The Return of Stewardship, Reliability and Prudence – A Commentary on the IASB’s New Conceptual Framework

References

• Anderson, S. B., Brown, J. L., Hodder, L., & Hopkins, P. E. (2015). The effect of alternative accounting measurement bases on investors’ assessments of managers’ stewardship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 46, 100–114. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R. (2015). Conservatism, prudence and the IASB’s conceptual framework. Accounting and Business Research, 45, 514–538. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2015.1031983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R., Lennard, A., Nobes, C., Trombetta, M., & Walton, P. (2014). Response of the EAA financial reporting standards committee to the IASB discussion paper a review of the conceptual framework for financial reporting. Accounting in Europe, 11, 149–184. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2014.940356
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R., & McGeachin, A. (2015). An analysis of concepts and evidence on the question of whether IFRS should be conservative. Abacus, 51, 169–207. doi: 10.1111/abac.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R., & Schulte, S. (2017). Representing the market perspective: Fair value measurement for non-financial assets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 56, 55–67. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R., & Teixeira, A. (2018). Gaps in the IFRS conceptual framework. Accounting in Europe, 15, 153–166. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2018.1476771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M. E. (2014). Measurement in financial reporting: The need for concepts. Accounting Horizons, 28, 331–352. doi: 10.2308/acch-50689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, A. M., O’Brien, P. C., & Saeed, U. (2014). Reliability makes accounting relevant: A comment on the IASB conceptual framework project. Accounting in Europe, 11, 211–217. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2014.967789
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, A., Hoogendorn, M., & Naarding, E. (2015). Will the changes proposed to the conceptual framework’s definitions and recognition criteria provide a better basis for IASB standard setting? Accounting and Business Research, 45, 547–571. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2015.1048769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2007). Financial reporting and global capital markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2015). Aiming for global accounting standards: The international accounting standards board, 2001-2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cascino, S., Clatworthy, M., Osma, B. G., Gassen, J., Imam, S., & Jeanjean, T. (2017). The usefulness of financial accounting information: Evidence from the field. Working Paper, London School of Economics et al.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, I. (2018). What is a conceptual framework for financial reporting? Accounting in Europe, 15, 374–401. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2018.1496269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichev, I. D. (2008). On the balance sheet-based model of financial reporting. Accounting Horizons, 22, 453–470. doi: 10.2308/acch.2008.22.4.453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichev, I. D. (2017). On the conceptual foundations of financial reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 47, 617–632. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2017.1299620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erb, C., & Pelger, C. (2015). “Twisting words”? A study of the construction and reconstruction of reliability in financial reporting standard-setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 13–40. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Financial Reporting Advisory Group. (2013a). Getting a better framework: Prudence bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.efrag.org/(X(1)S(xcfs5mqtybcdgpp0a4bwzq1r))/Assets/Download?assetUrl=2Fsites2Fwebpublishing2FProject20Documents2F2832FBulletin%20Prudence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Financial Reporting Advisory Group. (2013b). Getting a better framework: Accountability and the objective of financial reporting bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=2Fsites2Fwebpublishing2FSiteAssets2FBulletin2520Getting2520a2520Better2520Framework2520-2520Accountability2520and2520the2520Objective2520of2520Financial2520Reporting.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1978). Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 1 (SFAC 1): Objectives of financial reporting by business enterprises. Norwalk: FASB.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1980). Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 2 (SFAC 2): Qualitative characteristics of accounting information. Norwalk: FASB.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2010). Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 8 (SFAC 8): Conceptual framework for financial reporting. Norwalk: FASB.
   Google Scholar
• Gassen, J., & Schwedler, K. (2010). The decision usefulness of financial accounting measurement concepts: Evidence from an online survey of professional investors and their advisors. European Accounting Review, 19, 495–509. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2010.496548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, O. (2015). The removal and reinstatement of prudence in accounting: How politics of acceptance defeats financialisation. Working Paper. Manchester: University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, O. (2018). The worth of fair value accounting: Dissonance between users and standard setters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35, 1297–1331. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjesdal, F. (1981). Accounting for stewardship. Journal of Accounting Research, 19, 208–231. doi: 10.2307/2490970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, H. (2012, September). The concept of prudence: Dead or alive? FEE Conference on Corporate Reporting of the Future, Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from http://archive.ifrs.org/Alerts/PressRelease/Documents/2012/Concept%20of%20Prudence%20speech.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huikku, J., Mouritsen, J., & Silvola, H. (2017). Relative reliability and the recognisable firm: Calculating goodwill impairment value. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 56, 68–83. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2016.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2006). Discussion Paper: Preliminary views on an improved conceptual framework for financial reporting. Retrieved from http://archive.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Conceptual-Framework/DPJul06/Documents/DP_ConceptualFramework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2008). Exposure Draft of an improved conceptual framework for financial reporting. Retrieved from http://archive.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Conceptual-Framework/EDMay08/Documents/conceptual_framework_exposure_draft.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2010). Conceptual framework for financial reporting. London: IASB.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2013). Discussion Paper DP/2013/1: A review of the conceptual framework for financial reporting. Retrieved from http://www.ifrs.org/-/media/project/conceptual-framework/discussion-paper/published-documents/dp-conceptual-framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2015). Exposure Draft ED/2015/3: Conceptual framework for financial reporting. Retrieved from http://www.ifrs.org/-/media/project/conceptual-framework/exposure-draft/published-documents/ed-conceptual-framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2018). Conceptual framework for financial reporting. London: IASB.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Committee. (1989). Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements. London: IASC.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. T. (2004). Understanding the conceptual framework. Retrieved from http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1175818770601&blobheader=application%2Fpdf
   Google Scholar
• Kuhner, C., & Pelger, C. (2015). On the relationship of stewardship and valuation – an analytical viewpoint. Abacus, 51, 379–411. doi: 10.1111/abac.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennard, A. (2007). Stewardship and the objectives of financial statements: A comment on IASB´s preliminary views on an improved conceptual framework for financial reporting: The objective of financial reporting and qualitative characteristics of decision-useful financial reporting information. Accounting in Europe, 4, 51–66. doi: 10.1080/17449480701308774
   Google Scholar
• Mattessich, R. V. (1987). Prehistoric accounting and the problem of representation: On recent archaeological evidence of the Middle-East from 8000 B.C. To 3000 B.C. Accounting Historians Journal, 14, 71–91. doi: 10.2308/0148-4184.14.2.71
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. B. W., & Bahnson, P. R. (2010). Continuing the normative dialog: Illuminating the asset/liability theory. Accounting Horizons, 24, 419–440. doi: 10.2308/acch.2010.24.3.419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, A., & Walker, M. (2015). The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard-setting. Accounting and Business Research, 45, 620–650. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2015.1048770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. W., & Stadler, C. (2015). The qualitative characteristics of financial information and managers’ accounting decisions: Evidence from IFRS policy changes. Accounting and Business Research, 45, 572–601. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2015.1044495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P. C. (2009). Changing the concepts to justify the standards. Accounting Perspectives, 8, 263–275. doi: 10.1506/ap.8.4.1
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, V. (2007). Reflections on stewardship reporting. Accounting Horizons, 21, 215–227. doi: 10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.215
   Google Scholar
• Paul, J. M. (1992). On the efficiency of stock-based compensation. The Review of Financial Studies, 5(3), 471–502. doi: 10.1093/rfs/5.3.471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelger, C. (2016). Practices of standard-setting - An analysis of the IASB/FASB’s process of identifying the objective of financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 51–73. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelger, C., & Spieß, N. (2017). On the IASB’s construction of legitimacy – the case of the agenda consultation project. Accounting and Business Research, 47, 64–90. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2016.1198684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2010). Fair value accounting, financial economics and the transformation of reliability. Accounting and Business Research, 40, 197–210. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soll, J. (2014). The reckoning. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mourik, C. (2014). The equity theories and the IASB conceptual framework. Accounting in Europe, 11, 219–233. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2014.949278
   Google Scholar
• Van Mourik, C., & Katsuo, Y. (2015). The IASB and ASBJ conceptual frameworks: Same objective, different financial performance concepts. Accounting Horizons, 29, 199–216. doi: 10.2308/acch-50902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mourik, C., & Katsuo Asami, Y. (2018). Articulation, profit or loss and OCI in the IASB conceptual framework: Different shades of clean (or dirty) surplus. Accounting in Europe, 15, 167–192. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2018.1448936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenhofer, A. (2014). The role of revenue recognition in performance reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 44, 349–379. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2014.897867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, P. (2018). Discussion of Barker and Teixeira ([2018]. Gaps in the IFRS conceptual framework. Accounting in Europe, 15) and Van Mourik and Katsuo ([2018]. profit or loss in the IASB conceptual framework. Accounting in Europe, 15). Accounting in Europe, 15, 193–199. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2018.1437457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, G. (2008a). Fair value and the IASB/FASB conceptual framework project: An alternative view. Abacus, 44, 139–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2008.00255.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, G. (2008b). Harmonisation or discord? The critical role of the IASB conceptual framework review. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 495–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, G. (2016). A critical look at the IASB. In J. Haslam, & P. Sikka (Eds.), Pioneers of critical accounting (pp. 179–200). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. E., & Lipman, F. J. (1991). Tracing the American concept of stewardship to English antecedents. The British Accounting Review, 23, 355–368. doi: 10.1016/0890-8389(91)90068-D
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. J. (2006). Making up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 579–600. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2005.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeff, S. A. (2013). The objectives of financial reporting: A historical survey and analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 43, 262–327. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2013.782237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar