2,363
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Migrant immobilities in the periphery: insights from the Vietnam-Russia corridor

Pages 985-999 | Received 08 Jul 2022, Accepted 01 Feb 2023, Published online: 23 Feb 2023

References

  • Ahmed, S. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  • Alexseev, M. A. 2006. Immigration Phobia and the Security Dilemma: Russia, Europe, and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Appadurai, A. 2004. “The Capacity to Aspire: culture and the Terms of Recognition.” In Cultural Politics in a Global Age: Uncertainty, Solidarity, and Innovation, edited by D. Held and H. L. Moore, 29–35. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
  • Bayly, S. 2004. “Vietnamese Intellectuals in Revolutionary and Postcolonial Times.” Critique of Anthropology 24 (3): 320–344. doi:10.1177/0308275X04045424.
  • Bélanger, D., and R. Silvey. 2020. “An Im/Mobility Turn: power Geometries of Care and Migration.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (16): 3423–3440. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2019.1592396.
  • Bodziany, M. 2017. “Vietnamese Immigrants in Poland-Three Decades of Experience.” Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 3 (5): 586–608.
  • Bourdieu, P., and L. J. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Campbell, E. H. 2006. “Urban Refugees in Nairobi: Problems of Protection, Mechanisms of Survival, and Possibilities for Integration.” Journal of Refugee Studies 19 (3): 396–413. doi:10.1093/jrs/fel011.
  • Carling, J. 2002. “Migration in the Age of Involuntary Immobility: Theoretical Reflections and Cape Verdean Experiences.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 28 (1): 5–42. doi:10.1080/13691830120103912.
  • Carruthers, A. 2002. “The Accumulation of National Belonging in Transnational Fields: Ways of Being at Home in Vietnam.” Identities 9 (4): 423–444. doi:10.1080/10702890214872.
  • Chatterji, J. 2017. “On Being Stuck in Bengal: Immobility in the ‘Age of Migration’.” Modern Asian Studies 51 (2): 511–541. doi:10.1017/S0026749X16000664.
  • Cohen, J. H. 2002. “Migration and “Stay at Homes” in Rural Oaxaca, Mexico: Local Expression of Global Outcomes.” Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development 31 (2): 231–259.
  • Collins, F. L. 2018. “Desire as a Theory for Migration Studies: Temporality, Assemblage and Becoming in the Narratives of Migrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (6): 964–980. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384147.
  • Cooper, E., and D. Pratten. 2015. “Ethnographies of Uncertainty in Africa: An Introduction.” In Ethnographies of Uncertainty in Africa, edited by E. Cooper and D. Pratten. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Córdoba Azcárate, M. 2020. Stuck with Tourism: Space, Power, and Labor in Contemporary Yucatan. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
  • Dang, N. A., C. Tacoli, and X. T. Hoang. 2003. “Migration in Vietnam: A Review of Information on Current Trends and Patterns, and Their Policy Implications.” Paper Presented at the Regional Conference on Migration, Development, and Pro-Poor Policy Choices in Asia, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  • Davé, B. 2014. “Becoming “Legal” through “Illegal” Procedures: The Precarious Status of Migrant Workers in Russia.” Russian Analytical Digest 159: 1–8.
  • De Haas, H. 2014. “Migration Theory: Quo vadis?” The IMI Working Papers Series. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:45aacf94-8f24-4294-9c74-cbc8453fcbfb
  • Drbohlav, D. 2000. “International Migration and Migrants’ Integration – Selected Aspects (Czech Republic in a Broader Central/Eastern European context).” https://web.natur.cuni.cz/∼ksgrrsek/illegal/clanky/Drbohlav_berlin.pdf
  • Faist, T. 2013. “The Mobility Turn: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences?” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (11): 1637–1646. doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.812229.
  • Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  • Geiger, M. 2013. “The Transformation of Migration Politics: From Migration Control to Disciplining Mobility.” In Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People, edited by M Geiger and A Pécoud, 15–40. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Glick Schiller, N., and N. B. Salazar. 2013. “Regimes of Mobility across the Globe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39 (2): 183–200. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.723253.
  • Haerpfer, C., and C. Wallace. 1998. “Xenophobic Attitudes towards Migrants and Ethnic Minorities in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Central and Eastern Europe in Transition, edited by F. Columbus, Vol. I, 183–247. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
  • Haugen, H. Ø. 2012. “Nigerians in China: A Second State of Immobility.” International Migration 50 (2): 65–80. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00713.x.
  • Hoang, L. A. 2011. “Gender Identity and Agency in Migration Decision Making: Evidence from Vietnam.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37 (9): 1441–1457. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2011.623618.
  • Hoang, L. A. 2016. “Moral Dilemmas of Transnational Migration: Vietnamese Women in Taiwan.” Gender & Society 30 (6): 890–911. doi:10.1177/0891243216670602.
  • Hoang, L. A. 2017. “Governmentality in Asian Migration Regimes: The Case of Labour Migration from Vietnam to Taiwan.” Population, Space and Place 23 (3): e2019–12. doi:10.1002/psp.2019.
  • Hoang, L. A. 2020a. “Debt and (un) Freedoms: The Case of Transnational Labour Migration from Vietnam.” Geoforum 116: 33–41. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.08.001.
  • Hoang, L. A. 2020b. Vietnamese Migrants in Russia: Mobility in Times of Uncertainty. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Hoang, L. A. 2023. “Vietnamese Irregular Migrants in Moscow: Fractious Giving and Receiving of Care within the Transnational Family.” In Crisis for Whom? Critical Global Perspectives on Childhood, Care, and Migration, edited by R. Rosen, E. Chase, S. Crafter, V. Glockner, and S. Mitra. London: UCL Press.
  • Hoang, L. A., and B. S. A. Yeoh. 2012. “Sustaining Families across Transnational Spaces: Vietnamese Migrant Parents and Their Left-behind Children.” Asian Studies Review 36 (3): 307–325. doi:10.1080/10357823.2012.711810.
  • Hüwelmeier, G. 2015. “Mobile Entrepreneurs: Transnational Vietnamese in the Czech Republic.” In Rethinking Ethnography in Central Europe, 59–73. Cham: Springer.
  • Hüwelmeier, G. 2017. “Socialist Cosmopolitans in Postsocialist Europe: Transnational Ties among Vietnamese in the Cold War Period and Thereafter.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies 12 (1): 126–154. doi:10.1525/jvs.2017.12.1.126.
  • IOM. 2019. “World Migration Report 2020.” https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf
  • Johnson, M. 2015. “Surveillance, Pastoral Power and Embodied Infrastructures of Care among Migrant Filipino Muslims in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” Surveillance & Society 13 (2): 250–264. doi:10.24908/ss.v13i2.5339.
  • Kamenskiy, A. 2002. Contemporary Russia in International Labour Migration. In World in the mirror of international migration - Scientific Series: International migration of population: Russia and the Contemporary World, edited by V. Iontsev, Moscow: 'Lomonosov' University. https://demography.econ.msu.ru/sys/raw.php?o=1771&p=attachment, accessed 7 Feb 2023
  • Langevang, T., and K. V. Gough. 2009. “Surviving through Movement: The Mobility of Urban Youth in Ghana.” Social & Cultural Geography 10 (7): 741–756. doi:10.1080/14649360903205116.
  • Larin, A. 2012. “The Chinese Experience in Russia: adaptation, Tolerance, Law and Politics.” In Chinese Migrants in Russia, Central Asia and Eastern Europe, edited by F. B. Chang and S. T. Rucker-Chang, 41–68. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Larin, V. 2012. “Perceptions of Chinese Migrants in the Russian Far East.” In Chinese Migrants in Russia, Central Asia and Eastern Europe, edited by F. B. Chang and S. T. Rucker-Chang, 69–82. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Leshkowich, A. M. 2011. “Making Class and Gender: (Market) Socialist Enframing of Traders in Ho Chi Minh City.” American Anthropologist 113 (2): 277–290. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2011.01330.x.
  • Lindquist, J. 2018. “Infrastructures of Escort: Transnational Migration and Economies of Connection in Indonesia.” Indonesia 105 (1): 77–95. doi:10.1353/ind.2018.0003.
  • Margold, J. 2004. “Filipina Depictions of Migrant Life for Those at Home.” In Coming Home? Refugees, Migrants, and Those Who Stayed Behind, edited by L. D. Long and E. Oxfeld, 49–62. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Massey, D. 1994. Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Mata-Codesal, D. 2015. “Ways of Staying Put in Ecuador: Social and Embodied Experiences of Mobility–Immobility Interactions.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41 (14): 2274–2290. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2015.1053850.
  • MOLISA. 1995. Annual Review Report on the Administration of Foreign Employed Labor Force 1995. Hanoi: MOLISA.
  • Nguyen, M. T. 2009. Migration, Remittances and Economic Development: Case of Vietnam. Bangkok: The Thailand Research Fund. http://www.trf.or.th/TRFGallery/Upload/Gallery/Documents/Files/1000000027.pdf
  • Nožina, M. 2010. “Crime Networks in Vietnamese Diasporas. The Czech Republic Case.” Crime, Law and Social Change 53 (3): 229–258. doi:10.1007/s10611-009-9226-9.
  • Núñez, G. G., and J. M. Heyman. 2007. “Entrapment Processes and Immigrant Communities in a Time of Heightened Border Vigilance.” Human Organization 66 (4): 354–365. doi:10.17730/humo.66.4.v32mp32167k8l705.
  • Pieke, F. N., P. Nyíri, M. Thuno, and A. Ceccagno. 2004. Transnational Chinese: Fujianese Migrants in Europe. Standford, California: Standford University Press.
  • Salazar, N. B. 2010. Tanzanian Migration Imaginaries. Working Paper 20. Oxford: International Migration Institute, James Martin 21st Century School, University of Oxford.
  • Schewel, K. 2020. “Understanding Immobility: Moving beyond the Mobility Bias in Migration Studies.” International Migration Review 54 (2): 328–355. doi:10.1177/0197918319831952.
  • Schwenkel, C. 2017. “Vietnamese in Central Europe: An Unintended Diaspora.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies 12 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1525/jvs.2017.12.1.1.
  • Sen, A. 1993. “Capability and Well-Being.” In The Quality of Life, edited by M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (Eds.), 30–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Shamir, R. 2005. “Without Borders? Notes on Globalization as a Mobility Regime.” Sociological Theory 23 (2): 197–217. doi:10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00250.x.
  • Silvey, R. 2004. “Power, Difference and Mobility: feminist Advances in Migration Studies.” Progress in Human Geography 28 (4): 490–506. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph490oa.
  • Sommers, M. 2001. Fear in Bongoland: Burundi Refugees in Urban Tanzania. Vol. 8. New York: Berghahn Books.
  • Svobodová, A., and E. Janská. 2016. “Identity Development among Youth of Vietnamese Descent in the Czech Republic.” In Contested Childhoods: Growing up in Migrancy, 121–137. Cham: Springer.
  • Tsing, A. L. 2005. Friction an Ethnography of Global Connection. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Turner, B. S. 2007. “The Enclave Society: Towards a Sociology of Immobility.” European Journal of Social Theory 10 (2): 287–304. doi:10.1177/1368431007077807.
  • UN DESA. 2019. “International Migrant Stock 2019.” www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/estimates19.asp
  • Williams, A. M., and V. Balaz. 2005. “Winning, Then Losing, the Battle with Globalization: Vietnamese Petty Traders in Slovakia.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (3): 533–549. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00604.x.
  • Yea, S. 2016. “Everyday Spaces of Human Trafficking: (In) Visibility and Agency among Trafficked Women in US Military-Oriented Clubs in South Korea.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106 (4): 957–973. doi:10.1080/24694452.2016.1157012.
  • Yeoh, B. S., M. Platt, C. Y. Khoo, T. Lam, and G. Baey. 2016. “Indonesian Domestic Workers and the (un) Making of Transnational Livelihoods and Provisional Futures.” Social & Cultural Geography 18(3): 415–439.
  • Yudina, T. N. 2005. “Labour Migration into Russia: The Response of State and Society.” Current Sociology 53 (4): 583–606. doi:10.1177/0011392105052716.