Mapping Non-Territorial Autonomy Arrangements

References

• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989. http://classic.austlii.edu.au//au/legis/cth/num_act/aatsica1989478/
   Google Scholar
• Ackrén, M. (2009). Conditions for different autonomy regimes in the world. A fuzzy-set application. Åbo Akademis Förlag – Åbo Akademi University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alderman, J., & Tomaselli, A. (2020). Indigenous originary peasant autonomy (Autonomía Indígena Originaria Campesina) in Bolivia. Online compendium autonomy arrangements in the world. http://www.world-autonomies.info/tas/bolivia/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Andeva, M. (2013). Challenging national cultural autonomy in the Republic of Macedonia. In E. Nimni, A. Osipov, & D. J. Smith (Eds.), The challenge of non-territorial autonomy: Theory and practice (pp. 213–228). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Andreescu, G. (2007). Cultural and territorial autonomy and the issue of Hungarian identity. Hungarian Studies, 21(1–2), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1556/HStud.21.2007.1-2.3
   Google Scholar
• Baliqi, B. (2018). Promoting multi-ethnicity or maintaining a divided society: Dilemmas of power-sharing in Kosovo. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 17(1), 49–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, O. (2000). The question of nationalities and social democracy. University of Minnesota Press. (Originally published as Die Nationalitätenfrage und die Sozialdemokratie. Verlag der Wiener Volksbuchhandlung, 1907).
   Google Scholar
• Benedikter, T. (2009). The world's modern autonomy systems. Concepts and experiences of regional territorial autonomy. EURAC.
   Google Scholar
• Beysoylu, C. (2018). Implementing Brussels agreements: The EU’s facilitating strategy and contrasting local perceptions of peace in Kosovo. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2018.1474549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breton, R. (1964). Institutional completeness of ethnic communities and the personal relations of immigrants. American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1086/223793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, G., & Küpper, H. (2002). European options of autonomy: A typology of autonomy models of minority self-governance. In K. Gal (Ed.), Minority governance in Europe (pp. 13–36). LGI.
   Google Scholar
• Burbank, J., & Cooper, F. (2010). Empires in world history: Power and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burema, L. (2013). Decentralization in Kosovo: Defusing ethnic tensions or furthering ethnic isolation? In W. Bartlett, S. Maleković, & V. Monastiriotis (Eds.), Decentralization and local development in South East Europe (pp. 100–117). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Catt, H., & Murphy, M. (2002). Sub-state nationalism. A comparative analysis of institutional design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chouinard, S. (2014). The rise of non-territorial autonomy in Canada: Towards a doctrine of institutional completeness in the domain of minority language rights. Ethnopolitics, 13(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2013.794495
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (1994). Approaches to the resolution of ethnic conflict: The strategy of non-territorial autonomy. International Political Science Review, 15(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219401500305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2013). Non-territorial autonomy: A non-option for Northern Ireland? In E. Nimni, A. Osipov, & D. J. Smith (Eds.), The challenge of non-territorial autonomy: Theory and practice (pp. 55–70). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D., & Mahon, J. E. (1993). Conceptual “stretching” revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. The American Political Science Review, 87 (4), 845–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. (1995). NATLEX. Database of national labour, social security and related human rights legislation. Retrieved May 28, 2021, from https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natlex4.detail?p_lang=en&p_isn=41544
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, R. (2000). Cyprus: From corporate autonomy to the search for territorial federalism. In Y. Ghai (Ed.), Autonomy and ethnicity: Negotiating competing claims in multi-ethnic states (pp. 219–241). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalle Mulle, E. (2016). Belgium and the Brussels question: The role of non-territorial autonomy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1101839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Villiers, B. (2018). Managing diversity in deeply divided societies: The quest for self-determination by the Afrikaans-speaking community in South Africa. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 17(2), 47–76.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, C. (2007). The use of cultural autonomy to prevent conflict and meet the Copenhagen criteria: The case of Romania. Ethnopolitics, 6(3), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449050701487454
   Google Scholar
• Decker, C. (2011). Contemporary forms of cultural autonomy in Eastern Europe: Recurrent problems and prospects for improving the functioning of elected bodies of cultural autonomy. In The participation of minorities in public life. Series: Venice Commission. Science and technique of democracy No.45 (pp. 101–112). Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Deets, S. (2015). Networks and communal autonomy as practice: Health, education, and social welfare in Lebanon. Ethnopolitics, 14(4), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1015322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobos, B. (2016). The minority self-governments in Hungary. Online Compendium Autonomy Arrangements in the World. http://www.world-autonomies.info/ntas/hun/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Dundas, G. (2004). Cyprus from 1960 to EU accession: The case for non-territorial autonomy. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 50(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2004.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eide, A., Greni, V., & Lundberg, M. (1998). Cultural autonomy: Concept, content, history and role in the world order. In M. Suksi (Ed.), Autonomy: Applications and implications (pp. 251–276). Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• ENTAN. (2020). ENTAN - The European Non-Territorial Autonomy Network. Non-Territorial Autonomy in Theory and Practice: A 2020 Report. University American College (UACS). Retrieved May 18, 2021, from https://entan.org/entan-activity/non-territorial-autonomy-in-theory-and-practicea-2020-report/
   Google Scholar
• Falch, T., Selle, P., & Strømsnes, K. (2016). The Sámi: 25 years of indigenous authority in Norway. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1101846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fessha, Y. T. (2010). Ethnic diversity and federalism. Constitution making in South Africa and Ethiopia. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fort, E. (2018). From power-sharing arrangements to identity building: The case of Kosovo Serbs in Kosovo. Ethnopolitics, 17(5), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2018.1511159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, E. (2009). The ethnopolitics of territorial division in the Republic of Macedonia. Ethnopolitics, 8(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449050802243418
   Google Scholar
• Geldenhuys, D. (2020). Autonomy initiatives of the Afrikaner community in South Africa. In T. H. Malloy, & L. Salat (Eds.), Non-territorial autonomy and decentralization. Ethno-cultural diversity governance (pp. 90–113). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (1999). What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity, 31(3), 357–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghai, Y. (2005). Autonomy as a participatory right in the modern democratic state. Public participation, autonomy and minorities. In Z. Skurbaty (Ed.), Beyond a One-dimensional state: An emerging right to Autonomy? (pp. 3–45). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ghai, Y., & Cottrell, J. (2007). A tale of three constitutions: Ethnicity and politics in Fiji. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(4), 639–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mom030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts. A user’s guide. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, J. T. (1979). Polish society under German occupation: The generalgouvernement, 1939-1944. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunes, C., & Gürer, C. (2018). Kurdish movement’s democratic autonomy proposals in Turkey. In E. Nimni, & E. Aktoprak (Eds.), Democratic representation in plurinational states. The Kurds in Turkey (pp. 159–175). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, W. (1972). National solidarity and organic work in prussian Poland, 1815-1914. The Journal of Modern History, 44(1), 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/240706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze, H.-J. (1998). On the legal understanding of autonomy. In M. Suksi (Ed.), Autonomy: Applications and implications (pp. 7–32). Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Henrard, K. (2005). ‘Participation’, ‘representation’ and ‘autonomy’ in the Lund Recommendations and their reflections in the supervision of the FCNM and several Human Rights conventions. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 12(2-3), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181105774740606
   Google Scholar
• Hill, R. S. (2016). New Zealand Maori: The quest for indigenous autonomy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1101844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, H. (2018). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and multinational federalism in Australia. Griffith Law Review, 27(3), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2018.1557587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housden, M. (2005). Cultural autonomy in Estonia: One of history’s ‘curiosities’? In D. J. Smith (Ed.), The Baltic States and their region: New Europe or old? (pp. 227–250). Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Housden, M. (2014). On their own behalf. Ewald Ammende, Europe’s national minorities and the campaign for cultural autonomy 1920–1936. Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, C. (2000). Civil resistance in Kosovo. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Josefsen, E. (2010). The Sámi and the national parliaments: Channels for political influence. IPU & UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Kapidžić, D. (2020). Subnational competitive authoritarianism and powersharing in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2020.1700880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, S. (2013). Multinational federalism in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Klatt, M. (2014). Minority schools financing in the Danish-German border region. European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online, 11, 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90110053
   Google Scholar
• Koch, S. (2020). The formation of Bulgaria's policy concerning Bulgarians abroad. ICELDS Opinion. January 27. https://www.icelds.org/2020/01/27/the-formation-of-bulgarias-policy-concerning-bulgarians-abroad/
   Google Scholar
• Lagerspetz, M. (2014). Cultural autonomy of national minorities in Estonia: The erosion of a promise. Journal of Baltic Studies, 45(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2014.942676
   Google Scholar
• Lajcakova, J. (2010). Advancing empowerment of the Roma in Slovakia through a non-territorial national autonomy. Ethnopolitics, 9(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449050902868486
   Google Scholar
• Landry, R., Allard, R., & Deveau, K. (2007). Bilingual schooling of the Canadian Francophone minority: A cultural autonomy model. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2007(183), 133–162. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2007.029
   Google Scholar
• Lapidoth, R. (1997). Autonomy: Flexible solutions to ethnic conflicts. United States Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (1999). Concepts and cognitive science. In E. Margolis, & S. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core readings (pp. 3–81). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law about the unrestricted development and right to cultural autonomy of Latvia’s nationalities and ethnic groups, adopted on March 19, 1991, with amendments of June 15, 1994, In Human Rights: Collection of Legislative Acts and Informative Materials (pp. 42–43). Saeima of the Republic of Latvia, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy and plural societies. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, A. (2012). Between the integration and accommodation of ethnic difference: Decentralization in the Republic of Macedonia. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 11(3), 80–103.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. (2009). The Lund recommendations and non-territorial arrangements: Progressive de-territorialization of minority politics. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 16(4), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115_016_04-13
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. H. (2015). Introduction. In T. H. Malloy, A. Osipov, & B. Vizi (Eds.), Managing diversity through non-territorial autonomy: Assessing advantages, deficiencies, and risks (pp. 1–15). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. H., & Salat, L. (Eds.). (2020). Non-territorial autonomy and decentralization. Ethno-cultural diversity governance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy, J., & Aboultaif, E. W. (2020). Power-sharing challenges: From weak adoptability to dysfunction in Iraq. Ethnopolitics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2020.1739363
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, J., & O’Leary, B. (2007). Iraq’s constitution of 2005: Liberal consociation as political prescription. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(4), 670–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mom026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. P., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2002). New public management. Current trends and future prospects. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, M., Palermo, F., & Milano, E. (Eds.). (2016). Law, territory and conflict resolution. Law as a problem and law as a solution. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Nimni, E. (Ed.). (2005). Natural cultural autonomy and its contemporary critics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nimni, E. (2007). National–cultural autonomy as an alternative to minority territorial nationalism. Ethnopolitics, 6(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449050701487363
   Google Scholar
• Nimni, E. (2013). The conceptual challenge of non-territorial autonomy. In E. Nimni, A. Osipov, & D. J. Smith (Eds.), The challenge of non-territorial autonomy: Theory and practice (pp. 1–24). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• O’Driscoll, D. (2017). Autonomy impaired: Centralisation, authoritarianism and the failing Iraqi state. Ethnopolitics, 16(4), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1086126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osipov, A. (2004). Natsionalno-Kulturnaya Avtonomiya: Idei, Resheniya, Instituty [National Cultural Autonomy: Ideas, Decisions, Institutions]. Centre for Independent Sociological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Osipov, A. (2010). National cultural autonomy in Russia: A case of symbolic law. Review of Central and East European Law, 35(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/157303510X12650378239955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osipov, A. (2011). The ‘Peoples’ Congresses’ in Russia: Failure or success? Authenticity and efficiency of minority representation. ECMI Working paper No.48. https://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/redakteure/publications/pdf/Working_Paper_48_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osipov, A. (2012). Implementation unwanted? – Symbolic vs. instrumental policies in the Russian management of ethnic diversity. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2012.731933
   Google Scholar
• Pendarovski, S., Dodovski, I., & Andeva, M. (2017). Fearing endless demands and learning to negotiate the change: Minority representation in the Republic of Macedonia. In B. Vizi, N. Tóth, & E. Dobos (Eds.), Beyond international conditionality: Local variations of minority representation in central and South-Eastern Europe (pp. 161–186). Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Pentassuglia, G. (2018). Do human rights have anything to say about group autonomy? In G. Pentassuglia (Ed.), Ethno-cultural diversity and human rights. Challenges and critiques (pp. 125–167). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Petričušić, A. (2015). Non-territorial autonomy in Croatia. In T. H. Malloy, A. Osipov, & B. Vizi (Eds.), Managing diversity through non-territorial autonomy: Assessing advantages, deficiencies, and risks (pp. 53–68). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pogonyi, S. (2017). Extra-territorial ethnic politics, discourses and identities in Hungary. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Poleshchuk, V. (2015). Russian national cultural autonomy in Estonia. In T. H. Malloy, A. Osipov, & B. Vizi (Eds.), Managing diversity through non-territorial autonomy: Assessing advantages, deficiencies, and risks (pp. 229–248). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Van Thiel, S., & Homburg, V. (2007). New public management in Europe. Adaptation and alternatives. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, K. (2003). The realisation of national minority rights. Macquarie Law Journal, 3(4), 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Prina, F. (2016). National minorities in Putin's Russia. Diversity and assimilation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prina, F. (2020). Nonterritorial autonomy and minority (dis)empowerment: Past, present, and future. Nationalities Papers, 48(3), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2019.124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prina, F., Smith, D., & Molnar Sansum, J. (2018). National cultural autonomy in Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and possibilities. In E. Nimni, & E. Aktoprak (Eds.), Democratic representation in plurinational states. The Kurds in Turkey (pp. 85–111). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, D. (2015). The Sorbian people in Germany. In T. H. Malloy, A. Osipov, & B. Vizi (Eds.), Managing diversity through non-territorial autonomy: Assessing advantages, deficiencies, and risks (pp. 163–182). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renner, K. (2005). State and nation. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National cultural autonomy and its contemporary critics (pp. 15–47). Routledge. (Originally published as Synopticus (pseudonym) (1899). Staat und Nation: Zur österreichischen Nationalitätenfrag. Dietl).
   Google Scholar
• Roach, S. C. (2005). Cultural autonomy, minority rights, and globalization. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, S. (2008). The Tibetan government-in-exile. Politics at large. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roshwald, A. (2007). Between Balkanization and Banalization: Dilemmas of ethno-cultural diversity. Ethnopolitics, 6(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449050701487371
   Google Scholar
• Safran, W. (2000). Spatial and functional dimensions of autonomy: Cross-national and theoretical perspectives. In W. Safran, & R. Maiz (Eds.), Identity and territorial autonomy in plural societies (pp. 11–34). Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Saleniece, I., & Kuznetsovs, S. (1999). Nationality policy, education and the Russian question in Latvia since 1918. In C. Williams, & T. D. Sfikas (Eds.), Ethnicity and nationalism in Russia, the CIS and the Baltic states (pp. 236–264). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, W., Taylor, J., & Ross, K. (2000). Participation and representation in ATSIC elections: A ten-year perspective. Australian Journal of Political Science, 35(3), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/713649344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholsem, J.-C. (2011). Personal autonomy through the ‘communities’ system: Does the example of Belgium suggest that forms of non-territorial autonomy can make a difference in terms of minority participation? In The Participation of minorities in public life. Series: Venice Commission. Science and technique of democracy No.45 (pp. 113–129). Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2012). Indigenousness, human rights, ethnicity, language and power. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2012(213), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2012.008
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. J. (2016). Estonia: A model for inter-War Europe? Ethnopolitics, 15(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1101841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. J., & Hiden, J. (2012). Ethnic diversity and the nation state: National cultural autonomy revisited. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. (1989). Three distinctions about concepts and categorization. Mind & Language, 4(1-2), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00241.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations. Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, K. (2019). Multiculturalism, biculturalism, and national Identity in Aotearoa / New Zealand. In R. T. Ashcroft, & M. Bevir (Eds.), Multiculturalism in the British commonwealth: Comparative perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 104–123). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Triantafillou, P. (2009). The politics of self-governance. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Stroschein, S. (2011). Making or breaking Kosovo: Applications of dispersed state control. Perspectives on Politics, 6(4), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270808184X
   Google Scholar
• Suksi, M. (2008). Personal autonomy as institutional form – focus on Europe against the background of Article 27 of the ICCPR. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 15(2–3), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181108X332587
   Google Scholar
• Suksi, M. (2015). Non-territorial autonomy: the meaning of ‘(non-)territoriality’. In T. Malloy, & F. Palermo (Eds.), Minority accommodation through territorial and non-territorial autonomy (pp. 83–118). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uyama, T. (Ed.). (2018). Comparing modern empires: Imperial rule and decolonization in the changing world order. Slavic-Eurasian Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Verstichel, A. (2009). Participation, representation and identity: The right of persons belonging to minorities to effective participation in public affairs: Content, justification and limits. Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. (2017). The Crimean Tatar question: A prism for changing nationalisms and rival versions of eurasianism. Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society, 3(2), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.24216/97723645330050302_01
   Google Scholar
• Yupsanis, A. (2019a). Autonomy for minorities: Definitions, types and status in international law. Finnish Yearbook of International Law, 25, 3–46. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509927180.0004
   Google Scholar
• Yupsanis, A. (2019b). Cultural autonomy for minorities in Hungary: A model to be followed or a futile promise? International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 26(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02601004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yupsanis, A. (2019c). Minority cultural autonomy in Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia: A real opportunity for cultural survival or a right void of substance? Europäisches Journal für Minderheitenfragen, 12(1-2), 83–112.
   Google Scholar