Normalizing home ranges of immature Kemp’s ridley turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) in an important estuarine foraging area to better assess their spatial distribution

References

• Abecassis M, Senina I, Lehodey P, Gaspar P, Parker D, Balazs G, Polovina J. 2013. A model of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) habitat and movement in the oceanic North Pacific. PLoS One. 8(9):e73274. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barco SG, Burt ML, DiGiovanni RA Jr, Swingle WM, Williard AS. 2018. Loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta density and abundance in Chesapeake Bay and the temperate ocean waters of the southern portion of the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Endang Species Res. 37:269–287. doi:10.3354/esr00917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barco SG, Law JM, Drummond B, Koopman HN, Trapani CM, Reinheimer SD, Rose SA, Swingle WM, Williard AS. 2016. Loggerhead turtles killed by vessel and fishery interaction in Virginia, USA are healthy prior to death. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 555:221–234. doi:10.3354/meps11823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barco SG, Lockhart GG, Rose SA, Mallette SD, Swingle WM, Boettcher R. 2015. Virginia/Maryland sea turtle research & conservation initiative. Final Report to NOAA for 2nd Award #NA09NMF4720033. VAQF Scientific Report 2015-05. Virginia Aquarium 3 Foundation, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Barco SG, Swingle M. 2014. Sea turtle species in the coastal waters of Virginia. Virginia Aquarium Foundation Technical Report #2014-07b. Prepared for the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy. 19pp.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd JD, Brightsmith DJ. 2013. Error properties of argos satellite telemetry locations using least squares and Kalman filtering. PLoS One. 8(5):e63051. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick AC, Coyne MS, Fuller WJ, Glen F, Godley BJ. 2007. Fidelity and over-wintering of sea turtles. Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 274(1617):1533–1538. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt WH. 1943. Territoriality and home-range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy. 24(3):346–352. doi:10.2307/1374834
   Google Scholar
• Byles RA. 1988. The behavior and ecology of sea turtles in Virginia. Ph.D. Dissertation. Gloucester Point (VA): Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. 112 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas DC, Weinzierl R, Davidson SC, Kays R, Wikelski M. 2012. Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking data. Methods of Ecology and Evolution. 3:999–1007. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley AM, Stacy BA, Hardy RF, Shea CP, Minch KE, Schroeder BA. 2019. Characterizing watercraft-related mortality of sea turtles in Florida. Journal of Wildlife Management. 83(5):1057–1072. doi:10.1002/jwmg.21665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard I, Ouellet J, Courtois R, Dussault C, Breton L. 2002. Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 66(4):1290–1300. doi:10.2307/3802962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris S, Cresswell WJ, Forde PG, Trewhella WJ, Woollard T, Wray S. 1990. Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data–a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Review. 20:97–123. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.1990.tb00106.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart KM, Lamont MM, Fujisaki I, Tucker AD, Carthy RR. 2012. Common coastal foraging areas for loggerheads in the Gulf of Mexico: opportunities for marine conservation. Biological Conservation. 145:185–194. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes LA, Broderick AC, Coyne MS, Godfrey MH, Godley BJ. 2007. Only some like it hot – quantifying the environmental niche of the loggerhead sea turtle. Diversity and Distributions. 13:447–457. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays GC, Åkesson S, Godley BJ, Luschi P, Santidrian P. 2001. The implications of location accuracy for the interpretation of satellite-tracking data. Animal Behavior. 61:1035–1040. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell EA, Hoover A, Benson SR, Bailey H, Polovina JJ, Seminoff JA, Dutton PH. 2015. Enhancing the TurtleWatch product for leatherback sea turtles, a dynamic habitat model for ecosystem-based management. Fisheries Oceanography. 24:57–68. doi:10.1111/fog.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DS, London JM. 2018. Crawl: An R package for fitting continuous-time correlated random walk models to animal movement data. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.596464
   Google Scholar
• Johnson DS, London JM, Lea M-A, Durban JW. 2008. Continuous-time correlated random walk model for animal telemetry data. Ecology. 89:1208–1215. doi:10.1890/07-1032.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones TT, Bostrom BL, Carey M, Imlach B, Mikkelsen J, Ostafichuk P, Eckert S, Opay P, Swimmer Y, Seminoff JA, Jones DR. 2011. Determining transmitter drag and best practice attachment procedures for sea turtle biotelemetry studies. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC-480.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsen ID, Myers RA, James MC. 2007. Identifying leatherback turtle foraging behaviour from satellite telemetry using a switching state-space model. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 337:255–264. doi:10.3354/meps337255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keinath JA, Musick JA, Byles RA. 1987. Aspects of the biology of Virginia’s sea turtles: 1979–1986. Virginia Journal of Science. 38:329–336.
   Google Scholar
• List of Endangered Foreign Fish and Wildlife, 35 Federal Register 12222-12225 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Litwiler TL. 2001. Conservation plan for sea turtles, marine mammals, and the shortnose sturgeon in Maryland. Maryland Department of Natural Resources Technical Report FS-SCOL-01-2. Oxford, Maryland. 134 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lutcavage M. 1981. The status of marine turtles in Chesapeake Bay and Virginia coastal waters. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Gloucester Point (VA): College of William and Mary.
   Google Scholar
• Lutcavage M, Musick JA. 1985. Aspects of the biology of sea turtles in Virginia. Copeia. 1985:449–452. doi:10.2307/1444857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield KL. 2006. Sources of mortality, movements and behavior of sea turtles in Virginia. Dissertation. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, 343pp.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield KL, Saba VS, Keinath JA, Musick JA. 2009. Satellite tracking reveals a dichotomy in migration strategies among juvenile loggerhead turtles in the Northwest Atlantic. Marine Biology. 156(12):2555–2570. doi:10.1007/s00227-009-1279-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield KL, Seney EE, Musick JA. 2002. An evaluation of sea turtle abundances, mortalities and fisheries interactions in the Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, 2002. Final Contract Report (Contract#: 43-EA-NF-110773). National Marine Fisheries.
   Google Scholar
• Marcovaldi MÂ, Lopez GG, Soares LS, Lima EHSM, Thomé JCA, Almeida AP. 2010. Satellite-tracking of female loggerhead turtles highlights fidelity behavior in northeastern Brazil. Endangered Species Research. 12:263–272. doi:10.3354/esr00308
   Google Scholar
• Marquez MR. 1994. Synopsis of biological data on the Kemp’s Ridley sea turtle. Lepidochelys kempi (Garman, 1880). NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFC-343.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell SM, Breed GA, Nickel BA, Makanga-Bahouna J, Pemo-Makaya E. 2011. Using satellite tracking to optimize protection of long-lived marine species: Olive ridley sea turtle conservation in Central Africa. PLoS One. 6(5):e19905. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell SM, Conner MG, Sisson NB, Dawson TM. 2016. Potential benefits and shortcomings of marine protected areas for small seabirds revealed using miniature tags. Frontiers in Marine Science. 3:264. doi:10.3389/fmars.2016.00264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millikin MR, Williams AB. 1984. Synopsis of biological data on the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus Rathbun. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 1, 39 p.
   Google Scholar
• Moore MJ, van der Hoop J, Barco SG, Costidis AM, Gulland FM, Jepson PD, et al. 2013. Criteria and case definitions for serious injury and death of pinnipeds and cetaceans caused by anthropogenic trauma. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 103:229–264. doi:10.3354/dao02566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth R, Nowak JF, Anderson G, Kiley KP, Whiting JR. 1992. Distribution of submerged aquatic vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and tributaries and Chincoteague Bay – 1991. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. doi:10.21220/m2-031r-g688
   Google Scholar
• Orth RJ, Moore KA. 1984. Distribution and abundance of submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay: an historical perspective. Estuaries. 7:531–540. doi:10.2307/1352058
   Google Scholar
• Orth RJ, Wilcox DJ, Whiting JR, Kenne AK, Smith ER, Nagey L. 2017. 2016 aerial imagery acquired to monitor the distribution and abundance of submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay and coastal bays. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. Dataset. doi:10.21220/V5Q14R
   Google Scholar
• Otis D, White G. 1999. Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 63(3):1039–1044. doi:10.2307/3802819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panjiva. 2019. Port trends. Accessed June 2019. https://panjiva.com/sitemap/port_directory.
   Google Scholar
• Powell RA. 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home-range estimators. In: Boitani L., Fuller T.K., editor. Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press; 442 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard PCH, Marquez MR. 1973. Kemp’s Ridley turtle or Atlantic Ridley. Monograph No. 2. Marine Turtle Series. Morges, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam NF, Mansfield KL, Ruoying H, Shaver DJ, Verley P. 2013. Predicting the distribution of oceanic-stage Kemp’s ridley sea turtles. Biology Letter. 9(5). doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Richlen M, Keenan-Bateman T, Cummings E, McAlarney R, McLellan W, Pabst DA, Burt L, Thomas L, Aschettino J, Engelhaupt A, et al. 2018. Occurrence, distribution, and density of protected marine species in the Chesapeake Bay near naval air station Patuxent River: Final report. Prepared for U.S. Fleet Forces Command. Submitted to Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Atlantic, Norfolk, Virginia, under Contract No. N62470-10-3011, Task Order 55, issued to HDR, Inc., Virginia Beach, Virginia. June 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Santos BS, Friedrichs MAM, Rose SA, Barco SG, Kaplan DM. 2018. Likely locations of sea turtle stranding mortality using experimentally-calibrated, time and space-specific drift models. Biological Conservation. 226:127–143. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seney EE, Higgins BM, Landry AM. 2010. Satellite transmitter attachment techniques for small juvenile sea turtles. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 384:61–67. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seney EE, Landry AM. 2008. Movements of Kemp’s ridley sea turtles nesting on the upper Texas coast: implications for management. Endangered Species Research. 4:73–84. doi:10.3354/esr00077
   Google Scholar
• Seney EE, Musick JA. 2005. Diet analysis of Kemp’s ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) in Virginia. Chelonian Conservation and Biology. 4(4):864–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver DJ, Rubio C. 2008. Post-nesting movement of wild and head-started Kemp’s ridley sea turtles Lepidochelys kempii in the Gulf of Mexico. Endangered Species Research. 4:43–55. doi:10.3354/esr00061
   Google Scholar
• Silverman BW. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Soanes LM, Arnould JPY, Dodd SG, Sumner MD, Green JA. 2013. How many seabirds do we need to track to define home-range area? Journal of Applied Ecology. 50:671–679. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes L, Epperly S, editors. 2008. Sea turtle research techniques manual. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-579, 92p.
   Google Scholar
• Swingle WM, Barco SG, Costidis AM, Bates EB, Mallette SD, Rose SA, Epple AL. 2018. Virginia sea turtle and marine mammal stranding network 2017 grant report. Final Report to the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program, NOAA CZM Grant NA16NOS4190171, Task 49. Virginia Beach (VA): VAQF Scientific Report 2018-01, 52 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Turtle Expert Working Group. 2009. An assessment of the loggerhead turtle population in the western North Atlantic Ocean. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-575 142 pp. http://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/seaturtletechmemos.jsp.
   Google Scholar
• United States. 1983. The endangered species act as amended by public law 97-304 (The endangered species act amendments of 1982). Washington: U.S. G.P.O.
   Google Scholar
• United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. The U.S. Fish and wildlife service’s process for telemetry attachment on nesting sea turtles and sea turtles housed in a rehabilitation facility. 7pp. https://www.fws.gov/northflorida/SeaTurtles/Docs/20161230_FWS%20process%20and%20conditions%20for%20telemetry%20attachments_Sea_Turtles_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Avyle MJ, Fowler DL. 1984. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (South Atlantic)–Blue crab. United States Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-82/11.19. US Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL-82-4, 16 p.
   Google Scholar
• van Engel WA. 1958. The blue crab and its fishery in Chesapeake Bay. Part 1. Reproduction, early development, growth and migration. VIMS Articles. 1771. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/1771.
   Google Scholar
• Van Winkle W. 1975. Comparison of several Probabilistic home-range models. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 39(1):118–123. doi:10.2307/3800474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Zanden H, Bjorndal KA, Reich KJ, Bolten AB. 2010. Individual specialists in a generalist population: results from a long-term stable isotope series. Biology Letters. 6:711–714. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel P, Smith WHFA. 1996. A global, self-consistent, hierarchical, high-resolution shoreline database. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 101:8741–8743. doi:10.1029/96JB00104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel P, Smith WHFA. 2017. Global self-consistent, hierarchical, high-resolution geography database. Version 2.3.7. released June 15, 2017. https://www.soest.hawaii.edu/pwessel/gshhg/.
   Google Scholar
• Wibbels T, Bevan E. 2019. Lepidochelys kempii (errata version published in 2019). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T11533A155057916.
   Google Scholar