253
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Form and media in management and organizational history how different research programs transform the ‘Past’ into ‘History’

&
Pages 34-56 | Received 19 Jan 2021, Accepted 22 Dec 2023, Published online: 17 Jan 2024

References

  • Andersen, N. Å. 2003. Discursive Analytical Strategies. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Andersen, N. Å. 2011. “Conceptual History and the Diagnostics of the Present.” Management & Organizational History 6 (3): 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935911406152.
  • Andersen, N. Å., H. Knudsen, and J. Sandager. 2023. “Potentialising the Potential: Dream of Everything You Can Become, and Become Everything You Dream of.” European Educational Research Journal: 147490412311670. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041231167063.
  • Ashby, R. 1956. An Introduction to Cybernetics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Ashby, R. 1960. Design for a Brain. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Booth, C., and M. Rowlinson. 2006. “Management and Organizational History: Prospects.” Management & Organizational History 1 (1): 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935906060627.
  • Braudel, F. 1982. On History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Bucheli, M., and D. Wadhwani, Eds. 2014. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark, P., and M. Rowlinson. 2004. “The Treatment of History in Organisation Studies: Towards an ‘Historic Turn’?” Business History 46 (3): 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007679042000219175.
  • Decker, S., J. Hassard, and M. Rowlinson. 2021. “Rethinking History and Memory in Organization Studies: The Case for Historiographical Reflexivity.” Human Relations 74 (8): 1123–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720927443.
  • Erslev, K. 1911. Historisk teknik. Den historiske undersøgelse fremstillet i sine grundlinier. København: Jacob Erslevs Forlag.
  • Erslev, K. [1911] 1978. “Historieskrivning. Grundlinier til nogle kapitler af historiens theori” in Om historieskrivning og historieforskning.” In Reprografisk genudgivet og forlagt af Selskabet for udgivelse af kilder til Dansk historie, edited by K. Erslev and P. Bagge, 1–58. København: J. H. SCHULTZ A/S.
  • Esposito, E. 1996. “From Self-Reference to Autology: How to Operationalize a Circular Approach.” Societal Science Information 35 (2): 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901896035002006.
  • Evans, R. J.1997. In Defence of History. London: Granta Books.
  • Foucault, M. 1986. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock Publication.
  • Foucault, M. 1998a. “On the Archaeology of the Sciences: Response to the Epistemology Circle.” In Michel Foucault, Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 2, Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology, edited by J. D. Faubion, 297–334. New York: The New Press.
  • Foucault, M. 1998b. “The Order of Things.” In Michel Foucault, Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, Vol. 2, Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology, edited by J. D. Faubion, 261–268. New York: The New Press.
  • Foucault, M. 2013. Speech Begins After Death. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Fuglsang, M., and A. Born. 1999. “En bemærkning om Udsagnet.” Grus 59 (20): 71–77.
  • Ginzburg, C. 1979. “Clues- Roots of a Scientific Paradigm.” Theory and Society 7 (3): 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207323.
  • Ginzburg, C. 1980. “Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and Scientific Method.” History Workshop Journal 9 (1): 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/9.1.5.
  • Ginzburg, C. 2012. Threads and Traces: True False Fictive. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Glassman, R. B.1973. “Persistence and Loose Coupling in Living Systems.” Behavioral Science 18 (2): 83–89.
  • Goldman, P. 1994. “Searching for History in Organizational Theory: Comment on Kieser.” Organization Science 5 (4): 621–623. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.4.621.
  • Heider, F. [1926] 1959. “Thing and Medium.” Psychological Issues 1 (3): 1–34.
  • Herzogenrath, B., ed. 2015. Media|matter. The Materiality of Media, Matter as Medium. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Hollander, J. 2011. “Contemporary History and the Art of Self-Distancing.” History & Theory 50 (4): 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00603.x.
  • Kieser, A. 1994. “Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses—And How This Should Be Performed.” Organization Science 5 (4): 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.4.608.
  • Kieser, A. 2015. “Twenty Years After: Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses.” The Routledge Companion to Management and Organizational History, edited byMcLaren, P.G., Mills, A. J., and Weatherbee, T.G., 47–48. Routledge.
  • Koselleck, R. 1985. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Krämer, S. 1998. “Form als Vollzug oder: Was gewinnen wir mit Niklas Luhmanns Unterscheidung von Medium und Form.” Rechthistorisches Journal 17:558–573. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=163349.
  • Levine, C. 2015. Forms. Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Luhmann, N. 1987. “The Medium of Art.” Thesis Eleven 18–19 (1): 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/072551368701800107.
  • Luhmann, N. 1988. Erkenntnis als Konstruktion. Bern: Benteli Verlag.
  • Luhmann, N. 1992. “The Form of Writing.” Stanford Literature Review 9 (1): 25–42.
  • Luhmann, N. 1993. Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik, Band 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Luhmann, N. 1995. Social Systems. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Luhmann, N. 2000. Art as a Social System. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Luhmann, N. 2012. Theory of Society. Vol. 1. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Luhmann, N. 2013. A Systems Theory of Religion. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Maturana, H. 1978. “Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality.” In Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Ertic Lenneberg, edited by G. A. Miller and E. Lenneberg, 27–63. New York: Academic Press.
  • Mckinlay, A. 2013. “Following Foucault into the Archives: Clerks, Carers and Cartoons.” Management & Organizational History 8 (2): 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2012.761498.
  • McLaren, P. G., A. J. Mills, and T. G. Weatherbee, Eds. 2015. The Routledge Companion to Management and Organizational History. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
  • Mizrahi, V. 2018. “Perceptual Media, Glass and Mirrors.” In Perceptual Ephemera, edited by T. Crowther and C. M. Cumhaill, 238–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mizrahi, V. 2021. “Seeing Through Photographs: Photography as a Transparent Visual Medium.” The Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism 79 (1): 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpaa009.
  • Mordhorst, M., and S. Schwarzkopf. 2017. “Theorising Narrative in Business History.” Business History 59 (8): 1155–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2017.1357697.
  • Rowlinson, M., and J. S. Hassard. 2013. “Historical Neo-Institutionalism or Neo-Institutionalist History? Historical Research in Management and Organization Studies.” Management & Organizational History 8 (2): 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2013.780518.
  • Rowlinson, M., J. Hassard, and S. Decker. 2014. “Research Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue Between Historical Theory and Organization Theory.” Academy of Management Review 39 (3): 250–274. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0203.
  • Seitter, W. 2015. “[Meta] Physics of Media.” In Media|matter. The Materiality of Media, Matter as Medium, edited by B. Herzogenrath, 19–27. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Stenner, P., and N. Å. Andersen. 2020. “The Emotional Organization and the Problem of Authenticity: The Romantic, the Pedagogic, the Therapeutic and the Ludic as Liminal Media of Transition.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 37 (3): 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2687.
  • Steve, T., and J. Wilson. 2010. “In Defence of Business History: A Reply to Taylor, Bell and Cooke.” Management & Organizational History 5 (1): 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935909353919.
  • Suddaby, R., W. M. Foster, and C. Quinn Trank. 2010. “Rhetorical History as a Source of Competitive Advantage.” In The Globalization of Strategy Research (Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 27), edited by A. C. Joel and J. Lampel, 147–173. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • von Ranke, L. 1973. “Preface: History of the Latin and Germanic Nations from 1494-1514, (1824).” In The Varieties of History, edited by F. Stern, 54–62. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Wadhwani, R. D., and C. Lubinski. 2017. “Reinventing Entrepreneurial History.” Business History Review 91 (4): 767–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680517001374.
  • Wadhwani, R. D., R. Suddaby, M. Mordhorst, and A. Popp. 2018. “History as Organizing: Uses of the Past in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 39 (12): 1663–1683. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618814867.
  • Weick, K. E. 1976. “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875.
  • Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
  • Weick, K. E. 1982. “Managing of Organizational Change Among Loosely Coupled Elements.” In Change in Organizations, edited by P. S. Goodman, 375–408. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • White, H. 1973. Metahistory – The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkin University Press.
  • White, H. 1980. “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality.” Critical Inquiry 7 (1): 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1086/448086.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.