Ensiled sugar beets as dietary component and their effect on preference and dry matter intake by goats

References

• Allen MS. 2000. Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 83:1598–1624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymus. 2013. Tierschutzgesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 18. Mai 2006 (BGBl. I S. 1206, 1313), das zuletzt durch Artikel 4 Absatz 90 des Gesetzes vom 7. August 2013 (BGBl. I S. 3154) geändert worden ist. § 11 Abs. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt M, Schuldt A, Mannerkorpi P, Vearasilp T. 1987. Zur enzymatischen Stärkebestimmung im Darminhalt und Kot von Kühen mit hitzestabiler Amylase. Arch Anim Nutr. 37:455 (Abstract).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntinx SE, Pond KR, Fisher DS, Burns JC. 1997. The utilization of multidimensional scaling to identify forage characteristics associated with preference in sheep. J Anim Sci. 75:1641–1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns JC, Fisher DS, Mayland HF. 2001. Preference by sheep and goats among hay of eight tall fescue cultivars. J Anim Sci. 79:213–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel JLP, Amaral RC, Sá Neto A, Cabezas-Garcia EH, Bispo AW, Zopollatto M, Cardoso TL, Spoto MHF, Santos FAP, Nussio LG. 2013a. Performance of dairy cows fed high levels of acetic acid or ethanol. J Dairy Sci. 96:398–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel JLP, Weiß K, Custódio L, Sá Neto A, Santos MC, Zopollatto M, Nussio LG. 2013b. Occurrence of volatile organic compounds in sugarcane silages. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 185:101–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durix A, Jean-Blain C, Sallmann HP, Jouany JP. 1991. Use of a semicontinuous culture system (RUSITEC) to study the metabolism of ethanol in the rumen and its effects on ruminal digestion. Can J Anim Sci. 71:115–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes JM. 1995. Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals. Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes JM. 2007. A personal view of how ruminant animals control their intake and choice of food: minimal total discomfort. Nutr Res Rev. 20:132–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach K, Liao Y, Südekum K-H. 2014. Aerobic exposure of lucerne silages and its impact on preference and dry matter intake by goats. Small Rumin Res. 121:308–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach K, Roß F, Weiß K, Büscher W, Südekum K-H. 2013. Changes in maize silage fermentation products during aerobic deterioration and effects on dry matter intake by goats. Agric Food Sci. 22:168–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [GfE] Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie. 2008. New equations for predicting metabolisable energy of grass and maize products for ruminants. Proc Soc Nutr Physiol. 17:191–197.
   Google Scholar
• Goatcher WD, Church DC. 1970. Taste responses in ruminants. I. Reactions of sheep to sugars, saccharin, ethanol and salts. J Anim Sci. 30:777–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner SD, Montes F, Rotz CA, Mitloehner F. 2010. Ethanol emission from loose corn silage and exposed silage particles. Atmos Environ. 44:4172–4180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermansen JE. 1990. Feed intake and milk yield using an ensiled mixture of whole crop beets and straw compared with traditionally stored beets for dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 31:231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laube W, Weissbach F, Budzier HH. 1968. Untersuchungen zur Konservierung von Hackfrüchten durch Silierung. Arch Anim Nutr. 18:229–238.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. 1991. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Marlow: Chalcombe Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McGechan MB. 1990. A review of losses arising during conservation of grass forage: part 2, storage losses. J Agr Eng Res. 45:1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Steingass H. 1987. Schätzung des energetischen Futterwerts aus der in vitro mit Pansensaft bestimmten Gasbildung und der chemischen Analyse. II. Regressionsgleichungen. Übers Tierernährg. 15:59–94.
   Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev. 28:7–55.
   Google Scholar
• Provenza FD. 1995. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J Range Manage. 48:2–17.
   Google Scholar
• Randby ÅT, Selmer-Olsen I, Baevre L. 1999. Effect of ethanol in feed on milk flavor and chemical composition. J Dairy Sci. 82:420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooke JA, Hatfield RD. 2003. Biochemistry of ensiling. In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH, editors. Silage science and technology. Madison: ASA, CSSA, SSSA; p. 95–139.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt S, Steingass H, Jungbluth T, Drochner W. 2001. Sugar beet mash silage as a component of a total-mixed-ration for dairy cows – effects on parameters of digestion and animal performance. Arch Anim Nutr. 54:47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaysen J, Auerbach H, Weißbach F. 2012. Fermentation losses during ensiling of sugar beets as substrate for biogas production. In: Kuoppala K, Rinne M, Vanhatalo A, editors. Proc XVIth Int Silage Conference. July 2-4 2012, Hämeenlinna, Finland; p. 460–461.
   Google Scholar
• [VDLUFA] Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten. 2012. VDLUFA-Methodenbuch, Bd. III. Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. 8. Erg. 2012. Darmstadt: VDLUFA-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• von Lengerken J, Zimmermann K. 1991. Handbuch Futtermittelprüfung. Berlin: Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner A, Weber U, Weber G, Scholtissek M, Auerbach H, Weißbach F. 2009. Preservation of sugar beets in plastic bags for biogas production. In: Broderick GA, et al. editors. Proc of the XVth Int Silage Conf. July 27-29 2009, Madison, WI; p. 471–472.
   Google Scholar
• Weiß K, Kaiser E. 1995. Milchsäurebestimmung in Silageextrakten mit Hilfe der HPLC. Wirtschaftseig Futter. 41:69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Weißbach F, Strubelt C. 2008a. Correcting the dry matter content of grass silages as a substrate for biogas production. Landtechnik. 63:210–211a.
   Google Scholar
• Weißbach F, Strubelt C. 2008b. Correcting the dry matter content of maize silages as a substrate for biogas production. Landtechnik. 63:82–83.
   Google Scholar
• Weißbach F, Strubelt C. 2008c. Correcting the dry matter content of sugar beet silages as a substrate for biogas production. Landtechnik. 63:354–355b.
   Google Scholar