Comparative Analysis of State and Civil Society Discourse on Human Rights Implementation and the Position of Roma in the Former Yugoslav Space

References

• Ad hoc Coalition of 22 Civil Society Organizations. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Skopje: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ahern, L., & Rosenthal, E. (2008). Torment not treatment: Serbia’s segregation and abuse of children and adults with disabilities. Washington, DC: Mental Disability Rights International.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International Montenegro. (2013). Submission to the UN universal periodic review 15th session of the UPR working group, January–February 2013. Podgorica: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International Submission Slovenia. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Ljubljana: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Antic, B. (2005). Roma and right to health care in Serbia. Belgrade: Minority Rights Center.
   Google Scholar
• Autonomous Women’s Centre. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Belgrade: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 57, 947–952. doi: 10.2307/1952796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagilhole, B. (2009). Understanding Equal Opportunities and Diversity. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barany, Z. (2002). The East European Gypsies: Regime change, marginality, and ethnopolitics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barenbaum, J., Ruchkin, V., & Schwab-Stone, M. (2004). The psychosocial aspects of children exposed to war: Practice and policy initiatives. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 41–62. doi: 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00304.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Beco, G., Hyll-Larsen, P., & Ron Balsera, M. (2009). The Right to Education: Human Rights Indicators and the Right to Education of Roma Children in Slovenia, Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2010 - Reaching the marginalized. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved July 12, 2016, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001866/186604e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bosanac, B., & Zdravković, L. (2012). Imagination castrated: Critical rethinking of the civil society (organisation) in contemporary society. Ljubljana: Peace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Castles, S. (2005). Hierarchical citizenship in a world of unequal nation-states. Political Science and Politics, 38, 689–692. doi: 10.1017/S1049096505050353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Regional Policy Research and Cooperation ‘Studiorum’; Roma Organization for Multicultural Affirmation S.O.S.; & Association of Education Workers and Protection of the Rights of Women and Children ‘LIL’. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Skopje: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Civil society coalition incorporating the Institute of the Association for Transitional Researches & Roma National Council. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Zagreb: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Coalition for Monitoring Child Rights in Serbia. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Belgrade: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, L., & McNeilly, K. (2013). The United Kingdom, the United Nations human rights council and the first cycle of the universal periodic review. The International Journal of Human Rights, 17(1), 152–177. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2012.720571
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2002). Fundamental principles on the status of non-governmental organisations in Europe and explanatory memorandum fundamental principles on the status of non-governmental organisations in Europe. Strasbourg: CoE.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2015). Official estimates. Retrieved October 10, 2015, from http://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/roma
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (2000). Gender-related aspects of race discrimination. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C. (2004). Rhetoric, practice & the dynamics of institutional change: Immigrant policy in Sweden 1964–2000. Scandinavian Political Studies, 27(3), 287–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2004.00107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devic, A. (2006). Transnationalization of civil society in Kosovo: International and local limits of Peace and multiculturalism. Ethnopolitics, 5(3), 257–273. doi: 10.1080/17449050600911067
   Google Scholar
• Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (2004). Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(1), 615–630. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00061-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Roma Rights Centre and Minority Rights Centre, Concerning Serbia. (2013). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Belgrade: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Roma Rights Centre and National Roma Centrum, Concerning Macedonia. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Skopje: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). Roma survey – Data in focus poverty and employment: The situation of Roma in 11 EU member states. Vienna: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fekete, L. (2014). Europe against the Roma. Race & Class, 55(3), 60–70. doi: 10.1177/0306396813509196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2013). Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Qualitative Research, 14(3), 341–352. doi: 10.1177/1468794113481790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. (2011). On labour market discrimination against Roma in south east Europe. Papers in Regional Science, 90(4), 773–788. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus, critical reflections on the ‘postsocialist’ condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• French, L., & Nikolic-Novakovic, L. (2012). War trauma and its aftermath: An international perspective on the Balkan and gulf wars. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Gëzim, K. (2015). Equal citizens, uneven communities: Differentiated and hierarchical citizenship in Kosovo. Ethnopolitics, 14(2), 197–217. doi: 10.1080/17449057.2014.991152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheorghe, N. (2013). Choices to be made and prices to be paid: Potential roles and consequences in Roma activism and policy-making. In W. Guy (Ed.), From victimhood to citizenship – The path of Roma integration (pp. 79–91). Budapest: Kossuth Press/CEU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenny, M. (1993). The fall of Yugoslavia: The third Balkan War. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge: Havard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D., & Durst, D. (2004). Civil society in southeast Europe. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Bosnia & Herzegovina. (2014). National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to human rights council resolution 16/21 (Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, Twentieth session). A/HRC/WG.6/20/BIH/1. Sarajevo, NY: OHCHR.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Montenegro. (2013). National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to human rights council resolution 16/21 (Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, Twentieth session). A/HRC/WG.6/15/MNE/1. NY: OHCHR.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Serbia. (2013). National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to human rights council resolution 16/21 (Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, Twentieth session). Belgrade: Government of Serbia. A/HRC/WG.6/15/SRB/1. NY: OHCHR.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Slovenia. (2014). National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to human rights council resolution 16/21 (Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, Twentieth session). A/HRC/WG.6/20/SVN/1. Belgrade, NY: OHCHR.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36(1), 175–195. doi: 10.1023/A:1024834510939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannes, K., & Macaitis, K. (2012). A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: Update on a review of published papers. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 402–442. doi: 10.1177/1468794111432992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R., & Palenchar, M. (1997). Strategic issues management: Organizations and public policy challenges. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hogwood, B., & Gunn, L. (1984). Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Sarajevo: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch Croatia. (2013). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Zagreb: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Imre, A. (2009). Identity games: Globalization and the transformation of media cultures in the new Europe. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of the Association for Transitional Researches and National Education; Institute of the Association for Transitional Researches and National Education – STINA; Roma National Council; and Centre for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Zagreb.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, D., & Yardley, H. (2003). Content and thematic analysis. In D. Marks, & H. Yardley (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 86–98). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jugović, I., & Doolan, K. (2013). Is there anything specific about early school leaving in southeast Europe? A review of research and policy. European Journal of Education, 48(3), 363–377. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungić, Ž., Palić, T., Halitović, S., & Sivić, L. (2014). The condition of the Roma population in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Chapter 4. In A. Rosenbloom, C. Parkes, & M. Gudic (Eds.), Socially responsible organizations and the challenge of poverty (Vol. 1, pp. 153–159). Sheffield: Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E., & Skelcher, C. (2008). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Four conjectures and their implications for theory and practice. Public Administration, 85(3), 587–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00662.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kóczé, A. (2012). Civil society, civil involvement and social inclusion of the Roma. In A. Ivanov & J. Kling (eds.), Roma inclusion working papers. Bratislava: United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved July 9, 2016, from http://www.eurasia.undp.org/content/dam/rbec/docs/Civil-society-civil-involvement-and-social-inclusion-of-the-Roma.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kóczé, A., & Rövid, M. (2012). Pro-Roma global civil society: Acting for, with or instead of Roma? Chapter 7. In M. Kaldor, H. L. Moore, & S. Selchow (Eds.), Global civil society 2012: Ten years of critical reflection (pp. 110–122). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kostadinova, G. (2011). Minority rights as a normative framework for addressing the situation of Roma in Europe. Oxford Development Studies, 39(2), 163–183. doi: 10.1080/13600818.2011.570864
   Google Scholar
• Križan, M. (1989). Of “civil society” and socialism in Yugoslavia. Studies in Soviet Thought, 37(4), 287–306. doi: 10.1007/BF01044468
   Google Scholar
• Kukla, A. (2000). Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, J. (1999). Roma of the former Yugoslavia. Nationalities Papers, 27(2), 205–226. doi: 10.1080/009059999109037
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. (1970). Decision making vs. policy making: Toward an antidote for technocracy. Public Administration Review, 30(3), 314–325. doi: 10.2307/974053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machel, G. (2001). The impact of war on children. London: Hurst & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Macura-Milovanović, S., Munda, M., & Peček, M. (2013). Roma pupils’ identification with school in Slovenia and Serbia: Case studies. Educational Studies, 39(5), 483–502. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2013.801768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin Thornton, G. (2014). The outsiders: Power differentials between Roma and non-Roma in Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 15(1), 106–119. doi: 10.1080/15705854.2013.873260
   Google Scholar
• May, S. (2012). Language and minority rights ethnicity, nationalism and the politics of language. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCrudden, C. (1982). Institutional discrimination. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2(3), 303–367. doi: 10.1093/ojls/2.3.303
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, A., & Agarin, T. (2014). Unpacking the Roma participation puzzle: Presence, voice and influence. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(12), 1972–1990. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2014.897599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organisations: Formal structure as myth & ceremony. Chapter 4. In W. Powell, & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organisational analysis (pp. 212–243). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Micher, S. (2006). Poverty and the determinants of welfare for Roma and other vulnerable groups in south-eastern Europe. Comparative Economic Studies, 48(1), 20–35. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100148
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro Informal Coalition of non-governmental organizations for Children Rights. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Podgorica: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, L. (2001). Legitimation issues in the state-nonprofit relationship. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(1), 707–719. doi: 10.1177/0899764001304005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T., & Oxleya, Z. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1040–1067. doi: 10.2307/2647553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordberg, C. (2005). Integrating a traditional minority into a Nordic society: Elite discourse on Finnish roma. Social Work & Society, 3(2), 158–173.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2011). Information note for NHRIs regarding the Universal Periodic Review Mechanism. Retrieved August 12, 2015, from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/NoteNHRIS.aspx
   Google Scholar
• O’Higgins, N. (2010). It’s not that I’m a racist, it’s that they are Roma: Roma discrimination and returns to education in south Eastern Europe. International Journal of Manpower, 31(2), 163–187. doi: 10.1108/01437721011042250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y., & Warin, P. (2007). Are innovative, participatory and deliberative procedures in policy making democratic and effective? European Journal of Political Research, 46(1), 445–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petr, K. (2004). Information needs of the Romany minority in eastern Croatia: Pilot-study. New Library World, 105(9-10), 357–369. doi: 10.1108/03074800410557312
   Google Scholar
• Posavec, K., & Hrvatic, N. (2000). Intercultural education and Roma in Croatia. Intercultural Education, 11(1), 93–105. doi: 10.1080/14675980050005424
   Google Scholar
• Poucki, B., & Bryan, N. (2014). Vulnerability to human trafficking among the Roma population in Serbia: The role of social exclusion and marginalization. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 35(2), 145–162. doi: 10.1080/07256868.2014.885417
   Google Scholar
• Price, J., & Shildrick, M. (1999). Feminist theory and the body: A reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2003). The domain of the political and overlapping consensus. In D. Matravers, & J. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy (pp. 142–168). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ringold, D., Orenstein, M., & Wilkens, E. (2005). Roma in an expanding Europe: Breaking the poverty cycle. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Roma Organization for Multicultural Affirmation S.O.S., Association of Education Workers and Protection of the Rights of Women and Children ‘LIL’& Centre for Regional Policy Research and Cooperation ‘Studiorum’. (2014). Parallel report to the human rights council, universal periodic review. Skopje: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sandana, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sardelić, J. (2013). Roma Minorities on the Margins of Post-Yugoslav Citizenship Regimes, The Europeanisation of Citizenship in the Successor States of the Former Yugoslavia (CITSEE). University of Edinburgh, School of Law, Working Paper 2013/31.
   Google Scholar
• Sardelić, J. (2015). Roma minorities and uneven citizenship access in the post-Yugoslav space. Ethnopolitics, 14(2), 159–179. doi: 10.1080/17449057.2014.991154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasse, G. (2008). The politics of EU conditionality: The norm of minority protection during and beyond EU accession. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 842–860. doi: 10.1080/13501760802196580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnellbach, C. (2012). The role of NGOs in promoting minority rights in the enlarged European Union. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13(4), 497–512. doi: 10.1080/15705854.2012.731937
   Google Scholar
• Simeunović Bajić, N. (2011). Roma in Serbia after the collapse of Yugoslavia: Political implications and media silence on racial violence. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D., Rochford, E., Worden, S., & Benford, R. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. doi: 10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stambolieva, M. (2015). Welfare state change and social citizenship in the post-Yugoslav states. European Politics and Society, 16(3), 379–394. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2015.1061775
   Google Scholar
• Stauber, R., & Vago, R. (2013). The Roma: A minority in Europe: Historical, political and social perspectives. Budapest: Central European University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sterland, B. (2006). Civil society capacity building in post-conflict societies: The experience of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo. Oxford: INTRAC.
   Google Scholar
• Sunčica, M., & Mojca, P. (2013). Attitudes of Serbian and Slovenian student teachers towards causes of learning underachievement amongst Roma pupils. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(6), 629–645. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2012.703247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajkovski, H. (1999). Macedonia – Civil society in transition. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Trehan, N. (2001). In the name of the Roma? The role of private foundations and NGOs. In W. Guy (Ed.), Between past and future: The Roma of central and Eastern Europe (pp. 134–149). Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trehan, N. (2010). The Roma subaltern within neoliberal European civil society: NGOization of human rights and silent voices, Chapter 3. In N. Trehan, & N. Sigona (Eds.), Roma politics in contemporary Europe: Poverty, ethnic mobilization, and the neo-liberal order (pp. 51–71). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tremlett, A. (2014). Making a difference without creating a difference: Super-diversity as a new direction for research on Roma minorities. Ethnicities, 14(6), 830–848. doi: 10.1177/1468796814542183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremlett, A., & McGarry, A. (2013). Challenges facing researchers on Roma Minorities in contemporary Europe: Notes towards a Research Program, ECMI Working Paper #62, European Centre for Minority Issues, Flensburg.
   Google Scholar
• Trubek, D., & Trubek, L. (2005). Hard and soft social Europe: The role of the open method of Co-ordination. European Law Journal, 11(3), 343–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00263.x
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Children’s Fund. (2012). Child poverty in Montenegro report. Belgrade: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Urh, S. (2008). The development of an ethnically sensitive approach in social work in Slovenia. European Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 117–129. doi: 10.1080/13691450701532016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis, Chapter 18. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 18–59). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vladisavljev, N., & Kiers, J. (2004). Roma access to employment, Serbia and Montenegro. Belgrade: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, J., Clair, M., & Wilson, K. (2009). Problematics of grounded theory: Innovations for developing an increasingly rigorous qualitative method. Qualitative Research, 9(3), 355–381. doi: 10.1177/1468794109106605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C., & Sabatier, P. (2009). Coalitions, science, and belief change: Comparing adversarial and collaborative policy subsystems. Policy Studies Journal, 37(2), 195–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00310.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, S. (2010). Gender as catalyst for violence against Roma in contemporary Italy. Patterns of Prejudice, 44(5), 469–488. doi: 10.1080/0031322X.2010.527444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (1999). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar