The temporal nature of legitimation: the case of IFRS8

References

• Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation and Governance, 2, 137–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botzem, S., & Dobusch, L. (2012). Standardisation cycles: A process perspective on the formation and diffusion of transnational standards. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 737–762. doi: 10.1177/0170840612443626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapello, E., & Medjad, K. (2009). An unprecedented privatisation of mandatory standard setting: The case of European accounting policy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, 448–468. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., Extance, H., Helliar, C. V., & Power, D. M. (2012). Operating segments: The usefulness of IFRS8. Edinburgh: ICAS.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., Ferguson, J., Helliar, C. V., & Power, D. M. (2014). Control over accounting standards within the European Union: The political controversy surrounding the adoption of IFRS8. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(4), 304–318. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., Helliar, C. V., Monk, E., & Veneziani, M. (2014). International Accounting Education Standards Board: Organisational legitimacy within the field of professional accountancy education. Accounting Forum, 38, 67–89. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2013.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., Helliar, C. V., & Power, D. M. (2010). IFRS8: Exploring stakeholder perceptions of the new standard and its EC endorsement process. London: ICAEW.
   Google Scholar
• Danjou, P., & Walton, P. (2012). The legitimacy of the IASB. Accounting in Europe, 9(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2012.664396
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., & Fortin, A. (2010). Standard-setting institutions’ user-oriented legitimacy management strategies – The Canadian case. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 7(4), 476–504. doi: 10.1108/11766091011094545
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., & Fortin, A. (2011). Practitioners’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process. Accounting and Business Research, 41(1), 29–50. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2011.549635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., Fortin. A., & Cote, L. (2007). Users’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process: A theory-building study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 29–59. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., & Smith, R. A. (1996). Competitive disadvantage and voluntary disclosures: The case of segmental reporting. British Accounting Review, 28, 155–172. doi: 10.1006/bare.1996.0012
   Google Scholar
• Emmanuel, C. R., Garrod, N. W., McCallum, C., & Rennie, E. D. (1999). The impact of SSAP 25 and the 10% materiality rule on segment disclosure in the UK. British Accounting Review, 31, 127–149. doi: 10.1006/bare.1998.0090
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2007). Endorsement of IFRS8 operating segments: Analysis of potential effects. Brussels. Retrieved August 2015, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02002R1606–20080410&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2002). Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of The Council of 19 July 2002 on the Application of International Accounting Standards. Retrieved November 30, 2012, from http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/Reg_1606_02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2007). Resolution of 14 November 2007 on the draft Commission regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1725/2003 adopting certain International Accounting Standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 8, concerning disclosure of operating segments. Retrieved November 3, 2009, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2007-0526+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Securities and Markets Authority. (2011). Review of European enforcers on the implementation of IFRS8 – Operating Segments. ESMA/2011/372. Paris. Retrieved January 2012, from http://www.esma.europa.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1997). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from http://www.gasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1175820923368&blobheader=application%2Fpdf
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Review Panel. (2010). FRRP highlights the challenge of implementing new segmental reporting requirements. FRRP PN 124. Retrieved January 18, 2010, from http://www.frc.org.uk/frrp/press/pub2203.html
   Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Forum. (2015). The compendium of standards. Retrieved from http://www.fsb.org/what–wet–do/aboutt–thet–compendium-of-standards/
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G., & Jack, L. (2011). In pursuit of legitimacy: A history behind fair value accounting. The British Accounting Review, 43, 311–323. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2011.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, I., & Gallery, N. (2012). Assessing financial reporting comparability across institutional settings: The case of pension accounting. British Accounting Review, 44(1), 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2011.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, D., & Thomas, W. B. (2000). A model of forecast precision using segment disclosures; implications for SFAS131. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00022-7
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, J., & Staden, C. J. V. (2011). Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures. British Accounting Review, 43(3), 200–213. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2011.06.005
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2011). Post implementation reviews: Plan for developing the framework for conducting post-implementation reviews. IASB Board meeting February 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2011, from http://www.ifrs.org/NR/rdonlyres/3E1502E4-F1E8-4907-838B-FFB20C7268ED/0/PIR02111st2ndb04obs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2012a). IASB agenda Ref 8 – post-implementation review of IFRS8 – paper topic update on progress made to February 2012. Retrieved July 2015, from http://www.ifrs.org/Meetings/Documents/IFRS80312b08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2012b). Staff paper, agenda Ref 10A – annual improvements to IFRSs – 2010-2012 cycle (ED/2012/1) comment letter analysis, paper topic IFRS8 operating segments – aggregation of operating segments. Retrieved July 2015, from http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/IFRS-8-operating-segments-aggregation/Documents/101211AP10A%20-%20CL%20analysis%20-%20IFRS%208%20Aggregation%20of%20operating%20segments.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2013a, July). Report and feedback statement – post-implementation review: IFRS8 Operating Segments. Delaware: Author.
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2013b). IASB agenda ref 6A: Post-implementation review IFRS8 operating segments – comment letter analysis and summary of outreach conducted. Retrieved August 2015, from http://www.ifrs.org/Meetings/Pages/IASBJanuary2013.aspx
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2013c, February). IASB and IFRS Interpretations Committee: Due process handbook. Delaware: Author. ISBN: 978-1-907877-81-0.
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2015, September 2). The global reach of IFRS is expanding. Retrieved January 2016, from http://www.ifrs.org/Features/Pages/Global-reach-of-IFRS-is-expanding.aspx
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2006a). International Financial Reporting Standard 8 ‘Operating Segments’. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2006b). Comment letters on Exposure Draft ED 8. Retrieved August 16, 2010, from www.iasb.co.uk/currentprojects/IASBProjects/SegmentReporting/CommentLetters
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2006c). Exposure Draft ED 8 ‘Operating Segments’: comments to be received by 19 May 2006. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2006d). Observer Notes: Segment Reporting: Analysis of comment letters to ED 8 (Agenda Paper 5). Retrieved March 2012, from http://www.ifrs.org/NR/rdonlyres/5077510D-EB73-48E2-9DE0-7AEE9752BAAD/0/ObNotes_OpSeg0607ob05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2010). The conceptual framework for financial reporting. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Committee. (1997). International Accounting Standard 14(revised)-Segment Reporting. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. (2011). Standards and codes. Retrieved July 2015, from http://www.imf.org/external/standards/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, K. K. (2010). Strategies for dealing with standard-setting resistance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(2), 175–200. doi: 10.1108/09513571011023183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & Van der Tas, L. (2012). Formal participation in the IASB's due process of standard-setting: A multi-issue/multi-period analysis. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 693–729. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2010.522775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, W. C. C., & Sharp, D. (2005). Power and international accounting standard setting – evidence from segment reporting and intangible assets projects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(1), 74–99. doi: 10.1108/09513570510584665
   Google Scholar
• Loft, A., Humphrey, C., & Turley, S. (2006). In pursuit of global regulation: Changing governance and accountability structures at the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(3), 428–451. doi: 10.1108/09513570610670361
   Google Scholar
• Moldovan, R. (2014). Post-implementation reviews for IASB and FASB standards: A comparison of the process and findings for the operating segments standards. Accounting in Europe, 11(1), 113–137. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2014.901588
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R. (2007, April 7). Cited in: ‘A standard nobody likes’, by Shakhraj (2007a), Accountancy Age.
   Google Scholar
• Neveling, N. (2007, May). EU delays IFRS8 ratification in shock move: European Parliament tables resolution forcing European Commission to reappraise divisive IFRS8. Accountancy Age. Retrieved December 17, 2009, from http://www.accountancyage.com/articles/print/2188561
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, N. B., & Street, D. L. (2007). The relationship between competition and business segment reporting decisions under the management approach of IAS 14 revised. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 16(1), 51–68. doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2007.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. (2013). The continued survival of international differences under IFRS. Accounting and Business Research, 43(2), 83–111. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2013.770644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwalk Agreement. (2002). Memorandum of understanding. Retrieved July 2015, from http://www.fasb.org/news/memorandum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, B., Owen, D., & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 31–52. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2010). Fair value accounting, financial economics and the transformation of reliability. Accounting and Business Research, 40(3), 197–210. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PWYP. (2005). Global witness – International Accounting Standard 14 Segment Reporting 2005 Update Submission to the International Accounting Standards Board. London: Global Witness.
   Google Scholar
• PWYP. (2006). Comment Letter (CL) 1 to ED8 Operating Segments – Need for reporting on country-by-country basis. Retrieved July 2015, from http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Segment-Reporting/Exposure-Draft-and-Comment-Letters/Comment-Letters/Pages/CL-1.aspx. [This submission is the same as PWYP (2005) document previously submitted to IASB].
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, E. D., & Emmanuel, C. R. (1992). Segmental disclosure practice: Thirteen years on. Accounting and Business Finance, 22(86), 151–159.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. J., & Eberlein, B. (2011). Legitimating transnational standard-setting: The case of the International Accounting Standards Board. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 217–245. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0543-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhraj, P. (2007a, April 7). A standard that nobody likes. Accountancy Age.
   Google Scholar
• Sukhraj, P. (2007b, May). Segment reporting row hots up. Accountancy Age. Retrieved December 17, 2009, from http://www.accountancyage.com/accountancy/analysis/2191097/segmentreporting-standard-row
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, T. G. (1984). Lobbying of accounting standard-setting bodies in the UK and USA: A Downsian analysis. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 9(1), 81–95. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(84)90031-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon, N. (2007). EU adoption of the IFRS8 standard on operating segments: Presentation to the economic and monetary affairs committee of the European Parliament. Retrieved March 2012, from http://veron.typepad.com/main/files/EuroParl_IFRS8_Sep07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. J. (2006). Making up users. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 31, 579–600. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2005.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar