Exploring the use of new school buildings through post-occupancy evaluation and participatory action research

References

• Askins, K., & Pain, R. (2011). Contact zones, participation, materiality and the messiness of interaction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 803–821. doi: 10.1068/d11109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Bernstein, H. (2012). The impact of school buildings on student health and performance (Report for the McGraw-Hill Foundation in partnership with the Centre for Green Schools). Retrieved from http://www.ncef.org/rl/impact_learning.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Bakó-Biró, Z., Clements-Croome, D., Kochhar, N., Awbi, H., & Williams, M. (2012). Ventilation rates in schools and pupils’ performance. Building and Environment, 48, 215–223. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt Hacking, E., Barratt, R., & Scott, W. (2007). Engaging children: Research issues around participation and environmental learning. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 529–544. doi:10.1080/13504620701600271
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Creating spaces for learning or making room for education? “Transforming Our Schools” (Lecture series). University of Nottingham, Nottingham. Retrieved from http://sustainability-and-schools.com/open_seminars_nottingham_09.php
   Google Scholar
• Birmingham City Council. (2011). Free school meals: Guidance notes for schools 2011–2012 (pamphlet). Retrieved from http://www.schooljotter.com/imagefolders/ladypoolsch/Free_Meal_Guidance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blewitt, J. (2004). Introduction. In J. Blewitt & C. Cullingford (Eds.), The sustainability curriculum: The challenge for higher education (pp. 1–12). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Bordass, B., & Leaman, A. (2005). Making feedback and post occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portfolio of feedback techniques. Building Research & Information, 33(4), 347–352. doi: 10.1080/09613210500162016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordass, B., & Leaman, A. (2012). A new professionalism: Remedy or fantasy? Building Research & Information, 41(1), 1–7. doi:10.1080/09613218.2012.750572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill, C. (2007). The personal is political: Developing new subjectivities through participatory action research. Gender, Place & Culture, 14(3), 267–292. doi: 10.1080/09663690701324904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J. (2011). Regenerative design and development: Current theory and practice. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/09613218.2012.617516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R., Robinson, J., Brown, Z., & O'Shea, M. (2008). Recontextualizing the notion of comfort. Building Research & Information, 36(4), 323–336. doi: 10.1080/09613210802076328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. (2006). Assessing secondary school design quality: Research report. London: Author. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110118095356/http://www.cabe.org.uk/publications/assessing-secondary-school-design-quality
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. M., & Albert, D. H. (Eds.). (2003). The healing heart for families: Storytelling to encourage caring and healthy families. Washington, DC: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J., & Ghani, A. (2006). Private finance initiative (PFI) school procurement. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Gaia Research. (2003). Sustainable construction CPD module 12: Post occupancy evaluation. Edinburgh: Gaia Group.
   Google Scholar
• Garbarino, J., & Stott, F. M. (1989). What children can tell us. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Z. M., Tierney, M. J., Pegg, I. M., & Allan, N. (2010). Low-energy dwellings: The contribution of behaviours to actual performance. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 491–508. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2010.505371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Jones, K., & Thomson, P. (2011). Snapshots, illustrations and portraits: Re-presenting research findings. In P. Thomson & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Researching creative learning: Methods and issues (pp. 126–142). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2006). Guide to post occupancy evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.aude.ac.uk/info-centre/goodpractice/AUDE_POE_guide
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2005). Children's geographies and the new social studies of childhood. In C. Jenks (Ed.), Childhood: Critical concepts in sociology (pp. 163–188). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Hoof, J., Rutten, P. G. S., Struck, C., Huisman, E. R. C. M., & Kort, H. S. M. (2014). The integrated and evidence-based design of healthcare environments. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, p1–21 ( ahead-of-print). doi:10.1080/17452007.2014.892471
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons. (2011, July 18). Private Finance Initiative (Report of the Treasury Committee), Vol. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Janda, K. B. (2011). Buildings don't use energy: People do. Architectural Science Review, 54(1), 15–22. doi: 10.3763/asre.2009.0050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaatz, E., Root, D., & Bowen, P. (2005). Broadening project participation through a modified building sustainability assessment. Building Research & Information, 33(5), 441–454. doi:10.1080/09613210500219113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindon, S., & Pain, R. (2009). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, T. (1998). Storytelling: Is it really research? Methodological issues in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(6), 1182–1190. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00853.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: Introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lackney, J. A. (1997). The relationship between environmental quality of school facilities and student performance. Energy smart schools: Opportunities to save money, save energy and improve student performance. Briefing of the US House of Representatives Committee on Science. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED439594
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., & Bordass, W. (2001). Assessing building performance in use: The probe occupant surveys and their implications 4. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 129–143. doi: 10.1080/09613210010008045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallory-Hill, S., Preiser, W. F. E., & Watson, C. G. (2012). Enhancing building performance. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nold, C. (2009). Emotional cartography technologies of the self [Video]. Retrieved from http://emotionalcartography.net
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K. (2002). Ephemera, mess and miscellaneous piles: Texts and practices in families. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 2(2), 145–166. doi: 10.1177/14687984020022002
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., & Roswell, J. (2003). Artifactual literacies. In J. Larson & J. Marsh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 263–278). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, S. R., Mackrill, J., Cain, R., Strelitz, J., & Gate, L. (2014). Developing interior design briefs for health-care and well-being centres through public participation. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, p1–16 ( ahead-of-print). doi:10.1080/17452007.2014.923288
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007). Walking with video. Visual Studies, 22(3), 240–252. doi:10.1080/14725860701657142
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sanoff, H. (2001). School building assessment methods. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. Retrieved from edfacilities.org/pubs/sanoffassess.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F. (2008). Post-occupancy evaluation of housing [Online]. PowerPoint presentation retrieved from www.usablebuildings.co.uk/Pages/UBEvents.html
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F. (2009). Post-occupancy evaluation and sustainability: A review. Urban Design and Planning, 162(3), 123–130. doi: 10.1680/udap.2009.162.3.123
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F., & Rijal, H. (2010). Developing occupancy feedback from a prototype to improve housing production. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 549–563. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2010.496182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer, A., Dunne, J., & Boussabaine, H. (2012). Schools design quality: A user perspective. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 8(4), 257–272. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2012.683768
   Google Scholar
• Upitis, R. (2004). School architecture and complexity. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, S. (2009). Focus groups with children. In J. Fielder & C. Posch (Eds.), Yes they can! Children researching their lives (pp. 86–98). Germany: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, C. (2003). Review of building quality using post occupancy evaluation. PEB Exchange, Programme on Educational Building (No. 2003/03). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, C. (2005, February 2). Post occupancy evaluation. Falkirk: Braes High School, Scottish Executive. Retrieved from www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/01/23112827/11
   Google Scholar
• Watson, C., & Thomson, K. (2005). Bringing post-occupancy evaluation to schools in Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/unitedkingdom/37905347.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, A., Boughlaghem, D., & Malekzadeh, M. (2011). What do young people tell us about sustainable lifestyles when they design sustainable schools? PLEA 2011 Proceedings (Vol. 1), Presses universitaries Louvain, Louvain, Belgium, pp. 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, A., & Martin, M. (2001). Post-occupancy evaluation: Benefits and barriers. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 168–174. doi:10.1080/09613210010016857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar