Let the best story win – evaluation of the most cited business history articles

References

• Abramo, G., C. A. D’Angelo, and A. Caprasecca. 2009. “Allocative Efficiency in Public Research Funding: Can Bibliometrics Help?” Research Policy 38 (1): 206–215.10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramovitz, M. 1986. “Catching Up, Forging Ahead and Falling Behind.” The Journal of Economic History 46 (2): 385–406.10.1017/S0022050700046209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatori, F., and G. Jones, eds. 2003. Business History Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, L. I. M., M. A. Hong, W. E. N. Qi, X. U. Zhou, and C. Brenda. 2009. “Distinguishing Citation Quality for Journal Impact Assessment.” Communications of the ACM 52 (8): 111–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskin, J. B. 1988. “The Development of Corporate Financial Markets in Britain and the United States, 1600–1914: Overcoming Asymmetric Information.” Business History Review 62 (2): 199–237.10.2307/3115999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyns, T. 1998. “British Business History: A Review of the Periodical Literature for 1996.” Business History 40 (2): 95–114.10.1080/00076799800000172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadberry, S. N., and N. F. Crafts. 1996. “British Economic Policy and Industrial Performance in the Early Post-War Period.” Business History 38 (4): 65–91.10.1080/00076799600000135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunninge, O. 2009. “Using History in Organizations: How Managers Make Purposeful Reference to History in Strategy Processes.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 22 (1): 8–26.10.1108/09534810910933889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casson, M. 1997. “Institutional Economics and Business History: A Way Forward?” Business History 39 (4): 151–171.10.1080/00076799700000150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casson, M. 1999. “The Economics of the Family Firm.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 47 (1): 10–23.10.1080/03585522.1999.10419802
   Google Scholar
• Casson, M. 2010. “Entrepreneurship: Theory, Institutions and History. Eli F. Heckscher Lecture, 2009.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 58 (2): 139–170.10.1080/03585522.2010.482288
   Google Scholar
• Cheffins, B., and S. Bank. 2009. “Is Berle and Means Really a Myth?” Business History Review 83 (3): 443–474.10.1017/S0007680500002968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. 1993. “The Rigid Disk Drive Industry: A History of Commercial and Technological Turbulence.” Business History Review 67 (4): 531–588.10.2307/3116804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, R. 1993. “The Family Firm in Industrial Capitalism: International Perspectives on Hypotheses and History.” Business History 35 (4): 17–43.10.1080/00076799300000127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, P., and M. Rowlinson. 2004. “The Treatment of History in Organisation Studies: Towards an ‘Historic Turn’?” Business History 46 (3): 331–352.10.1080/0007679042000219175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colli, A., C. Howorth, and M. B. Rose. 2013. “Long-term Perspectives on Family Business.” Business History 55 (6): 841–854.10.1080/00076791.2012.744589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colli, A., and M. Larsson. 2014. “Family Business and Business History: An Example of Comparative Research.” Business History 56 (1): 37–53.10.1080/00076791.2013.818417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colli, A., and M. Vasta. 2015. “Large and Entangled: Italian Business Groups in the Long Run.” Business History 57 (1): 64–96.10.1080/00076791.2014.977872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M. A., Y. Mylonadis, and R. S. Rosenbloom. 1992. “Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta.” Business History Review 66 (1): 51–94.10.2307/3117053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C., and F. Carden. 1998. “Research Effectiveness and R&D Evaluation in Developing Countries.” Knowledge and Policy 10 (4): 7–30.10.1007/BF02912497
   Google Scholar
• Decker, S. 2016. “Paradigms Lost: Integrating History and Organization Studies.” Management and Organizational History. 11 (4): 364–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, S., M. Kipping, and R. D. Wadhwani. 2015. “New Business Histories! Plurality in Business History Research Methods.” Business History 57 (1): 30–40.10.1080/00076791.2014.977870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, A., D. M. Higgins, and H. van Driel. 2015. “Towards a New Business History?” Business History 57 (1): 5–29.10.1080/00076791.2014.977869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, A., D. M. Higgins, and H. van Driel. 2016. “A Citation Analysis of Business History and Related Disciplines.” In The Routledge Companion to Business History, edited by John F. Wilson, Steven Toms, Abe de Jong, and Emily Buchnea, 3–54. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eloranta, J., J. Ojala, and H. Valtonen. 2010a. “Quantitative Methods in Business History: An Impossible Equation?” Management & Organizational History 5 (1): 79–107.10.1177/1744935909353837
   Google Scholar
• Eloranta, J., J. Ojala, and H. Valtonen. 2010b. “Methods, Topics, and Trends in Recent Business History Scholarship.” Business History News. The Newsletter of the Association of Business Historians. Spring, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Folkman, P., J. Froud, S. Johal, and K. Williams. 2007. “Working for Themselves? Capital Market Intermediaries and Present Day Capitalism.” Business History 49 (4): 552–572.10.1080/00076790701296373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman-Peck, J., and L. Hannah. 2012. “Extreme Divorce: The Managerial Revolution in UK Companies Before 1914.” The Economic History Review 65 (4): 1217–1238.10.1111/ehr.2012.65.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschet, M. 2009. “A Cluster Analysis of Scholar and Journal Bibliometric Indicators.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 60 (10): 1950–1964.10.1002/asi.v60:10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, W. A., and G. Jones. 2011. “Business History: Time for Debate.” Business History Review 85 (1): 1–8.10.1017/S0007680511000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froud, J., and K. Williams. 2007. “Private Equity and the Culture of Value Extraction.” New Political Economy 12 (3): 405–420.10.1080/13563460701485656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos, L. 1970. “The Emerging Organizational Synthesis In Modern American History.” Business History Review 44 (3): 279–290.10.2307/3112614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos, L. 1983. “Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization: Central Themes of the Organizational Synthesis.” Business History Review 57 (4): 471–493.10.2307/3114810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos, L., and J. L. Sturchio. 1998. “Pharmaceutical Firms and the Transition to Biotechnology: A Study in Strategic Innovation.” Business History Review 72 (2): 250–278.10.2307/3116278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbert, M., W. Ruigrok, and B. Wicki. 2008. “What Passes as a Rigorous Case Study?” Strategic Management Journal 29 (13): 1465–1474.10.1002/smj.v29:13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. C., J. Hassard, E. S. O’Connor, M. Rowlinson, and M. Ruef. 2016. “What is Organizational History? Toward a Creative Synthesis of History and Organization Studies.” Academy of Management Review 41 (4): 590–608.10.5465/amr.2016.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, L. 1974. “Takeover Bids in Britain Before 1950: An Exercise in Business ‘pre-history’.” Business History 16 (1): 65–77.10.1080/00076797400000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, L. 2007. “The ‘Divorce’of Ownership from Control from 1900 Onwards: Re-calibrating Imagined Global Trends.” Business History 49 (4): 404–438.10.1080/00076790701295821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. E. 2012. “Business History: A Cultural and Narrative Approach.” Business History Review 86 (4): 693–717.10.1017/S0007680512001201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, C., and J. Wilson. 2007. “Redefining Business History: An Editorial Statement.” Business History 49 (1): 1–7.10.1080/00076790601062933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W., and R. van der Wal. 2009. “A Google Scholar h-Index for Journals: An Alternative Metric to Measure Journal Impact in Economics and Business.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 60 (1): 41–46.10.1002/asi.v60:1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helper, S. 1991. “Strategy and Irreversibility in Supplier Relations: The Case of the U.S. Automobile Industry.” Business History Review 65 (4): 781–824.10.2307/3117265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M. H., and Y. W. Chang. 2008. “Characteristics of Research Output in Social Sciences and Humanities: From a Research Evaluation Perspective.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 59 (11): 1819–1828.10.1002/asi.v59:11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarwal, S. D., A. M. Brion, and M. L. King. 2009. “Measuring Research Quality Using the Journal Impact Factor, Citations and ‘Ranked Journals’: Blunt Instruments or Inspired Metrics?” Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management 31 (4): 289–300.10.1080/13600800903191930
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G., and J. Zeitlin, eds. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Business History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G., and T. Khanna. 2006. “Bringing History (Back) into International Business.” Journal of International Business Studies 37 (4): 453–468.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., M. H. van Leeuwen, and S. Broadberry. 2012. “The Future of Economic, Business, and Social History.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 60 (3): 225–253.10.1080/03585522.2012.727766
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., D. M. Cable, A. E. Colbert, and S. L. Rynes. 2007. “What Causes a Management Article to be Cited – Article, Author, or Journal?” Academy of Management Journal 50 (3): 491–506.10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., H. Morris, M. Rowlinson, and C. Harvey, eds. 2009. The Association of Business Schools Academic Journal Quality Guide. Version 3. Introduction: Context, Purpose and Method. March [Online]. Accessed February 9, 2010. http://www.the-abs.org.uk/files//ABS2009web_introduction.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kieser, A. 1994. “Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses – And How This Should Be Performed.” Organization Science 5 (4): 608–620.10.1287/orsc.5.4.608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipping, M. 1999. “American Management Consulting Companies in Western Europe, 1920 to 1990: Products, Reputation, and Relationships.” Business History Review 73 (2): 190–220.10.2307/3116240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipping, M., and B. Üsdiken. 2014. “History in Organization and Management Theory: More Than Meets the Eye.” The Academy of Management Annals 8 (1): 535–588.10.1080/19416520.2014.911579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipping, M., R. D. Wadhwani, and M. Bucheli. 2014. “Analyzing and Interpreting Historical Sources: A Basic Methodology.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, edited by Marcelo Bucheli and R. Daniel Wadhwani, 305–330. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Kobrak, C., and A. Schneider. 2011. “Varieties of Business History: Subject and Methods for the Twenty-first Century.” Business History 53 (3): 401–424.10.1080/00076791.2011.565515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor, Y. Y., and J. T. Mahoney. 2000. “Penrose’s Resource-based Approach: The Process and Product of Research Creativity.” Journal of Management Studies 37 (1): 109–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux, N., D. M. G. Raff, and P. Temin. 2008. “Economic Theory and Business History.” In The Oxford Handbook of Business History, edited by G. Jones and J. Zeitlin, 37–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, R. N. 1992. “External Economies and Economic Progress: The Case of the Microcomputer Industry.” Business History Review 66 (1): 1–50.10.2307/3117052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebenau, J. 1984. “Industrial R & D in Pharmaceutical Firms in the Early Twentieth Century.” Business History 26 (3): 329–346.10.1080/000767918400000004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, A., and A. Wild. 2014. “Bringing History (Back) into the Resource-based View.” Business History 56 (3): 372–390.10.1080/00076791.2013.790371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mass, W. 1989. “Mechanical and Organizational Innovation: The Drapers and the Automatic Loom.” Business History Review 63 (4): 876–929.10.2307/3115965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDuffie, J. P. 1995. “Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry.” ILR Review 48 (2): 197–221.10.1177/001979399504800201
   Google Scholar
• Mass, W., and W. Lazonick. 1990. “The British Cotton Industry and International Competitive Advantage: The State of the Debates.” Business History 32 (4): 9–65.10.1080/00076799000000143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordhorst, M. 2014. “Arla and Danish National Identity – Business History as Cultural History.” Business History 56 (1): 116–133.10.1080/00076791.2013.818422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C., and B. R. Weingast. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-century England.” The Journal of Economic History 49 (4): 803–832.10.1017/S0022050700009451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala, J., and S. Tenold. 2013. “What is Maritime History? A Content and Contributor Analysis of the International Journal of Maritime History, 1989–2012.” International Journal of Maritime History 25 (2): 17–34.10.1177/084387141302500206
   Google Scholar
• Perchard, A., N. G. MacKenzie, S. Decker, and G. Favero. 2017. “Clio in the Business School: Historical Approaches in Strategy, International Business and Entrepreneurship.” Business History 59: 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley and Sons..
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. T. 1960. “The Growth of the Firm – A Case Study: The Hercules Powder Company.” Business History Review 34 (1): 1–23.10.2307/3111776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, A. 2009. “History, a Useful ‘Science’ for Management?” A Response. Enterprise & Society 10 (4): 831–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff, D. 2013. “How to Do Things with Time.” Enterprise & Society 14 (3): 435–466.10.1093/es/kht025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode, P. W., Joshua L. Rosenbloom, and David F. Weiman, eds. 2011. Economic Evolution and Revolution in Historical Time. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, C. D. 1994. “The End of Economic History?” The Journal of Economic Education 25 (1): 49–66.10.1080/00220485.1994.10844814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, M. J., and U. S. Daellenbach. 1999. “Rethinking Research Methods for the Resource-based Perspective: Isolating Sources of Sustainable Competitive Advantage.” Strategic Management Journal 20 (5): 484–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstreich, D., and B. Wooliscroft. 2009. “Measuring the Impact of Accounting Journals Using Google Scholar and the g-Index.” The British Accounting Review 41 (4): 227–239.10.1016/j.bar.2009.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, M., C. Booth, P. Clark, A. Delahaye, and S. Procter. 2010. “Social Remembering and Organizational Memory.” Organization Studies 31 (1): 69–87.10.1177/0170840609347056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, M., J. Hassard, and S. Decker. 2014. “Research Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue Between Historical Theory and Organization Theory.” Academy of Management Review 39 (3): 250–274.10.5465/amr.2012.0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, M. 2015. “Historiography and the ‘historic turn’ in Organization Theory.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy in Organization Studies, edited by Raza Mir, Hugh Willmot, and Michelle Greenwood, 412–420. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stremersch, S., I. Verniers, and P. C. Verhoef. 2007. “The Quest for Citations: Drivers of Article Impact.” Journal of Marketing 71 (3): 171–193.10.1509/jmkg.71.3.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symeonidis, G. 2008. “The Effect of Competition on Wages and Productivity: Evidence from the United Kingdom.” Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (1): 134–146.10.1162/rest.90.1.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J., and N. Tiratsoo. 1998. “‘An Old Story, Freshly Told’? A Comment on Broadberry and Crafts’ Approach to Britain’s Early Post-War Economic Performance.” Business History 40 (2): 62–72.10.1080/00076799800000169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toms, S., and M. Wright. 2005. “Divergence and Convergence within Anglo-American Corporate Governance Systems: Evidence from the US and UK, 1950–2000.” Business History 47 (2): 267–295.10.1080/0007679042000313684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üsdiken, B., and A. Kieser. 2004. “Introduction: History in Organisation Studies.” Business History 46 (3): 321–330.10.1080/0007679042000219166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• di Vaio, G., D. Waldenström, and J. Weisdorf. 2012. “Citation Success: Evidence from Economic History Journal Publications.” Explorations in Economic History 49 (1): 92–104.10.1016/j.eeh.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, J. K. 2010. “New Directions in Business History: Themes, Approaches and Opportunities.” Business History 52 (1): 1–16.10.1080/00076790903475734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle, A., and J. Wilson. 2015. “Ethnomethodology and the Production of History: Studying ‘history-in-action’.” Business History 57 (1): 41–63.10.1080/00076791.2014.977871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, M. 1992. “The Neglected Intangible Asset: The Influence of the Trade Mark on the Rise of the Modern Corporation.” Business History 34 (1): 66–95.10.1080/00076799200000004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., and S. Toms. 2008. “Fifty years of Business History.” Business History 50 (2): 125–126.10.1080/00076790801994042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., S. Toms, A. de Jong, and E. Buchnea, eds. 2016. The Routledge Companion to Business History. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G. 2013. “An Evolutionary Program for Business History?” Enterprise & Society 14 (3): 498–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G. 2012. “Capabilities: Their Origins and Ancestry.” Journal of Management Studies 49 (8): 1402–1406.10.1111/joms.2012.49.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J. 2003. “Flexibility. Governance, and Strategic Choice in Industrial History.” In Business History Around the World, edited by F. Amatori and G. Jones, 62–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511512100
   Google Scholar
• Zuccala, A., R. Guns, R. Cornacchia, and R. Bod. 2015. “Can we Rank Scholarly Book Publishers? A Bibliometric Experiment with the Field of History.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (7): 1333–1347.10.1002/asi.23267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar