Guide dog versus robot dog: assembling visually impaired people with non-human agents and achieving assisted mobility through distributed co-constructed perception

References

• Albert, Saul, William Housley, and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2019. “In Case of Emergency, Order Pizza: An Urgent Case of Action Formation and Recognition.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, 1–2. CUI ’19, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, Peter. 2005. “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text –Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 25 (1): 7–36. doi:10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, and John Law. 1997. “After the Individual in Society: Lessons on Collectivity from Science, Technology and Society.” Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie [Canadian Journal of Sociology] 22 (2): 165–182. doi:10.2307/3341747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cekaite, Asta. 2016. “Touch as Social Control: Haptic Organization of Attention in Adult–Child Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 92 (January): 30–42. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.003.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, Asta. 2020. “Human-to-Human Touch in Institutional Settings: A Commentary.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 3 (1). doi:10.7146/si.v3i1.120246.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, Jeff, and E. D. Parsons. 1990. “The Praxiology of Perception: Visual Orientations and Practical Action.” Inquiry 33 (3): 251–272. doi:10.1080/00201749008602223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, Tim. 2010. “Towards a Politics of Mobility.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (1): 17–31. doi:10.1068/d11407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, Tim. 2011. “Mobilities I: Catching Up.” Progress in Human Geography 35 (4): 550–558. doi:10.1177/0309132510383348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dant, Tim. 2004. “The Driver-Car.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5): 61–79. doi:10.1177/0263276404046061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 2004. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London; New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Due, Brian L. 2019. “Laughing at the Robot: Incongruent Robot Actions as Laughables.” Mensch Und Computer 2019 - Workshopband. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. doi:10.18420/muc2019-ws-640.
   Google Scholar
• Due, Brian L. 2021a. “Distributed Perception: Co-Operation between Sense-Able, Actionable, and Accountable Semiotic Agents.” Symbolic Interaction 44 (1): 134–162. doi:10.1002/symb.538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Due, Brian L. 2021b. “RoboDoc: Semiotic Resources for Achieving Face-to-Screenface Formation with a Telepresence Robot.” Semiotica 2021 (238): 253–278. doi:10.1515/sem-2018-0148.
   Google Scholar
• Due, Brian L. 2021c. “Interspecies Intercorporeality and Mediated Haptic Sociality: Distributing Perception with a Guide Dog.” Visual Studies 0 (0): 1–14. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2021.1951620.
   Google Scholar
• Due, Brian L. 2022. “The Haecceity of Assembling by Distributing Perception.” In Re-Configuring Human-Robot Interaction, edited by Andreas Bischof, Eva Hornecker, Antonia Lina Krummheuer, and Matthias Rehm. Hokkaido, Japan: Originaly Sapporo.
   Google Scholar
• Due, Brian, and Simon Lange. 2018a. “Semiotic Resources for Navigation: A Video Ethnographic Study of Blind People’s Uses of the White Cane and a Guide Dog for Navigating in Urban Areas.” Semiotica 2018 (222): 287–312. doi:10.1515/sem-2016-0196.
   Google Scholar
• Due, Brian L., and Simon Bierring Lange. 2018a. “The Moses Effect: The Spatial Hierarchy and Joint Accomplishment of a Blind Person Navigating.” Space and Culture 21 (2): 129–144. doi:10.1177/1206331217734541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Due, Brian L., and Simon Bierring Lange. 2018b. “Troublesome Objects: Unpacking Ocular-Centrism in Urban Environments by Studying Blind Navigation Using Video Ethnography and Ethnomethodology.” Sociological Research Online. 24 (4): 475–495. doi:10.1177/1360780418811963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, Clemens, and Michael Lynch. 2021. “Introduction to Harold Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodological ‘Misreading’ of Aron Gurwitsch on the Phenomenal Field.” Human Studies 44 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10746-020-09564-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, Judy. 2016. Visually Impaired: Assistive Technologies, Challenges and Coping Strategies. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Feely, Michael. 2016. “Disability Studies after the Ontological Turn: A Return to the Material World and Material Bodies without a Return to Essentialism.” Disability & Society 31 (7): 863–883. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fele, Giolo. 2008. “The Phenomenal Field: Ethnomethodological Perspectives on Collective Phenomena.” Human Studies 31 (3): 299–322. doi:10.1007/s10746-008-9099-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer, Eelke. 2015. “Exploring the Use of an Aerial Robot to Guide Blind Runners.” ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 112 (112): 3–7. doi:10.1145/2809915.2809916.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, Leopoldina, and Sakari Taipale. 2017. “Mobilities and the Network of Personal Technologies: Refining the Understanding of Mobility Structure.” Telematics and Informatics 34 (2): 560–568. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, Adam H., and Robert K. Wayne. 2017. “Deciphering the Origin of Dogs: From Fossils to Genomes.” Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 5 (February): 281–307. doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-110937.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold. 1952. The Perception of the Other: A Study in Social Order. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold. 1991. “Respecification: Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Methods, Etc. in and of the Essential Haecceity of Immortal Ordinary Society (I) – an Announcement of Studies.” In Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, edited by Graham Button, 10–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working out Durkeim’s Aphorism. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold, and Eric Livingston. 2003. “Phenomenal Field Properties of Order in Formatted Queues and Their Neglected Standing in the Current Situation of Inquiry.” Visual Studies 18 (1): 21–28. doi:10.1080/147258603200010029.
   Google Scholar
• Gehle, Raphaela, Karola Pitsch, Timo Dankert, and Sebastian Wrede. 2017. “How to Open an Interaction between Robot and Museum Visitor?: Strategies to Establish a Focused Encounter in HRI.” In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 187–95, HRI ’17, New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2909824.3020219.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. J. 1996. “A Geography for Disabled People?” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21 (2): 387–396. doi:10.2307/622488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1978. “Response Cries.” Language 54 (4): 787–815. doi:10.2307/413235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggin, Gerard. 2016. “Disability and Mobilities: Evening up Social Futures.” Mobilities 11 (4): 533–541. doi:10.1080/17450101.2016.1211821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, David. 2007. Playing with My Dog Katie: An Ethnomethodological Study of Dog-Human Interaction. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited by G. Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 2002. “Time in Action.” Current Anthropology 43 (S4): S19–S35. doi:10.1086/339566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society 18 (1): 53–74. doi:10.1177/0957926507069457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerreiro, João, Daisuke Sato, Saki Asakawa, Huixu Dong, KrisM. Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2019. “CaBot: Designing and Evaluating an Autonomous Navigation Robot for Blind People.” In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 68–82, ASSETS ’19, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Guide Dogs for the Blind. 2019. “Training Phase Descriptions.” https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi3z9WdkZj1AhVSQ_EDHQL5B34QFnoECAgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.guidedogs.com%2Fuploads%2Ffiles%2FPuppy-Raising-Manual%2FTraining-Phase-Descriptions.pdf&usg=AOvVaw20xIM9N5gSO72GEUBoKU33.
   Google Scholar
• Hannam, Kevin, Mimi Sheller, and John Urry. 2006. “Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/17450100500489189.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto. Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, edited by Haraway , 149–181. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and T. Stivers. 1999. “Online Commentary in Acute Medical Visits: A Method of Shaping Patient Expectations.” Social Science & Medicine 49 (11): 1501–1517. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00219-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highstein, Stephen M., Richard R. Fay, and Arthur N. Popper. 2004. The Vestibular System. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Iwatsuka, K., K. Yamamoto, and K. Kato. 2004. “Development of a Guide Dog System for the Blind People with Character Recognition Ability.” In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004, ICPR 2004, Vol.1, 453–456.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, Kobin H., Penelope Brown, Mark Dingemanse, Simeon Floyd, Sonja Gipper, Kaoru Hayano, Elliott Hoey, et al. 2020. “Sequence Organization: A Universal Infrastructure for Social Action.” Journal of Pragmatics 168 (October): 119–138. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.009.
   Google Scholar
• Kerepesi, A., E. Kubinyi, G. K. Jonsson, M. S. Magnusson, and Á. Miklósi. 2006. “Behavioural Comparison of Human-Animal (Dog) and Human-Robot (AIBO) Interactions.” Behavioural Processes 73 (1): 92–99. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 2009. From Pipes to Scopes. The Flow Architecture of Financial Markets. Konstant. Bibliothek der Universität Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• Konok, Veronica, Beta Korcsok, Ádám Miklósi, and Márta. Gácsi. 2018. “Should We Love Robots? – the Most Liked Qualities of Companion Dogs and How They Can Be Implemented in Social Robots.” Computers in Human Behavior 80: 132–142. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreplak, Yaël, and Chloé Mondémé. 2014. “Artworks as Touchable Objects.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 295–318. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, F., K. C. Mitchell, G. Deshpande, and J. S. Katz. 2021. “Human–Dog Relationships as a Working Framework for Exploring Human–Robot Attachment: A Multidisciplinary Review.” Animal Cognition 24 (2): 371–385. doi:10.1007/s10071-021-01472-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurier, Eric, Barry Brown, and Moira McGregor. 2016. “Mediated Pedestrian Mobility: Walking and the Map App.” Mobilities 11 (1): 117–134. doi:10.1080/17450101.2015.1099900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurier, Eric, Ramia Maze, and Johan Lundin. 2006. “Putting the Dog Back in the Park: Animal and Human Mind-in-Action.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 13 (1): 2–24. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1301_2.
   Google Scholar
• Lehn, Dirk vom. 2010. “Discovering ‘Experience-Ables’: Socially Including Visually Impaired People in Art Museums.” Journal of Marketing Management 26 (7–8): 749–769. doi:10.1080/02672571003780155.
   Google Scholar
• Licoppe, Christian. 2016. “Mobilities and Urban Encounters in Public Places in the Age of Locative Media. Seams, Folds, and Encounters with ‘Pseudonymous Strangers.” Mobilities 11 (1): 99–116. doi:10.1080/17450101.2015.1097035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Mike. 2017. “On the Way to Cycle Rage: Disputed Mobile Formations.” Mobilities 12 (3): 384–404. doi:10.1080/17450101.2015.1096031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Mike. 2019. “The Non-Looks of the Mobile World: A Video-Based Study of Interactional Adaptation in Cycle-Lanes.” Mobilities 14 (4): 500–523. doi:10.1080/17450101.2019.1571721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manduchi, Roberto, and Sri Kurniawan. 2018. Assistive Technology for Blindness and Low Vision. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, Doreen. 1994. “Power-Geometry and a Progressive Sense of Place.” In Travellers’ Tales: Narratives of Home and Displacement, edited by G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis, and T. Putnam. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, Paul. 2015. “The Joy of Biking Together: Sharing Everyday Experiences of Vélomobility.” Mobilities 10 (1): 55–82. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.844950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, Paul, Mathias Broth, and Pentti Haddington. 2014. “Moving Together Mobile Formations in Interaction.” Space and Culture 17 (2): 104–106. doi:10.1177/1206331213508679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michalko, Rod. 1999. The Two-in-one: Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, Lorenza. 2006. “Participants’ Online Analysis and Multimodal Practices: Projecting the End of the Turn and the Closing of the Sequence.” Discourse Studies 8 (1): 117–129. doi:10.1177/1461445606059561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondémé, Chloé. 2011a. “Animal as Subject Matter for Social Sciences: When Linguistics Addresses the Issue of a Dog’s ‘Speakership.” In Non-Humans in Social Science: Animals, Spaces, Things, edited by Petr Gibas, Karolína Pauknerová, and Marco Stella, 87–105. Cervený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.
   Google Scholar
• Mondémé, Chloé. 2011b. “Dog-Human Sociality as Mutual Orientation.” https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/en/publications/dog-human-sociality-as-mutual-orientation.
   Google Scholar
• Mondémé, Chloé. 2020. La Socialité Interspécifique: Une Analyse Multimodale Des Interactions Homme-Chien. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.
   Google Scholar
• Monforte, Javier, Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, and Brett Smith. 2020. “Traveling Material↔Semiotic Environments of Disability, Rehabilitation, and Physical Activity.” Qualitative Health Research 30 (8): 1249–1261. doi:10.1177/1049732318820520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morel, Julien, and Marc Relieu. 2011. “Locating Mobility in Orientation Sequences.” Nottingham French Studies 50 (2): 94–113. doi:10.3366/nfs.2011-2.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishizaka, Aug. 2020. “Multi-Sensory Perception during Palpation in Japanese Midwifery Practice.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 3 (1). doi:10.7146/si.v3i1.120256.
   Google Scholar
• Norouzi, Nahal, Kangsoo Kim, Myungho Lee, Ryan Schubert, Austin Erickson, Jeremy Bailenson, Gerd Bruder, and Greg Welch. 2019. “Walking Your Virtual Dog: Analysis of Awareness and Proxemics with Simulated Support Animals in Augmented Reality.” 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E. 1979. “Transcription as Theory.” In Developmental Pragmatics, edited by E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pelikan, Hannah R. M., and Mathias Broth. 2016. “Why That Nao?: How Humans Adapt to a Conventional Humanoid Robot in Taking Turns-at-Talk.” In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4921–32. CHI’16, New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Pitsch, Karola. 2016. “Limits and Opportunities for Mathematizing Communicational Conduct for Social Robotics in the Real World? Toward Enabling a Robot to Make Use of the Human’s Competences.” AI & SOCIETY 31 (4): 587–593. doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0629-0.
   Google Scholar
• Psathas, George. 1976. “Mobility, Orientation, and Navigation: Conceptual and Theoretical Considerations.” Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 70 (9): 385–391. doi:10.1177/0145482X7607000904.
   Google Scholar
• Psathas, George. 1992. “The Study of Extended Sequences: The Case of the Garden Lesson.” In Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, edited by Graham Watson and Robert M. Seiler, 99–122. Newbury Park: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Quéré, Louis, and Marc Relieu. 2001. “Modes de Locomotion et Inscription Spatiale Des Inégalités. Les Déplacements Des Personnes Atteintes de Handicaps Visuels et Moteurs Dans l’esplace Public.” Convention Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Scienc es Sociales/Ministère de l’équipement, du transport et du logement-Direction générale de l’urbanisme, de l’habitat et de la constructio. Paris, Centre D'etude Des Mouvements Sociaux.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, Anne Warfield, Kevin A. Whitehead, and Waverly Duck, eds. 2020. Black Lives Matter – Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Studies of Race and Systemic Racism in Everyday Interaction. A Free Book in Coordination with Our Series Directions in Ethnomethodology And Conversation Analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Relieu, Marc. 1994. “Les Catégories Dans L’action. L’apprentissage Des Traversées de Rue Par Des Non-Voyants [Categories in Action. Blind Persons Learning to Cross the Street].” Raisons Pratiques. L’enquête Sur Les Categories 5: 185–218.
   Google Scholar
• Robillard, Albert B. 1999. Meaning of a Disability: The Lived Experience of Paralysis. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossano, Federico. 2013. “Sequence Organization and Timing of Bonobo Mother-Infant Interactions.” Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 14 (2): 160–189. doi:10.1075/is.14.2.02ros.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, Harvey L., Emmanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, Emmanuel A. 1984. “On Some Gestures’ Relation to Talk.” In Structures of Social Action, 266–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, EmmanuelA. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, Alfred. 1953. “Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (1): 1–38. doi:10.2307/2104013.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, Mimi. 2016. “Uneven Mobility Futures: A Foucauldian Approach.” Mobilities 11 (1): 15–31. doi:10.1080/17450101.2015.1097038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, Mimi, and John Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38 (2): 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, Jürgen. 1995. “On Projection.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, edited by E. Goody, 87–110. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Jürgen, and J. S. Jordan. 2009. “Projection and Anticipation: The Forward-Looking Nature of Embodied Communication.” Discourse Processes 46 (2–3): 93–102. doi:10.1080/01638530902728777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachi, S., K. Tanie, K. Komoriya, Y. Hosoda, and M. Abe. 1981. “Guide Dog Robot—Its Basic Plan and Some Experiments with Meldog Mark I.” Mechanism and Machine Theory 16 (1): 21–29. doi:10.1016/0094-114X(81)90046-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, John. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Yamazaki, Akiko, Keiichi Yamazaki, Yusuke Arano, Yosuke Saito, Emi Iiyama, Hisato Fukuda, Yoshinori Kobayashi, and Yoshinori Kuno. 2019. “Interacting with Wheelchair Mounted Navigator Robot.” doi:10.18420/muc2019-ws-651.
   Google Scholar