%20information%20commissioner
- Sherry, S. (2013). ‘A Summary of Why We Need More Judicial Activism’, 16 Green Bag 2d 449.
- Singh. (2013). R (on the application of Jasbir Singh and others) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 2873 (Admin).
- Singh, C. (2021). Prosecuting terrorism: Secret courts, evidence and special advocates. The panoply of challenges facing criminal justice, the United Kingdom perspective. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 33(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2020.1850166
- Smith, J. (2022). ‘The False Dichotomy of National Security and Human Rights’ (Medium, 5 January 2022): https://medium.com/jacobsmith01/the-false-dichotomy-of-national-security-and-human-rights-c78074ee08c1?p = 310bf68e746d
- Stone, E. (2022). ‘Yemen: UK diplomat says ‘no military solution’ – after UK arms industry made billions supplying arms’ (National World, 18 February 2022): https://www.nationalworld.com/news/world/diplomat-says-no-military-solution-in-yemen-after-uk-has-made-billions-supplying-arms-in-the-conflict-3572580#:~:text = A%20top%2Dranking%20British%20diplomat,of%20serious%20human%20rights%20violations
- St Vincent, S. (2021). In Shamima Begum Case, UK Supreme Court Dismisses Rights and Overlooks Potential Victimhood Just Security, 26 February 2021. https://www.justsecurity.org/75016/in-shamima-begum-case-uk-supreme-court-dismisses-rights-and-overlooks-potential-victimhood/
- Trapp, K. N., & Smith, J. (forthcoming). The mosaic of international dispute settlement: The role of domestic courts in international dispute settlement. In D. F. Franchini, N. Tsagourias, & R. J. Buchan (Eds.), The changing character of international dispute settlement: Challenges and prospects. CUP.
- Tyrie, A. ‘The UK’s secret trials’ (Prospect, 10 February 2017): https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/essays/43936/the-uks-secret-trials
- Wolfers, A. (1952). "National security" as an ambiguous symbol. Political Science Quarterly, 67(4), 481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2145138
- Woods, L. (2021). Executive accountability and national security. The Modern Law Review, 84(3), 553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12624
- Wyatt, D. (2021). ‘Reflects on Reform of the UK Supreme Court’ (Policy Exchange).