The Term ‘Non-financial Information’ – A Semantic Analysis of a Key Feature of Current and Future Corporate Reporting

References

• AAA Financial Accounting Standards Committee. (2002). Recommendations on disclosure of nonfinancial performance measures. Accounting Horizons, 16, 353–362. doi: 10.2308/acch.2002.16.4.353
   Google Scholar
• ACCA. (2013). What do investors expect from non-financial reporting. Retrieved from: http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/sustainability-reporting/tech-tp-wdir.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Adelberg, A. (1979). A methodology for measuring the understandability of financial report messages. Journal of Accounting Research, 17, 565–591. doi: 10.2307/2490519
   Google Scholar
• Admiraal, M., Nivra, R., & Turksema, R. (2009). Reporting on nonfinancial information. International Journal of Government Auditing. Retrieved from http://www.intosaijournal.org/technicalarticles/technicaljul2009b.html
   Google Scholar
• AICPA. (1994). Improving Business Reporting – a customer focus. Author. Retrieved from http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/FRC/AccountingFinancialReporting/DownloadableDocuments/Jenkins%20Committee%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alcaniz, L., Gomez-Bezares, F., & Roslender, R. (2011). Theoretical perspectives on intellectual capital: A backward look and a proposal for going forward. Accounting Forum, 35, 104–117. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2011.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, D. (2006). Legal certainty, European-ness and realpolitik. Accounting in Europe, 3, 65–80. doi: 10.1080/09638180600920194
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Evaluating sustainability: A need for standards. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 2, 19–35. doi: 10.22164/isea.v2i1.23
   Google Scholar
• Arbeitskreis Externe Unternehmensberichtserstattung der Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft für Betriebswirtschaft e.V. (2015). Nichtfinanzielle Leistungsindikatoren – Bedeutung für die Finanzberichtserstattung [ Nonfinancial KPIs – relevance for corporate business reporting]. zfbf, 67, 235–258.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, S., & McLeay, S. (1991). Issues in transnational financial reporting: A linguistic analysis. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 12, 347–361. doi: 10.1080/01434632.1991.9994469
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, S. (2011). Disclosure of non-financial information in the annual report: A management-team perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 277–300. doi: 10.1108/14691931111123421
   Google Scholar
• ASSC. (1975). The corporate report: Accounting standards steering committee. London: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• AXA Investment Managers and AQ Research (2008, July 28). Investment Professionals vote ‘ESG’ and ‘Sustainability’ as top descriptions. With 16 descriptions, surly it’s time to agree what to call it. London.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., & Evans, L. (2011). The darkening glass: Issues for translation of IFRS. Edinburgh: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Belkaoui, A. (1978). Linguistic relativity in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3, 97–104. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(78)90019-3
   Google Scholar
• Belkaoui, A. (1980). The interprofessional linguistic communication of accounting concepts: An experiment in sociolinguistics. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 362–374. doi: 10.2307/2490583
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, R. (2008). Accounting as the language of business. Accounting Horizons, 22, 433–436. doi: 10.2308/acch.2008.22.4.433
   Google Scholar
• Boiral, O., & Henry, J. F. (2015). Is sustainability performance comparable? A study of GRI reports of mining organizations. Business & Society, 56, 283–317. doi: 10.1177/0007650315576134
   Google Scholar
• Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship. (2008). The use of non-financial information: What do investors want? [White Paper: Report on Project Findings; PDF] Retrieved from http://www.finrafoundation.org/web/groups/foundation/@foundation/documents/foundation/p118412.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bozzolan, S., O’Regan, P., & Ricceri, F. (2006). Intellectual capital disclosure (ICD): A comparison of Italy and the UK. Journal of Human Ressource Costing & Accounting, 10, 92–113. doi: 10.1108/14013380610703111
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, S., Clubb, C., & Hopwood, A.G. (1985). Accounting in its social context: Towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10, 381–413. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(85)90002-9
   Google Scholar
• Cabré Castellví, M. T. (2003). Theories of terminology: Their description, prescription and explanation. Terminology, 9, 163–199. doi: 10.1075/term.9.2.03cab
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services. (2011). Disclosure of non-financial information by companies. Sevenoaks. [PDF] Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/finance/accounting/docs/non-financial-reporting/com_2013_207-study_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ceres. (2007). The quiet revolution in business reporting [PDF]. Retrieved from http://www.ceres.org/resources/reports/the-quiet-revolution-in-business-reporting
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2009). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 299–317. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9794-0
   Google Scholar
• Colasse, B. (1997). The French notion of the image fidèle: The power of words. European Accounting Review, 6, 681–691. doi: 10.1080/09638189700000009
   Google Scholar
• Courtis, J. K. (2004). Corporate report obfuscation: Artefact or phenomenon. The British Accounting Review, 36, 291–312. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, E., & Williams, C. (2014). Communicating corporate social responsibility through nonfinancial reports. In O. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 338–357). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1–13. doi: 10.1002/csr.132
   Google Scholar
• Danish Commerce and Companies Agency. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and Reporting in Denmark – Impact of the second year subject to the legal requirements for reporting on CSR in the Danish Financial Statements Act. Retrieved from http://csrgov.dk/file/319199/corporate_social_responsibility_and_reporting_in_denmark_november_2011.pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Danish Minister for Economic and Business Affairs. (2008). Proposal for an Act amending the Danish Financial Statements Act (Report on social responsibility for large businesses. Retrieved from http://csrgov.dk/file/319999/proposal_report_on_social_resp_december_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, R., Mousa, G., & Woodhead, A. (2005). The role of environmental initiatives in encouraging companies to engage in environmental reporting. European Management Journal, 23, 702–716. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2005.10.014
   Google Scholar
• Dragsted, B. (2014). A case study of letters to shareholders in annual reports before, during and after the financial crisis. LSP Journal, 5, 84–104.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R., & Krzus, M. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R., Krzus, M., Rogers, J., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The need for sector-specific materiality and sustainability reporting standards. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 24, 65–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2012.00380.x
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R., Serafeim, G., & Krzus, M. (2011). Market interest in nonfinancial information. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23, 113–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2011.00357.x
   Google Scholar
• EFFAS & DVFA. (2010). KPIs for ESG. A Guideline for the Integration of ESG into Financial Analysis and Corporate Valuation – Version 3.0. Retrieved from http://www.effas-esg.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/KPIs_for_ESG_3_0_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Engberg, J. (2006). Language for specific purposes. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 679–684). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013a). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large companies and groups. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013PC0207&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013b). Commission Staff Working Document Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013SC0128&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by large companies and groups – frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-301_de.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2003). Dirrective 2003/51EC of the European parliament and of the council of 18 June 2003 amending directives 78/660/EEC, 83/349/EEC, 86/635/EEC and 91/674/EEC on the annual and consolidated accounts of certain types of companies, banks and other financial institutions and insurance undertakings, revised (2003/51/EC). Official Journal of the European Union, 51, L 178/16–L 178/22.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 22 oktober 2014 amending directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, revised (2014/95/EU). Official Journal of the European Union, 62, L 330/1–L 330/9.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2004): Language, translation and the problem of international accounting communication. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17, 210–248. doi: 10.1108/09513570410532438
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2010). Observations on the changing language of accounting. Accounting History, 15(4), 439–462. doi: 10.1177/1032373210373619
   Google Scholar
• Faber, P. (2012). Terminology and specialized language. In G. Kristiansen, I. Ruiz de Mendoza, & J. Francisco (Eds.), Applications of cognitive linguistics [ACL] ( vol. 20. 1st ed. 30 vols., pp. 13–33). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times Lexicon. (2015). Definition of non-financial performance measures. Retrieved from http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=non_financial-performance-measures
   Google Scholar
• Flamholtz, E., & Cook, E. (1978). Connotative meaning and its role in accounting change: A field study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3, 115–139. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(78)90021-1
   Google Scholar
• Flöstrand, P., & Ström, N. (2006). The valuation relevance of non-financial information. Management Research News, 29, 580–597. doi: 10.1108/01409170610709014
   Google Scholar
• GSIA. (2015). Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. Retrieved from http://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/GSIA_Review_download.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guthire, J., Ricceri, F., & Dumay, J. (2012). Reflections and projections: A decade of intellectual capital accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 44, 68–82. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2012.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Guy, G. (2011). Language, social class and status. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of sociolinguistics (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 159–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, A. (1997). Wertschöpfungsrechnung. Ein Instrument zur Steigerung der Ausagefähigkeit von Unternehmensabschlüssen im internationalen Kontext [Value added statements: Enhancing the decision usefulness for corporate reports in the international context]. Suttgart: Schäfer-Poeschel Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, A. (2006). Nachhaltigkeitsleistung als element des value reporting [ Sustainable performance as part of value reporting]. Zeitschrift für Controlling & Management, 50, 62–73.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, A., van Staden, C., & Landis, C. (2016, October 8). Value added as part of sustainability reporting: Reporting on distribuational fairness or obfuscation? Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3338-9
   Google Scholar
• Haried, A. (1972). The semantic dimensions of financial statements. Journal of Accounting Research, 10, 376–391. doi: 10.2307/2490016
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, A. (2006). Langfristig mehr Wert. Nichtfinanzielle Leistungsindikatoren mit Nachhaltigkeitsbezug auf dem Weg in die Geschäftsberichte deutscher Unternehmen [ More value in the long term: Nonfinancial KPIs relating to sustainability are on their way into the Corporate Reports of German Companies]. Deloitte: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit . Retrieved from http://www.sd-m.de/files/Hesse_SD-M_Deloitte_BMU_Langfristig_mehr_Wert.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, L. (1985). Kommunikationsmittel Fachsprache. Eine Einführung [ Language for specific purpose as a tool of communication: An introduction] (2nd ed.). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Holthoff, G., Hoos, F., & Weissenberger, B. (2015). Are we lost in translation? The impact of using translated IFRS on decision-making. Accounting in Europe, 12, 107–125. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2015.1052824
   Google Scholar
• Holthoff, G., & Weißenberger, B. (2012). Rechnungslegung als fachsprache in der betrieblichen kommunikation: Friktionen und lösungsansätze [ Financial reporting as a language for specific purpose within the company: Frictions and solutions]. Controlling & Management, 56, 417–428.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, K. (1987). True and fair view: An empirical study of connotative meaning. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 143–152. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90003-1
   Google Scholar
• Hrasky, S., & Smith, B. (2008). Concise corporate reporting: Communication or symbolism? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13, 418–432. doi: 10.1108/13563280810914847
   Google Scholar
• Hronsky, J., & Houghton, K. (2001). The meaning of a defined accounting concept: Regulatory changes and the effect on auditor decision making. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 123–139. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00020-9
   Google Scholar
• IFAC. (2011). Uniting financial, non-financial, and narrative information in the Business Reporting Jigsaw. [Interview with D. Phillips]. Retrieved from http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/IFAC_BRSC_David_Phillips_Interview_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IIRC. (2013). The International <IR> Framework. Retrieved from http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THE-INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing. (2013). Sustainability reporting: Concepts, frameworks and the role of supreme audit institutions. Retrieved from http://www.environmental-auditing.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=vM4hrHlBd0s%3D&tabid=128&mid=568
   Google Scholar
• Jain, T. (1973). Alternative methods of accounting and decision making: A psycho-linguistical analysis. The Accounting Review, 48, 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, T., & Plenborg, T. (2013). Prioritising disclosures in the annual report. Accounting and Business Research, 43, 605–635. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2013.827105
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, N. (2006). Perceptions of the true and fair view concept: An empirical investigation. Abacus, 42, 205–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00198.x
   Google Scholar
• Leong, S., Hazelton, J., Taplin, R., Timms, W., & Laurence, D. (2014). Mine site-level water reporting in the Macquarie and Lachlan catchments: A study of voluntary and mandatory disclosures and their value for community decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.021
   Google Scholar
• Li, D. (1963). The semantic aspect of communication theory and accountancy. Journal of Accounting Research, 1, 102–103. doi: 10.2307/2489847
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, S., & Milne, M. (2007). Accounting as codified discourse. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20, 805–824. doi: 10.1108/09513570710830254
   Google Scholar
• Luchins, A., & Luchins, E. (1959). Rigidity of behaviour: A variational approach to the effect of Einstellung. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, G., Roberts, C., & Gray, S. (1995). Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by U.S., U.K. and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 555–572. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490186
   Google Scholar
• Mills, P. (1989). Words and the study of accounting history. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2(1), 21–35. doi: 10.1108/09513578910132259
   Google Scholar
• Nerantzidis, M., Koutsoukis, N.-S., Kostagiolas, P., & Karoulia, Z. (2013). Intellectual capital myths: Comments on literature review. Corporate Ownership and Control, 10, 169–176. doi: 10.22495/cocv10i3c1art1
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. W. (2006). Revenue recognition and EU endorsement of IFRS. Accounting in Europe, 3, 81–89. doi: 10.1080/09638180600920210
   Google Scholar
• Norberg, C., & Johansson, J. (2013). Accounting terminology and translation – a linguistic challenge. LSP Journal, 4, 30–48.
   Google Scholar
• NZICA. (2012). The management accountant and non-financial information. Chartered Accountants Australia + New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.nzica.com/News/Archive/2012/March/The-management-accountant-and-non-financial-information.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, B. (1974). The semantic differential: A device for measuring the interprofessional communication of selected accounting concepts. Journal of Accounting Research, 12, 299–316. doi: 10.2307/2490378
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1965). The measurement of meaning (5th ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. H. (1994). Finding English words to talk about accounting concepts. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7, 70–85. doi: 10.1108/09513579410058193
   Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2002). Non-financial measures are highest-rated determinants of total shareholder value, PricewaterhouseCoopers finds. Retrieved from http://www.barometersurveys.com/vwAllNewsByDocID/BC10B017C5062D2485256BA60000F6B6/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (1995). The linguistic shaping of accounting. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Robb, S., Louise, E. S., & Zarzeski, M. T. (2001). Nonfinancial disclosure across Anglo-American countries. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10, 71–83. doi: 10.1016/S1061-9518(01)00036-2
   Google Scholar
• Roelcke, T. (1999). Sprachwissenschaft und Wissenschaftssprache [Linguistics and academic language]. In H. E. Wiegand (Ed.), Sprache und Sprachen in den Wissenschaften. Geschichte und Gegenwart. Festschrift für Walter de Gruyter & Co anläßlich einer 250jährigen verlagstradition (Vol. 1, pp. 595–618). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Saussure, F. (1964). Course in general linguistics. With assistance of C. Bally, A. Sechehaye, A. Reidlinger, W. Baskin (2nd ed.). London: Peter Owen.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Taffler, R. (1992). Readability and understandability: Different measures of the textual complexity of accounting narrative. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5, 84–98.
   Google Scholar
• Stawinoga, M. (2013). Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung im Lagebericht: Konzeptionelle und empirische Analyse einer integrierten Berichterstattung [ Sustainability reporting in the management report: A conceptual and empirical analysis of integrated reporting]. Hamburg: Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Betriebswirtschaftliche Steuerlehre.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmeier, M., & Stich, M. (2015). Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung in Deutschland - in puncto assurance alles andere als ‘weltmeisterlich!’ [ Sustainability reporting in Germany: Not ‘world class’ in terms of assurance], Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, 68, 413–423.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, R., & Gouldson, A. (2012). Does voluntary carbon reporting meet investors’ needs? Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.020
   Google Scholar
• van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105. doi: 10.1023/A:1023331212247
   Google Scholar
• Walton, P. (1993). Introduction: The true and fair view in British accounting. European Accounting Review, 2, 49–58. doi: 10.1080/09638189300000003
   Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Capital/Assets Initiative (WICI). (2016). Intangibles Reporting Framework. Retrieved from http://www.wici-global.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/WICI-Intangibles-Reporting-Framework_ver-1.0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wüstemann, J., & Kierzek, S. (2006). True and fair view revisited – a reply to alexander and nobes. Accounting in Europe, 3, 91–116. doi: 10.1080/09638180600920236
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, S. (2007). Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality. The British Accounting Review, 39, 290–230. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2007.08.001
   Google Scholar