199
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Influence of feeding sunflower seed and meal protected against ruminal fermentation on ruminal fermentation, bacterial composition and in situ degradability in sheep

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 380-396 | Received 08 Feb 2020, Accepted 10 Apr 2020, Published online: 14 May 2020

References

  • Agricultural Research Council (ARC). 1984. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. London (UK):Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau.
  • AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2005. Official methods of analysis. 18th. MD (USA): International: Gaithersburg.
  • Arroyo JM, González J. 2013. Effects of the ruminal comminution rate and microbial contamination of particles on accuracy of in situ estimates of ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of feedstuffs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 97:109–118.
  • Arroyo JM, González J, Ouarti M, Silván JM, Ruiz Del Castillo ML, De la Pena Moreno F. 2013. Malic acid or orthophosphoric acid-heat treatments for protecting sunflower (Helianthus annuus) meal proteins against ruminal degradation and increasing intestinal amino acid supply. Animal. 7:223–231.
  • Bates DB, Gillett JA, Barao SA, Bergen WR. 1985. The effect of specific growth rate and stage of growth on nucleic acid protein values of pure cultures and mixed ruminal bacteria. J Anim Sci. 61:713–724.
  • Carro MD, Ungerfeld EM. 2015. Utilization of organic acids to manipulate ruminal fermentation and improve ruminant productivity. In: Puniya AK, Sing R, Kamra DN, editors. Rumen microbiology: from evolution to revolution. New Delhi: Springer; p. 177–197.
  • Chesson A, Forsberg CW. 1988. Polysacharide degradation by rumen microorganisms. In: Hobson PN, Stewart CS, editors. The rumen microbial ecosystem. Dordrecht: Elsevier Applied Science Publications. Springer; p. 329–381.
  • Cummins CS. 1989. Bacterial cell wall structure. In: O’leary MW, editor. Practical handbook of microbiology. Florida: CRC, Press Inc; p. 349–379.
  • Díaz-Royón F, Arroyo JM, Sánchez-Yélamo MD, González J. 2016. Sunflower meal and spring pea ruminal degradation protection using malic acid or orthophosphoric acid-heat treatments. Anim Prod Sci. 56:2029–2038.
  • Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GSA. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 226:497–509.
  • García-Martínez R, Ranilla MJ, Tejido ML, Carro MD. 2005. Effects of disodium fumarate on in vitro rumen microbial growth, methane production and fermentation of diets differing in their forage:concentrate ratio. Br J Nutr. 94:71–77.
  • Gargallo S, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A. 2006. Technical note: A modified three-step in vitro procedure to determine intestinal digestion of proteins. J Anim Sci. 84:2163–2167. doi:10.2527/jas.2004-704.
  • González J, Andrés S, Rodríguez CA, Alvir MR. 2002. In situ evaluation of the protein value of soybean meal and processed full fat soybeans for ruminants. Anim Res. 51:455–464.
  • González J, Arroyo JM, Guevara-González JA, Moubi R, Piquer O, Moya VJ. 2014. Effects of the comminution rate and microbial contamination of particles in the rumen on accuracy of in situ estimates of digestion of protein and amino acids of dehydrated sugar beet pulp. J Agric Sci Camb. 152:166–174.
  • González J, Arroyo JM, Ouarti M, Guevara-González J, Rodríguez CA, Alvir MR, Moya VJ, Piquer O. 2012. Composition of free and adherent ruminal bacteria: inaccuracy of the microbial nutrient supply estimates obtained using free bacteria as reference samples and 15N as the marker. Animal. 6:468–475.
  • González J, Faría-Mármol J, Matesanz B, Rodríguez CA, Alvir MR. 2003. In situ intestinal digestibility of dry matter and crude protein of cereal grains and rapeseed in sheep. Rep Nutr Develop. 43:29–40.
  • González J, Ouarti M, Rodríguez CA, Centeno C. 2009. A simplified management of the in situ evaluation of feedstuffs in ruminants: application to the study of the digestive availability of protein and amino acids corrected for the ruminal microbial contamination. Arch Anim Nutr. 63:304–320.
  • González J, Rodríguez CA, Andrés SG, Alvir MR. 1998. Rumen degradability and microbial contamination of fish meal and meat meal measured by the in situ technique. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 73:71–84.
  • González J, Sánchez L, Alvir MR. 1999. Estimation of intestinal digestibility of undegraded sunflower meal protein from nylon bag measurements. A Mathematical Model. Reprod Nutr Dev. 39:607–616.
  • Haro AN, González J, de Evan T, de la Fuente J, Carro MD. 2019. Effects of feeding rumen-protected sunflower seed and meal protein on feed intake, diet digestibility, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and growth performance of lambs. Anim. 9:415. doi:10.3390/ani9070415.
  • INRA. 2007. Alimentation des Bovins, Ovins et Caprins. Besoins des Animaux – valeurs des Aliments. Tables INRA. Quae Editions. Versailles.
  • Legay-Carmier F, Bauchart D. 1989. Distribution of bacteria in the rumen contents of dairy cows given a diet supplemented with soya-bean oil. Br J Nutr. 61:725–740.
  • Newbold CJ, de la Fuente G, Belanche A, Ramos-Morales E, McEwan NR. 2015. The role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen. Front Microbiol. 6:Article 1313.
  • Ørskov ER, McDonald I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci. 92:499–503.
  • NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirement of dairy cattle. (7th Rev. Ed). National Academic Press. National Research Council ed. Washington DC (USA).
  • Palmquist DL, Jenkins TC. 1980. Fat in lactation rations : review. J Dairy Sci. 63:1–14.
  • Pereira JC, Carro MD, Gonzalez J, Alvir MR, Rodriguez CA. 1998. Rumen degradability and intestinal digestibility of brewers’ grains as affected by origin and heat treatment and of barley rootlets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 74:107–121.
  • Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ. 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In: James WPT, Theander O, editors. The analysis of dietary fiber in food. New York (USA): Marcel Dekker Inc; p. 123–142.
  • Rodríguez CA, González J. 2006. In situ study of the relevance of bacterial adherence to feed particles for the contamination and accuracy of rumen degradability estimates for feeds of vegetable origin. Br J Nutr. 96:316–325.
  • Rodríguez CA, González J, Alvir MR, Repetto JL, Centeno C, Lamrani F. 2000. Composition of bacteria harvested from the liquid and solid fractions of the rumen of sheep as influenced by feed intake. Br J Nutr. 84:369–376.
  • Russell JB, Van Soest PJ. 1984. In vitro ruminal fermentation of organic acids common in forage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 47:155–159.
  • Sahraei-Belverdy M, Alamouti AA, Khadem AA, González J, Carro MD, Kianmehr MH, Azizi MH. 2019. Encapsulation of soybean meal with fats enriched in palmitic and stearic acids: effects on rumen-undegraded protein and in vitro intestinal digestibility. Arch Anim Nutr. 73:158–169.
  • Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.
  • Vanegas JL, Carro MD, Alvir MR, González J, Carro MD. 2017b. Protection of sunflower seed and sunflower meal protein with malic acid and heat: effects on in vitro ruminal fermentation and methane production. J Sci Food Agric. 97:350–356.
  • Vanegas JL, González J, Alvir MR, Carro MD. 2017c. Influence of malic acid-heat treatment for protecting sunflower protein against ruminal degradation on in vitro methane production: A comparison with the use of malic acid as an additive. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 228:123–131.
  • Vanegas JL, González J, Carro MD. 2017a. Influence of protein fermentation and carbohydrate source on in vitro methane production. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 101:E288–E296.
  • Weatherburn MW. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal Chem. 39:971–974.
  • Williams AG, Coleman GS. 1988. The rumen protozoa. In: Hobson PN, editor. The rumen microbial ecosystem. London (UK): Elsevier Applied Science Publications; p. 73–139.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.