Art, knowledge and moral understanding

References

• Brudney, D. 1998. “Lord Jim and Moral Judgment: Literature and Moral Philosophy.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (3): 265–281.10.2307/432366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, N. 1996. “Moderate Moralism.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 36: 223–239.10.1093/bjaesthetics/36.3.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, N. 1998a. “Art, Narrative and Moral Understanding.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited by J. Levison, 28–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, N. 1998b. “Moderate Moralism versus Moderate Autonomism.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 38: 419–424.10.1093/bjaesthetics/38.4.419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, N. 2000. “Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research.” Ethics 110: 350–387.10.1086/233273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, N. 2002. “The Wheel of Virtue: Art, Literature and Moral Knowledge.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1): 3–26.10.1111/jaac.2002.60.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, N. 2003. “Aesthetics and the Educative Powers of Art.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Education, edited by R. Curren, 365–383. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G. 1995. “The Moral Psychology of Fiction.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73: 250–259.10.1080/00048409512346581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G. 1998. “Realism of Character and the Value of Fiction.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited by J. Levison, 161–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dancy, J. 1993. Moral Realism. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Devereux, M. 2004. “Moral Judgments and Works of Art: The Case of Narrative Literature.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62: 3–11.10.1111/jaac.2004.62.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diffey, T. 1995. “What Can We Learn from Art?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73: 202–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldridge, R. 2003. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164740
   Google Scholar
• Gaut, B. 1998. “The Ethical Criticism of Art.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited by J. Levinson, 182–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaut, B. 2001. “Art and Ethics.” In The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, edited by B. Gaut and D. Lopes, 431–443. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203390795
   Google Scholar
• Gaut, B. 2003. “Reasons, Emotions and Fiction.” In Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts, edited by M. Kieran and D. McIver Lopes, 15–34. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, N. 1978. Ways of World Making. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, G. 1995. “Learning from Art.” British Journal of Aesthetics 35 (1): 26–37.10.1093/bjaesthetics/35.1.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, G. 1997. Philosophy of the Arts: An Introduction to Aesthetics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203244937
   Google Scholar
• Greenspan, P. 1988. Emotions and Reasons. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R. M. 1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, R. 1972. “The Arts and the Education of Feeling and Emotion.” In Education and the Development of Reason, edited by R. F. Dearden, P. H. Hirst, and R. S. Peters, 484–500. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, R. 1992. “Truth and Representation.” In Philosophical Aesthetics: An Introduction, edited by O. Hanfling, 239–296. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• John, E. 2001. “Art and Knowledge.” In The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, edited by B. Gaut and D. McIver Lopes, 417–429. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalin, J. 1992. “Knowing Novels: Nussbaum on Fiction and Moral Theory.” Ethics 103: 135–151.10.1086/293475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl, G., and J. Robinson. 1997. “Shostakovich’s Tenth Symphony and Musical Expression of Cognitively Complex Emotions.” In Music and Meaning, edited by J. Robinson, 154–178. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kekes, J. 1984. “Moral Sensitivity.” Philosophy 59: 3–19.10.1017/S003181910005645X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieran, M. 1996. “Art, Imagination and the Cultivation of Morals.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (4): 337–351.10.2307/431916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieran, M. 2005. Revealing Art. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kivy, P. 1998. “On the Banality of Literary Truths.” Philosophic Exchange 28: 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lamarque, P. 1997. “Learning from Literature.” Dalhousie Review 77: 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, J. 1997. “Emotion in Response to Art: A Survey of the Terrain.” In Emotion and the Arts, edited by M. Hjort and S. Laver, 20–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libeskind, D. 2001. The Space Encounter. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Madell, G. 1996. “What Music Teaches about Emotion.” Philosophy 71: 63–82.10.1017/S0031819100053262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1977. The Aesthetic Dimension: Towards a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullin, A. 2004. “Moral Defects, Aesthetic Defects, and the Imagination.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (3): 249–261.10.1111/jaac.2004.62.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, I. 1970. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Novitz, D. 1987. Knowledge, Fiction and Imagination. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 1990. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hear, A. 1988. The Element of Fire: Science, Art and the Human World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, J. 1992. Morality and the Emotions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, M. 1981. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, F. 1992. Literature and Moral Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198242321.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Radford, C. 1975. “How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 149: 67–80.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/49.1.67
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 1995. “L’éducation Sentimentale.” [Sentimental Education.] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73: 212–226.10.1080/00048409512346551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellekens, E. 2007. Aesthetics and Morality. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Scruton, R. 1983. The Aesthetic Understanding. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Stolnitz, J. 1992. “On the Cognitive Triviality of Art.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 32: 191–200.10.1093/bjaesthetics/32.3.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi, S. 2003. “The Funerary Sadness of Mahler’s Music.” In Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts, edited by M. Kieran and D. McIver Lopes, 259–290. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, K. 1997. “Spulunking, Simulation and Slime: On Being Moved by Fiction.” In Emotion and the Arts, edited by M. Hjort and S. Laver, 37–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. 2002. “The Limits of Aesthetic Separatism: Literary Education and Michael Oakeshott’s Philosophy of Art.” Westminster Studies in Education 25 (2): 163–173.10.1080/0140672020250206
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. 1983. “Literature and Knowledge.” Philosophy 58 (226): 489–496.10.1017/S003181910006664X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, P. 1972. “The Universalizability of Moral Judgments.” The Monist 49: 196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar