In situ crude protein and starch degradation and in vitro evaluation of pea grains for ruminants

References

• Agricultural Food and Research Council (AFRC). 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants: an advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on responses to nutrients. Wallingford (UK):CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilera JF, Bustos M, Molina-Alcaide E. 1992. The degradability of legume seed meals in the rumen: effect of heat treatment. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 36:101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastianelli D, Grosjean F, Peyronnet C, Duparque M, Régnier JM. 1998. Feeding value of pea (Pisum sativum, L.) 1. Chemical composition of different categories of pea. Anim Sci. 67:609–619.
   Google Scholar
• Bayourthe C, Moncoulon R, Enjalbert F. 1998. Effect of extruded lupin seeds as a protein source on lactational performance of dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 72:121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayourthe C, Moncoulon R, Enjalbert F. 2000. Effect of particle size on in situ ruminal disappearances of pea (Pisum sativum) organic matter, proteins and starch in dairy cows. Can J Anim Sci. 80:203–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canbolat O, Tamer E, Acikgoz E. 2007. Chemical composition, metabolizable energy and digestibility in pea seeds of differing testa and flower colors. J Biol Environ Sci. 1:59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Cerneau P, Michalet-Doreau B. 1991. In situ starch degradation of different feeds in the rumen. Reprod Nutr Dev. 31:65–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Bannink A, France J, López S. 2005. Application of the gas production technique to feed evaluation systems for ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 123–124:561–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon RM, Hosking BJ. 1992. Nutritional value of grain legumes for ruminants. Nutr Res Rev. 5:19–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie (GfE) 2009. New equations for predicting metabolisable energy of compound feeds for cattle. In: Proc Soc Nutr Physiol. Mar 10–12; Göttingen, Germany. p. 143–146.
   Google Scholar
• Giger-Reverdin S, Maaroufi C, Chapoutot P, Peyronnet C, Sauvant D. 2014. Influence of grinding on the nutritive value of peas for ruminants. Comparison between in vitro and in situ approaches. Food Sci Nutr. 2:308–320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gueguen J, Barbot J. 1988. Quantitative and qualitative variability of pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein composition. J Sci Food Agric. 42:209–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg J, Koenzen E, Seifried N, Steingass H, Schenkel H, Rodehutscord M. 2018. Prediction of CP and starch concentrations in ruminal in situ studies and ruminal degradation of cereal grains using NIRS. Animal. 12:472–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg J, Seifried N, Steingass H, Rodehutscord M. 2017. In situ and in vitro ruminal starch degradation of grains from different rye, triticale and barley genotypes. Animal. 11:1745–1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licitra G, Hernandez TM, Van Soest PJ. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 57:347–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López S, Dijkstra J, and France J. 2000. Prediction of energy supply in ruminants, with emphasis on forages. In: GivensDI, OwenE, Axford RFE, and Omed HM, editors. Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition. Wallingford (UK): CABI; p. 63–94.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen J, Hvelplund T. 1994. Prediction of in situ protein degradability in the rumen. Results of a European ringtest. Livest Prod Sci. 39:201–212.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald I. 1981. A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. J Agric Sci. 96:251–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev. 28:7–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa AF, Christensen DA, McKinnon JJ. 1998. Effects of moist heat treatment on crude protein composition and degradability of field peas. Can J Anim Sci. 78:453–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naguleswaran S, Vasanthan T. 2010. Dry milling of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) groats prior to wet fractionation influences the starch yield and purity. Food Chem. 118:627–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offner A, Bach A, Sauvant D. 2003. Quantitative review of in situ starch degradation in the rumen. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 106:81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ørskov ER, McDonald I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci. 92:499–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker ML, Kirby AR, Morris VJ. 2008. In situ imaging of pea starch in seeds. Food Biophys. 3:66–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit HV, Rioux R, Ouellet DR. 1997. Milk production and intake of lactating cows fed raw or extruded peas. J Dairy Sci. 80:3377–3385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippeau C, Landry J, Michalet-Doreau B. 2000. Influence of the protein distribution of maize endosperm on ruminal starch degradability. J Sci Food Agric. 80:404–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifried N, Steingass H, Hoffmann N, Rodehutscord M. 2017. In situ starch and crude protein degradation in the rumen and in vitro gas production kinetics of wheat genotypes. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 101:779–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifried N, Steingass H, Schipprack W, Rodehutscord M. 2016. Variation in ruminal in situ degradation of crude protein and starch from maize grains compared to in vitro gas production kinetics and physical and chemical characteristics. Arch Anim Nutr. 70:333–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniffen CJ, O’Connor JD, Van Soest PJ, Fox DG, Russell JB. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J Anim Sci. 70:3562–3577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer D, Higgins TJV, Freer M, Dove H, Coombe JB. 1988. Monitoring the fate of dietary proteins in rumen fluid using gel electrophoresis. Br J Nutr. 60:241–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steingass H, Südekum K-H. 2013. Proteinbewertung beim Wiederkäuer. Grundlagen, analytische Entwicklungen und Perspektiven. Übers Tierernährg. 41:51–73.
   Google Scholar
• Südekum K-H. 2005. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer Standardisierung der in situ-Methodik zur Schätzung des ruminalen Nährstoffabbaus. Übers Tierernährg. 33:71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Titze N, Krieg J, Steingass H, Rodehutscord M. 2019. Variation of lupin protein degradation in ruminants studied in situ and using chemical protein fractions. Animal. 13:709–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten (VDLUFA) (Herausgeber). 1976. Handbuch der Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs- und Untersuchungsmethodik (VDLUFA-Methodenbuch). In: Bd. III Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln mit 1. – 8. Ergänzungslieferung (1983–2012). 3 ed. Darmstadt: VDLUFA-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Walhain P, Foucart M, Théwis A. 1992. Influence of extrusion on ruminal and intestinal disappearance in sacco of pea (Pisum sativum) proteins and starch. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 38:43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westreicher-Kristen E, Steingass H, Rodehutscord M. 2015. Estimation of utilisable crude protein at the duodenum of dried distillers’ grains with solubles using a modified gas test. Arch Anim Nutr. 69:351–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuber T, Siegert W, Salehi H, Hummel F, Rodehutscord M. 2019. Variability of amino acid digestibility of lupin and pea grains in caecectomised laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 60:229–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar