Tri-oceanic connectivity of the supposedly cosmopolitan polychaete, Harmothoe imbricata (Annelida: Polynoidae): insights from the COI marker

References

• Barnich R, Fiege D. 2000. Revision of the Mediterranean species of Harmothoe Kinberg, 1856 and Lagisca Malmgren, 1865 (Polychaeta: Polynoidae: Polynoinae) with descriptions of a new genus and a new species. Journal of Natural History. 34:1889–1938. doi:10.1080/00222930050144783.
   Google Scholar
• Barnich R, Fiege D. 2009. Revision of the genus Harmothoe Kinberg, 1856 (Polychaeta: Polynoidae) in the Northeast Atlantic. Zootaxa. 2104:1–76. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.2104.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Blake JA. 1975. The larval development of Polychaeta from the northern California Coast. III. Eighteen Species of Errantia. Ophelia. 13:43–61. doi:10.1080/00785236.1975.10421969.
   Google Scholar
• Blake JA, Arnofsky PL. 1999. Reproduction and larval development of the spioniform Polychaeta with application to systematics and phylogeny. Hydrobiologia. 402:57–106. doi: 10.1023/A:1003784324125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen BW, Gaither MR, DiBattista JD, Iacchei M, Andrews KR, Grant WS, Toonen RJ, Briggs JC. 2016. Comparative phylogeography of the ocean planet. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 113(29):7962–7969. doi:10.1073/pnas.1602404113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasier MJ, Wiklund H, Neal L, Jeffreys R, Linse K, Ruhl H, Glover AG. 2016. DNA barcoding uncovers cryptic diversity in 50% of deep-sea Antarctic polychaetes. Royal Society Open Science. 3:160432. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr CM, Hardy SM, Brown TM, Macdonald TA, Hebert PD. 2011. A tri-oceanic perspective: DNA barcoding reveals geographic structure and cryptic diversity in Canadian polychaetes. PLoS One. 6:e22232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly JM. 1972. The maturation and breeding biology of Harmothoe imbricata (Polychaeta: Polynoidae). Marine Biology. 12:53–66. doi:10.1007/BF00347429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David AA, Krick M. 2019. DNA barcoding of polychaetes collected during the 2018 rapid assessment survey of floating dock communities from New England. Marine Biology Research. 15:317–324. doi: 10.1080/17451000.2019.1655160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David AA, Matthee CA, Loveday BR, Simon CA. 2016. Predicting the dispersal potential of an invasive polychaete pest along a complex coastal biome. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 56:600–610. doi: 10.1093/icb/icw011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day JH. 1967. A monograph on the Polychaeta of Southern Africa. British Museum of Natural History Publications. 656:459–878. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.8596.
   Google Scholar
• Day JH. 1973. New Polychaeta from Beaufort, with a key to all species recorded from North Carolina. NOAA Technical Report, NMFS CIRC-375, Washington, DC. 141 pp. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.62852.
   Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources. 10:564–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauvel P. 1959. Annelida Polychaeta. The fauna of India, including Pakistan, Ceylon, Burma and Malaya. Allahabad, India: The Indian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giangrande A. 1997. Polychaete reproductive patterns, life cycles and life histories: an overview. Oceanography and Marine Biology. 35:323–386. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0031284432&origin=inward&txGid=6fc39a6e20d4c754d5f3480449d958de
   Google Scholar
• Glasby CJ, Wei N-WV, Gibb KS. 2013. Cryptic species of Nereididae (Annelida: Polychaeta) on Australian coral reefs. Invertebrate Systematics. 27:245–264. doi: 10.1071/IS12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grube AE. 1850. Die Familie der Anneliden. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte. 16:249–364. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.46818.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy SM, Carr CM, Hardman M, Steinke D, Corstorphine E, Mah C. 2011. Biodiversity and phylogeography of Arctic marine fauna: insights from molecular tools. Marine Biodiversity. 41:195–210. doi: 10.1007/s12526-010-0056-x
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings P, Kupriyanova E. 2018. Cosmopolitan polychaetes – fact or fiction? Personal and historical perspectives. Invertebrate Systematics. 32:1–9. doi: 10.1071/IS17035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings RM, Shank TM, Mullineaux LS, Halanych KM. 2009. Assessment of the Cape Cod phylogeographic using the bamaboo worm Clymenella torquata reveals the role of regional water masses in dispersal. Journal of Heredity. 100:86–96. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esn067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl SA, Toonen RJ, Grant WS, Bowen BW. 2012. Common misconceptions in molecular ecology: echoes of the modern synthesis. Molecular Ecology. 21:4171–4189. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05576.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawry Jr JV. 1971. The parapodial and segmental musculature of Harmothoe imbricata (L.). Journal of Morphology. 135:259–272. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051350302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh JW, Bryant D. 2015. Popart: a full-feature software for haplotype network reconstruction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 6:1110–1116. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom S. 2001. The Bering Strait connection: dispersal and speciation in boreal macroalgae. Journal of Biogeography. 28:243–251. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00529.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney E, Fairey R, Lyman A, Walton Z, Sigala M. 2007. Introduced aquatic species in California’s open coastal waters. final Report. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game. 84 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Martin D, Britayev TA. 1998. Symbiotic polychaetes: review of known species. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. 36:2017–340. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84889120997&origin=inward&txGid=d1de2d4ba4bab02410d6bcf4a22e7193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murina V. 1997. Pelagic larvae of Black Sea Polychaeta. Bulletin of Marine Science. 60:427–432. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/umrsmas/bullmar/1997/00000060/00000002/art00022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren A. 2014. Cryptic polychaete diversity: a review. Zoologica Scripta. 43:172–183. doi: 10.1111/zsc.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren A, Norlinder E, Panova M, Pleijel F. 2011. Colour polymorphism in the polychaete Harmothoe imbricata (Linnaeus, 1767). Marine Biology Research. 7:54–62. doi: 10.1080/17451001003713555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettengill JB, Wendt DE, Schug MD, Hadfield MG. 2007. Biofouling likely serves as a major mode of dispersal for the polychaete tubeworm Hydroides elegans as inferred from microsatellite loci. Biofouling. 23:161–169. doi: 10.1080/08927010701218952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picchi L, Lorenzi MC. 2018. Polychaete worms on the brink between hermaphroditism and separate sexes. In: Transitions between sexual systems. Cham: Springer; p. 123–163. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94139-4_5.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett T, David AA. 2018. Global connectivity patterns of the notoriously invasive mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk using archived CO1 sequence data. BMC Research Notes. 11:231. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3328-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plyuscheva M, Martin D, Britayev T. 2004. Population ecology of two sympatric polychaetes, Lepidonotus squamatus and Harmothoe imbricata (Polychaeta, Polynoidae), in the White Sea. Invertebrate Zoology. 1:65–73. doi: 10.15298/invertzool.01.1.06
   Google Scholar
• Reish DJ. 1965. Benthic polychaetous annelids from Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort seas. Proceedings of the United States Natural History Museum. 117:131–157. doi: 10.5479/si.00963801.117-3511.131
   Google Scholar
• Rice LN, Lindsay S, Rawson P. 2018. Genetic homogeneity among geographically distant populations of the blister worm Polydora websteri. Aquaculture Environment Interactions. 10:437–446. doi: 10.3354/aei00281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman J, Darling JA. 2007. Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 22:454–464. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse GW, Pleijel F. 2001. Polychaetes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 354 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sanchez-Gracia A. 2017. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 34:3299–3302. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hosel C, Kube M, Lieb B, Meyer A, Tiedemann R, Purschke G, Bleidorn C. 2011. Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature. 471:95–98. doi: 10.1038/nature09864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tampi PRS, Rengarajan K. 1964. Some polychaetous annelids from the Andaman waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India. 6:98–123.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeij GJ. 1991. Anatomy of an invasion: The trans-Arctic interchange. Paleobiology. 17:281–307. doi: 10.1017/S0094837300010617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virgilio M, Fauvelot C, Costantinim Abbiati M, Backeljau T. 2009. Phylogeography of the common ragworm Hediste diversicolor (Polychaete: Nereididae) reveals cryptic diversity and multiple colonization events across its distribution. Molecular Ecology. 18:1980–1994. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04170.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams L, Matthee CA, Simon CA. 2016. Dispersal and genetic structure of Boccardia polybranchia and Polydora hoplura (Annelida: Spionidae) in South Africa and their implications for aquaculture. Aquaculture. 465:235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar