Formal Participation in the EFRAG’s Consultation Processes: The Role of European National Standard-Setters

References

• Abela, M., & Mora, A. (2012). Understanding the consequences of accounting standards in Europe: The role of EFRAG. Accounting in Europe, 9, 147–170. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2012.720872
   Google Scholar
• Albu, C. N., Albu, N., & Alexander, D. (2014). When global accounting standards meet the local context – insights from an emerging economy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25, 489–510. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, N., Gallery, N., & Sidhu, B. K. (2000). The incentives of Australian public companies lobbying against proposed superannuation accounting standards. Abacus, 36, 40–70. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00053
   Google Scholar
• Bamber, M., & McMeeking, K. (2016). An examination of international accounting standard-setting due process and the implications for legitimacy. The British Accounting Review, 48, 59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botzem, S. (2015). The European Union’s role in international economic fora. Paper 7: The IASB. Study for the ECON Committee, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, IP/A/ECON/2014-15 PE 592.196. Retrieved from European Parliament website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/542196/IPOL_STU%282015%29542196_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burlaud, A., & Colasse, B. (2011). International accounting standardisation: Is politics back? Accounting in Europe, 8, 23–47. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2011.574412
   Google Scholar
• BusinessEurope. (2013). Draft report ‘Should IFRS standards be more European?’ – Letter from Jérôme P. Chauvin to Philippe Maystadt. Retrieved from https://www.businesseurope.eu/publications/draft-report-should-ifrs-standards-be-more-european-letter-jerome-p-chauvin-philippe
   Google Scholar
• Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2015). Aiming for global accounting standards: The international accounting standards board, 2001–2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2018). The challenge of setting standards for a worldwide constituency: Research implications from the IASB’s early history. European Accounting Review, 27, 289–312. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2017.1296780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatham, M. D., Larson, R. K., & Vietze, A. (2010). Issues affecting the development of an international accounting standard on financial instruments. Advances in Accounting, 26, 97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.adiac.2010.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Colasse, B., & Pochet, C. (2009). The genesis of the 2007 conseil national de la comptabilité: A case of instititutional isomorphism? Accounting in Europe, 6, 25–55. doi: 10.1080/17449480902896379
   Google Scholar
• Deakin, E. B. (1989). Rational economic behavior and lobbying on accounting issues: Evidence from the oil and gas industry. The Accounting Review, 64, 137–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, C., Morris, R., & Stokes, D. (1990). Audit firm lobbying on proposed disclosure requirements. Australian Journal of Management, 15, 261–280. doi: 10.1177/031289629001500203
   Google Scholar
• Dobler, M., & Knospe, O. (2016a). Constituents’ formal participation in the IASB’s due process: New insights into the impact of country and due process document characteristics. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 5(3), 50–66. doi: 10.22495/jgr_v5_i3_p6
   Google Scholar
• Dobler, M., & Knospe, O. (2016b). Determinants of lobbying towards the IASB: Participation, content and success. Unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Business and Economics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., Fortin, A., & Côté, L. (2007). Users’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process: A theory-building study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 29–59. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2001). Press release: Europe organizes itself in the field of accounting! Retrieved from Deloitte IAS Plus website: http://hbfm.link/616
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2003). Proposals for the enhancement of the role and working process of EFRAG. Retrieved from Deloitte IAS Plus website: http://www.iasplus.com/en/binary/efrag/0312efragpaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2005). Annual review 2004. Retrieved from http://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FAnnual%2520Report%25202004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2007). Annual review 2006. Retrieved from http://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FAnnual%2520Report%25202006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2008). Strengthening the European contribution to the international standard-setting process: Final report on enhancement of EFRAG. Retrieved from Deloitte IAS Plus website: http://www.iasplus.com/en/binary/efrag/0812enhancementproposal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2009). Annual review 2008. Retrieved from http://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FAnnual%2520Report%25202008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2010). Annual review 2009. Retrieved from http://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FAnnual%2520Report%25202009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2012). Annual review 2011. Retrieved from http://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FAnnual%2520Report%25202011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2016a). Annual review 2015. Retrieved from https://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FAnnual%2520Report%25202015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2016b). Working arrangements between the European Commission and EFRAG. Retrieved from http://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FWorking%2520Arrangements%2520EFRAG-EC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2017a). EFRAG – internal rules. Retrieved from https://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FFinal%2520EFRAG%2520Internal%2520Rules-%2520approved%252023%2520October%25202017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2017b). EFRAG – statutes. Retrieved from https://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FFinal%2520EFRAG%2520%2520Statutes%2520English%2520approved%252023%2520October%25202017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2018). Annual review 2017. Retrieved from https://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FEFRAG%2520Annual%2520Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Enevoldsen, S., & Oversberg, T. (2008). Importance of a European voice in international standard setting: The role of EFRAG. In H. G. Bruns, H. H. Herz, H.-J. Neubürger, & D. Tweedie (Eds.), Globale Finanzberichterstattung/Global financial reporting – Entwicklung, Anwendung und Durchsetzung von IFRS/Development, application and enforcement of IFRS: Festschrift für Liesel Knorr (pp. 89–106). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2002). Regulation (EC) No. 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards. Retrieved from European Union law website: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriserv/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:243:0001:0004:en:PDF
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the activities of the IFRS Foundation, EFRAG and PIOB in 2014, COM(2015) 461 final, 17.9.2015. Retrieved from European Union law website: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0461&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the activities of the IFRS Foundation, EFRAG and PIOB in 2015, COM/2016/0559 final, 8.9.2016. Retrieved from European Union law website: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0559&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2016). Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 258/2014 establishing a Union Programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing for the period of 2014–20, (COM(2016)0202 – C8-0145/2016–2016/0110(COD)), 14.10.2016. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A8-2016-0291+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN
   Google Scholar
• Fédération des Experts-comptables Européens. (2000). Accounting standard setting in Europe. Retrieved from Accountancy Europe website: https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/Accounting20Standard20Setting20in20Europe2012005171552-4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flower, J. (2004). European financial reporting: Adapting to a changing world. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (1987). Lobbying against proposed accounting standards: The case of employers’ pension accounting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 6, 35–57. doi: 10.1016/0278-4254(87)90004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. (2002). Corporate non-participation in the ASB standard-setting process. European Accounting Review, 11, 699–722. doi: 10.1080/0963818022000001028
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. (2004). Corporate lobbying on accounting standards: Methods, timing and perceived effectiveness. Abacus, 40, 219–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2004.00152.x
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. (2005). Investigating corporate management lobbying in the U.K. Accounting standard-setting process: A multi-issue/multi-period approach. Abacus, 41, 323–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2005.00185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. (2010). The IASB standard-setting process: Participation and perceptions of financial statement users. The British Accounting Review, 42, 103–118. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2010.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G., & Roberts, C. B. (2004). Corporate lobbying in the UK: An analysis of attitudes towards the ASB’s 1995 deferred taxation proposals. The British Accounting Review, 36, 441–453. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.06.006
   Google Scholar
• Gilfedder, D., & Ó hÓgartaigh, C. (1998). The grasshoppers and the great cattle: Participation and non-participation in the ASB’s standard-setting process. Journal of Management and Governance, 2, 287–296. doi: 10.1023/A:1009911411266
   Google Scholar
• Giner, B., & Arce, M. (2012). Lobbying on accounting standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on share-based payments. European Accounting Review, 21, 655–691. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.701796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner, B., & Arce, M. (2014). National standard-setters’ lobbying: An analysis of its role in the IFRS 2 due process. In R. Di Pietra, S. McLeay, & J. Ronen (Eds.), Accounting and regulation: New insights on governance, markets and institutions (pp. 377–398). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. B. (2011). Lobbying of the IASB: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Accounting Research, 10(2), 57–75. doi: 10.2308/jiar-10078
   Google Scholar
• Haring, J. R. (1979). Accounting rules and ‘the accounting establishment’. The Journal of Business, 52, 507–519. doi: 10.1086/296061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, N. T., Shelton, S. W., & Stevens, K. T. (2002). Corporate lobbying behaviour on accounting for stock-based compensation: Venue and format choices. Abacus, 38, 78–90. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00098
   Google Scholar
• Hoarau, C. (2009). The reform of the French standard-setting system: Its peculiarities, limits and political context. Accounting in Europe, 6, 127–148. doi: 10.1080/17449480903171970
   Google Scholar
• Huian, M. C. (2013). Stakeholders’ participation in the development of the new accounting rules regarding the impairment of financial assets. Business Management Dynamics, 2(9), 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein, M. E., & Ketz, J. E. (1991). Accounting standards-setting in the U.S.: An analysis of power and social exchange. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10, 59–81. doi: 10.1016/0278-4254(91)90020-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2012). Report of the trustees’ strategy review 2011 – IFRSs as the global standards: Setting a strategy for the foundation’s second decade. Retrieved from http://archive.ifrs.org/Alerts/PressRelease/Documents/TrusteesStrategyReviewFeb2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2016a). Due process handbook, June 2016. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/about-us/legal-and-governance/constitution-docs/due-process-handbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2016b). Constitution, December 2016. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/about-us/legal-and-governance/constitution-docs/ifrs-foundation-constitution.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2017a). IFRS application around the world – jurisdictional profile: Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/around-the-world/jurisdiction-profiles/switzerland-ifrs-profile.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation. (2017b). IFRS application around the world – jurisdictional profile: Republic of Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/around-the-world/jurisdiction-profiles/ireland-ifrs-profile.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. B., & Solomons, D. (1984). Institutional legitimacy and the FASB. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 3, 165–183. doi: 10.1016/0278-4254(84)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Britton, A., Van Mourik, C., Hoogendoorn, M., & Alexander, D. (2017). International financial reporting and analysis (7th ed.). London: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & Van der Tas, L. (2012). Formal participation in the IASB’s due process of standard setting: A multi-issue/multi-period analysis. European Accounting Review, 21, 693–729. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2010.522775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & Van der Tas, L. (2013). A geographic analysis of constituents’ formal participation in the process of international accounting standard setting: Do we have a level playing field? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32, 237–270. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & Van der Tas, L. (2014). Constituents’ participation in the IASC/IASB’s due process of international accounting standard setting: A longitudinal analysis. In R. Di Pietra, S. McLeay, & J. Ronen (Eds.), Accounting and regulation: New insights on governance, markets and institutions (pp. 79–110). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., & Van de Poel, K. (2006). Lobbying towards a global standard setter – do national characteristics matter? An analysis of the comment letters written to the IASB. In G. N. Gregoriou, & M. Gaber (Eds.), International accounting: Standards, regulations, and financial reporting (pp. 1–40). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Katselas, D., Birt, J., & Kang, X. H. (2011). International firm lobbying and ED 8 operating segments. Australian Accounting Review, 21, 154–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2011.00132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. (1982). Corporate lobbying and changes in financing or operating activities in reaction to FAS no. 8. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1, 153–173. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4254(82)80005-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. (1985). Corporate management lobbying on FAS no. 8: Some further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 619–632. doi: 10.2307/2490829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, S. Y., & Larson, R. K. (1993). Lobbying behavior and the development of international accounting standards: The case of the IASC’s joint venture project. European Accounting Review, 2, 531–554. doi: 10.1080/09638189300000050
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner, C., & Schmidt, M. (2005). Private law making – IFRS: Problems of hybrid standard setting. In P. Nobel (Ed.), International standards and the Law (pp. 67–82). Bern: Stämpfli.
   Google Scholar
• Kirwan, C. E., & Pierce, A. (2017). The role and current status of IFRS in the completion of national accounting rules – evidence from Ireland. Accounting in Europe, 14, 113–120. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2017.1301673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, W. C. (2011). What drives firms’ decision to lobby and determinants of their lobbying positions: Evidence from firms’ comment letter submissions during FASB’s stock option expensing proposal in 2004. The International Journal of Accounting, 46, 1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2010.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Königsgruber, R. (2010). A political economy of accounting standard setting. Journal of Management and Governance, 14, 277–295. doi: 10.1007/s10997-009-9101-1
   Google Scholar
• Kosi, U., & Reither, A. (2014). Determinants of corporate participation in the IFRS 4 (insurance contracts) replacement process. Accounting in Europe, 11, 89–112. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2014.897459
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. (1997). Corporate lobbying of the international accounting standards committee. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 8, 175–203. doi: 10.1111/1467-646X.00024
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. (2007). Constituent participation and the IASB’s international financial reporting interpretations committee. Accounting in Europe, 4, 207–254. doi: 10.1080/17449480701727981
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. (2008). An examination of comment letters to the IASC: Special purpose entities. Research in Accounting Regulation, 20, 27–46. doi: 10.1016/S1052-0457(07)00202-0
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K., & Herz, P. J. (2011). The academic community’s participation in global accounting standard-setting. Research in Accounting Regulation, 23, 34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.racreg.2011.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K., & Herz, P. J. (2013). A multi-issue/multi-period analysis of the geographic diversity of IASB comment letter participation. Accounting in Europe, 10, 99–151. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2013.772716
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, F. W. (1987). Accounting standards and Olson’s theory of collective action. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 6, 59–72. doi: 10.1016/0278-4254(87)90005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, J. B. (1988). Some implications of auditor and client lobbying activities: A comparative analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 19(73), 56–64. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1988.9728836
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, J. B., & Groves, R. E. V. (1993). An empirical investigation into the impact of profit sharing schemes of executivies on the content of corporate submissions on proposed accounting standards. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 20, 623–638. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1993.tb00280.x
   Google Scholar
• Maystadt, P. (2013). Should IFRS standards be more ‘European’? Mission to reinforce the EU’s contribution to the development of international accounting standards. Retrieved from European Council and Council of the European Union website: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15614-2013-INIT/en/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meier, H. H., Alam, P., & Pearson, M. A. (1993). Auditor lobbying for accounting standards: The case of banks and savings and loan associations. Accounting and Business Research, 23, 477–487. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1993.9729892
   Google Scholar
• Mezias, S. J., & Chung, S. (1989). Due process and participation at the FASB: A study of the comment period. Morristown, NJ: Financial Executives Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mian, S. L., & Smith, C. W. (1990). Incentives associated with changes in consolidated reporting requirements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 13, 249–266. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90033-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, R. D. (1986). Lobbying on proposed standards. The Chartered Accountant in Australia, 56(8), 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ndubizu, G. A., Choi, Y. C., & Jain, R. (1993). Corporate lobbying strategy and pension accounting deliberations: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 8, 277–287. doi: 10.1177/0148558X9300800308
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. W., & Zeff, S. A. (2016). Have Canada, Japan and Switzerland adopted IFRS? Australian Accounting Review, 26, 284–290. doi: 10.1111/auar.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orens, R., Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., & Van der Tas, L. (2011). Corporate lobbying in private accounting standard setting: Does the IASB have to reckon with national differences? Accounting in Europe, 8, 211–234. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2011.621672
   Google Scholar
• Pelger, C., & Spieß, N. (2017). On the IASB’s construction of legitimacy – the case of the agenda consultation project. Accounting and Business Research, 47, 64–90. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2016.1198684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J., & Nöelke, A. (2005). International accounting standard setting: A network approach. Business and Politics, 7(3), 1–32. doi: 10.2202/1469-3569.1136
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2004). Academics in the accounting policy process: England and Germany compared. In C. Leuz, D. Pfaff, & A. Hopwood (Eds.), The economics and politics of accounting (pp. 376–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puro, M. (1984). Audit firm lobbying before the financial accounting standards board: An empirical study. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 624–646. doi: 10.2307/2490668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quack, S. (2010). Law, expertise and legitimacy in transnational economic governance: An introduction. Socio-Economic Review, 8, 3–16. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwp029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. J., & Eberlein, B. (2011). Legitimating transnational standard-setting: The case of the international accounting standards board. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 217–245. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0543-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenka, R., & Taylor, P. (2010). Setting UK standards on the concept of control: An analysis of lobbying behaviour. Accounting and Business Research, 40, 109–130. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, T. G. (1984). Lobbying of accounting standard-setting bodies in the U.K. and the U.S.A.: A downsian analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9, 81–95. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(84)90031-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandy, P. R., & Wilburn, N. L. (1992). Constituent participation in standard-setting: The FASB’s first 100 statements. Accounting Horizons, 6, 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Tandy, P. R., & Wilburn, N. L. (1996). The academic community’s participation in standard setting: Submission of comment letters on SFAS nos. 1–117. Accounting Horizons, 10, 92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Tokar, M. (2005). Convergence and the implementation of a single set of global standards: The real-life challenge. Accounting in Europe, 2, 47–68. doi: 10.1080/09638180500379079
   Google Scholar
• Tutticci, I., Dunstan, K., & Holmes, S. (1994). Respondent lobbying in the Australian accounting standard-setting process: ED49 – A case study. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 7(2), 86–104. doi: 10.1108/09513579410058201
   Google Scholar
• Van Mourik, C., & Walton, P. (2018). The European IFRS endorsement process – in search of a single voice. Accounting in Europe, 15, 1–32. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2018.1438635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenhofer, A. (2014). Global convergence of accounting standards. In C. Van Mourik, & P. Walton (Eds.), The routledge companion to accounting, reporting and regulation (pp. 246–264). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, P. (2015). IFRS in Europe – An observer’s perspective of the next 10 years. Accounting in Europe, 12, 135–151. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2015.1095306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, K., & Gronewold, U. (2018). EFRAG’s role in the international standard setting process. Unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Wingard, C., Bosman, J., & Amisi, B. (2016). The legitimacy of IFRS. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24, 134–156. doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-02-2014-0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeff, S. A. (2002). ‘Political’ lobbying on proposed standards: A challenge to the IASB. Accounting Horizons, 16, 43–54. doi:10.2308/acch.2002.16.1 doi: 10.2308/acch.2002.16.1.43
   Google Scholar