589
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Accountability in a state of liminality: Iranian students’ experiences in American airports

Pages 311-323 | Received 20 Jan 2016, Accepted 22 Dec 2016, Published online: 27 Apr 2017

References

  • Ahmed, Leila. 1982. “Western Ethnocentrism and Perceptions of the Harem.” Feminist Studies 8 (3): 521–534.10.2307/3177710
  • Amir-Moazami, Schirin. 2011. “Dialogue as a Governmental Technique: Managing Gendered Islam in Germany.” Feminist Review 98 (1): 9–27. doi:10.1057/fr.2011.8.
  • Aranda, Elizabeth, and Elizabeth Vaquera. 2011. “Unwelcomed Immigrants: Experiences with Immigration Officials and Attachment to the United States.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 27 (3): 299–321. doi:10.1177/1043986211412561.
  • Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Battaglia, Mike. 2008. “Convenience Sampling.” In Encyclopedia of Survery Research Methods, edited by Paul J. Lavrakas, 148–149. Thosand Oak, CA: Sage.
  • Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. doi:10.2307/323448.
  • Brewis, Joanna. 2014. “The Ethics of Researching Friends: On Convenience Sampling in Qualitative Management and Organization Studies.” British Journal of Management 25 (4): 849–862. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12064.
  • Brown, Wendy. 2006. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Buscher, M., and J. Urry. 2009. “Mobile Methods and the Empirical.” European Journal of Social Theory 12 (1): 99–116. doi:10.1177/1368431008099642.
  • Byng, Michelle D. 2008. “Complex Inequalities: The Case of Muslim Americans after 9/11.” American Behavioral Scientist 51 (5): 659–674. doi:10.1177/0002764207307746.
  • Cainkar, Louise. 2004. “Post 9/11 Domestic Policies Affecting U.S. Arabs and Muslims: A Brief Review.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 24 (1): 245–248.
  • Calhoun, Craig J. 2007. Nations Matter: Culture, History, and the Cosmopolitan Dream. New York: Routledge.
  • Charmaz, Kathy. 2003. “Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis.” In Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns, edited by James Holstein and Jaber F. Gubrium, 341–346. Thosand Oak, CA: Sage.
  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 1986. “Learning from the Outsider within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.” Social Problems 33 (6): S14–S32. doi:10.2307/800672.
  • Cresswell, Tim. 2006. On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  • Cresswell, Tim. 2010. “Towards a Politics of Mobility.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (1): 17–31. doi:10.1068/d11407.
  • D’Souza, Dinesh. 2002. What’s So Great about America. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.
  • Durkheim, Emile. (1984) 2012. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press. doi:10.2307/1116093.
  • Faist, Thomas. 2002. “‘Extension Du Domaine de La Lutte’: International Migration and Security before and after September 11, 2001.” International Migration Review 36 (1): 7–14.
  • Fatton, Robert. 1995. “Africa in the Age of Democratization: The Civic Limitations of Civil Society.” African Studies Review 38 (2): 67–99. doi:10.2307/525318.
  • Fleming, William C. 2014. “Icons, Itinerary, and Identity: Associations of Boundary and Mobility within the Contemporary US Passport.” Mobilities 9 (1): 42–62. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.800760.
  • van Gennep, Arnold. [1909] 1960. The Rites of Passage. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226027180.001.0001
  • Glenn, Evelyn Nakano. 2002. Unequal Freedom: How Race and Gender Shaped American Citizenship and Labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Go, Julian. 2013. “Sociology’s Imperial Unconscious: The Emergence of American Sociology in the Context of Empire.” In Sociology and Empire: The Imperial Entanglements of a Discipline, edited by George Steinmetz, 83–105. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Goodman, Leo A. 2011. “Comment: On Respondent-driven Sampling and Snowball Sampling in Hard-to-Reach Populations and Snowball Sampling Not in Hard-to-Reach Populations.” Sociological Methodology 41 (1): 347–353.10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01242.x
  • Grosfoguel, R. 2004. “Race and Ethnicity or Racialized Ethnicities? Identities within Global Coloniality.” Ethnicities 4 (3): 315–336. doi:10.1177/1468796804045237.
  • Hannam, Kevin, Mimi Sheller, and John Urry. 2006. “Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/17450100500489189.
  • Haque, Eve. 2010. “Homegrown, Muslim and Other: Tolerance, Secularism and the Limits of Multiculturalism.” Social Identities 16 (1): 79–101. doi:10.1080/13504630903465902.
  • Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press. doi:10.2307/2069993.
  • Huntington, Samuel P. 2004. Who Are We? the Challenges to America’s National Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Khan, Shahnaz. 2000. Muslim Women: Crafting a North American Identity. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
  • Lyman, Stanford M., and Marvin B. Scott. 1989. A Sociology of the Absurd. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Mahmood, S. 2006. “Secularism, Hermeneutics, and Empire: The Politics of Islamic Reformation.” Public Culture 18 (2): 323–347. doi:10.1215/08992363-2006-006.
  • Mantle, D. Ray. 2003. “What Foreign Students Fear: Homeland Security Measures and Closed Deportation Hearings.” Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, no. 2: 815–834. http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=59ecceb3-762f-4634-9e3a-28e5159fdbd0%40sessionmgr4009&hid=4103&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#AN=hein.journals.byuelj2003.29&db=edshol.
  • Martin, David A. 2003. “Immigration Policy and the Homeland Security Act Reorganization: An Early Agenda for Practical Improvements|Migrationpolicy.Org.” Migration Policy Institute. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/immigration-policy-and-homeland-security-act-reorganization-early-agenda-practical.
  • Martino, Wayne, and Goli M. Rezai-Rashti. 2008. “The Politics of Veiling, Gender and the Muslim Subject: On the Limits and Possibilities of Anti-Racist Education in the Aftermath of September 11.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29 (3): 417–431. doi:10.1080/01596300802259178.
  • Marvasti, Amir B., and Karyn D. McKinney. 2004. Middle Eastern Lives in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Menjívar, Cecilia. 2006. “Liminal Legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan Immigrants’ Lives in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 111 (4): 999–1037. doi:10.1086/499509.
  • Moallem, Minoo. 2005. Between Warrior Brother and Veiled Sister: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Politics of Patriarchy in Iran. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Nagra, Baljit. 2011. “‘Our Faith Was Also Hijacked by Those People’: Reclaiming Muslim Identity in Canada in a Post-9/11 Era.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37 (3): 425–441.10.1080/1369183X.2011.526781
  • Peek, Lori A. 2011. Behind the Backlash: Muslim Americans after 9/11. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Razack, Sherene H. 2004. “Imperilled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilised Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Forced Marriages.” Feminist Legal Studies 12 (2): 129–174. doi:10.1023/b:fest.0000043305.66172.92.
  • Rodriguez, Robyn M. 2016. “(Dis)Unity and Diversity in Post-9/11 America.” Sociological Forum 23 (2): 379–389.
  • Said, Edward W. 1979. Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  • Said, Edward W. 1981. Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  • Salthouse, Timothy. 1991. “Expertise as the Circumvention of Human Processing Limitations.” In Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits, edited by Andres K. Ericsson and Jacqui Smith, 286–300. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schoenholtz, Andrew I. 2003. “Transatlantic Dialogue on Terrorism and International Migration.” International Migration 41 (4): 330–373.
  • Selod, Saher. 2015. “Citizenship Denied: The Racialization of Muslim American Men and Women Post-9/11.” Critical Sociology 41 (1): 77–95. doi:10.1177/0896920513516022.
  • Sheller, Mimi, and John Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A 38 (2): 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268.
  • Steinmetz, George. 2013. Sociology and Empire. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822395409
  • Szakolczai, Arpad. 2009. “Liminality and Experience: Structuring Transitory Situations and Transformative Events.” International Political Anthropology 1: 141–172.
  • Thomassen, Bjørn. 2009. “The Uses and Meanings of Liminality.” International Political Anthropology 2 (1): 5–27. http://www.politicalanthropology.org/the-journal-current-a-past-issues/past-issues/172.
  • Tumlin, Karen C. 2004. “Suspect First: How Terrorism Policy is Reshaping Immigration Policy.” California Law Review 92 (4): 1173–1239. doi:10.2307/3481320.
  • Turner, Victor W. (Victor Witter). 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Ward, Lester. 1903. Pure Sociology: A Treatise on the Origin and Spontaneous Development of Society. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • West, Candace, and Sarah Fenstermaker. 2016. “Doing Difference.” Gender and Society 9 (1): 8–37.
  • West, Candace, and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender & Society 1 (2): 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.
  • Yeğenoğlu, Meyda. 1998. Colonial Fantasies: Towards a Feminist Reading of Orientalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.