Disability and mobilities: evening up social futures

References

• Aitchison, C. 2003. “From Leisure and Disability to Disability Leisure: Developing Data, Definitions, and Discourses.” Disability & Society 18 (7): 955–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper, M. 2016. Giving Voice: Mobile Communication, Disability, and Inequality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Block, P., D. Kasnitz, A. Nishida, and N. Pollard, eds. 2016. Occupying Disability: Critical Approaches to Community, Justice, and Decolonizing Disability. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boys, J. 2014. Doing Disability Differently: An Alternative Handbook on Architecture, Dis/Ability and Designing for Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, J. 2015. “The Exoskeleton Generation – Disability Redux.” Disability & Society 30 (10): 1568–1572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, M., ed. 2012. Service Robots and Robotics: Design and Application. Hersey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M.. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by S. Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chouinard, V., E. Hall, and R. Wilton, eds. 2010. Towards Enabling Geographies: ‘Disabled Bodies and Minds in Society and Space. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M. 1998. Deaf and Disabled, or Deafness Disabled? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cormode, L. 1997. “Emerging Geographies of Impairment and Difference: An Introduction.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15 (4): 387–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2010. “Towards a Politics of Mobility.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (1): 17–31.10.1068/d11407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2016. “Black Moves: Moments in the History of African American Masculine Mobilities.” Transfers 6 (1): 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbertson, A. 2015. “Exoskeletons v Wheelchairs: Disability Advocates Clash with Futurists over ‘Offensive Solution.” IB Times, April 14. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/exoskeletons-vs-wheel-chairs-disability-advocates-clash-futurists-over-offensive-solution-1496178.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, A., and J. Urry. 2010. Mobile Lives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K., and G. Goggin. 2016. “Disability, Locative Media, and Complex Ubiquity.” In Ubiquitous Computing, Complexity, and Culture, edited by U. Ekman, J. D. Bolter, L. Díaz, M. Søndergaard, and M. Engberg, 270–285. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K., and M. Kent. 2011. Disability and New Media. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eveleth, R. 2015. “The Exoskeleton’s Hidden Burden.” The Atlantic, August 7. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/08/exoskeletons-disability-assistive-technology/400667/.
   Google Scholar
• Fallah, N., I. Apostolopoulos, K. Bekris, and E. Folmer. 2012. “The User as Sensor: Navigating Users with Visual Impairments in Indoor Spaces Using Tactile Landmarks.” In CHI ‘12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 425–432. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Farman, J. 2013. Mobile Interface Theory: Embodied Space and Locative Media. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, J., and A. Hui. 2016. “Traces of a Mobile Field: Ten Years of Mobilities Research.” Mobilities 11 (1): 1–14.10.1080/17450101.2015.1103534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, J. 2015. Smartphones as Locative Media. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, R. 2003. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” NSWA Journal 14 (3): 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. 2006. Geographies of Disability. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., M. Sheller, and J. Urry. 2006. “Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1): 1–22.10.1080/17450100500489189
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, L. 2008. “Waiting for Immediacy: The Convergent Inertia of Mobility and Immobility.” In Integration and Ubiquity: Towards a Philosophy of Telecommunications, edited by K. Nyíri, 189–196. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. 1996. Disability and the City: International Perspectives. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. 2000. “Disability and Discourses of Mobility and Movement.” Environment and Planning A 32 (9): 1641–1656.10.1068/a331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T., and J. Vergunst, eds. 2008. Ways of Walking: Ethnography and Practice on Foot. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., D. Okabe, and M. Matsuda, eds. 2005. Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2013. Staging Mobilities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2015. “Of ‘Other’ Materialities: Why (Mobilities) Design is Central to the Future of Mobilities Research.” Paper presented to Mobility Intersections Workshop, Lancaster Centre for Mobilities Research, University of Lancaster, July 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2016. “Of ‘Other’ Materialities: Why (Mobilities) Design is Central to the Future of Mobilities Research.” Mobilities 11 (4): 585–595.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. 2003. Making Them Go Away: Clint Eastwood, Christopher Reeve and the Case against Disability Rights. Louisville, KY: Advocado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, S. K., C. Jayant, J. O. Wobbrock, and R. E. Ladner. 2009. “Freedom to Roam: A Study of Mobile Device Adoption and Accessibility for People with Visual and Motor Disabilities.” In Assets ‘09: Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 115–122. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, L. 2001. Take Up Thy Bed and Walk: Death, Disability, and Cure in Classic Fiction for Girls. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. 2012. Taken for Grantedness: The Embedding of Mobile Communication into Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, S. 2013. “Vision 2.0.” IEEE Spectrum 50 (3): 42–47.10.1109/MSPEC.2013.6471058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, F., A. Jaramillo, and C. Claramunt. 2011. “A Mobile Navigation and Orientation System for Blind Users in a Metrobus Environment.” In Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems, edited by K. Tanaka, P. Fröhlich, and K.-S. Kim, 94–108. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenov, T. 2014. Critical Theory and Disability: A Phenomenological Approach. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6
   Google Scholar
• Parent, L. 2013. “The Politics of Snow.” Paper given to Differential Mobilities, Montréal, May 8–11 2013.http://www.mobilities.ca/laurence-parent-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, L. 2016. “The Wheeling Interview: Mobile Methods and Disability.” Mobilities 11 (4): 521–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, K., and B. Hughes. 1999. “Disability Studies and Phenomenology: The Carnal Politics of Everyday Life.” Disability & Society 14 (5): 597–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullin, G. 2009. Design Meets Disability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, J., R. Anacleto, P. Novais, L. Figueiredo, A. Almeida, and J. Neves. 2013. “Geo-localization System for People with Cognitive Disabilities.” In Trends in Practical Applications of Agents and Multiagent Systems, edited by J. B. Pérez, J. M. Corchado, J. Fähndrich, P. Mathieu, A. Campbell, M. C. Suarez-Figueroa, A. Ortega et al., 59–66. Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Remy-Neris, O. 2011. “Rehabilitation Robotics: The Role of the Exoskeleton.” Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 54 (S1): e236.10.1016/j.rehab.2011.07.323
   Google Scholar
• Rocon, E., and J. L. Pons. 2011. Exoskeletons in Rehabilitation Robotics: Tremor Suppression. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-17659-3
   Google Scholar
• Sawchuk, K. 2014. “Impaired.” In Routledge Handbook of Mobilities, edited by P. Addey, D. Bissell, K. Hannam, P. Merriman, and M. Sheller, 409–420. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. 2015. “Uneven Mobility Futures.” Mobilities 11 (1): 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solnit, R. 2014. Wanderlust: A History of Walking. London: Granta.
   Google Scholar
• Spurway, K., and K. Soldatic. 2015. “‘Life Just Keeps Throwing Lemons’: The Lived Experience of Food Insecurity among Aboriginal People with Disabilities in the West Kimberley.” Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability. doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1073235.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., and L. Limbrick. 2015. “A Review of the Use of Touch-screen Mobile Devices by People with Developmental Disabilities.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 45 (12): 3777–3791.10.1007/s10803-013-1878-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland, E. 2011. “Good-Bye, Wheelchair, Hello Exoskeleton.” IEEE Spectrum. Accessed December 30. http://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/bionics/goodbye-wheelchair-hello-exoskeleton
   Google Scholar
• Taipale, S. 2013. “Mobilities in Finland’s Information Society Strategies from 1995 to 2010.” Mobilities 8 (2): 293–311.10.1080/17450101.2012.655975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2006. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Vergunst, J. 2011. “Technology and Technique in a Useful Ethnography of Movement.” Mobilities 6 (2): 203–219.10.1080/17450101.2011.552900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). 2011. World Report on Disability. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, H., M. Meethu, U. Oh, and L. Findlater. 2014. “Current and Future Mobile and Wearable Device Use by People with Visual Impairments.” In CHI’ 14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3123–3132. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar